Arrowhead Weston Transmission Line Project Dave Van House Minnesota Power
Description & Overview 220 mile 345,000 volt electric transmission line Approved by the Minnesota and Wisconsin regulators in 2001 Construction Began in Minnesota February 2004 Construction to Begin in Wisconsin Fall 2004 Construction scheduled to be completed in 2008
Why was it proposed? Reliability!! Improves Regional System Security Provides Maintenance & Operational Flexibility Allows Customers Greater Access to Generation Sources
Minnesota Minnesota’s electric network is tied to neighboring states. If Wisconsin has a problem, Minnesota has a problem. Minnesota Power customers have been knocked off line by electric system disturbances related to the weak Minnesota- Wisconsin connection.
Recent Regional Problems June 11, 1997 June 25, 1998 June 10, 1999
IMPACT OF June 25, 1998 DISTURBANCE IN MAPP ■ 60+ TRANSMISSION LINES TRIPPED ■ 4,000+ MW OF GENERATION LOST ■ More Than 39,000+ CUSTOMERS AFFECTED IN NW ONTARIO ■ BLACK OUT TO 113,000 CUSTOMERS ■ 650 MW OF LOAD LOST ■ 270 MW OF Generation Lost
Wisconsin Actions 1997 events raise concerns about electric supply reliability in Wisconsin Wisconsin utilities and regulators form Wisconsin Reliability Assessment Organization (WRAO) WRAO forms engineering group to study alternatives - WIRES group
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DETAILED POWER FLOWS SIMULATION GENERATOR RESPONSE DYNAMIC STABILITY VOLTAGE STABILITY IMPACT ON MAPP CONSTRUCTION COSTS LOSS EVALUATION
Power Flow Analysis Reactive Voltage Support Requirements Steady State Maximum Transfer capability Sensitivity to Modeling Assumptions Transmission System Loss Analysis
Generator Response Mechanical Stress on Weston Generator Shaft ■ Large Phase Angle Across MAPP MAIN Interface ■ Eau Claire Arpin Line Switching ■ Instanteous change in Power output
Dynamic Stability Ability of Systems Generators to remain synchronized and recover from Major System Disturbance MAPP WUMS Disturbances Loss of New Facilities Impact on Existing Limiting Conditions Dynamic Reactive Support Requirements
Voltage Stability Ability of the System to Maintain Adequate Voltage Following a Disturbance Without Adequate Voltage Support System can Experience ■ Increased Current Demand (P = VI) ■ Slowly Declining Voltage ■ Loss of Voltage Sensitive Loads ■ Voltage Collapse
Engineering to Support Permitting Calculation of; ■ AUDIBLE NOISE ■ ELECTRIC FIELD ■ MAGNETIC FIELD Analysis of Potential Farm Impacts ■ Stray Voltage ■ Earth Currents
Magnetic Field Electric Field Spark Discharge Multiple Routes Multiple Structures Multiple Circuits Multiple Flows Future Years EMF Issues
Transmission Line Noise Due to Corona Discharge ■ Electric Field at surface of the conductor exceeds the breakdown strength of air ■ Generates light, audible noise radio noise and energy losses Mitigation ■ Increase Conductor Surface area Larger Conductors Multiple conductors
Substation Noise Monitoring Long Term Short Term Existing Equipment Impact of Additions
Arrowhead Substation Noise
Other Engineering Issues Differential GPS Interference ( Precision Farming ) Electric & Magnetic Field ■ Impacts on Pacemakers and implantable Defibulators ■ Impacts on Railroad, Pipeline and AM Radio Transmitter sites
Opposition to the project: l Save Our Unique Lands l Citizens Utility Board l Wisconsin Environmental Decade l North American Water Office l Hillside Dairy l World Organization of Landowner Freedom
Common Utility Corridor
Visual Impact Of Crossing
Existing 161 kV H-Frame
954 ACSR 2-Conductor Bundle with Shield Wire
Single 3M Composite Conductor
Post Permit Studies Equipment Specification Construction Support Analysis Operating studies
Equipment Specifications Transient studies ■ Breaker Switching Duties Shunt Reactor Shunt Capacitor 345 & 230 kV line breakers ■ Capacitor Bank Switching Issues Voltage Magnification ■ Insulation Coordination Surge Arrester rating & placement Equipment BIL requirements Line Insulation
Construction Impact Studies Constructability ■ Line outage concerns ■ Maintenance issues ■ Ownership Issues Increased Cost Landowner Opposition
Operating Studies Determination of Operating Limits ■ Reactive Support Requirements Shunt Capacitor location optimization ■ Line Loadability Issues System Intact and Post Contingency ■ Phase Shifter Requirements Line load sharing optimization Post Contingency requirements ■ New Flow-Gate Limits System Intact and Post Contingency
Summary Operating experience has shown there is a significant risk to electrical reliability in the upper Midwest and Wisconsin Engineering study commissioned through Assembly Act 204 WRAO recommendation Arrowhead Weston 345 kV Line
Summary The Arrowhead-Weston Project will substantially alleviate the reliability problems being experienced due to the weak electrical tie between the upper Midwest and Wisconsin. It will also provide import capability for Wisconsin to meet its emergency power supply requirements.