Program Viability Study Program Review Red Deer College ACCC Symposium February 2004.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.

Advertisements

Culture of Collaboration Cultivating a Campus Environment for Assessment.

WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.

Essentials of Enrolment Management and Planned Organizational Change Presentation to the National Conference of the RCCFC November 3, 2006 Victoria J.

Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.

PROJECT INFORMATION PUBLIC OUTREACH WHO IS INVOLVED?

AQIP Status Report An Overview and Discussion. Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey November 2000 AQIP admission 2002 First action projects submitted September.

How is IT workload viewed? A. Independent collection of resource consuming activities. B. IT unilateral decisions to fit IT view of needs. C. First In-First.

President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.

Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.

Review of Appendix 27, 27A, & 27B FA Background In AY the following changes to Appendix 16 were approved: – elimination of the reconsideration.

The Middle States Accreditation and Review Process & the ESC Self-Study Center for Distance Learning Craig Lamb – Director of Academic Support Val Chukhlomin.

Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.

Multiple Associate Degrees - Proposed New Policy 3 rd AGC Presentation & VOTE April 9,

Professional Development Day October 2009 Data Matters! Finding and Accessing Information at SPC.

A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator.

Higher Education Opportunity Act Measuring Performance Next Steps Higher Education Advisory Committee November 7, 2011 Jim Alessio Higher Education Restructuring.

University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.

1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.

PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.

A.A./GEN ED PROGRAM REVIEW Karen Borglum, Ed.D. Assistant Vice President Curriculum and Articulation.

LeBaron Woodyard Dean, Academic Affairs October 30, 2013 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHIEF INSTRUCTIONAL OFFICERS FALL 2013 CONFERENCE.

Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.

University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.

Foothill College Educational Master Planning June 9, 2015.

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.

Best Practices: Enrollment Management Plan Lorie Hach Director of Student Success Lisa McLaughlin Institutional Data Coordinator.

Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.

Presented by: Tram Vo-Kumamoto, VP of Instruction Roundtable February 23, 2015.

University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.

Right-Sizing Academic Affairs The New Normal at Appalachian State University Board of Trustees Retreat March 22, 2012.

Aligning Institutional Strategic and SEM Plans: Indiana State University November 12, 2012 Tom Green, Ph.D. Senior Consultant.

CEEMAN AccreditationCape Town, CEEMAN Accreditation IQA Dr.Virginijus Kundrotas.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.

Approved 1/26/2001 – Revised 11/26/2002 GRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT, STAFFING AND ASSESSMENT PROCESSES EXECUTIVE COUNCIL DECIDES TO RECOMMEND.

Better use of your ERP Brad Reese – Client actor Tom Phillip – Visual expert Keith Landa – Token academic member Gary L. Pratt – Scribe John S. Bojonny.

Policy Office Background & Status. Background : interest in policy development and organization Extensive research and study Systems Policy Review.

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Standards 1,6, & 9 Bill Bonaudi Big Bend Community College.

COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY &TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION POWERS, DUTIES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ACCREDITATION Project Outcomes and Activities.

Pathway to Employment Strategy 6.2: Provide increased transfer and employment opportunities for GRCC students College Action Project Develop a college-wide.

Periodic Review Report Committee Summary: Amended Monthly Progress Report December 22, 2003.

SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.

SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.

STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE VIU POLICY REVIEW PROCESS. STEP 1 SUBMISSION Scheduled Review  Every 5 years (at least) to Executive Responsible  Delegated.

Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.

BUDGET COMMUNICATION PLAN Budget By Charlotte Yates, Provost and Vice-President (Academic)

College-wide Meeting November 19, 2014 – 12:45PM Gateway A Photo Courtesy of James Hassett.

HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.

What’s Going on at SCC Presented by: Corinna Evett.

Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.

Maximum Student Credit Hour Load per Semester POLICY 8.22.

1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.

Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator

Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University

Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update

Institutional Effectiveness Plan

Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect

Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement

VIABILITY MODEL DISCUSSION

College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process

Presented by: Corinna Evett

In Preparation to ACCJC team site visit on 10/8-10/11

GOVERNANCE Adoption of a state-wide master plan for C&TC education Approval of institutional compacts and updates Allocate appropriations to institutions.

Program Discontinuance

CUNY Graduate School and University Center

Fort Valley State University

Start with PROGRAM REVIEW

Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting

Presentation transcript:

Program Viability Study Program Review Red Deer College ACCC Symposium February 2004

Annual Program Review  2 level review process 1 st level based on annual data collection Student demand (applications) Student enrollment Student satisfaction Program completion rate Employment/Transfer rate Cost/FLE student 2 nd level when indicators show problem areas More comprehensive review—customized to program area

Program Review Process  Criteria established through College-wide consultation.  Program Review Advisory Committee: Faculty, administration, support staff, students Reports to Senior Administration and Academic Council Sets criteria, establish process, review data Makes recommendations to administration, departments, or policy bodies.

Program Viability Study  Extraordinary Review  Based on Program Viability Definition Program feasibility and program sustainability Sustainability based on five year horizon 26 Factors Assumes quality has been maintained through annual review process

Viability Criteria  Data from annual Level 1 Review  Additional factors including data from departments, program advisory committees, and transfer institutions.  Examples of additional data: Adequacy of current resource allocation Future needs for additional resources Impact on community, students Employment outlook Fit with College mission and direction Cost effectiveness relative to benchmarks

Viability Process  Affirmation of Criteria (committee, consultation)  Establishment of data sources  Questionnaires sent to program departments  Submissions reviewed by Committee and Viability Profile established for each program  Viability Profile shared with departments for feedback  Recommendations sent to Educational Administration team. Program right-sizing, program growth, and program termination.

Viability Process  Senior administration used viability study recommendations to formulate plan.  Each department was informed of the changes that would be required.  Town hall meeting, press release and web posting of entire plan.  Plan was released in context of future direction for the College.

Further Information  Gerry Paradis Dean of Research and Technology Integration Red Deer College (403)