PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paul Scherrer Institut 5232 Villigen PSI EURISOL Kick-off meeting, L. Zanini EURISOL DS Task 4 L. Zanini PSI Kick-off Meeting CERN,
Advertisements

1 MEGAPIE Structural Materials : Is there a risk of failure? MEGAPIE Workshop Aix-en Provence, Nov MEGAPIE Structural Materials Is there a risk of.
SNS Experimental FacilitiesOak Ridge Target Systems for the Spallation Neutron Source Presented by John R. Haines at the High-Power Targetry for Future.
ESS End-to-End Optics and Layout Integration Håkan Danared European Spallation Source Catania, 6 July 2011.
Yoro TALL Santiago de Compostela (Spain) June 7 – 10, Second IP EUROTRANS Internal Training Course on Nuclear Data for Transmutation: status, needs.
Mike Fitton Engineering Analysis Group Design and Computational Fluid Dynamic analysis of the T2K Target Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation 6th September.
Hydraulics.
A Neutrino Factory Target Station Design based on Solid Targets J. R. J. Bennett STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Science.
Solid Targets for the Neutrino Factory J R J Bennett Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK
Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.
First Wall Thermal Hydraulics Analysis El-Sayed Mogahed Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin With input from S. Malang, M. Sawan, I.
 Stephen Brooks / UKNF meeting, Warwick, April 2008 Pion Production from Water-Cooled Targets.
Rotating Tungsten Helium cooled Target RoTHeTa Cyril Kharoua Daniela Ene, Ferenc Mezei, Etam Noah, François Plewinski, Pascal Sabbagh, Luca Massidda (CRS4,
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
Development of the FW Mobile Tiles Concept Mohamed Sawan, Edward Marriott, Carol Aplin University of Wisconsin-Madison Lance Snead Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
FETS-HIPSTER (Front End Test Stand – High Intensity Proton Source for Testing Effects of Radiation) Proposal for a new high-intensity proton irradiation.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy PASI_2012_Flowing_Target_Challenges Challenges for Flowing Targets Bernie Riemer (ORNL) (Jan.
ISIS Second Target Station
EURISOL Town Meeting October 2012 – Lisbon High-Power Targets High-Power Targets Developments and Testing of Spallation Neutron Sources Yacine Kadi,
EURISOL DS Target Meeting, CERN, CHY.KADIMarch 10-11, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET 1st year planning Y. Kadi (AB/ATB) European Organization.
Introduction and Charge to the Review of ESS Target building and Instrument Hall design requirements Roland Garoby November 2014, Lund
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
Completion of Water-Cooled Backup Study Eric Pitcher TAC-10 November 5, 2014.
PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT CERN / Oct / P.A.Schmelzbach.
Tungsten Calorimeter Model Calculations and Radiation Issues Pavel Degtiarenko Radiation Control Group, Jefferson Lab.
BL1U at TRIUMF UCN Beamline Spallation Target & Remote-Handling System (Aug/2010) L.Lee.
Positron Source General Update M. Kuriki(Hiroshima U./KEK) ALCW2015, April 2015,Tsukuba/Tokyo, Japan.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
Solid Targets for Neutron Spallation Sources Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented to: AHIPA Workshop October 20, 2009.
Target and Pion Collection System and Support Facility
Shield Module Design Considerations Adam Carroll Van Graves July 3, 2014.
PSB dump replacement 17 th November 2011 LIU-PSB meeting Alba Sarrió.
SEPTEMBER 2002 Pixel Support Tube A. Smith LBNL 1 ATLAS Pixel Detector Heater Panel Testing Alexis Smith September 17, 2002.
Summery of the power coupler session at the LCWS13 workshop E. Kako W.-D. Möller H. Hayano A. Yamamoto All members of SCRF WG November 14, 2013.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
3 May th High Power Targetry Workshop - Malmö1/25 Free Surface and Splashing Simulation of a Windowless Target Concept for ESS Luca Massidda, Vincent.
F.Staufenbiel / EuCARD 2 / Heat load and stress studies of the ILC collimator G. Moortgat-Pick 1;2 S. Riemann 2, F. Staufenbiel 2, A. Ushakov.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Shielding Workshop R. Casey Activation Issues for NSLS-II March 28, 2007.
J. G. Weisend II for the ESS Team Energy Efficiency & Recovery at ESS.
BENE/EURISOL-DS Joint Meeting, CERN, SwitzerlandFebruary 22, Progress in the Liquid Mercury Multi-MW Target Design Studies Y. Kadi On behalf of.
Beam on Target Diagnostics Beam on Target Meeting 2013 March Tom Shea.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Leslie Jones Target Design Engineer Goran Skoro, Steve Lilley, (Stuart Ansell)– Neutronic Dan Wilcox – Engineering Simulation Dan Coates – CAD - TRaM ISIS.
Task2: Liquid Metal Target Thermo hydraulic and structural analysis of the Eurisol liquid metal target Ashrafi-Nik M. * C.E.R.N, AB Department, ATB Group.
Target Proposal Feb. 15, 2000 S. Childress Target Proposal Considerations: –For low z target, much less power is deposited in the target for the same pion.
Paul Scherrer Institut 5232 Villigen PSI EURISOL Town Meeting Pisa, March 30-April 2, 2009 / W. Wagner PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT EURISOL Spallation Neutron.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy High Power Targets for Accelerator Based Research Facilities Bernard Riemer Spallation Neutron.
CSNS cryogenic system Institute of High Energy Physics Guoping Wang June 21, 2016.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
HPT & M/D I WG DISCUSSION SLIDES PASI 2012 Hurh et al.
Target Systems and Monolith Design Update Rikard Linander Group Leader Monolith and Handling April 2, 2014.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
The ESS Target Station F. Mezei ESS target division NPPatLPS, 2013.
ISIS TS1 Project: Target Design and Analysis
PIE program of STIP-V tungsten specimens for ESS target engineering
Targets Neutrino Factory J. R. J. Bennett
Making Difficult Decisions in a Transparent Way –
DCLL TBM Reference Design
Second SPL Collaboration Meeting, Vancouver May 2009
Designing Safety into a High-power Neutron Spallation Source
Peter Loveridge High Power Targets Group
Beam Window Studies for Superbeams
ESS Target Cryogenic System European Cryogenic Days CERN
1- Short pulse neutron source
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
Presentation transcript:

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen Good experience motivates consideration and preliminary assessment shows promising performance of Cannelloni for ESS NIMMA 625, 5-11 (2011), AccApp’11 Knoxville 85 % MEGAPIE

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen 1 pump 2 Target 3 decay tank 4 heat exchanger 5 expansion tank 6 filter Principal water-cooling circuit

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen real installation SINQ 1 pump 2 Target 3 decay tank 4 heat exchanger 5 expansion tank 6 filter

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen Good experience and simple calculation confirm modest required parameter values: Q = m cp ∆ T Q…….transported heat [ W ] m …….massflow [ kg/s ] cp ……. specific heat (water = 4190 J/kg K ) ∆ T…….temperature increase in coolant [ K ] 3 MW therm = 35.8 x 4190 x 20, i.e. ∆T = l/s also radiological issues, handling, … are well known water-cooling, basics

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen water-cooling, limits CHF “Shah”-relation for 0.75 m/s water flow at T bulk = 40 °C and 5 bar for a single tube Water offers reserve: see presentation R. Milenkovic

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen configurations Many configurations are possible, some examples: 0)crossflow, along beam direction, horizontal tubes, circular / rectangular geometry (SINQ, UCN) 1)„flat nose“, crossflow bottom up, horizontal tubes 2)„flat nose“, crossflow sideways, horizontal tubes 3)„flat nose“, crossflow sideways, vertical tubes 4)System layout on platform 5)Last step: continuously rotating wheel 6)…..

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen crossflow, along beam direction, horizontal tubes, circular / rectangular geometry (SINQ, UCN) configuration 0 Well established, requires ~300 cm 2 cross-section

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen „flat nose“, crossflow bottom up, horizontal tubes configuration 1 sideways connections are not in the way to the moderators G. Heidenreich

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen „flat nose“, crossflow sideways, horizontal or vertical tubes configurations 2 & 3 connections are even less in the way, (...continuous rotation) (vertical tubes with essentially solid filling only) G. Heidenreich

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen System layout on platform configuration 4 swapping targets at end of life (.....> continuous rotation) Starting in stepping mode allows for gradual build up of experience, qualification of new components in the peculiar spallation environment and for continual upgrades. The possibility of quickly swapping between inserts ensures maximum availability. Completing the remainders of the wheel with optimized reflector material could partly compensate for the lower density compared to more dense tungsten.

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen Continuously rotating wheel(s) configuration 5 cannelloni...> panzarotti …> canned tungsten blocks

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen beam conditions I A wide / flat beam profile relaxes conditions significantly for any target Peak temperatures after pulse for cannelloni (conf.1) during 50 ms Temperature Cannelloni external surface Temperature Cannelloni internal surface Temperature in Pb Center Mean current density: 21.2 µA/cm 2 sigma_x * sigma_y = 50 x 30 mm Mean current density: 42.4 µA/cm 2 (for maximum loaded location) sigma_x * sigma_y = 50 x 15 mm

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen beam conditions II there are ways to improve on the reference beam: Reference conditions: 5 MW, 2.5 GeV, 2mA (average), sigmaX=5 cm, sigmaY=1.5 cm, duration 1 ms, repetition rate 20 Hz peak current density: µA/cm 2 adding 2 octupoles in HEBT already reduces peak by 35 % with a sophisticated multipole system a flat profile (+/- 7 %) over 200x50 mm can probably be achieved

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen neutronic yield Preliminary result: Cannelloni produce 82 % of LBE (H 2 O coolant, lead filling) see presentation L. Zanini

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen density upgrade replacing lead by tungsten increases density & brilliance and neutronic yield: example geometry full wheel: 100% tungsten 75 % tungsten 75 % tungsten & 25 % light water

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen Conclusion Cannelloni offer minimum risk and maximum safety Limited development required (14 years in SINQ) Very high availabilty proven / expected Water-cooling offers relatively convenient handling Cannelloni open widest options for improvements (e.g. Cannelloni on a wheel can handle > 5 MW) Low building-, operations- and decommissioning cost Licensing and public acceptance are relatively easy Price to pay: some initial reduction in neutronic yield

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen Suggested Further Steps: Simulations: Optimize Geometry / Coupling for Cannelloni Target (Target, Moderator, Reflector, Beam Lines, Shielding) Simulations & Experiments: Verify Cooling Limits in Representative Set-Up(s) Re-Assessment: Size of & Response to Repetitive Stresses Urge Linac to provide Least Pointed Beam Profile

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen 3 more slides on criteria / evaluation

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen CriterionProConremarks Cost (building, op., decom.) XLow, relatively conventional water cooling PerformancexLimited, “diluted target“ SafetyXHigh, lead, water and zircaloy make the least harmfull inventory reasonable possible Devel. RiskXLow, 14 years of SINQ experience AvailabilityXHigh, quick replacement on wheel MaintainabilityXHigh, hands-on access to cooling circuits UpgradeabilityXHigh, e.g. via wheel speed up to high power Cannelloni in the light of main Selection Criteria, OVERVIEW

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen CriterionProConremarks Chemical toxicityXRelatively low, during operations limited Hg produced Radio-toxicityXRelatively low, during operations limited Po produced Release in op.XLow, only limited tritium Release in acc.XLow, inventory well contained in tiny portions, low decay heat Radiation exp.XLow, cooling with water HandlingXMost hands-on, only small inserts (or wheel) require relatively small hot cell and remote handling Decomm. & Disp.XEstablished, relatively easy Cannelloni in the light of main Selection Criteria, SAFETY

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT HPTW Malmö Cannelloni Technical Issues K. Thomsen CriterionProConremarks Failure toleranceXHigh, quick replacement (on wheel) FlexibilityXExample: SINQ, wheel opens many options Public acceptance XHigh, (PSI experience) LicensingXComparatively easy, (PSI experience) Damage potential to facility XLow, solid lead, water InstrumentationXEstablished, relatively easy Cannelloni in the light of some more prop. Selection Criteria