Works Citied. How Has the War on Terrorism Affected Civil Liberties? Opposing Viewpoints Civil Liberties.2004. 160-161. Cole, David. The War on Terrorism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can we fight Terrorism with Force? Braunwarth. Some Pre-War Claims Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11 Saddam Hussein posed a direct threat to the.
Advertisements

Chapter Thirteen Crimes Against the State. Chapter Thirteen: Learning Objectives Understand how defining and applying crimes against the state reflects.
The American Legal System
Chapter 13 Crimes Against the State Joel Samaha, 9th Ed.
The constitution The way it relates to you and me.
THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
The USA PATRIOT Act By Alex Braeuer, KyoungEun Jeong, Judith Martin, Gisela Torrenti.
1 The Patriot Act After 9/11 Attorney General John Ashcroft recommended a series of laws to fight terrorism. George Bush signed this Act into law in Oct.
Acronym for: Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (Wow, that’s a mouthful)
THE USA PATRIOT ACT AND THE DOMESTIC WAR ON TERROR Essential Questions: What limits should be put on the executive branch to carry out the domestic war.
USA PATRIOT ACT: Is it a legitimate law to protect national security or is it a violation of your Civil Liberties? Essential Question:
Patriot Act October 26, United (and) Strengthening America (by) Providing appropriate tools required (to) intercept (and) obstruct Terrorism Act.
Chapter 17 Law and Terrorism.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 9a– Homeland Security and Civil Liberties: USA Patriot Act.
Chapter 15.  Focus on stopping illegal acts before they occur– not after the commission of crime  Cannot afford to allow the catastrophic acts of terrorism.
Effects of Counterterrorism Legislation post 09/11 James J. Clements Honors Colloquium May 3 rd, 2007.
The Patriot ACt. Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.
USA PATRIOT ACT USA PATRIOT ACT
Agenda March 2 Twin Towers vs. Pearl Harbor Discussion.
13.1 Chapter 13 Privacy © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
Chapter 15 Counter-terrorism. Introduction  United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.
Law I Chapter 17. Law and Terrorism Pages
Unitary Executive Remember the words of Article I: All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall.
Chapter 3, Section 4 U.S. Government 2013
The 21 st Century Begins Present Chapter 32.
+ Protecting Individual Liberties Section 1 Chapter 14.
Law and Terrorism “The laws will thus not be silent in time of war, but they will speak with a somewhat different voice.” Chief Justice Rehnquist.
1 Copyright © 2011 M. E. Kabay, J. Tower-Pierce & P. R. Stephenson. All rights reserved. The U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act CJ341 – Cyberlaw & Cybercrime Lecture.
The Patriot Act Protecting the US or Violating People’s Freedoms.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2
Section 411 ‘Patriot Act’ violates 1st Amendment Permits guilt to be imposed solely on the basis of political associations protected by 1st Amendment.
JUSTICE  The principle of fairness: the idea of moral equality. Criminal Justice Today  The proper ordering of things and persons within a society.
American Government and Organization PS1301 Wednesday, 3 December.
Copyright 2006 Prentice Hall Prentice Hall PoliticalScienceInteractive Magleby et al. Government by the People Chapter 20 Special Topic The War on Terrorism.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2
The Bush Doctrine US Foreign and Domestic Policy Into.
Today’s Issues America and Canada Ch What Title would you give this picture? What action do you see in the Photo? What do you think this represents?
Chapter Five Civil Liberties. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.5 | 2 The Politics of Civil Liberties Civil liberties: protections.
“Congress lets the NSA run Amok” Jeffrey Rosen. Congress, NSA and President: Congress, NSA and President: Let Courts Deal with It Two NSA programs: 1)
ABUSE OF POWER BY OUR GOVERNMENT By Vinay Mathur.
Patriot Act (2002)Patriot Act (2002) Dylan Plassmeyer-Pd:8.
Bell Ringer At last year’s Super Bowl, the government secretly used face recognition software on people attending the event by using surveillance cameras.
Civil Liberties. Civil Liberties: Definition Personal freedoms (expressed and implied) that are protected for all individuals and that generally deal.
Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 2.
First 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Today’s Issues: The US and Canada Ch. 8 Intro to Geography.
STUDENT RIGHTS MINI-WRITE On a half sheet of paper write at least two paragraphs on the following questions: What rights do you have when you come to school?
Unit 2: Chapter 17.  Attacks on September 11, 2001 shook America to its core  Largest on U.S. soil since World War II  Feeling of vulnerability  Congress.
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Chapter 20.
NDAA The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.
Ruqayya Y Khan, Trinity University
Law and Terrorism Chapter 17.
Understanding the Constitution
U.S. and Texas Politics and Constitution Civil Liberties I February 3, 2015 J. Bryan Cole POLS 1336.
Bill of Rights.
Legal Implications.
Networking 2002 USA-Patriot Act Tracy Mitrano Cornell University
Protection Or Violation ?
What is terrorism? There is no agreed definition of terrorism internationally. The UK’s Terrorism Act 2000, defines terrorism as: The use or threat of.
War on Terror.
LIB 323 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
“To Illiberalize or Not to Illiberalize, that is the question.”
Chapter 3, Section 4 U.S. Government 2015
DO NOW.
Chapter 13 Globalization and Terrorism: Our Small World
I. September 11, 2001.
The Surveillance State
Modern America 1982—Present PART 5 OF 5
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2
Presentation transcript:

Works Citied

How Has the War on Terrorism Affected Civil Liberties? Opposing Viewpoints Civil Liberties Cole, David. The War on Terrorism Has Eroded Civil Liberties. Opposing Viewpoints

Works citied. Ashcroft, John. The War on Terrorism Has Not Eroded Civil Liberties. Opposing Viewpoints Civil Liberties The next two sections in this book are also good.

Chapter Preface What does the USA PATRIOT stand for? Supports of this act argue that it is needed for the US security because… Opponents of this act argue that it is an erosion of Civil Liberties because…

The War on Terrorism Has Eroded Civil Liberties. Write down the three questions on page 162. Partners take turns writing down the answers and reading. Answer the questions as you read along. Discuss with your partner.

The War on Terrorism has Not Eroded Civil Liberties. Write the three questions on page 173. Partners take turns reading and answering the questions.

Answers to the questions Chapter Preface. What does USA PATRIOT stand for? This stands for United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act.

Chapter Preface Supporters of the USA PATRIOT claim that with this act, tools are given to law enforcement to fight counterfeiting, smuggling and money laundering. Also this act gives the US intelligent community the ability to share information. It is a deterrent to potential terrorists because of penalties.

Supports also claim That the most controversial provisions will expire.

Opponents of the USA PATRIOT Act It defines terrorism in very broad terms so much so that it could possibly include anti war demonstrators, and citizens engage in civil disobedience. This act also lets the government detain and deport noncitizens. Government can conduct secret searches, for example looking into business records without evidence of a wrong doing.

Opponents The government can eavesdrop on Internet communications. Look at religious and political organizations. Protestors of the USA PATRIOT Act argue that the government is acting like a police state.

OPPONENTS Senator Russ Feingold pointed out that the framers of the Constitution wrote a document that limits powers of the federal government and we have a “Bill of Rights” to insure liberty in times of war and peace.

The War on Terrorism has Eroded civil Liberties Question 1. The most troubling provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act are: the greatest threat to our freedoms is our own government. The Bush administration has overridden our constitutional liberties in the name of freedom.

Question 1 con’t Internet tracking is being allowed instead of privacy. Physical liberty and habeas corpus survive only until you are labeled a bad guy. Property is being seized without a hearing. Ethnic profiling is happening.

Question 1 con’t Conversations with lawyers are being monitored.

Question 2 Noncitizens should be given same basic rights because if the government can detain these people without a hearing, bar them from entering the country based upon their speech, deports people because they are a disfavored group what will stop the government from taking the next step and doing the same to it’s citizens.

Questions # 3 The Bush Administration final line of defense that a person who is a national security risk warrants a response by the government. The world is more dangerous today than yesterday with more and more of America’s enemies have access to weapons of mass destruction.

Question #3 con’t In light of this new danger we should hold the people who are committing acts of terrorism accountable. Not an entire group of people based on their ethnic,, political or religious identity. Next the government should not be able to imprison anybody without public review. There must also be public oversight of law enforcement powers.

Question #3, con’t We should only adopt those measures that we would be willing to do to us. Stop repeating the same mistakes over and over again.

The War on Terrorism Has not Eroded Civil Liberties Question #1 The terrorist enemy is unlike what we have known before because they slaughter thousands of innocence victims. They seek weapons of mass destruction. They are in you communities looking for their opportunity to kill. They enjoy our freedoms. We are war with an

Question #1, con’t Enemy who abuses individual rights. Defending our country against terrorists attacks is the government’s #1 priority.

Question #2 THE PURPOSE OF THE FOREIGN TERRORIST TRACKING TASK FORCE IS TO PREVENT TERRORISTS FROM ENTERING THE COUNTRY AND TO LOCATE AND REMOVE THOSE WHO ALREADY HAVE.

QUESTION #3 THE US GOVERNEMTN DEFINES A TERRIORIST AS ONE WHO PERPETRATE PREMEDIATATED, POLITICALLY MOTIVATED VIOLENCE AGAINST NONCOMBANT TARGETS.