On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS Investigators Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antiplatelet Therapy in the Catheterization Laboratory
Advertisements

Decline in the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients With NSTEMI Undergoing PCI: Results From the CRUSADE and ACTION Registries Matthew T. Roe, Christopher.
Connie N. Hess, MD, Bimal R. Shah, MD, MBA, S. Andrew Peng, MS, Laine Thomas, PhD, Matthew T. Roe, MD, MHS, Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH Relationship of Early.
Impact of Anemia on One-Year Ischemic Events and Mortality Among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Steven.
ARCTIC investigators COI D ISCLOSURE FOR D R. M ONTALESCOT : Research Grants to the Institution or Consulting/Lecture Fees from Abbott Vascular, Astra-Zeneca,
PCI - A prospective, randomized, double- blind substudy of patients undergoing PCI in the CURE trial.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes Chapter 26 Jean-Claude Tardif, Phillipe L. L’Allier, David.
On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS Investigators Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for patients with UA/NSTEMI medically managed after angiographic triage — Results.
Long-term Outcomes of Patients with ACS and Chronic Renal Insufficiency Undergoing PCI and being treated with Bivalirudin vs UFH/Enoxaparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa.
A Risk Score for Predicting Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Sai Sadanandan, MD*; Christopher.
TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel TRITON-TIMI 38 TRITON-TIMI 38 Elliott M. Antman, MD.
Prasugrel Compared to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI with Stenting: the TRITON - TIMI 38 Stent Analysis Stephen D.
Anterior Depressions Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Presenting with Anterior ST-Segment Depressions C.
Prasugrel Compared to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI with Stenting: the TRITON - TIMI 38 Stent Analysis Stephen D.
Outcomes and Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy in Women Undergoing Fibrinolysis for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Jessica L. Mega, MD; David A. Morrow,
Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in NSTE ACS by duration of the upstream infusion in the ACUITY trial: Implications for ED and upstream management.
ADP Receptors Bhatt DL et al. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2003; 2:15-28.
Patterns of red blood cell transfusion use and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary clinical practice: Insights.
How Much AF is Too Much AF? Do I Initiate Anticoagulation Based on AF Detected on Device Monitoring? Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD, FACC Professor of Medicine,
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Identifier: NCT Gurbel PA, Erlinge D, Ohman EM, Jakubowski JA, Goodman SG, Huber K, Chan MY, Cornel JH, White HD, Fox KAA,
ISAR-REACT 4: Discussion Deepak L. Bhatt MD, MPH, FACC, FAHA Chief of Cardiology, VA Boston Healthcare System Director, Integrated Interventional Cardiovascular.
CHARISMA: The “CAPRIE-like” Cohort Deepak L. Bhatt MD, FACC, FSCAI, FESC, FACP Associate Director, Cleveland Clinic Cardiovascular Coordinating Center.
John H. Alexander, MD, MHS Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiovascular Research Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke Medicine Update on antithrombotics.
Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Joo Yong Hahn, Young Bin Song, Kyung Woo Park, Yang Soo Jang, Hyo-Soo.
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Naotsugu Oyama, MD, PhD, MBA A Trial of PLATelet inhibition and Patient Outcomes.
Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Risk Model From 302,152 Patients in the NCDR. Sameer K. Mehta MD, Andrew D. Frutkin.
Safety and Efficacy of Switching from Either UFH or Enoxaparin Plus a GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor to Bivalirudin Monotherapy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation.
The Risk of CV Events for Patients Treated with Clopidogrel or Prasugrel in Combination with a Proton Pump Inhibitor Results from the TRITON-TIMI 38 Trial.
Individualizing Treatment Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis from the DAPT Study Robert W. Yeh,
TCT Presentation October 2006 Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing PCI Treated with Bivalirudin Monotherapy versus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors.
Ramin Ebrahimi, MD University of California Los Angeles/ Greater Los Angeles VA Medical Center Implications of Preoperative Thienopyridine Use Prior to.
A Review of – Clopidogrel and Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ted Williams Pharm D Candidate Monday Lab.
Impact of Prior Myocardial Infarction Among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated in Contemporary Practice: A Report from the ACTION Registry.
Hypothesis: baseline risk status of the patients and proximity to a recent cardiovascular event influence the response to dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary.
The Effect of Cangrelor and Access Site on Ischemic and Bleeding Events – Insights from CHAMPION PHOENIX J. Antonio Gutierrez, MD, MHS, Robert A. Harrington,
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
TRITON TIMI-38 STEMI cohort Clopidogrel Under Fire: Is Prasugrel in Primary PCI or Recent MI Superior? Insights From TRITON-TIMI-38 Gilles Montalescot,
Insights from the PROMISE Trial Neha J. Pagidipati, MD MPH; Kshipra Hemal; Adrian Coles, PhD; Daniel B. Mark, MD MPH; Rowena J. Dolor, MD MHS; Patricia.
Reduction in Ischemic Events with Ticagrelor in Diabetic Patients from the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH, Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH, Sameer.
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Final One-Year Results from the.
On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS Investigators
Recent Breakthroughs in Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials in T2DM
Should We Preload STEMI Patients with Antiplatelet Therapy?
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
SYMPLICITY HTN-3: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Refractory Hypertension: Post Hoc.
Antiplatelet Therapy For STEMI: The Case for Cangrelor
ARCTIC-INTERRUPTION 2-year- Versus 1year Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After DES implantation The randomized ARCTIC-Interruption Study JP Collet.
The EUROMAX trial is supported by The Medicines Company
The Big Antiplatelet Debate Why I Prefer Prasugrel Over Ticagrelor
The ANTARCTIC investigators
Dr. Harvey White on behalf of the ACUITY investigators
The Time Dependence of Anti-thrombin Initiation in Patients with Non-ST-segment –elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Subgroup Analysis form the ACUITY.
European Society of Cardiology 2003
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
on Behalf of the COGENT Investigators
The European Society of Cardiology Presented by RJ De Winter
An Analysis of the ACUITY Trial Lincoff AM, JACC Intv 2008;1:639–48
Implications of Preoperative Thienopyridine Use
on behalf of the ACUITY investigators
What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose?
OASIS-5: Study Design Randomize N=20,078 Enoxaparin (N=10,021)
Section C: Clinical trial update: Oral antiplatelet therapy
Presentation transcript:

On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS Investigators Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are medically managed after angiographic triage — Results from the TRILOGY ACS Trial Stephen D. Wiviott, MD, Harvey D. White, MB, ChB, DSc, E. Magnus Ohman, MB, ChB, Keith A. A. Fox, MB, ChB, Paul W. Armstrong, MD, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, MD, DM, MSc, Gail Hafley, MS, William E. Boden, MD, Christian Hamm, MD, Peter Clemmensen, MD, DMSc, Jose C. Nicolau, MD, PhD, Alberto Menozzi, MD, PhD, Witold Ruzyllo, MD, Petr Widimsky, MD, DSc, Ali Oto, MD, Jose Leiva-Pons, MD, Gregory Pavlides, MD, Matthew T. Roe, MD, MHS, and Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH Identifier: NCT

Authors and Disclosures* The TRILOGY ACS Trial was funded by Eli Lilly & Company and Daiichi Sankyo. Stephen D. Wiviott—grant/research support from Eli Lilly & Company, AstraZeneca,Merck, Eisai; Consulting fees/honoraria from Eli Lilly & Company, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, BMS, Sanofi-Aventis, Eisai. Petr Widimsky—consulting fees/honoraria from Lilly, Ali Raif Ilac Sanayi, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Sanofi. Deepak L. Bhatt—honoraria and travel expenses from the Duke Clinical Research Institute; serving as a board member for Medscape Cardiology, Boston VA Research Institute, Society of Chest Pain Centers; grant funding from Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ethicon, Medtronic, Sanofi-Aventis, The Medicines Company; payment for developing educational presentations from WebMD; serving on clinical trial steering committees for the Duke Clinical Research Institute; serving as an editor for the American College of Cardiology and chief medical editor for Slack Publications. Gail Hafley and Witold Ruzyllo—nothing to report. *For all other authors, see MT Roe et al, NEJM 2012

Angiography Background  The proportion of ACS (UA/NSTEMI) patients worldwide who are managed medically without revascularization (PCI or CABG) is 40–60%. This includes 2 distinct sets of patients: triaged to medical therapy after angiography triaged to medical therapy after angiography for whom angiography is not performed for whom angiography is not performed  Prasugrel, a thienopyridine P2Y 12 inhibitor, improved ischemic outcomes in ACS patients undergoing PCI in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial, with an increase in major bleeding. Wiviott SD et al NEJM 2007

Primary Efficacy Endpoint and TIMI Major Bleeding Through 30 Months (Age < 75 years, N = 7243) HR (95% CI): 0.91 (0.79, 1.05) P = 0.21 HR (95% CI): 1.31 (0.81, 2.11) P = 0.27 Endpoint (%) Roe MT NEJM 2012

ITT Population N = 9326 Primary Population Age < 75 N = 7243 Triaged after Angiography* N = 3085 (43%) Randomized to Prasugrel N = 1524 Randomized to Clopidogrel N = 1561 Trigaged without Angiography* N = 4158 (57%) Randomized to Prasugrel N = 2096 Randomized to Clopidogrel N = 2062 Age ≥ 75 N = 2083 Prespecified Analysis of Angiographic Cohort *For angiography vs no angiography comparisons — p-values unadjusted, for prasugrel vs clopidogrel - p-value adjusted for clopidogrel stratum

Incidence of Outcomes by Angiography Status (Age < 75 years) P < P = 0.09

Primary Efficacy Endpoint to 30 Months (Age < 75 years) P interaction = % vs 14.9% P = HR (95% CI): 0.77 (0.61, 0.98) Angio N=3085 No Angio N= % vs 16.7% P = HR (95% CI): 1.01 (0.84, 1.20)

P interaction = % vs 10.3% P = HR (95% CI): 0.74 (0.55, 1.00) Angio No Angio 9.2% vs 10.6% P = HR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.79, 1.26) Myocardial Infarction

TIMI Major Bleeding P interaction = % vs 1.4% P = HR (95% CI): 1.84 (0.93, 3.63) Angio No Angio 1.6% vs 1.5% P = HR (95% CI): 0.92 (0.47, 1.83)

Conclusions  Substantial differences exist among patients triaged for medical therapy with or without angiography from TRILOGY ACS. Geographically, subjects from North America, Western Europe, and the Mediterranean tended to have angiography pre-randomization Geographically, subjects from North America, Western Europe, and the Mediterranean tended to have angiography pre-randomization Patients with angiography more often were enrolled with NSTEMI, and had prior history or PCI or CABG Patients with angiography more often were enrolled with NSTEMI, and had prior history or PCI or CABG  Patients with angiography had lower overall events rates, particularly CV death.

Conclusions  Overall, in the TRILOGY ACS Trial prasugrel did not reduce cardiovascular events among patients managed medically for ACS.  When treated with prasugrel compared to clopidogrel, patients triaged to medical therapy following angiography tended to have: lower rates of the combined endpoint of CVD/MI/CVA lower rates of the combined endpoint of CVD/MI/CVA Lower rates of MI, CVA alone, and recurrent ischemic events Lower rates of MI, CVA alone, and recurrent ischemic events higher rates of bleeding. higher rates of bleeding.  Though hypothesis generating, these results are consistent with previous trials and suggest when angiography is performed and coronary disease is confirmed, the benefits and risks of intensive antiplatelet therapy exist whether medical therapy or PCI is elected.