Unit 5 The Structures of English (2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 3a Clause functions Adapted from Mary Laughren.
Advertisements

Syntactic Complexity and Cohesion
Introduction to Syntax
L AUREA S PECIALISTICA I NFORMAZIONE, E DITORIA E G IORNALISMO A.A. 2014/15 L INGUA I NGLESE D OTT. E NRICO G RAZZI C ORSO PROGREDITO (6 C FU ) L ESSONS.
The Discourse Analysis of an Extract from Jane Eyre By Group 7
Discourse Martin Hassel KTH NADA Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm
Corpus 06 Discourse Characteristics. Reasons why discourse studies are not corpus-based: 1. Many discourse features cannot be identified automatically.
Reference and inference By: Esra’a Rawah
UAB UNIVERSITY WRITING CENTER Improving Word Choice.
TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR An introduction. LINGUISTICS Linguistics Traditional Before 1930 Structural 40s -50s Transformational ((Chomsky 1957.
Dr. Ansa Hameed Syntax (4).
Writing on Formal and Informal Language
Pragmatics A: I have a fourteen year old son B: Well that's all right A: I also have a dog B: Oh I'm sorry There are some aspects of meaning which are.
March 1, 2009 Dr. Muhammed Al-Mulhem 1 ICS 482 Natural Language Processing INTRODUCTION Muhammed Al-Mulhem March 1, 2009.
Constituents  Sentence has internal structure  The structures are represented in our mind  Words in a sentence are grouped into units, and these units.
LIN1180/LIN5082 Semantics Lecture 3
What is discourse analysis?
Lecture 12: 22/6/1435 Natural language processing Lecturer/ Kawther Abas 363CS – Artificial Intelligence.
SYNTAX Lecture -1 SMRITI SINGH.
Mtra. Martha Lorena Obermeier Pérez Febrero, 2013.
Cognition & Language Claudia Stanny PSY What is Cognition? Processes of knowing  Attending  Remembering  Reasoning Content of these processes.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 24, April 3, 2007.
Culturally Diverse Narratives for Oral Storytelling and Literacy University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders.
A formula for creating effective expository paragraphs
Metalanguage Revision English language year
UB LIS 571 Soergel Lecture 6.2b Document analysis for retrieval and information extraction Dagobert Soergel Department of Library and Information Studies.
第十四章 替代与省略  内容提要: ◆替代 ◆省略. 替代  Substitution is a grammatical device for avoiding repetition and achieving textual cohesion. There are three kinds of.
Grammatical Cohesion Cohesive relations in and between sentences create texture, which makes a set of sentences a text Cohesive relations in text are constructed.
1 Cohesion + Coherence Lecture 9 MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English.
HYMES (1964) He developed the concept that culture, language and social context are clearly interrelated and strongly rejected the idea of viewing language.
Pragmatics.
Culture , Language and Communication
Chapter Thirteen Rhetorical and Critical Analyses: Understanding Text And Image In Words.
Making it stick together…
1 Syntax 2. 2 Now let’s change the NP rule again Such that we have – S  NP VP – VP  V NP – NP  (DET) (ADJ) N Now you can diagram this sentence – The.
Pragmatics and Text Analysis Lecture 6. Pragmatics is the study of language usage from a functional perspective and is concerned with the principles that.
L AUREA M AGISTRALE L.M. 19 I NFORMAZIONE, E DITORIA E G IORNALISMO A.A. 2015/16 L INGUA I NGLESE D OTT. E NRICO G RAZZI C ORSO PROGREDITO (6 C FU ) L.
Language let loose upon the world
Yule: “Words themselves do not refer to anything, people refer” Reference and inference Pragmatics: Reference and inference.
Natural conversation “When we investigate how dialogues actually work, as found in recordings of natural speech, we are often in for a surprise. We are.
Differences between Spoken and Written Discourse
Grammatical and lexical coherence in writing group Done by: O`rinboyeva M. Checked by : RasulovaS.
The final chapter.  Constituents ◦ Natural groupings of a sentence  Morphemes ◦ Smallest meaningful units of a word  How to test whether a group of.
REFERENCE AND INFERENCE Words themselves do not refer to anything, people refer.
Semantics Lecture 5. Semantics Language uses a system of linguistic signs, each of which is a combination of meaning and phonological and/or orthographic.
Lesson 3 and 4 Grammatical cohesion. Grammatical Cohesion These are the grammatical words (function) words that are used to link sentences across an entire.
Differences between Spoken and Written Discourse Source: Paltridge, p.p
Focus on the following stages in order to build your PEEEL paragraphs for your assessment. Ensure that you check the assessment question with your teacher.
Discourse Analysis 11th, 12th Meeting Dra. Sri Mulatsih, M.Pd.
HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER TRAINING WORKSHOP
Lecturer : Ms. Abrar Mujaddidi S YNTAX. I NTRODUCTION  In the previous chapter, we moved from the general categories and concepts of traditional grammar,
Chapter 4 Syntax a branch of linguistics that studies how words are combined to form sentences and the rules that govern the formation of sentences.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 King Faisal University.
Plato’s Cratylus 2 distinct views A) – Language is natural B) - Language is conventional.
Analysis of spontaneous speech
课件名称:词义和语境 制作人:孙红梅、张培成 单位:曲阜师范大学外国语学院
Laurea Magistrale L. M. 19 Informazione, Editoria e Giornalismo A. A
Zeno Vendler and Traditional Epistemology
Discourse Analysis & Grammar
Introduction to Linguistics
Cohesion Reference Substitution Ellipsis Conjunction Lexical cohesion.
Discourse Analysis Setyo Prasiyanto C., S.S., M.Pd.
David Kauchak CS159 – Spring 2019
Pragmatics: Reference and inference
Coherence and Cohesion in Academic Writing
References by: Dania Abbas M. Ali
Approaches to Teaching and Learning
Deixis Saja S. Athamna
Presentation transcript:

Unit 5 The Structures of English (2)

The Structures of English (2) Unit5 The Structures of English (2)

Review: What is meant by IC analysis? What are ‘surface structure’ and ‘deep structure’? Analyze how the following sentence is ambiguous: Flying planes can be dangerous.

IC analysis Flying planes can be dangerous flying planes

Labeled tree diagram S VP NP VP Adj AdjPc ?? N AUX V flying planes can dangerous

Deep Structure 1 Flying planes can be dangerous NP VP AdjP N flying

Deep Structure 2 S NP VP S’ NP VP N Aux V planes (are) flying can be dangerous

Contents 6.1 English paragraphs 6.2 English texts 6.3 Cohesion in English texts 6.4 Turn taking in English conversations

6.1 English paragraphs PP. 87-88

6.2 English texts P. 88 Discuss PP. 90-91 No. 2

6.3 Cohesion in English texts Sentence connection a. Conjoining (coordination) b. Embedding (subordination)

Means of cohesion(衔接): a. Lexically ( repetition, synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy--reiteration) b. Grammatically (ellipsis, substitution, reference) c. Logically (connectives)

Identify the cohesive devices in the following passage: A latest survey has been held among some citizens from Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou about the Internet’s influence on people’s habit of reading. The research shows that 40% of them have strong belief that it will replace the book as the sole source of information, but the remaining 60% argue that the Internet will coexist with the traditional means of information transmission. I agree with the latter.

Discuss P. 93 No. 6

Reference deserves further elaboration here Reference deserves further elaboration here. The first distinction can be drawn between endophoric reference and exophoric reference. While the former points to a relation between an entity in the situational context and a linguistic item in the text (as in “He is the man you want to see!” said when the mentioned person comes over to the speaker), the latter refers to the relation between two linguistic items in the same text.

For endophoric reference, further distinction is attempted between anaphoric reference and cataphoric reference. The former involves a relation between a preceding referential expression or an antecedent and the current pronominal item (as in “John loves Jane. He takes great care of her. This is known to all.”) , whereas the latter denotes a relation between the current pronominal item and the later occurring expression (as in “This is what John does for Jane: he sends a bunch of roses to her every day.”) .

Discuss P. 90 No. 1

6.4 Turn taking in English conversations In conversation, dialogue rather than monologue dominates. Conversationalists take turns speaking. The chance to speak is technically termed as floor. The current speaker may try to maintain the floor, or give up the floor. While the next speaker may opt to interrupt in order to seize the floor, he or she can wait to be nominated by the current speaker, or take the hints from him such as a long pause, a gesture, a gaze, etc.

An initiation, say a question or a request, by the first speaker and the response by the second speaker, like an answer to the question and a compliance with the request, form an adjacency pair. If the second part of the adjacency pair is positive, it is preferred; if the second part of the adjacency pair is negative, it is dispreferred. The latter is characterized by the use of such signals as “well”, hesitation markers like “erm”, pauses, explanations or accounts, etc.

Discuss PP. 91-92 No. 3, 4

Presentation session Phatic communion in English and Chinese

Assignments: P. 95 No. 9 P. 98 No. 5