Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Advertisements

Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting.  Effective Teacher: An effective teacher consistently uses educational practices that foster the intellectual,
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Specialists and Licensed Professionals Spring Mini-Pilot Angela Kirby-Wehr.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness April 23, 2012 revision.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness 1.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Educator Effectiveness PSLA May 3, 2013.
Educator Effectiveness ACT 82 Overview 1. ACT 82 Within Act 82, new requirements for Educator Effectiveness have been defined for teachers, principals,
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
Differentiated Supervision
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness May 3, 2012 revision.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Differentiated Supervision
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
PAIUCC PAIUCC MEETING Terry Barnaby, Director Bureau of School Leadership and Teacher Quality.
Multi Measure Educator Effectiveness
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Non Teaching Professionals ½ Day Training. Act 82 of 2012 Passed on June 30, 2012 Defined Three Groups of Educators ◦ Teaching Professionals  Began
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Non-Teaching Professionals’ Effectiveness Dr. Patricia DiRienzo October 1, 2014.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness May 3, 2012 revision, modified.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Applying the Danielson Framework for Teaching to Specialists and Licensed Professionals A Guided.
The Three Buckets. #1 Classroom Teachers #2 Principals #3 Nonteaching Professional Employees.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness December 2012 revision 1.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness December 2012 revision 1.
CAIU 15 October 14,  Introductions ◦ Name, District, School(s), Years as a coach  Announcements ◦ Schedule of network meetings for this year ◦
Educator Performance Assessments ESE Spring Convening May 27 and 28, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
A framework for teaching (Danielson, 1996) Domain 2: The classroom environment – 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport – 2b: Establishing.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness:
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Act 82 Boot Camp Day 1 July 29 th, 2015 Angela Kirby-Wehr, Educator Effectiveness.
A Guided Review and Discussion
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  Evaluate educators based on their effectiveness in serving students  “Highly.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
PA-ETEP Overview for Teachers. Table of Contents  Registration Registration  Portal Navigation Portal Navigation  Notifications Notifications.
Educator Effectiveness Digging into Domain 4. Educator Effectiveness in PA  PDE has been working since 2010 to develop an educator effectiveness model.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Montgomery Township Board of Education
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Educator Effectiveness
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013

Measuring Educator Effectiveness What do you know? Define good instruction. Think…What do you know about Act 82. Pair…What does a partner think? Share…What are the generalizations.

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Act 82 – June 30, 2012 requires… Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness – – Observation/Evidence (50%) – Student Achievement (50%) Multiple Measures of Non-Teaching Professional Employee Effectiveness – – Observation/Evidence (80%) – Student Performance (20%) Multiple Measures of Principal Effectiveness – – Observation/Evidence (50%) – Student Performance (50%)

Measuring Educator Effectiveness School District Teachers Without Eligible PVAAS Score

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

The Framework Create a T chart. Name the four domains. Identify the 22 components. BONUS: A special prize is granted to the first group to correctly identify the 22 components in order.

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Non-Teaching Professional Employee Effectiveness beginning in Educational Specialists Licensed Professionals – local decision Individuals working under instructional certifications who do not provide direct instruction to students 19

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educational Specialists Educational Specialists are defined in Pennsylvania School Code with the scope of their certificates and assignments described in Certification and Staffing Polices and Guidelines (CSPGs). Currently CSPG 75 through 81 list the following specialist certifications: – Dental Hygienist – Elementary School Counselor – Home and School Visitor – Instructional Technology Specialist – Secondary School Counselor – School Nurse – School Psychologist PDE is in the process of working with stakeholder groups from across the Commonwealth to revise the Danielson Framework for Teaching to reflect the specific roles and functions of the identified specialist groups

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Licensed Professionals Given that many LEAs hire licensed professionals under teacher contracts who are not certificated as specialists under Pennsylvania School Code, PDE has made a decision to develop revised Danielson Framework for Teaching rubrics for the following roles: – Occupational Therapist – Physical Therapist – Social Workers – Behavior Analysts – Educational Interpreters PDE is in the process of working with stakeholder groups from across the Commonwealth to revise the Danielson Framework for Teaching to reflect the specific roles and functions of the identified licensed professionals.

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Individuals working under instructional certifications who do not provide direct instruction to students PDE has made the determination to classify individuals working under instructional certifications who do not provide direct instruction to students as non-teaching professionals as defined in Act 82. Given that they are working under an instructional certification they will be evaluated utilizing the Framework for Teaching. However, the observation component will constitute 80% and the multiple measures component will be 20% of professional’s evaluation. Additionally, they will not be evaluated under Act 82 until the fall of Examples – IU TAC hired under a teacher contract – IU Consultants hired under a teacher contract – Instructional/Curriculum coaches – Special education case-managers – Program Coordinators – Itinerant Teachers

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Non-Teaching Professional Employee Rating in

Measuring Educator Effectiveness What Leads to Teacher Growth (and student achievement)? Coaching or Rating?

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Danielson Framework 7

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Danielson Framework, Domain 3: Service Delivery

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Unpacking the Rubrics Examine your assigned performance level. What are the characteristics of this performance level?

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness – Observation/Evidence Classroom observations by Principal/Supervisor, including evidence that demonstrates behaviors associated with improving student achievement: – Planning and preparation, including selecting standards-based lesson goals and designing effective instruction and assessment; – Environment, including establishing a culture for learning and appropriate classroom management techniques that maximize instructional time; – Service Delivery, including the use of research-based strategies which engage students in meaningful learning and utilize assessment results to make decisions abut student needs; and – Professional Development, including using systems for managing student data and communicating with student families

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Professional Development for Teachers – Teachscape Teacher Effectiveness Series is available to registered users of the PDE SAS Portal. – Online training and 2 Act 48 hours – PDE Non Teaching Professionals Page – Standards Aligned Systems