1 Today’s Plan 900am–915am:Sort out questions regarding refund forms 915am–945am:Finalise today’s agenda 945am-1045am:Breakout Groups Session 1 1045am–1115am:Coffee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
Advertisements

Labour Market Planning LMDA Service Delivery Advisory Group September 28, 2006 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
Federal Audit Executive Council (FAEC) June 2012 Bi-Monthly Meeting Heather I. Keister Doris G. Yanger June 14, 2012 Green Book Update.
CVD Risk Reduction Group Retention Draft Guidelines July 2005.
Slide #1 Writing Winning Proposals. Slide #2 Agenda  Overview  Writing Tips  Comments, Suggestions, Questions  Upcoming Seminars.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Robert's Drawers (and other variations on GRE shared tasks) Gatt, Belz, Reiter, Viethen.
Developing an accessibility policy. In this talk we will discuss What is an accessibility policy Why do we need one? Getting started - steps to consult.
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
Denver Plan Goals Development Network Meetings February 2014.
Grade 3-5 ELA Common Core Ambassadors August 13-17, 2012 Albany, NY.
Developing an accessibility strategy. In this talk we will discuss an accessibility strategy an accessibility policy getting started - steps to consultation.
COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Strategic Planning Steering Committee Session V September 7, 2012.
18 March th meeting of the Evaluation Expert Committie 1 Thematic Working Group „Ex post Evaluation Guidelines” State of play Jela Tvrdonova.
Enhancement of participation of local stakeholders, key to success of CDM projects: Current rules and procedures under the CDM Fatima-Zahra Taibi, UNFCCC.
1 Ensuring the Future of the Arthur W. Page Society Communications Committee Plan Paul Capelli Peter Debreceny.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting September 10, 2013.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Data Provenance Community Meeting August 21st, 2014.
Performance Assurance 5 th August Value Chain Further Evolvement.
SPS Workshop Taipei, 5-6/12/2001 The Transparency Provisions of the SPS Agreement.
SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY © Tomi Männistö, Varvana Myllärniemi, 2008 T Software Architectures.
Desiderata for evaluation Nancy Green, Kathy McCoy, David McDonald, Cecile Paris, Donia Scott.
HR Administration ‘Day 1’ Readiness Overview
Welcome! Course Development Camp Session II July 16 July July
Framework for success workshop 1 st October 2009.
An Evaluation Competition? Eight Reasons to be Cautious Donia Scott Open University & Johanna Moore University of Edinburgh.
Progress reviews and setting targets during learning.
Shared Task Virtual World Barbara Di Eugenio Andrew Koller James Lester Johanna Moore Laura Stoia.
1 IRES, version 0: an overview Vladimir Markhonko United Nations Statistics Division The Oslo Group on Energy Statistics Fifth meeting, Cork, Ireland,
TAG-TF Introduction Surveymonkey.com/s/TAGTFSurvey.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.
Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.
DEVELOPMENT OF A WHITE PAPER ON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Ministry of Correctional Services.
Conflicts of Interest Peter Hughes IESBA June 2012 New York, USA.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting November 19, 2013.
Edinburgh Shadow Strategic Planning Group Friday 19 June 2015 Welcome Back.
1 Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
2050AP Project WP5: “Conclusions” UPM Madrid 11 de Octubre 2013.
Virtually unknown: web conferences as a tool for teacher development Caroline Moore [Tony Fisher & Eric Baber]
G5/4 Revision Project Progress Update Andrew Bower
Michael Gross, Perry Williams, Carmen Sanchez
Bruce Winter, IAASB Member and ISA 700 Drafting Team Chair
Community Session - Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace WHOIS
of the Standing Committee Bonn, 9-10 November 2016
Effective writing for bids and grants
Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation CEOS SIT-33
Professional Skepticism
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation CEOS SIT-33
Quality Management at the Engagement Level Proposed ISA 220 (Revised)
IAASB-IESBA Coordination
STF 442 Specialist Task Force initiated by ETSI MTS Manpower Duration
Reliability Standards Development Plan
MODEL FOR COMBINED EVALUATION AND RECOGNITION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Text-to-Text Generation
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Proposed ISQM 1 Karin French, Quality Control Task Force Chair
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Quality Management at the Engagement Level Proposed ISA 220 (Revised)
Review Art.17/12 for 2016 and onwards
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Optional Module 6—Scholarly Project
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
DO THE ENDS MEET THE NEEDS
Objectives of the Training Workshop
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
Presentation transcript:

1 Today’s Plan 900am–915am:Sort out questions regarding refund forms 915am–945am:Finalise today’s agenda 945am-1045am:Breakout Groups Session am–1115am:Coffee + recalibration at am–1215pm:Breakout Groups Session pm–145pm:Lunch 145pm–245pm:Report-backs 245pm–300pm:Wrap-up

2 Yesterday’s Shifting Sentiment #1

3 Yesterday’s Shifting Sentiment #2

4 Yesterday’s Main Themes #1 General Methodological Concerns: – Reasons to be cautious [Scott, Moore, Di Eugenio, McCoy, Green] Frameworks for Evaluation: – Frameworks for evaluation [Paris, Stent] – GENEVAL [Belz and Reiter] – Building on RAGS [Mellish + Scott] Resources: – A Wiki [Stent] – Shared data resources [Walker]

5 Yesterday’s Main Themes #2 Shared Tasks: – DUC or other existing STECs as a host [McKeown] – Referring Expression Generation [Gatt, Viethen] – Virtual Environments [Koller et al] – Question Qeneration [Rus + Graesser] – Textual Variation [McDonald]

6 Today’s Goals Observation: – Opinion is spread between those who favour a Shared Task (one or many) and those who are cautious Hypothesis #1: – Those who favour a Shared Task will push ahead anyway Hypothesis #2: – Those who are cautious are the best people to identify the relevant desiderata

7 Possible Working Groups Desiderata Development Evaluation Shared Resources Shared Task #1: Text to Text (perhaps via DUC?) Shared Task #2: Referring Expression Generation Shared Task #3: Data to Text Shared Task #4: Virtual Environments

8 Target Outcome A document How far can we get today? – A set of PowerPoint files that plans the sections of the document to one bullet point per subsubsection or paragraph – Report-back on planned content to the assembled group After the workshop: – Flesh out the text

9 Task 1: Desiderata Main Sections: – What’s unique about NLG Evaluation – Approaches and Frameworks – A ‘due diligence checklist’ —` a clear enumeration of the things you should consider if you are going to pursue a Shared Task in NLG

10 Tasks 2 through N: Shared Tasks Proposals Main Sections: – A definition of the Shared Task and its type – The aims of the Shared Task: what it will achieve – The subcommunity it seeks to engage, and how it will do this – Whether the task will involve evaluation and how – The resources required, and how they will be obtained – A plan of execution – [Later] How this Shared Task addresses the desiderata

11 Today’s Plan 900am–915am:Sort out questions regarding refund forms 915am–945am:Finalise today’s agenda 945am-1045am:Breakout Groups Session am–1115am:Coffee + recalibration 1115am–1215pm:Breakout Groups Session pm–115pm:Lunch 115pm–245pm:Report-backs 245pm–300pm:Wrap-up

12 Possible Working Groups Desiderata Development [5] Shared Task #1: Text to Text (perhaps via DUC?) [3] Shared Task #2: Referring Expression Generation [5] Shared Task #4: Virtual Environments [5]

13 New Thoughts and Considerations Is this working? Is the spec broken or can it be refined? What have you thought of that you think the others could benefit from in working out their plan?

14 Today’s Plan 900am–915am:Sort out questions regarding refund forms 915am–945am:Finalise today’s agenda 945am-1045am:Breakout Groups Session am–1115am:Coffee + recalibration 1115am–1215pm:Breakout Groups Session pm–115pm:Lunch 115pm–245pm:Report-backs 245pm–300pm:Wrap-up

15 Next Steps One or two people in each group commits to making sure there is follow-through Each group commits to writing up their section of the report and delivering a draft to MW + RD by June 1st. At time June 1st, all sections are redistributed to all workshop participants. All can send comments on any part to MW+RD by mid June. In mid-June, comments are collated and redistributed to authors of sections. Revised versions are returned to MW + RD by 15th July. Distributed to community for input to be received by mid August. Comments taken on board and final report made available to the community at end August.

16 The Responsible Adults Group 1: Donia Scott and Cécile Paris Group 2: Marilyn Walker and Amanda Stent Group 3: Albert Gatt Group 4: Johanna Moore and Alex Koller

17 Report-Backs Desiderata Development Shared Task #1: Text to Text Shared Task #2: Referring Expression Generation Shared Task #3: Virtual Environments