Groundwater Resources of Parowan Valley Tom M. Marston, U. S. Geological Survey In cooperation with the Utah Division of Water Rights.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John Walton Fall, Grows over shallow water table areas High amount of evapotranspiration Water balance component Q out of reach = Q into.
Advertisements

Patrick M. Lambert, U.S. Geological Survey, Utah Water Science Center 2011 Utah Water Users Workshop March 14-16, 2011 St. George Utah.
Evaporation (E) from Walker Lake, Nevada U.S. Geological Survey Walker River Basin Project Kip K. Allander: Project Hydrologist Thomas J. Lopes: Project.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A National Water Census You Can’t Manage What You Don’t Measure…
The Barton Springs Part of the Edwards Aquifer: Basic physical and hydrologic characteristics pertinent to permitted discharges Raymond Slade, Jr, Certified.
Curlew Valley Water Issues Public Meeting April 28, 2009.
Lost Creek Basin Aquifer Recharge and Storage Study Presented to: 2013 GSA Annual National Meeting October 27, 2013 Ralf Topper – Colorado Div. of Water.
Salt Lake Valley Groundwater Management Plan State of Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights.
Percolation Precipitation Abstract 70% of the population in Oregon lives above the seven major aquifer systems in the Willamette Valley. The seven primary.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Availability, Water Use, and the Great Lakes Compact Jim Nicholas, Director USGS Water Science.
“That’s Not A Levee Boil !” or “How to do more with less” By Glen Pearson, Northern District 2005 Annual Geology and Groundwater Meeting Geology and Groundwater.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Lake Evaporation using Energy Budget Method: Walker Lake, NV - a case study In cooperation with.
Cedar Valley, Utah County, Utah Cedar Valley Water Rights Management Plan Status and Review March 7, 2013 Teresa Wilhelmsen, P.E. UL/JR Regional Engineer.
Water.
Idaho Water Resources Research Institute
California’s Water Resources
Water-level monitoring and a groundwater model in the Big Wood River Valley Presented by Mike McVay November 5, 2012.
Proposed San Antonio Groundwater Availability Project Claudia Faunt and Matt Landon California Water Science Center U.S. Geological Survey.
Methods for the Estimation of Mine Infiltration Bruce Leavitt PE PG, Consulting Hydrogeologist Washington, Pennsylvania.
Surface Water & Groundwater Interactions Middle Reach of Russian River
Making the Linkage Between Water Management & Planning Rita P. Maguire, President and CEO ACMA 2006 Summer Conference July 27, Tucson, AZ.
Great Valley Water Resources Science Forum
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
Water Resource. Total Withdrawal: 134,000 Mgal/day Surface water : 63% Groundwater: 37% Irrigation Use: 39% of all freshwater withdrawal.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Sustainability of Ground-Water Use in the San Pedro River Basin, Cochise County, Arizona James Leenhouts,
Evapotranspiration (ET) in the Lower Walker River Basin, West- Central Nevada By Kip K. Allander, J. LaRue Smith, Michael J. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey,
Hydrogeologic Data Collection for Water-Resources Evaluation in Bedford County, Virginia Brad White, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Ground.
John Hoffmann Introduction to USGS Arizona Program and Hydrology USGSGeologyMappingBiologyWater Water-Science Centers.
Mississippi River Flood Plain prior to landscape modifications for agriculture Land Characterization:  Bottomland hardwood wetlands  Annual flooding.
Moab/Spanish Valley Public Meeting April 16, 2014.
Water for America Initiative Eric J. Evenson Advisory Committee on Water Information February 20, 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
DEQ Water Supply Planning Integrating Monitoring, Modeling, and Scientific Study with Adaptive Management and Planning.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Jack Eggleston and Verne Schneider June 22-23, 2013 Groundwater Science Potential.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Monitoring in the Lake Michigan Basin Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council.
WHY PUMPING IN BIG CHINO VALLEY THREATENS THE VERDE RIVER By William Meyer and Edward W. Wolfe January 28, 2009.
HEA 1738 IC as amended Water Resource Allocation and Distribution in Indiana IDNR Division of Water.
Northern Utah County Groundwater Northern Utah County Groundwater Management Plan Status and Review November 3, 2010 Teresa Wilhelmsen, P.E. UL/JR Regional.
A More Accurate and Powerful Tool for Managing Groundwater Resources and Predicting Land Subsidence: an application to Las Vegas Valley Zhang, Meijing.
Cedar Valley/ Northern Utah Valley July 9, Agenda   Background   Groundwater Hydrology   Current Conditions   Water Rights   Proposed.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Environment Committee September 13, 2011 Water Supply Work Plan for Clean Water Fund Activities.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Study For Malad and Bear Rivers Drainages, Box Elder County Bear River Water Conservancy.
Gilpin County Ground Water Level Review Nov. 16, 2006.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jim Nicholas, Center Director USGS Michigan Water Science Center U.S. Department of the Interior.
South Platte Decision Support System Colorado Water Conservation Board and Division of Water Resources.
Regional Integrated Science Projects - Opequon Creek/Shenandoah River Basins Agencies Involved – USGS Water, Geology, GIO/ Geography, and Biology Disciplines,
Kenneth D. Schmidt Principal Kenneth D. Schmidt & Associates.
Drainage Basin. Mississippi River Basin Drainage Basin.
Groundwater – Vital to Healthy Communities Steve Gaffield – Montgomery Associates Thomas Hovel – City of Fitchburg, WI Madeline Gotkowitz – Wisconsin Geological.
Prescott AMA Virtual Tour Prescott Active Management Area 2200 East Hillsdale Road Prescott, AZ (928)
Ogallala Formation (containing High Plains Aquifer): Deposited over 10 million years ago Coarse-grained sand, gravel, fine clay, silt, and sand 174,000.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
Direct vs. Indirect Water Usage Direct Drinking water Shower Watering your lawn Indirect Food Clothes.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Overview and Evaluation of the Current Hydrologic Data Network Scott Morlock USGS Indiana Water.
Ground-Water Management Plan Beryl Enterprise Area August 6, 2007 Sign up sheet.
Board of County Commissioners October 14, 2008 Vinzant Landing Swallet Santa Fe River.
Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.
Chapter 21 Water Supply, Use and Management. Groundwater and Streams Groundwater –Water found below the Earth’s surface, within the zone of saturation,
The Importance of Groundwater in Sustaining Streamflow in the Upper Colorado River Basin Matthew Miller Susan Buto, David Susong, Christine Rumsey, John.
Workshop on “Coastal Aquifer Management in the Caribbean” 14 th - 16 th December 2011 Trinidad and Tobago Workshop on “Coastal Aquifer Management in the.
2016 Water Inventory and Analysis Report Highlights on Land Use, Water Supply, and Water Budgets Christina Buck, PhD Water Resources Scientist Board of.
Creating a Generalized Hydrologic Water Budget for Cache Valley, UT/ID
Development and Application of a Groundwater-Flow Model of the Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifers, Aiken County, South Carolina to Support Water Resource.
Overview of Spokane- Coeur d’Alene Hydrology
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
Water Budget & Bank Storage
DEVELOPING A WATER BUDGET FOR MORGAN VALLEY, MORGAN COUNTY, UTAH
Groundwater Flow: Blackboard Example
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
Presentation transcript:

Groundwater Resources of Parowan Valley Tom M. Marston, U. S. Geological Survey In cooperation with the Utah Division of Water Rights

Parowan Valley Approx. 160 mi 2 Structural depression between Hurricane fault and the Red Hills Closed surface-water basin (aside from Winn Gap) – Little Salt Lake (playa) – Parowan Gap Historically flowing/artesian conditions for large area of central portion of valley Unconsolidated fill deposits are 1,000+ ft thick Background

Previous investigations – Thomas, H. E., and Taylor, G.H., 1946, Geology and ground-water resources of Cedar City and Parowan Valleys, Iron County, Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 993. Approximately 6,000 acre-ft of annual groundwater withdrawal Water-levels relatively stable – Bjorklund, L. J., Sumsion, C. T., and Sandberg, G. W., 1978, Ground-water Resources of the Parowan-Cedar City Drainage Basin, Iron County, Utah: Utah Department of Natural Resources Technical Publication No. 60. Approximately 34,000 acre-ft of annual groundwater withdrawal Water-levels in decline since early 1960’s

Ongoing Monitoring in Parowan Valley

(Water-Levels)

Ongoing Monitoring in Parowan Valley (Withdrawals) Withdrawal totals based on discharge/power use ratings (1963-present) Estimates of yearly withdrawals from 1940’s to present

Objectives Development of an updated groundwater budget for the valley fill aquifer Evaluation of current groundwater level and storage conditions, and changes since 1975 Evaluation of effects from historic changes in aquifer water levels and storage

The Water Budget Basic Components Recharge Mountain Infiltration Stream seepage on alluvial fans (non- growing season) Irrigation Valley precip (negl.) Change in storage Discharge Springs Evapotranspiration (mountain and valley) Captured runoff Withdrawals

Recharge Estimates of infiltration and runoff will be made using the Basin Characteristics Model (Flint and others, 2007; Flint and others, 2011) – Most valley recharge likely occurs as seepage on alluvial fans and subsurface mountain block groundwater Steam seepage to alluvial fans will be evaluated by using historically USGS stream gages on Summit, Parowan, Red, and Little Creeks. – Additionally discharge measurements will be made on the four creeks – Need assistance in understanding timing and placement of irrigation distributions

Little Creek USGS Natural Channel Little Creek Diversion and Distribution Structure

Red Creek Red Creek Reservoir North Fork Power Diversion South Fork Power Diversion Penstock Power Plant Red Creek Diversion and Distribution Structure Paragonah Culinary Spring

Parowan and Bowery Creeks USGS USGS Parowan Creek Diversion Structure Penstock Yankee Meadows Reservoir

Parowan Power Plant and Distribution Penstock Power Plant Parowan Creek Distribution Structure Natural Channel Parowan Creek Diversion Structure

Summit Creek USGS Summit Creek Diversion Structure Natural Channel Red Creek Distribution Structure

Changes in Storage Rates of storage change will be made on calculated changes in water-levels and estimated aquifer storage properties – Most valley recharge likely occurs as seepage on alluvial fans and subsurface mountain block groundwater Potentiometric map for Nov (complete) Change maps – Water year 2013 – MODFLOW model (GBCAAS) to estimate storage properties

Water-Levels Oct-Nov 1974

Water-Levels November 2012

Discharge Withdrawals from wells – Principally irrigation wells – 1965 through irrigation wells were visited triennially under the state-wide groundwater use monitoring program – New consumption estimates will be made on these wells (Summer 2013) – Flow meters installed on a portion of irrigation wells Evapotranspiration – Natural and Irrigation Water Quality – Irrigation wells – pH, SpC, Temp – Selected 25 wells – Major-ion chemistry, nutrients, stable isotopes

Irrigation Withdrawals Rated WellsMetered Wells

Evapotranspiration

Long-term groundwater declines since the mid-1960s Updated groundwater budget Re-characterization of aquifer chemistry Evaluation of effects of decreased water-levels Accurate measurements imperative to quality of data and decreased uncertainty Summary

William Wilson – Summit Creek Irrigation Kelly Stones – Parowan City Public Works Frank Lister – Red Creek Irrigation Tony Dalton – Little Creek Irrigation Acknowledgements

Tom Marston U. S. Geological Survey Utah Water Science Center