TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
The Teacher Work Sample
PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
Dr. Pratibha Gupta Associate professor Deptt. of Community Medicine ELMC & H, Lucknow.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
July 28, 2011 Nancy Nation & Mirna Whidden.  What do you associate with the word assessment??
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Emporia State University Ken Weaver (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The.
Critical Thinking and Knowledge of Subject Matter
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
Department of Education
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Also referred to as: Self-directed learning Autonomous learning
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
 Implementing Best Practice Strategies New Licensed Staff Induction Program.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
EDUCATE ALABAMA & PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PLAN Oak Mountain High School
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Guidelines For successful Portfolio Implementation by Melissa Wood.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria. Connected to:  Beginning teacher evaluation  Experienced teacher evaluation  Induction / Mentoring  Professional.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Office of Service Quality
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Director of Mathematics, Coppell ISD Mary Kemper.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Competency Assessment
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
February 21-22, 2018.
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Presentation transcript:

TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS

The Mission of the Teacher Work Sample The TWS measures the ability to: Construct and deliver an instructional unit Construct challenging and meaningful assessments Adapt instruction to meet student needs Measure learning gains and achievement Analyze and reflect on teaching decisions and results TWS

The TWS Vision TWS The TWS Vision is to: Connect the performance of candidates to PK-12 student learning Assess candidate performance relative to national, state, and institutional standards Provide a framework for teacher professional development Develop self-assessment & reflection skills

Preparation for the TWS TWS Completing a TWS became a requirement for all student teachers & interns beginning Spring Elementary interns learn about the TWS process beginning in Block 1 classes. During Block 2 (first P. D. S. semester), interns prepare a sample reading TWS using elements of the TWS design. Elementary (Block 3) complete a TWS as part of the EL431 Secondary (Phase 1) complete a “Practice” TWS (prior to student teaching). Secondary (Phase 2) complete a TWS as part of the ED431 course. ESU supervisors will provide appropriate assistance to interns. Mentor teachers/supervisors may provide assistance as provided by the TWS Assistance Policy.

The Seven Factors

The Seven Kansas Performance Assessment Factors Reflected in the TWS Each TWS needs to provide proof of meeting the following standards. Contextual Information & Learning Environment Unit Learning Goals & Objectives Factors Instructional Design & Implementation Demonstration of Integration Skills Analysis of Classroom Learning Environment Analysis of Assessment Procedures Reflection & Self-Evaluation

Factor 1: Contextual Information & Learning Environment Educational Purposes Increase teacher’s concept of classroom diversity Link information about diversity to instructional design Measurement Purpose: Provide information about teacher’s awareness of contextual factors and ultimately data to examine their ability to function as a professional in a diverse setting. Rubric used by scorers

Factor 2: Unit Learning Goals and Objectives Educational Purposes Promote use of more challenging instruction for all P-12 pupils Promote use, interpretation, and application of Kansas Content Standards and District Standards Encourage teachers to avoid “knowledge only” targets Measurement Purpose: Aid in interpretation of gain scores (i.e., what type and presentation of learning does the gain score represent) Rubric used by scorers

Factor 3: Instructional Design & Implementation Educational Purposes Link instructional design to learning objectives Encourage teachers to design challenging lessons that: Impact learning for all students Address different learning styles Incorporate a wide range of reading abilities Incorporate technology Use learning centered environment Measurement Purpose: Ensure that teachers understand and use a variety of appropriate instructional strategies Rubric used by scorers

Factor 4: Demonstration of Integration Skills Educational Purposes: Demonstrate the ability to integrate across and within content fields Demonstrate the ability to teach thinking skills Measurement Purpose: Ensure that teachers can facilitate all students’ abilities to understand relationships between subject areas Rubric used by scorers

Factor 5: Analysis of Classroom Learning Environment Educational Purposes: Provide opportunity for teachers to link learning results to classroom efforts Promote teacher reflection on the impact the unit had on individual small group and whole group learning Provide evidence of a sufficient classroom management plan Measurement Purpose: Ensure teachers provide a classroom environment supportive of student interaction in learning activities Rubric used by scorers

Factor 6: Analysis of Assessment Procedures Educational Purposes: Promote link between learning objectives and assessments Encourage the use of different assessment formats Encourage the use of challenging assessments Measurement Purposes: Encourage teachers to avoid using simple knowledge based assessment unless appropriate Teachers can present some representation of calculating student gain scores Rubric used by scorers

Factor 7: Reflection and Self-Evaluation Educational Purposes: Promote analysis and synthesis of all activities Promote professional development Promote a better understanding of the implications for the state assessment and accreditation process on the teacher’s classroom Measurement Purposes: Estimate the degree to which the unit was successful Demonstrate that the teacher can successfully evaluate the effects of his or her choices and actions Rubric used by scorers

Review the assessor guidelines Click on the link

Check your scoring biases Step 1 Traits of an Excellent Teacher Work Sample biases Step 2 Traits of a Poor Teacher Work Sample biases Step 3 Record your PERSONAL BIAS HIT LIST