Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2010 Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services (DBHDS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Advertisements

Consumer Involvement in Evaluating a Recovery-based Systems Change Initiative Vicki Cousins, Director Office of Consumer Affairs South Carolina Department.
Introduction Update Virginias Brain Injury Action Plan Define brain injury service options, terms Solicit feedback on core services Identify local service.
The Ohio Mental Health Consumer Outcomes System A Training for Family Members Prepared by Velma Beale, M.A. NAMI Ohio For the Ohio Department of Mental.
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
SUPPORT PLANNING & BROKERAGE HUB Sarah Stuart, Support Planning and Brokerage Hub Manager.
Evidence-Based Practices: Shaping Mental Health Services Toward Recovery Illness Management and Recovery.
Person-Directed Services and Supports Demonstrating Mental Health Recovery Through Person Centered Planning And Self-Directed Services and Supports Michael.
Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2012 ROSI Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services January,
Incorporating Data into a Needs Assessment Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Office of Planning Office of Research.
Culturally Competent Care from the Perspective of the Consumer: What Matters Most October, 2007.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
BestChoiceHomeHealthCare.org BEST CHOICE HOME HEALTH CARE A Member of the Centerlight Health System Caring for New Yorkers for over 90 years, employing.
2005 Consumer-Directed Supports: An Introduction.
Consumer Satisfaction Surveys 2009 Survey For further information contact Dennis McBride (253) or For the complete report.
A MERICAN P SYCHOLOGICAL A SSOCIATION 13. Peer Delivered Services.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
Typical level of education that most workers need to enter this occupation. Doctorate or Professional degree All states require physical therapists to.
1. Self-AdvocacyObjective 1.1: Increase the number of individuals with developmental disabilities who participate in self- advocacy, leadership and self-determination.
FAMILY PEER SUPPORT SERVICES OMH Children’s Division of Integrated Community Services May 19, 2015 Presentation to New York State Success Membership.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
2006 Statewide Survey of Drop-In Centers in Pennsylvania LaKeetra McClaine UPENN Collaborative on Community Integration Jim McCormack, PhD. MHASP John.
11 Building an Effective Peer Support Program: A Proven Volunteer Model General Overview of Peer Support and ABIL Program September 23, :00 a.m.
Participant Choice – Access to Recovery as a Voucher Service Delivery Model Presented to National Summit on Prisoner Re-Entry Sponsored by the White House.
Building a Brighter Future for Our Kids and Families Multnomah County Department of School and Community Partnerships.
Recovery and the Patient Perspective in an In-Patient Setting Office for Consumer Empowerment Contra Costa Mental Health.
Grading America’s Public Mental Health System – Cloudy Skies, Silver Lining on the Horizon? Mary Giliberti Director of Public Policy and Advocacy, NAMI.
Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2011 ROSI Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services September,
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Indicators of Family Engagement Melanie Lemoine and Monica Ballay Louisiana State Improvement Grant/SPDG.
Presented by: Karen Gauthier
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
Competency of Psychiatry Residents in the Treatment of Severe Mental Illness Before and After a Psychiatric Rehabilitation Community Rotation Melinda Randall.
DBHDS Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services Improving Discharge Processes Updates on Waiver Changes Heidi Dix Assistant Commissioner.
Recovery A New Model for Veterans Affairs Mental Health Programs.
Implementing the Care Act in Essex. Overview The Care Act – a reminder of the requirements Update on implementation of the Care Act How ECC is responding.
D B H D S Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services Creating Opportunities for People with Substance Use Disorders a presentation.
Daniel Fisher, MD, PhD, The National Empowerment Center From Maintenance to Recovery: by Daniel B. Fisher,MD,PhD, Executive Director, National.
Mental Health Recovery Overview. History 1993 Mental Health dialogues/forums were held around the state with consumers, family members, providers, and.
For over 70 years, the Texas Commission for the Blind has assisted blind and visually impaired Texans in achieving independent and successful lives through.
Pam Danner, MBA Former Program Director, West Texas AHEC Steve Shelton, PA, MBA Program Director, East Texas AHEC.
Practical Approaches to Designing and Conducting Surveys for Quality Management Teresa Richard Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services 2006.
1 CMHS Block Grant Peer Reviews Ann Arneill-Py, PhD, Executive Officer CA Mental Health Planning Council California Mental Health Planning Council April.
Service Learning Dr. Albrecht. Presenting Results 0 The following power point slides contain examples of how information from evaluation research can.
Disability Program Navigator Training A Joint Initiative of the U.S. Department of Labor and the Social Security Administration Colorado Navigator Experience.
Introduction Results and Conclusions ATR Results: On demographic and social characteristics, ATR completers were more likely to be Hispanic, employed,
Health Homes as Recovery Homes NYAPRS Executive Seminar on Systems Transformation Albany, NY April 27, 2011.
Parent Satisfaction Surveys What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  Each year schools from our district are selected to participate in the.
Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2015 ROSI Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services September,
Mercer Island High School Assets Survey Longitudinal Results 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010.
Positive Behavior Supports 201 Developing a Vision.
Adult Consumer Assessments of Care in New York Chip Felton, Senior Deputy Commissioner Jeff Kirk Doug Dornan New York State Office of Mental Health Center.
YOUR HEALTH!.
Ekaterina P. Forrester, Ph.D.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
Knowledge and Attitudes of Mental Health Professionals to the concept of Recovery in Mental Health Anne Cleary Registered Advanced Nurse Practitioner East.
1 Understanding Healthcare Settings Understanding Healthcare Settings Chapter One.
Introduction Results and Conclusions Results: On demographic and social characteristics, ATR completers were more likely to be male, Hispanic, employed,
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Physical Therapy Clinical Instructor Training Harriet Lewis, PT, MS Assistant Clinical Professor, Co ACCE.
Annual report 2016 Family Preservation Family Reunification
Maria Fuentes, MSW Senior Services Manager
Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Massachusetts Peer Specialist Training
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Person-Directed Services and Supports Demonstrating Mental Health Recovery Through Person Centered Planning And Self-Directed Services and Supports.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Recovery to Practice and American Association of
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2010 Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services (DBHDS)

ROSI Background: National Mental Health Recovery: What Helps and What Hinders? –CMHS * -sponsored NASMHPD ** national research project involving 8 States: Arizona Department of Health Services Hawaii Adult Mental Health Division New York State Office of Mental Health Oklahoma Department of MH & SA Services Rhode Island Department of MH/MR South Carolina Department of Mental Health Texas Health and Human Services Commission Washington Department of Social and Health Services –Developed and tested the 42 Item ROSI Survey –* Federal Center for Mental Health Services –**National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors

ROSI Background: National The 42 items that make up the ROSI Survey are categorized into the following eight domains: –Meaningful Activities ( involves the findings that work, education, voluntary and/or group advocacy activities that are meaningful to the individual facilitate recovery) –Basic Material Resources (involves the findings that recovery from mental illness is incumbent on basic material resource needs being met). –Peer Support (involves the findings that peer support and consumer operated services in a myriad of forms facilitate recovery). –Choice (involves the findings that having choices, as well as support in the process of making choices, regarding housing, work, social, service, treatment as well as other areas of life facilitate recovery). –Social Relationships (involves the findings concerning the roles social and personal relationships play in facilitating recovery). –Formal Service Staff (involves the findings as to the critical roles formal service staff play in helping or hindering the recovery process). –Formal Services (involves the findings that formal service systems’ culture, organization, structure, funding, access, choice, quality, range, continuity and other characteristics can help or hinder the process of recovery). –Self/Holism (involves the findings that characteristics that relate to one’s sense of self, such as self-reliance, as well as having a holistic and human rights focus can facilitate recovery, and other such characteristics, such as low self-esteem, can hinder recovery).

ROSI Background: Virginia 2005: CMS * ‘Real Choice Systems Change’ grant- funded ROSI survey pilot conducted by MH service recipients trained by VOCAL ** –Surveyed 610 adults receiving mental health services –Associated with 11 Community Service Boards (CSBs) 2006: DMHMRSAS *** System Transformation Initiative Data/Outcomes Measures Workgroup –Endorsed use of the ROSI as one standard measure of achieving our vision of: “self-determination, empowerment, recovery, resilience…” –* Federal Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services –** “Virginia Organization of Consumers Asserting Leadership” –*** Former acronym for DBHDS

ROSI Virginia : Expanded Use FY08 Partnership Agreements: –The partners agree, to the greatest extent possible, to use the ROSI or a similar mechanism to assess the consumer recovery orientation of the CSB. FY09 DBHDS created web-based ROSI and data entry systems for paper versions (added Spanish online and paper versions in FY10) FY10 Performance Contract: –CSBs shall administer the ROSI Consumer Survey sample of 5% or a minimum of 70 individuals with serious mental illness receiving mental health services from the Board Complete the ROSI Provider Survey (13 item survey) annually.

FY 2010 ROSI Survey Method Between January and April 2010, all 40 CSBs conducted the ROSI survey with 3,559 adult service recipients of mental health services. 24 CSBs – used online version (n=1,596) 22 CSBs – used paper version/data entry system (n=1,963) (One CSB’s survey data was lost due to problems with the DBHDS online version)

Survey Analysis Using Microsoft Access and SPSS –Average scores from 1 to 4 1 = strongly disagree 2 = disagree 3 = agree 4 = strongly agree –% responding Yes = agree or strongly agree No = disagree or strongly disagree N/A = does not apply to me Blank = no response

Survey Findings On average, respondents rated their mental health system’s recovery orientation very positively in the domains of formal service staff, formal services, and social relationships; –with average scores of 3.333, 3.328, and respectively –(i.e., well above 3 = “Agree”).

Survey Findings Respondents also rated positively their mental health system’s recovery orientation in the domains of choice, basic material resources, and peer support; –with average scores of 3.184, 3.038, and respectively.

Survey Findings Respondents were less positive about their mental health system’s recovery orientation in the domains of meaningful activities and self/holism, –with average scores of and respectively (i.e., below 3). Overall, the average score for all eight domains was positive at

Survey Findings Survey items that appeared to make the biggest difference in whether the mental health system was considered truly recovery oriented were: 1.Having a peer advocate to turn to. 2.Receiving help to get or keep employment. 3.Having a say about what happens in a crisis. 4.Having a chance to advance in education.

8 ROSI Recovery Domains Ranked Average Score divided by 4 = Grade Formal Service Staff /4 = 83.3 Formal Services /4 = 83.3 Social Relationships /4 = 82.5 Choice /4 = 79.5 Basic Material Resources /4 = 76.0 Peer Support /4 = 75.5 Meaningful Activities /4 = 74.3 Self/Holism /4 = 72.8 Average for all 8 Domains /4 = 78.7

Survey Item Scores by ROSI Recovery Domains Each ROSI Recovery Domain is made up of selected items in the survey. –If two-thirds or more of the selected items were answered by respondents, their average scores were included in the Domain score. –If the item was worded in the negative, the scoring was reversed for the Domain score. The following slides show both average scores and the percent of respondents who agreed (“% “Yes”) by survey item.

Findings: Formal Service Staff Formal Service Staff Domain – Avg. Score = 3.33 –the critical roles formal service staff play in helping or hindering the recovery process % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 89%: Staff respect me as a whole person. (3.33) 84%: Staff treat me with respect regarding my cultural background. (3.57) 81%: Staff believe that I can grow, change and recover. (3.48) 81%: Staff listen carefully to what I say. (3.44)

Findings: Formal Service Staff Formal Service Staff continued % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 76%: Staff see me as an equal partner in my treatment program (3.36) 69%: My treatment plan goals are stated in my own words. (3.25) 22%: Staff lack up-to-date knowledge on the most effective treatments. (1.84) 19%: Staff do not understand my experience as a person with mental health problems. (1.92)

Findings: Formal Services Formal Services Domain – Avg. Score = 3.33 –the systems’ culture, organization, structure, funding, access, choice, quality, range, continuity and other characteristics can help or hinder the process of recovery % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 80%: Mental health staff support my self-care or wellness. (3.43) 77%: The doctor worked with me to get on medications that were most helpful for me. (3.48) 76%: Mental health staff help me build on my strengths. (3.31) 72%: I have information and/or guidance to get the services and supports I need. (3.30) 67%: I can see a therapist when I need to. (3.25)

Findings: Formal Services Formal Services continued % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 48%: My family gets the education or supports they need to be helpful to me. (2.86) 17%: I cannot get the services I need when I need them. (1.88) 14%: The mental health staff ignore my physical health. (1.84) 12%: Mental health services have caused me emotional or physical harm. (1.73) 6%: Staff use pressure, threats or force in my treatment. (1.23)

Findings: Social Relationships Social Relationships Domain – Avg. Score = 3.30 –the roles social and personal relationships play in facilitating recovery % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 90%: There is at least one person who believes in me. (3.40) 24%: I do not have the support I need to function in the roles I want in my community. (2.05) 10%: Mental health staff interfere with my personal relationships. (1.41)

Findings : Choice Choice Domain – Avg. Score = 3.18 –having choices, as well as support in the process of making choices, regarding housing, work, social, service, treatment as well as other areas of life facilitate recovery % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 77%: Staff give me complete information in words I understand before I consent to treatment or medication. (3.41) 66%: I have a say in what happens to me when I am in crisis. (3.19) 62%: My right to refuse treatment is respected. (3.19) 25%: I do not have enough good service options to choose from. (2.07)

Findings: Basic Material Resources Basic Material Resources Domain – Avg. Score = 3.04 –(recovery from mental illness is incumbent on basic material resource needs being met). % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 82%: I have a place to live that feels like a comfortable home to me (3.21) 76%: Staff stood up for me to get the services and resources I needed (3.40) 72%: Mental health services helped me get medical benefits that meet my needs. (3.16)

Findings: Basic Material Resources Basic Material Resources continued % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 66%: I have reliable transportation to get where I need to go. (3.10) 58%: I have housing that I can afford. (3.08) 50%: Mental health services helped me get housing in a place I feel safe. (2.91) 47%: I have enough income to live on. (2.42)

Findings: Peer Support Peer Support Domain – Avg. Score = 3.02 –peer support and consumer operated services in a myriad of forms facilitate recovery % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 75%: I am encouraged to use consumer-run programs (e.g., support groups, drop-in centers, etc.) (3.12) 50%: There was a consumer peer advocate to turn to when I needed one. (2.91) 47%: There are consumers working as paid employees in the mental health agency where I receive services. (2.97)

Findings: Meaningful Activities Meaningful Activities Domain – Avg. Score = 2.97 –(work, education, voluntary and/or group advocacy activities that are meaningful to the individual facilitate recovery). %‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 78%: Staff encourage me to do things that are meaningful to me. (3.39) 47%: I have a chance to advance my education if I want to. (2.83) 25%: Mental health services helped me get or keep employment. (2.46)

Findings: Self/Holism Self/Holism Domain – Avg. Score = 2.91 –characteristics that relate to one’s sense of self, such as self- reliance, as well as having a holistic and human rights focus can facilitate recovery and other such characteristics, such as low self-esteem, can hinder recovery % ‘Yes’: Survey Item (average score) 78%: Services help me develop the skills I need. (3.07) 38%: Mental health services led me to be more dependent, not independent. (2.30) 22%: I lack the information or resources I need to uphold my client and basic human rights. (2.01)

42 Items Average Score = % of 3,291 respondents scored their system’s recovery orientation above average and 46% below average % Scored above average - by category –Gender: Male 58%, Female 50% –Race: White 59%, African Amer./Black 48% –CSB Type: Rural 57%, Urban 50% –Housing: »own home 59%, supervised apartment 47%, »boarding home 39%, homeless 23%

Above or Below Avg. by Gender Rated Below Rated Above

Above or Below Avg. by Race Rated Below Rated Above

Above or Below Avg. by CSB Urban or Rural Type Rated Below Rated Above

Above or Below Avg. by Living Situation Rated Below Rated Above

42 Items Average Score = % scored their system’s recovery orientation above average and 46% below average Which items make the most difference? % ‘Yes’ Above vs Below: Survey Item (average scores) –84% vs 47%: Peer advocates to turn to (3.43 vs 2.37) –68% vs 33% Help getting/keeping employment (3.02 vs 2.01) –91% vs 57%: A say in what happens in crisis (3.66 vs 2.67) –77% vs 42%: Chance to advance education (3.30 vs 2.32)

Above or Below Avg. by Peer Advocate Rated Below Rated Above Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree DisagreeAgree

Above or Below Avg. by Employment Assistance Rated Below Rated Above Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree DisagreeAgree

Above or Below Avg. by Having a Say when in Crisis Rated Below Rated Above Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree DisagreeAgree

CSB Provider Survey Selected CSB responses in Provider Surveys significantly tied to above average scores: –60% of CSBs have a recovery oriented mission statement –41% of CSBs have peer training slots for consumers –42% of CSBs provide help with advance directives Do these make a difference in consumers’ perception of the CSB’s recovery orientation?

Above or Below Avg. by CSB’s Recovery Mission Statement Rated Below Rated Above No Yes

Above or Below Avg. by CSB’s # of Peer Training Slots Rated Below Rated Above

Above or Below Avg. by CSB’s Advanced Directives Help Rated Below Rated Above No Yes

Next Steps DBHDS and CSBs will continue to conduct the ROSI survey each year. DBHDS analyses and provides results to each CSB and publishes statewide results. CSB staff share results with the individuals they serve and discuss how improvements might be made to become more recovery oriented.