 Two proposals were submitted to EPA under Recovery Act Funding for National Clean Diesel Campaign (NCDC)  Both for demonstrating “EPA Emerging Technology”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Nonattainment Area Elected Officials and City and County Managers and Planners.
Advertisements

State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond April 7, 2005.
Applications Request for Applications (vs request for proposals) Check for options to submit appropriately Check for appropriate request Location of project.
Robert Tekniepe Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management Air Quality Forum November 14, 2006 Clean Diesel Strategies.
Clean Diesel Construction Requirements of the Port Authority of NY & NJ Dorian Bailey, Supervisor Chemical/Environmental Testing Engineering Department.
Center for Air Quality Studies SmartWay ℠ Applications for Cross-Border Drayage Trucks By Monica Beard-Raymond, Carlos Duran, Joe Zietsman, Reza Farzaneh,
Retrofit Emission Control Technologies for On-Road, Off-Road, and Stationary Diesel Engines Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association May 2000.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Clean Diesel: How, Why, and the Money Wes McQuiddy Environmental Protection Agency Blue Skyways Collaborative Coordinator.
PM 2.5 Advance Path Forward Transportation Advisory Committee June 12, 2014.
Biodiesel Production: Government Regulations (IL) Barry Latham, M.A.Ed. Biodiesel Production & Curriculum Chemistry & Physics Instructor Chicago Heights,
Reducing Emissions from Existing Trucks and Buses
Briefing on Recent Emission Control Developments May, 2000 Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association.
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD DIESEL EMISSIONS STANDARDS AL UPTON BUTTE COUNTY FLEET MANAGER  Four separate rules apply to Public Agencies  On-Road.
Cleaning Up Diesel in the Bay Area What Are the Sources? What are the Clean-Up Opportunities? Patricia Monahan Senior Analyst, Clean Vehicles Program.
PM Control Strategies for Mobile Sources Presentation for PM2.5 Implementation Workshop June 21, 2007 Gary Dolce U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and.
How will Current Regulations be Revised to Improve Air Quality? Randy Wood October 21, 2003 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
EPA Funding Opportunities Tyler Cooley Air Division - Clean Energy & Climate Change Office U.S. EPA, Region 9 1 July 9, 2015.
Connie Ruth May 21, Presentation Overview What is the DERA Program? What is the DERA Tribal Program? Where you can get more information? FY 2015.
Comprised of eight Central Valley counties: San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Kings, Tulare and the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin portion.
New York City Clean Transportation CMAQ Program Mark Simon Alternate Fuels Program New York City DOT December, 2004
Reducing Emissions from Existing Diesel Engines (AKA Retrofit) STAPPA/ ALAPCO May 7, 2002 Pam Jones Coeur D’Alene, Idaho Diesel Technology Forum
National Clean Diesel Campaign Clean Diesel Programs: Overview Halida Hatic U.S. EPA New England April 7, 2008.
OTC Mobile Source Committee OTC Committee Meeting September 2009 Buffalo, New York 1.
Air Quality Division TERP (8377) Page 1 Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) Workshop Air Quality Division.
0 Office of Transportation and Air Quality Update for Air Directors: Transportation and Air Quality Christopher Grundler Deputy Director NACAA Spring Meeting.
2015 Northern California Clean Cities Funding Workshop Low Carbon Transportation Investments and Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) July 9,
PUBLIC WORKSHOP DIESEL ENGINE IDLE REDUCTION STANDARD March 19, 2008 Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Resource Management.
Working together for clean air Central Puget Sound Diesel Emission Reduction Program Dave Kircher Manager, Air Resources Department June 7, 2007 Dave Kircher.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
Updated 11/14/11 Carolyn Watkins, Office of Environmental Education Carolina Prado, Division of.
EPA Clean Diesel Engine Implementation Workshop Kevin Otto Cummins Inc. August 6-7, 2003.
EPA Funding for Diesel Emission Reductions Matt Laurita EPA Region 2 October 4, 2013.
Technology For 2007 And Beyond Dr. Steve Charlton Executive Director – Advanced Engineering Cummins Inc.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Clean Ports USA Trish Koman March 17, 2010.
NCDC Funding: Philadelphia Port Equipment Project Presented By: Eric Cheung, Esq. Senior Attorney, Clean Air Council Coordinator, Philadelphia Diesel Difference.
Southeast Diesel Collaborative Alabama Clean Fuels Coalition Moving Alabama Forward Workshop March 17, 2010 Dale Aspy, EPA Region 4.
The Status and Future of Transportation Fuel Technologies for Wisconsin Maria Redmond Wisconsin State Energy Office 2013 Sustainability Summit and Exposition.
1 Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Updated 10/26/11 Carolyn Watkins, Office of Environmental Education Carolina Prado, Division of Air.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Upcoming Funding Opportunities Rosalva Tapia June 3, 2009 National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Management Conference 2009.
WRAP Offroad Mobile Source Retrofit Program Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City November 10, 2004.
A competitive grant program that provides incentives to upgrade or replace older on-road heavy-duty vehicles, non- road equipment, locomotives, marine.
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair & Conference May 5, 2015 Page 1 Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) Air Quality Division May 2015.
Emissions Solutions Al Gray Technical Communicator Cashman Equipment.
1 MAPS. Counties With Monitors Violating Alternate 8-hour Ozone Standards of and parts per million 398 counties violate.075 ppm 135 additional.
California’s Efforts to Address Air Quality Impacts Related to Goods Movement Activities.
Update on Vehicle Emissions Research California Air Resources Board Board Hearing, April 23 rd
EPA CLEAN DIESEL ENGINE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP CHUCK SALTER AUGUST 6-7, 2003.
Office of Transportation & Air Quality Voluntary Diesel Retrofit Program January 27, 2005 “Reducing emissions from all diesel engines”
Transforming Transit in California October 22, 2015 CalACT Fall Conference and Bus Show Rohnert Park, CA Tony Brasil, Chief Heavy Duty Diesel Implementation.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
July 21, Today’s Proposed Action Approve ozone SIP revisions for South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Reasonable Further Progress Transportation.
2013 Priorities January 25, Overview of 2013 Board Actions State implementation plans Climate change: plan update, regulatory actions, sustainable.
Diesel Retrofit Projects: An Introduction National Tribal Forum on Air Quality April 19, 2007 Ken Cronin.
1 South Coast AQMD Staff Comments on Proposed Regulation for In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicles South Coast Air Quality Management District Agenda Item No.
DIESEL EXHAUST EMISSIONS
30th Space Wing Team Vandenberg - HAWKS 1 California Airborne Toxic Control Measures for Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines John Gilliland.
November 15, Clean Air Act Framework National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) set public health goals Planning process considers science,
Air Quality Division May 2016 Page 1 Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP): Helping to Keep the Air Clean in Texas.
1 Mobile Sources Work Group Final Report - PM 2.5 SIP Brian Newbacher Dir. of Public Affairs, AAA Chair, Mobile Sources Work Group June 12, 2007 NOACA.
AB 118 Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) Proposed 2011 Funding Plan Air Resources Board Meeting July 21, 2011 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
1 Proposed Amendments to the Verification Procedure for In-Use Diesel Emission Control Strategies August 23, 2012 California Environmental Protection Agency.
Proposed Research Plan Fiscal Year Today’s Proposed Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Allocate $6 million in four research.
Office of Transportation and Air Quality, USEPA National Association of Clean Air Agencies Fall Membership Meeting October 20, 2008.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO ENHANCE TERP PARTICIPATION IN THE NETAC AREA John Grant, Sue Kemball-Cook, Greg Yarwood 1.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N The Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program Peter Ward Electric Drive Workshop.
PM Control Strategies for Mobile Sources
Administered statewide by: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Presentation transcript:

 Two proposals were submitted to EPA under Recovery Act Funding for National Clean Diesel Campaign (NCDC)  Both for demonstrating “EPA Emerging Technology”  Most of the current EPA or CARB “Verified Technologies” only capable of PM, HC/CO reduction, not NOx  EPA: $20 millions allocated for Emerging Technology under Recovery Act  EPA: Still have $3-4 millions regular funding annually

1.Emissions Reduction by Retrofitting Caterpillar 3500 Marine Diesel Engines with 3500 Emissions Upgrade Group: Field Demonstration of Tier 1 Kit 2.Emissions Reduction by Retrofitting Onroad Diesel Vehicles and Offroad Diesel Equipment with Three Different Types of Emerging Technologies

 RFGA status (RFGA-14, 17, 18)  Project status  Financials

 QuantLogic, “Reducing Emissions from Drayage Trucks”  Eaton, “Electrification for Engine-Off Operations of Trucks in Ports”  ESW, “Combination Engine and Aftertreatment Technology”  NETT Technologies, “Low Temperature Off-Road SCR”  NETT Technologies, “Low Temperature On-Road SCR”  Clean Diesel Technologies, “Verification Advanced SCR Control Strategies”  Clean Air Systems, “All Temperature SCR System”, Project started Contracting phase, delayed due to their supplier Contracting phase, IP language negotiation

CompanyProject Topic Maximum Approval $ CaterpillarCaterpillar 3406 Emissions Upgrade Group$740,647 EMDCommon Rail Fuel System $750,000 FEVRetrofit Solid SCR System for NOx Reduction $750,000 EatonReformer, LNT and SCR based Aftertreatment System $654,703  Initial Award: 4 proposals from 34 submitted ($2.895 million)  Very conservative when recommended  Uncertainty about availability of funding based on the request from TCEQ(a $4.6 million reduction)  Additional award recommendations: 2 proposals ($1.46 million)  A budget reduction will not occur,  Tinnerman/Shadowood, TEC2010 reformer/LNT/SCR  Haynes, Locomotive fuel system retrofit with electronic unit injection system

 April 6 - May 6  Received: 36,  ETAC review: 35  TCEQ eligibility: 30  Under 6 technical categories  Focused research  Engine combustion  Fuel modification  Urea-SCR  HC-SCR, LNT  Hybrid

 Available funding: $4.15 million  Total NTRD funding requested: $21.14 million  Focused research: $2,874,991  Engine combustion: $2,460,932  Fuel modification: $4,145,291  Urea-SCR: $4,785,374  HC-SCR, LNT: $4,041,255  Hybrid: $2,833,158  Additional RFGA-17 awards further reduce available funding

CompanyProject Topic Funding Requested Donaldson Non-Road Retrofit PM/SCR System Development $ 750,000 and Verification Engine Control Integration, Demonstration and Initial Verification Systemof a Combined Retrofit SCR-DPF System for $ 462,332 HD Highway Diesel Vehicles Johnson Matthey SCRT& SCCRT Verification $200,000 Nett Demonstration and Verification of BlueMAX PLUS SCR Emission Control System for Off-Road Applications $ 471,631 MIRATECH Verification Testing of a 50% NOx Emissions Reduction $ 400,000 Kit for Marine EMD Diesel Engines ISEHybrid Drive Development, Characterization and Verification for Shuttle Bus and heavy-Duty $ 748,409 Vehicle Applications  Proposals for or with verification

 RFGA-18 (open duration: 4/6/09– 5/6/09)  Cost effective system approaches  Long term sustainable approaches that OEM will likely continue  Competitive technology in market place  Last RFGA in FY09  RFGA-19 (will NOT proceed)  Cost effective enabling technologies  OBD (To address requirement from EPA)  Controls  Energy recovery  May use for future RFGA

 RFGA status (RFGA-14, 17, 18)  Project status  Financials

 32 active projects,  8 completed projects.  Additional 15 projects are scheduled to finish by the end of June  Final reports  9 projects  Project under verification testing  N-06, Johnson Matthey Onroad SCCRT System  N-03, NETT Onroad and Offroad BlueMAX SCR System  N-09, ECS DOC and SCR for ON-road

 Technology Verification Status  EPA Emerging Technology List update  Eight “Emerging Technology” from five NTRD projects  NETT-N06:Off-road SCR, and On-road SCR,  Johnson Matthey-N03: On-road SCR,  ESW-N23: DOC for Marine application,  Caterpillar-N38: 3500 Marine Emissions Upgrade Group,  ECS-N23: Urea based SCR System.  One project did accelerated aging to meet EPA durability requirement  Johnson Matthey SCRT technology, N-03

 Pluggable Hybrid Electric Terminal Tractor (with cleaner diesel)  Tested at the Port of Houston

 2008 EPA Emerging Technology List Update  Six “Emerging Technology”, three from NTRD projects  NTRD funded 50% on the list  > $1 million EPA fund known to be invested to implement them in Texas fleets

 2009 EPA Emerging Technology List Update  Eleven “Emerging Technology”, eight from NTRD projects  73% from NTRD funded  Optimistic estimates, > $3.5 million EPA fund to be invested to implement them in Texas fleets  Investment from Federal funds on NTRD funded technologies will quickly catch up or exceed NTRD investment  Verified technologies  Emerging Technology Status  Recovery Act Funds, regular NCDC funds

 RFGA status (RFGA-14, 17, 18)  Project status  Financials

 Additional awards under RFGA-17: 2 proposals ($1.46 million) CompanyProject Topic Max NTRD Funding Tinnerman/Shadowood, TEC2010 NOx Compliance $ 750,000 without the Use of Urea Haynes,Marine and Inland Port NOx Reduction through Optimization, Verification and $ 710,259 Certification of Three Locomotive Types

CompanyProject Topic Max NTRD Funding Donaldson Non-Road Retrofit PM/SCR System Development $ 750,000 and Verification Engine Control Integration, Demonstration and Initial Verification Systemof a Combined Retrofit SCR-DPF System for $ 462,332 HD Highway Diesel Vehicles Johnson Matthey SCRT& SCCRT Verification $200,000 Nett Demonstration and Verification of BlueMAX PLUS SCR Emission Control System for Off-Road Applications $ 471,631 MIRATECH Verification Testing of a 50% NOx Emissions Reduction $ 400,000 Kit for Marine EMD Diesel Engines ISEHybrid Drive Development, Characterization and Verification for Shuttle Bus and heavy-Duty $ 748,409 Vehicle Applications  RFGA-18 awards: 6 proposals ($3.032 million)

 Appointment of Donald Lewis to the ETAC  Fleet manager and coordinator of the Alternative Fuels Group for the Texas Department of Transportation