Moving Assessment Across ALL Programs and Operations Effective Assessment Solutions for Accreditation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.
Ron Smelser Professor and Associate Dean Dean’s Office.
THE DIVERGENT BUT COMPLEMENTARY PATHS OF COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM REVIEW AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT A Case Study Presentation At the 2004 AAHE.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
- Overview- Program Review and SLOs Preparing to Write the Self-Study Why? What? How? For more SLO resources see:
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Learning Outcomes Assessment RESULTS AND ACTION PLAN Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
University Of North Alabama General Education Assessment Paradigm Shift: A plan for Revising General Education Assessment at UNA.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Academic.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
ASSESSMENT WHERE WE ARE AND WHERE WE ARE GOING…...
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Navigating Assessment Malissa Martin, Ed.D., ATC, CSCS Director, Athletic Training Education Department of Health Sciences College of Mount St Joseph Cincinnati,
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Revision of Initial and Continued Approval Standard Guidelines for Educational Leadership Programs Presentation to FAPEL Winter Meeting Tallahassee, FL.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Unit Assessment System Teacher Education at Purdue March 4, 2012.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
FACULTY LEADING ACADEMIC PROGRAM STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT A Case Study Presentation 2004 IUPUI Assessment Institute November 1, 2004 Val Whittlesey,
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
More Timely, Credible and Cost Effective Performance Information on Multilateral Partners Presented by: Goberdhan Singh Director of the Evaluation Division.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Becoming one with the SLO The Zen Of Our Course and Program SLOs.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
EDUCAUSE MARC 2004 E-Portfolios: Two Approaches for Transforming Curriculum & Promoting Student Learning Glenn Johnson Instructional Designer Penn State.
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

Moving Assessment Across ALL Programs and Operations Effective Assessment Solutions for Accreditation

Institutional and Program Level Samples WASC NCATE, AACSB, ABET, NLNAC. Etc.

Commonalities Educational effectiveness at the core Perform with respect to program standards or performance indicators Achieve objectives, goals, mission Must show integration of processes so that cyclic review and improvements are possible Systematic Evaluation of Students, Curriculum, and overall Effectiveness Follow-up, i.e. after completion of program

Institutional Mission – General Education Programs must support institutional mission General Education is a substantial component of each undergraduate program Programs support student learning Programs utilize appropriate assessment to ensure quality Continual review

How to address all MASTERS! Design a process by which information can be utilized for multiple MASTERS Establish clear and SIMPLE processes Data should be relevant Easily monitored at all levels Methodologies developed for displaying results Review and begin again

University Wide Assessment Model UNIVERSITY Mission Statement Goals General Education Competency Plans & Reports College Level Data not in electronic format Non-Artifact Based Data College Assessment Plan Program Level Assessment Department Level Assessment Course Candidate Level Information Artifact Non-Artifact Based Data Artifact Non-Artifact Based Data Artifact Non-Artifact Based Data Artifact Non-Artifact Based Data Artifact Non-Artifact Based Data UNIVERSITY LEVEL College/Program Assessment Plan Program/SPA Level Assessments

UA Fort Smith Old Process – Unmanageable, no relevant information, burden to faculty and staff, disconnected with student learning, no feedback New Process – Data readily available, can directly link to student assessment, able to show linkage to institutional standards and objectives across all documents and coverage of standards

Sample Process to Achieve All Results Colleges write assessment plans that will measure student learning –May use components from College/Program level accreditation performance standards, assessments, and reports (Current LiveText Usage for COE, COB, COH) –If not accredited by outside agency, should write plan to support university program review processes Each plan should possess two student learning objectives and one general education learning objective

Sample Process continued Colleges submit plans for all approved programs – (Lowest level to submit is AAS, AA, AFA, etc.) Plans are peer reviewed by university assessment committee –Plans are scored utilizing a rubric correlated with university general education competencies or standards Adequate plans are activated Inadequate plans are rewritten until satisfactory

Sample Process continued Colleges/Programs write an annual report reviewing the results of their plan These reports are peer reviewed by university assessment committee –Reports are scored utilizing a rubric correlated with university general education competencies or standards Adequate reports are accepted and archived Inadequate reports are rewritten until satisfactory

Now WHAT? University level assessment committee and chair discuss the overall quality of all plans and reports. Committee makes recommendations for procedural or content changes for plans or reports Colleges/Programs will submit a plan for the following year which might be either a continuation or a new plan depending upon the recommendation of the committee.

University Wide Assessment The plans and reports are displayed in a secure environment where the administration, faculty, and staff can view the results. Forms feature is utilized to survey faculty, committee, and administration on processes Reports are generated for standards, assessments, and forms.

Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template

Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric

Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric Colleges/Departments Write Assessment Plans from Results to meet Goals, Missions, Accreditation Criteria Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

Colleges/Departments Write Assessment Plans from Results to meet Goals, Missions, Accreditation Criteria

SLC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric Institution Establishes Student Learning Committee (SLC) Colleges/Departments Write Assessment Plans from Results to meet Goals, Missions, Accreditation Criteria Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

SLC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Institution Establishes Student Learning Committee (SLC)

SLC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Institution Establishes Student Learning Committee (SLC)

SLC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Colleges/Departments Write SLC Plan with Template Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric Institution Establishes Student Learning Committee (SLC) Colleges/Departments Write Assessment Plans from Results to meet Goals, Missions, Accreditation Criteria Colleges/Departments Utilize Selected Elements and Results from Assessment Plans for SLC Assessment Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

Colleges/Departments Write SLC Plan with Template Current LiveText Colleges/Departments Utilize Selected Elements and Results for Assessment Plans for SLC Assessment

SLC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Colleges/Departments Write SLC Plan with Template Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template SLC Accepts Plans SLC Reviews PlanSLC Rejects Plan Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric Institution Establishes Student Learning Committee (SLC) Colleges/Departments Write Assessment Plans from Results to meet Goals, Missions, Accreditation Criteria Colleges/Departments Utilize Selected Elements and Results from Assessment Plans for SLC Assessment Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning Colleges/Departments Implement Plan

Colleges/Departments Write SLC Plan with Template SLC Accepts Plans SLC Reviews PlanSLC Rejects Plan Colleges/Departments Implement Plan

SLC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Colleges/Departments Write SLC Plan with Template Colleges/Departments write annual report for selected artifacts and results that were part of the SLC Assessment Plan Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template Colleges/Departments Implement Plan SLC Accepts Plans SLC Reviews PlanSLC Rejects Plan Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric Institution Establishes Student Learning Committee (SLC) Colleges/Departments Write Assessment Plans from Results to meet Goals, Missions, Accreditation Criteria Colleges/Departments Utilize Selected Elements and Results from Assessment Plans for SLC Assessment Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

Colleges/Departments write annual report for selected artifacts and results that were part of the SLC Assessment Plan )

SLC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Colleges/Departments Write SLC Plan with Template Colleges/Departments write annual report for selected artifacts and results that were part of the SLC Assessment Plan Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template Colleges/Departments Implement Plan SLC Accepts Plans SLC Reviews Plan SLC Reviews Reports SLC Rejects Plan Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric SLC Accepts Reports Institution Establishes Student Learning Committee (SLC) Colleges/Departments Write Assessment Plans from Results to meet Goals, Missions, Accreditation Criteria Colleges/Departments Utilize Selected Elements and Results from Assessment Plans for SLC Assessment SLC Reviews Reports Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

Colleges/Departments write annual report for selected artifacts and results that were part of the SLC Assessment Plan SLC Reviews Reports SLC Accepts Reports SLC Reviews Reports

SLC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Colleges/Departments Write SLC Plan with Template Colleges/Departments write annual report for selected artifacts and results that were part of the SLC Assessment Plan Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template SLC Write Annual Summary of Reports Colleges/Departments Implement Plan SLC Accepts Plans SLC Reviews Plan SLC Reviews Reports SLC Rejects Plan Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric SLC Accepts Reports Institution Establishes Student Learning Committee (SLC) Colleges/Departments Write Assessment Plans from Results to meet Goals, Missions, Accreditation Criteria Colleges/Departments Utilize Selected Elements and Results from Assessment Plans for SLC Assessment SLC Reviews Reports Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

) SLC Write Annual Summary of Reports

SLC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Colleges/Departments Write SLC Plan with Template Colleges/Departments write annual report for selected artifacts and results that were part of the SLC Assessment Plan Student Creates Artifact with College Define Template SLC Write Annual Summary of Reports Colleges/Departments Implement Plan SLC Accepts Plans SLC Reviews Plan SLC Reviews Reports SLC Rejects Plan Faculty Scores Artifact with a College or Departmentally Selected/Created Form or Rubric SLC Accepts Reports Institution Establishes Student Learning Committee (SLC) Colleges/Departments Write Assessment Plans from Results to meet Goals, Missions, Accreditation Criteria Colleges/Departments Utilize Selected Elements and Results from Assessment Plans for SLC Assessment SLC Reviews Reports Faculty Design Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Learning

Non-Accredited Programs Non-Academic Programs Academic Support Programs The following slide would be used to demonstrate how non-accredited, non-academic programs, and academic support programs would work through the assessment process. This process could be employed as the methodology by which you satisfy your QEP for SACS

SAC Designs Assessment Plan & Report Template, Rubrics, Guidelines Colleges/Departments Write SAC Support Plan with Template Colleges/Departments write annual report for selected artifacts and results that were part of the SAC Assessment Plan SAC Write Annual Summary of Reports Colleges/Departments Implement Plan SAC Accepts Plans SAC Reviews Plan SAC Reviews Reports SAC Rejects Plan SAC Accepts Reports Institution Establishes Status of Accreditation Committee (SAC) SAC Reviews Reports

UA Fort Smith

Tim Martin, Ed.D. Director of Institutional Effectiveness University of Arkansas – Fort Smith 5210 Grand Avenue/PO Box 3649 Fort Smith, AR