Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

Impacts of the New Boiler MACT Rules Les Oakes King & Spalding.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Energy and the Environment: Likely Winners & Losers in the Second Obama Administration ACG Breakfast - December 14, 2012 Copyright © by N.W. Bernstein.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
CAIR & MATS 2012 Southern Sectional AWMA Annual Meeting & Technical Conference September 12, 2012 Chris Goodman, P.E. Environmental Strategy.
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
1 Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA Region 4 PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 14 th Annual Power Generation.
MCIC Workshop 2012 Complying with NC Air Quality Regulations Boiler MACT/GACT and 112j Steve Schliesser Division of Air Quality Environmental Engineer.
Michael Hopkins Assistant Chief, Permitting Ohio EPA Update on GHG Permitting in Region V.
Wes Thornhill, Chief Industrial Chemicals Section Air Division
Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern Section AWMA Conference Callaway Gardens, GA Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern.
Division of Air Quality Update on EPA Boiler MACT Rules Steve Schliesser Environmental Engineer March 2012.
April 15, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
1 Year in Review: Clean Air Act Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 Things Are Getting Really Complicated.
EPA Rulemakings to Set GHG Emission Standards for Power Plants National Hydropower Association Webinar Kyle Danish February 14, 2014.
Air Protection Branch 1. 2 Air Quality Activities Support the Mission of the Air Protection Branch Monitor and Report Air Quality Data Analysis and Planning.
EPA Regulations On Electric Utility Generating Units (EGU)
Reducing Toxic Pollution from Power Plants March 16, 2011 EPA’s Proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana Energy Association September 11, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
Setting the Stage: The Clean Air Act’s Opportunities and Challenges NASUCA Annual Meeting November 11, 2012 Bill Becker, National Association of Clean.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Pennsylvania Draft Regulations for the Control of Mercury From Coal-fired Electric Generating Units Allegheny Section- AWMA Air Quality Issues Workshop.
Reducing Toxic Pollution from Power Plants April 13, 2011 EPA’s Proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.
Overview of Environmental Regulations and Drought Impacts in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT July 13, 2015.
American Legislative Exchange Council America’s Clean Air Success Story and the Implications of Overregulation November 28, 2012 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E.,
Massachusetts’ Power Plant Mercury Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection WESTAR Fall Business Meeting - September.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Air Emission Benefits of CHP Air Innovations Conference August 10, 2004 Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc. Prepared under contract.
Reducing Toxic Pollution from Power Plants EPA’s Proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards March 22, 2011.
Presented By: Suruchi Verma, University of New Orleans Bhaskar Kura, University of New Orleans.
GHG Regulations Update AWMA Southern Section September 12, 2012 Biloxi, MS Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority EPA – Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
Analysis of Existing and Potential Regulatory Requirements and Emission Control Options for the Silver Lake Power Plant APPA Engineering & Operations Technical.
Electric Utility Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Second Rule Development Workshop December 5, 2007 Department of Environmental Protection Division of.
Clean Air Update GA AWMA REGULATORY UPDATE CONFERENCE Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Beverly Banister Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division U.S. Environmental.
Bill Harnett March 30, 2010 WESTAR Spring Meeting.
UTILITY MACT WORKING GROUP STATE AND LOCAL STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS.
Air & Waste Management Association September 13, 2012 The Cahaba Lilies Photo by Danny Smith U.S. Environmental Policy Issues and the Natural Gas Solution.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
Assessment of Mercury Rules for Electric Generators in North Carolina September 9, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission – Air Quality.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
NACAA Fall Meeting October 2012 Innovative and Replicable Initiatives - The Colorado Clean Air/Clean Jobs Act Will Allison, Director CDPHE Air Pollution.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment February 12, 2015 Tegan B. Treadaway Assistant Secretary Office of.
WRAP States Four Factor Reasonable Progress Lee Gribovicz WRAP IWG Meeting March 10, 2009.
Massachusetts’ 4-Pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Innovations Conference - August.
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
1 Recommendations of the Clean Energy Group on Utility MACT Issues Utility MACT FACA Meeting September 9, 2002 Robert LaCount The Clean Energy Group The.
24 th Annual Sustainability and Environmental, Health & Safety Symposium March 25, 2015 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of Environmental.
Air Pollution Challenges Kentucky Coal Association April 29, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
2.14.  In 1970 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established  Required to set and enforce air quality standards  Air quality standard –
Portland Cement NESHAPs & NSPS, and Related Solid Waste Combustion Rules David L. Jones Eastern Kern APCD November 4, 2011 California Desert Air Working.
© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP Overview of the EPA Clean Power Plan Suzanne Beaudette Murray February 19, 2016 Tulane Environmental Law Summit.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
The Clean Power Plan.  Standards of Performance for GHG Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources (111(b)).  Carbon Pollution.
Tampa Electric Company’s Emission Reduction Program
Clean Air Act Litigation Update State Air Director Meeting May 2015
Steve Page Office Director, OAQPS NACAA Spring Meeting 2010
Reducing Air Pollution
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Department of Environmental Quality
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
Air Pollutants 200 Air pollutants are recognized and assessed by the USEPA Listed in the Clean Air Act.
Presentation transcript:

Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality in the Paso del Norte Air Basin 1

Recent EPA Rulemaking Activity ACTION ON TWO FRONTS OVER PAST YEAR: 1.Targeted Emission Reductions from Industry  Industrial Boilers, Cement Kilns and Incinerators  Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE)  Mercury and Air Toxics Standards  Carbon Controls on New Power Plants 2.More Protective National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)  New PM2.5 Standards 2

The Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS) OVERVIEW Industry Affected: Coal and Oil Fueled Power Plants Pollutants Targeted: Metals (Mercury, Chromium, Nickel), Acid Gases (HF and HCl), Particulate Matter Rule Effective Date: April 16, 2012 Compliance Date: New Sources – Immediately upon start-up; Existing Sources April 16, 2015 (up to two years extension possible for electricity reliability and other factors) Cost Benefit: $9.6 billion annual cost. $37 - $90 billion annual health benefits. 3

Proven control technologies include scrubbers, fabric filters, and activated carbon injection and are widely available Many units already use one or more of these technologies Some plants will upgrade existing controls (e.g. electrostatic precipitators) Some plants may also install new controls (e.g. fabric filters, dry sorbent injection, or activated carbon injection) Sources Can Achieve These Standards

Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for NEW Power Plants OVERVIEW Industry Affected: NEW Electric Power Plants Pollutants Targeted: Carbon Dioxide (GHG) Rule Effective Date: PROPOSED March 27, 2012 Compliance Date: Unknown. Rule not yet final. 5

Highlights of Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard Proposes output-based emission standard of 1,000 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour (lb CO2 /MWh gross). Applies to new: Fossil fuel-fired boilers, Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) units, and Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) units. New combined cycle natural gas power plants could meet the standard without add-on controls. New coal or petroleum coke power plants would need to incorporate carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). The proposal includes an alternative 30-year compliance period to allow these new plants to incorporate CCS at a later date to reach compliance. New power plants that use Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) would have the option to use a 30-year average of CO2 emissions to meet the proposed standard, rather than meeting the annual standard each year. 6

New Standards for Industrial Boilers, Incinerators and Cement Kilns INDUSTRIAL BOILERS OVERVIEW Industry Affected: All industrial boilers (but less than 1% will need to meet numerical emission limits – the rest: best practices) Pollutants Targeted: Metals (Mercury, Chromium, Nickel), Particulate Matter, HCl, SO2, CO Rule Effective Date: March 2011; adjustments December 12, 2012 Compliance Date: Existing Major Sources (up to one year extension possible). Existing Area Sources – March 21, 2014 Cost Benefit: $13 to $29 health benefit for every dollar spent on compliance. Technical Assistance: U.S. DOE Clean Energy Application Centers (e.g. CHP); USDA on biomass burning. 7

New Standards for Industrial Boilers, Incinerators and Cement Kilns Industrial Boilers There are more than 1.5 million boilers in the U.S. For 86 percent of all boilers in the United States, these rules would not apply, because these boilers burn clean natural gas at area source facilities and emit little pollution. For almost 13 percent of all boilers in the United States, EPA’s standards would continue to rely on practical, cost-effective work practice standards to reduce emissions. For the highest emitting 0.4 percent of all boilers in the United States, including boilers located at refineries, chemical plants, and other industrial facilities, EPA is proposing more targeted revised emissions limits that provide industry practical, protective, cost- effective options to meet the standards. Boilers with design heat input greater than 250 MMBtu/hour most impacted by monitoring requirements, etc. Gas-fired and small (<10 MMBtu hour not required to install controls).8

Compliance Deadlines for Boilers The existing major source boilers that are subject to numerical emission limits will have until early 2016 to comply with the standards and, if needed, they may request an additional year. Existing area source boilers will have until March 21, 2014 to comply with these standards, if needed they may request an additional year. For Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) units, existing incinerators have to comply no later than early New incinerators will need to meet the standards 180 days following publication in the Federal Register. 9

Improving Air Quality Intended Designations Region 6 Areas EPA Intends to Designate Nonattainment for 1-hr SO2 NAAQS (based on data) NO 2 /SO 2 2NDY PMO3PbNO 2 SO 2 CO CURRENT MAR 2012 OCT 2006 MAR 2008 OCT 2008 JAN 2010 JUN 2010 JUN 2011 PROPOSED MAR 2017 JUN JAN 2014 AUG 2015 FEB 2016 JUL 2016 FINAL DEC 2017 DEC NOV 2014 MAY 2016 NOV 2016 APR 2017 NAAQS Schedules