Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
6105 Counseling CWO3 Walls Legal Services Support Team MCAS Cherry Point Administrative Law Section.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Differentiated Supervision
Professional Development Recognition Programme Robyn Dymock Education Co-ordinator March 2009.
Compliance Monitoring Audit Tutorial Version 1.0 April 2013.
ADEPT Framework
By: Farzad Dadgari Soil and Environmental Specialist SWHISA.
College of Liberal Arts Tenure and Promotion workshop: Dossier Preparation 21 March 2014.
PAS…. The Second Observation Cycle Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation Cycles for.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
February 28, 2008The Teaching Center, Washington University The Teaching Citation Program & Creating a Teaching Portfolio Beth Fisher, Ph.D. Assistant.
District Meeting # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching: Part 2 Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum April 8, 2013.
Chairperson’s Evaluation of Faculty Training Session April 11, 2006 (The YSU/YSU-OEA Agreement is the definitive source on the chairperson’s evaluation.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Anne Hanley Director of Graduate Studies Department of History Northern Illinois University The Teaching Portfolio for Ph.D Candidacy Examinations.
Practicum Supervision What College Supervisors and Students Need to Know about the Practicum.
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Nuts & Bolts Tri 3 AHEP - Getting to the End of the Year!
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
My Learning Plan Observation and Appraisal SYStem
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston, MA Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
A guide for holders of initial and transitional certificates
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Faculty Evaluation Plan
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Introduction to Core Professionalism
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
HEYWORTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS
HSSD Teacher Evaluation Process
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Teaching Assistant Evaluations

Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the school year. Revisions are being made for the second year, It will include ALL untenured TA’s (approximately 100) and a sample of tenured TA’s (50) in all 3 instructional divisions.

What does the contract say? ARTICLE IV M. Evaluations – Teaching Assistants 1 – 5, including an Evaluation Form (handout)

THREE ‘TYPES’ OF EVALUATION Supervisor Evaluation Growth Plan Project Plan

The ‘RUBRIC’ Handout of the Capital Region BOCES Teaching Assistant Evaluation Form (5 pages)

4 Domains of the Rubric Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instructional Environment Professional Responsibility –4 levels of performance (Unsatisfactory, Basic, Proficient, Distinguished) and Not Applicable

The “Supervisor Evaluation” Form The purpose The frequency To fill it in entirely, or concentrate on only a few of the elements? Where is it filed?

Using the Supervisor Evaluation Form All of the 14 elements are of equal importance The document should be as complete as possible Use the narrative space to provide context This is ONE of the tools and sources of information used to evaluate an individual

When a TA is Encountering Difficulty May wish to use the “TA’s Encountering Difficulty” guidelines (Handout) It is NOT required to be written or submitted, however it is advised that if serious or long-standing, a written document be produced and signed by both parties and forwarded to HR

Resolving Differences of Opinion About Performance The TA has the option of writing a rebuttal. If the TA refuses to sign, the supervisor so notes, and includes the date. Chain of command should be followed.

Growth Plan TA reflects on their practice, and marks each element Instead of “Comments”, they write their “Evidence” Conversation with supervisor follows Each writes a section on the last page

Growth Plan (continued) Starts with TA review of the rubrics and where they think they are performing. The conversation with the supervisor is a ‘jumping off point’ for at least one goal related to the rubric. The goal should relate to an element in the rubric. The last page records the area selected for growth and includes the Plan, the Timeline, the Materials, if any, and the Evidence of completion. All growth goals must relate to one of the four areas and at least one of the elements in the rubric.

Project Plan An individual or group PROJECT (handout) A project is typically an activity, event, detailed plan or course of action related to the students served. Must be agreed to (in writing) early in the year selected Whose priority can it be?

Additional Clarification No separate Summative Narrative Evaluation at the end of the year – submit the actual form instead Scope of pilot How will we monitor and evaluate the pilot this year? TA’s to be included on the APPR Committee during the pilot year