Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld ADWICE Advanced Diagnosis and Warning system for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assimilation of radar data - research plan
Advertisements

Anthony Illingworth, + Robin Hogan, Ewan OConnor, U of Reading, UK and the CloudNET team (F, D, NL, S, Su). Reading: 19 Feb 08 – Meeting with Met office.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
Water vapor estimates using simultaneous S and Ka band radar measurements Scott Ellis, Jothiram Vivekanandan NCAR, Boulder CO, USA.
The German In-flight Icing Warning System ADWICE - current status, on-going research & development and future challenges In-Flight Icing Users Technical.
Assimilation of sea surface temperature and sea ice in HIRLAM Mariken Homleid HIRLAM/AAA workshop on surface assimilation Budapest 13 November 2007.
Chapter 1 Ways of Seeing. Ways of Seeing the Atmosphere The behavior of the atmosphere is very complex. Different ways of displaying the characteristics.
Verification of DWD Ulrich Damrath & Ulrich Pflüger.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
© Crown copyright Met Office Overview of Cloud Scheme Developments at the Met Office Cyril Morcrette November 2009, Reading University.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
MDSS Challenges, Research, and Managing User Expectations - Weather Issues - Bill Mahoney & Kevin Petty National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
Aviation Decision Support InFlight and Ground Icing: what do I need to know? Marcia Politovich, NCAR Flight Planning: –Where is it? Along my planned route.
Ch 13 - Icing. Ch 13 - Icing Ch 13 - Icing Introduction Aircraft icing can have serious negative effects on both the powerplant and the aerodynamic.
11/09/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE CARPE DIEM WP 7: FMI Progress Report Jarmo Koistinen, Heikki Pohjola Finnish Meteorological Institute.
Folie 1 Mature Convection: DLR activities presented by Caroline Forster DLR - Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany Convection Working.
1 Section 03: Global Weather. 2 Lesson: 01 Professional Forecasting and Technology Section 4.9 Pages
Section 4: Forecasting the Weather
ESA DA Projects Progress Meeting 2University of Reading Advanced Data Assimilation Methods WP2.1 Perform (ensemble) experiments to quantify model errors.
NARVAL South Lutz Hirsch, Friedhelm Jansen Sensor Synergy While Radars and Lidars provide excellent spatial resolution but only ambiguous information on.
Post-Processing at DWD Post-Processing at DWD Sebastian Trepte (FEZE) Grid-based forecasts COSMO, GME - derived products (thunderstorm ind., weather-related.
COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept Dependance of bias on initial time of forecasts 1 WG1 Overview
IMPROVING VERY-SHORT-TERM STORM PREDICTIONS BY ASSIMILATING RADAR AND SATELLITE DATA INTO A MESOSCALE NWP MODEL Allen Zhao 1, John Cook 1, Qin Xu 2, and.
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting Acquisition of weather information Acquisition of weather information Weather forecasting tools Weather forecasting tools.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
LAPS __________________________________________ Analysis and nowcasting system for Finland/Scandinavia Finnish Meteorological Institute Erik Gregow.
Julie Haggerty National Center for Atmospheric Research Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather October July 2014.
GOES–R Applications for the Assessment of Aviation Hazards Wayne Feltz, John Mecikalski, Mike Pavolonis, Kenneth Pryor, and Bill Smith 7. FOG AND LOW CLOUDS.
Budgets of second order moments for cloudy boundary layers 1 Systematische Untersuchung höherer statistischer Momente und ihrer Bilanzen 1 LES der atmosphärischen.
►Weather forecasting dates back to 650 B.C. The Babylonians observed cloud patterns to predict weather. ►Aristotle described weather patterns in Meteorologica.
10/05/041 Satellite Data in the Verification of Model cloud forecasts Christoph Zingerle Tartu, 24. – 26. Jan HiRLAM mini workshop on clouds and.
Titelfoto auf dem Titelmaster einfügen Deutscher Wetterdienst Dr. Paul James, German Weather Service, ECAM/EMS Conference, Reading, 9. Sept NowCastMIX.
The Rapid Developing Thunderstorm (RDT) product CDOP to CDOP2
3-5 November Workshop Modules for coding and encoding METAR, TAF, GAFOR and SYNOP Peter Schmitt, Günter Rosemann (DWD) Klaus Fischer (DFS)
Weather and Meteorology
Sally Pavlow NWS Indianapolis
Meteorology 5.08 Extreme Weather References:
5.32 Estimating regions of tropopause folding and clear-air turbulence with the GOES water vapor channel Tony Wimmers, Wayne Feltz Cooperative Institute.
ASAP In-Flight Icing Research at NCAR J. Haggerty, F. McDonough, J. Black, S. Landolt, C. Wolff, and S. Mueller In collaboration with: P. Minnis and W.
Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.
Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics INCA-CE ─ A Central European Initiative for Severe Weather Warnings and Improved Communication Strategies.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
Joint SRNWP/COST-717 WG-3 session, Lisbon Stefan Klink Data Assimilation Section Early results with rainfall assimilation.
 Federal Aviation Administration’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on certification of aircraft for operation in supercooled large drop (SLD) icing conditions.
Nowcasting Aircraft Icing Conditions Using GOES- Derived Cloud Products Cory A. Wolff Ben C. Bernstein Frank McDonough World Weather Research Program Symposium.
Forecasting the weather
4. GLM Algorithm Latency Testing 2. GLM Proxy Datasets Steve Goodman + others Burst Test 3. Data Error Handling Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) Lightning.
Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar.
A physical initialization algorithm for non-hydrostatic NWP models using radar derived rain rates Günther Haase Meteorological Institute, University of.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Nearcasting Severe Convection.
Gridded WAFS Icing Verification System Matt Strahan WAFC Washintgon.
Representation of low clouds/stratus in Aladin/AUT: Ongoing work and Outlook.
In-Flight Icing Products for Helicopters Ben C. Bernstein National Center for Atmospheric Research In-flight Icing Product Development Team FAA – Aviation.
Assimilating Cloudy Infrared Brightness Temperatures in High-Resolution Numerical Models Using Ensemble Data Assimilation Jason A. Otkin and Rebecca Cintineo.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
SIGMA: Diagnosis and Nowcasting of In-flight Icing – Improving Aircrew Awareness Through FLYSAFE Christine Le Bot Agathe Drouin Christian Pagé.
Water in the Atmosphere Section 3 Section 3: Precipitation Preview Key Ideas Forms of Precipitation Causes of Precipitation Measuring Precipitation Weather.
Actions & Activities Report PP8 – Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany 2.1Compilation of Meteorological Observations, 2.2Analysis of.
Section 12.3 – Gathering Weather Data
Precipitation Classification and Analysis from AMSU
Relevant publications
Overview of Downscaling
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
Recent developments in Latent Heat Nudging at DWD
Tony Wimmers, Wayne Feltz
A LATENT HEAT RETRIEVAL IN A RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING HURRICANE
Visible Satellite, Radar Precipitation, and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning
Turbulence-Related Products Robert Sharman NCAR/RAP
Upper Air Data The Atmosphere is 3D and can not be understood or forecast by using surface data alone.
Presentation transcript:

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld ADWICE Advanced Diagnosis and Warning system for aircraft ICing Environments C. Leifeld, T. Hauf Institute of Meteorology and Climatology (IMUK) University of Hannover, Germany A. Tafferner DLR Oberpfaffenhofen, Institute of Atmospheric Physics Wessling, Germany H. Leykauf DWD, German Weather Service, Business Unit Aviation Offenbach, Germany

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld Aircraft icing – a severe threat in aviation Icing is caused by supercooled liquid water drops cloud water drops  <50  m freezing drizzle  50  m – 500  m freezing rain  >500  m supercooled liquid drops hit and freeze on wings, propellers, etc. ice accretion rates up to several mm per minute are observed, ice accretion depends on atmospheric and aircraft parameters  severe reduction of aircraft performance is possible

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld Ice accretion DLR research aircrafts

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld Minimizing the icing hazard Ice removal: Technical anti-icing systems: heating the leading edges and using inflatable boots Ice avoidance: Meteorologists have to diagnose and forecast clouds and precipitation with icing potential supercooled liquid water (SLW) and its constituents –cloud drops, –drizzle and –rain. Ice removal: Technical anti-icing systems: heating the leading edges and using inflatable boots Ice avoidance: Meteorologists have to diagnose and forecast clouds and precipitation with icing potential supercooled liquid water (SLW) and its constituents –cloud drops, –drizzle and –rain.

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld How to forecast hazardous icing clouds ? Current NWP models do not forecast the SLWC with sufficient accuracy  Nowcasting systems like IIDA (NCAR) and ADWICE (IMUK, DLR, DWD) are under development. They rely on instant observations and modelling data. ADWICE uses the Local Model (LM) of the German Weather Service (DWD) full domain 325  325 grid points; 35 levels 7 km horizontal grid spacing humidity, temperature model data and parameterisation of moist convection observation data (SYNOP, METAR, RADAR)  Using empirical relationships between the data, ADWICE calculates location, intensity and type of icing. Current NWP models do not forecast the SLWC with sufficient accuracy  Nowcasting systems like IIDA (NCAR) and ADWICE (IMUK, DLR, DWD) are under development. They rely on instant observations and modelling data. ADWICE uses the Local Model (LM) of the German Weather Service (DWD) full domain 325  325 grid points; 35 levels 7 km horizontal grid spacing humidity, temperature model data and parameterisation of moist convection observation data (SYNOP, METAR, RADAR)  Using empirical relationships between the data, ADWICE calculates location, intensity and type of icing.

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld satellite data LWC... Icing Volumes Location (3D) Type (e.g. drops  ) Intensity (LWC) model humidity radar data SYNOP & METAR model temperature Nowcasting system ADWICE convection „Tiedtke“

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld ADWICE schedule Start ADWICE PIA 00 UTC Start LM Start ADWICE Prognostic Icing Algorithm (PIA) PIP Start LM Prognostic Icing Product (PIP) PIP Actual time: 03:15 UTC

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld Prognostic Icing Algorithm (ADWICE PIA) freezingconvectivestratiformgeneral Search/check model data for criteria for icing clouds of different types Prognostic Icing Product (PIP) ADWICE PIP FL UTC model data temperature relative humidity convection „Tiedtke“

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld ADWICE schedule Start ADWICE PIA 00 UTC Start LM Start ADWICE Prognostic Icing Algorithm (PIA) PIP Start LM Prognostic Icing Product (PIP) PIP DIP Start ADWICE Diagnostic Icing Algorithm (DIA) Available data at 06UTC: PIP, SYNOP, METAR, RADAR Diagnostic Icing Product (DIP) Actual time: 06:00 UTC

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld Diagnostic Icing Algorithm (ADWICE DIA) observation data SYNOP/METAR RADAR give information about possible atmospheric structures with icing clouds (cloud/weather/icing types)... model data temperature relative humidity convection „Tiedtke“ Search/check model data for typical structure (observation data) to get more detailed information Compare with PIP

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld ADWICE PIP is confirmed, rejected, changed or icing type is set Check cloud cover cloud base Correction of 3D cloud/icing position reject cloud/icing set cloud/icing freezingconvectivestratiformgeneral ADWICE Diagnostic Icing Product (DIP) with four different icing types: Four different icing types: freezing convective stratiform general ADWICE DIP FL UTC

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld SYNOP UTC N  4

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld Icing at UTC ADWICE DIP FL40ADWICE PIP FL40 Four different icing types: freezing convective stratiform general

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld PIREPS – important data source for validation Deficiencies of PIREPs Reporting and event time may differ, location and flight level very often are not precisely given, coding errors. Problems with validation of ADWICE Number of european PIREPs is too small For more information and other methods to validate ADWICE see poster „Methods of validating ADWICE“ AS11-1MO4P-0862 Deficiencies of PIREPs Reporting and event time may differ, location and flight level very often are not precisely given, coding errors. Problems with validation of ADWICE Number of european PIREPs is too small For more information and other methods to validate ADWICE see poster „Methods of validating ADWICE“ AS11-1MO4P-0862

Institute of Meteorology and Climatology University of HannoverEGS Nice, April 2003 Christoph Leifeld Conclusions The current version of ADWICE uses model data, SYNOP, METAR and radar data. Detection of cloudy and cloud free regions Improvement in forecasting and diagnosing clouds with SLWC Validation of ADWICE is done in single cases only because of lack of PIREPS. More PIREPS are needed. Currently ADWICE is in preoperational use at the DWD and provides helpful information. The current version of ADWICE uses model data, SYNOP, METAR and radar data. Detection of cloudy and cloud free regions Improvement in forecasting and diagnosing clouds with SLWC Validation of ADWICE is done in single cases only because of lack of PIREPS. More PIREPS are needed. Currently ADWICE is in preoperational use at the DWD and provides helpful information.