Data-link: Fact and Fiction Kim O’Neil Advanced Aviation Technology Ltd. www.aatl.net.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Competency-Based Training Solutions in a non-standardized world APATS September 2009 Capt. Kris Van den Bergh Vice-President Pilot Provisioning.
Advertisements

ATC Simulation as an integral part of ensuring Operational Safety David Webb Air Systems.
Eurocontrol HQ, Brussels September 13-14, 2011 Belgian Civil Aviation Auhtority General Directorate Aviation Belgian approach related to unmanned aircraft.
AVIATION SAFETY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME
Experiences on the road to Fatigue Risk Management Regulation
Slide 1 NEWSKY – NEtWorking the SKY for aeronautical communications Michael Schnell, Sandro Scalise German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Communications.
1 © TriaGnoSys GmbH - All rights reserved The Role of Satellites and Passenger Communications for Future Air Traffic Management Markus Werner TriaGnoSys.
ATFM Priorities Evaluation Study Alison Hudgell QinetiQ
Service Technique de la Navigation Aérienne NexSAT: Mission Hypothesis 20 may, 2003 STNA/31 ATM issues at horizon 2015 over ECAC Capacity: - VHF spectrum.
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
PETAL A major step Towards Cooperative Air Traffic Services Patrice BEHIER Manager of the Air/ground Co operative ATS Programme Directorate Infrastructure,
Page 1STNApresentation of data-link activities DATA-LINK IMPLEMENTATION IN FRANCE Initial data-link services with ACARS - Departure Clearance, ATIS - CPDLC.
Mission Trajectory Step 1 From planning to deployment.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
ATN ‘99, London, 23 September 1999 David Russell ATS Market Manager, SITA AIRCOM SITA AIRCOM Data Link Service.
Air-Ground Data Link - DFS Strategy
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-40/PIA-4 Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application.
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.
Integrated information and telecommunications solutions AIRCOM Implementation VHF Digital Link Presented by Philip Clinch to ATN 2001 Conference 19 September.
Civil/Military Users: Whose Airspace is it Anyway? Kim O’Neil Advanced Aviation Technology Ltd. AAT.
1st ASAS-Thematic Network 2 Workshop Malmoe 26th-28 th September 2005 “Implementation planning and future packages” Session Moderator: Giorgio MATRELLA.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
SPECTRUM STRATEGY & VISION ICAO ACP WG-F October 2014 Raffi Khatcherian EUROCONTROL DPS/POL Spectrum Management SESAR WP Spectrum Project.
What SMS means for an Operator’s relationship with the CAA
1 Introduction of new electronic systems for aviation Thor Breien, Dr. Ing Park Air Systems AS Presented by Linda Lavik.
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
The World of General Aviation. International Council of Aircraft Owner and Pilot Associations Founded 1962 Founded Countries 61 Countries 470,000.
ATN Subnetwork Implementation:
6Th International Conference ICAO Global Aviation Training Office
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
EEC-ATI (V2) 1 ATN2002 CONFERENCE LINK2000+ ATN2002 CONFERENCE LINK2000+ LINK2000+ European ATS Provider Benefits Real-time Simulation Results ATN2002.
Proposal to the MDM.032 Working Group Y Morier Meeting
Page Lufthansa ASAS It's Time for a paradigm change... Workshop May 2003, Rome
Can our ATM systems cope?
CRISTAL ATSAW Project Sep 2007 ASAS TN Christelle Pianetti, DSNA Simona Canu-Chiesa, Airbus.
Clustering ASAS Applications ASAS-TN2 First Workshop, Malmö 26 to 28 September 2005 Fraser McGibbon BAE Systems.
FANS-1/A and ATN Data Link: An Avionics Perspective Bob Kerr
NORTH ATLANTIC ADS WAYPOINT REPORTING TRIALS. John Coulson NATS Infrastructure Services.
International Data Link Symposium st October 2003, Newbury, UK FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CIVIL AVIATION DATA LINK FOR ADS-B BASED ON MIDS / LINK16 Bob.
Overcoming The Challenges Together Fred Brisbois Director, Aviation & Product Safety Sikorsky Aircraft REDUCING THE ACCIDENT RATE.
- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.
Human Factors Concerns for Design & Performance of Warnings J.L.Harbluk & P.C. Burns Ergonomics & Crash Avoidance, Transport Canada Human Factors Forum.
The CASCADE Programme From Concept to Operations ASAS-TN Malmö September 2005 Alex Wandels CASCADE Programme Manager, EUROCONTROL European Organisation.
Direction générale de l’Aviation civile centre d’Études de la navigation aérienne First ASAS thematic network workshop The user’s expectations and concerns.
CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC PROBLEM SOLVING CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC 2008.
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
Airlines and Aircraft Airline Services Airline Evaluation Airline Contracts.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office SAFETY MANAGEMENT The ICAO perspective Michel Béland ICAO Regional Safety.
SSAP The European Strategic Safety Action Plan (SSAP) The History & Rationale.
Certification Considerations for the Implementation of ASAS Applications on Aircraft Kevin Hallworth: UK CAA ASAS-TN Seminar – October 2004.
Next VVSG Training Standards 101 October 15-17, 2007 Mark Skall National Institute of Standards and Technology
Ensuring the Safety of Future Developments
Boeing and Airborne Surveillance. Page 2 Boeing and Airborne Surveillance Some good news………….and some other news.
A consolidated starting point from DFS / AENA / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Toulouse, Is ASAS /ADS-B needed for ANSP strategy?
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 rd -25 th April 2007 ASAS-SEP Applications Airborne Implementation Overall Architectural Considerations.
A Lightweight Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Plan Motahareh Moravej Issuers’ Affairs Director at CSDI PHD. Student of Computer Engineering, UT.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
IATA’s Role – Implementation of Safety Activities
NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES
Spectrum issues and challenges, not on the specific agenda for WRC-19
Safeguarding flight data and locating/recovering on-board recorders
Rome November 2008 Johan Martensson, CASCADE
Ground System implication for ASAS implementation
Presented at ICAO ACP WG-I By Robin Hughes
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
ATN Subnetwork Implementation:
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
Peter Simpson Head of Safety, Security, Quality & Environment SCOOT
Presentation transcript:

Data-link: Fact and Fiction Kim O’Neil Advanced Aviation Technology Ltd.

Data-link: Fact & Fiction F Decision Process F Safety F Key Factors F Comparison of Data-links F Conclusions…….

Decision Process F Who Chooses? –ICAO? CAAs? Airlines? Eurocontrol? ECAC? F What Criteria? –Safety? Cost? Benefits? Functionality? –Commercial Interest? Spectrum Efficiency? –Political expediency? Vested Interest? –……...or something else?

Decision Process F Probable Answer: All of the above……. F Implies - No Perfect Solution –i.e. some one’s going to be unhappy…….. F Also implies - A LOT of Confusion!

Decision Process F WHAT Application?……. –CPDLC? –AOC? –ASAS? ADS-B? Etc. Etc. F Different Datalinks for each? –Aerials???? F Or one Datalink for all?

Safety F Is Safety an Issue? –Application dependent F Typical Factors: –Integrity –Reliability –Availability –Communication delays –Security

Certification F Certification: –Equipment, installation, maintenance –People, procedures, safety management –HMI, human factors….. –Operations….. –Applications…….

Certification F “End to End” Certification? F Implies certification of Network –NEVER been done before……. F “Legally” impossible –Outside authority of CAAs…. F Regulators will have to work hard……..

Certification F Certification Necessary –e.g. for time critical applications F If no application safety standards –then no operational certification….. F Conformance is NOT Safety F Safety Cases are not enough…….

Decision Factors F Many Players: –Airlines –ATC –Telecom providers –Manufacturers F Many priorities –Consensus difficult F Vested Interests….

Decision Factors F Commitment?: –Airlines watch service providers –Service providers watch ATC –ATC watch airlines……… –Manufacturers watch everyone. F Or lack of comittment? F CAAs not installing VDL2 –BUT want others to…….

Decisions: VDL mode 4 F Russia –Entire Surveillance System –Communication Services, more……. F European States –Intensive evaluation and trials…. –NEAN/NUP, FARAWAY etc. etc. etc. –CPDLC over VDL4 prototypes

Functionality F CPDLC: –A long road –Required functionality depends on timescales…. –“Quick Fix” may be counter-productive –Beware dead-end solutions F NEED a highly adaptable data-link

Spectrum Efficiency F Key Issues: –NEED 25 kHz service –Essential for frequency planning –No interference to voice –Frequency re-use –Capacity –No special protection

Transition F LONG Transition period F NEED a Transition Strategy F MUST coexist with existing system F VDL2&3 increase pressure on spectrum F ACARS to VDL2 requires more frequencies F CPDLC and AOC share frequencies????

Feasibility F VDL mode 4 widely demonstrated –100,000 flight hours on commercial aircraft –many demonstrations, evaluations, simulations –including CPDLC! F VDL mode 2? F VDL mode 3?

Cost/Benefits F Airlines sensitive to costs –Equipment, installation, certification –Maintenance, crew training, –Operating fees………. F Minimal cost to ATC –Favourable contracts with service providers F Communication providers business drivers: –Want to expand and want more spectrum…..

Cost/Benefits F NEED to address entire operational life –the future? F Ideally fit ONLY one data-link –with operational redundancy F NEED to compare datalink options –assess each against future needs –calculate the cost –“guestimate” the benefits

Comparing Datalinks…. Global StandardVDL2VDL3VDL4 Block to BlockNoNoYes AvailabilityNoYesYes IntegrityYesYesYes RobustnessNo?Yes Spectrum EfficiencyNoNoYes CapacityNoNoYes Future NeedsNo?Yes Transition??Yes

Conclusions F ICAO sets Standards –Does not mandate technologies –States decide F VDL 2 has severe limitations F VDL 3 has limitations …..and when? –Risk loss of both Voice and Data –Transition?

Conclusions F VDL mode 4 meets known requirements F VDL mode 4 widely demonstrated F VDL mode 4 can provide CDTI and ASAS –Situation Awareness essential for CPDLC F VDL mode 4 meets time critical requirements F VDL mode 4 has higher capacity F VDL mode 4 has graceful degradation

Conclusions F VDL mode 4: –Spectrum Efficient –High capacity –Long range –Redundant –Robust –Expansible F VDL mode 4 provides Seamless Transition

The End! Thank You! (updated paper at