Duke Energy Carolinas Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services September 12, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
Advertisements

Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
FERCs OASIS II ANOPR Marvin Rosenberg Economist Division of Policy Analysis and Rulemaking Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates Federal Energy Regulatory.
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
Western Electricity Coordinating Council Market Interface Committee Report to the WECC Board of Directors December 6-7, 2007 Robert D. Schwermann MIC Chair.
Arizona Corporation Commission Arizona Independent Scheduling Administrator (AzISA) September 22,
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, February 25, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EST.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, November 5, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EST.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, August 26, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
1 MISO Business Plan: Enhanced Reliability, Customer Service & Market Implementation James P. Torgerson, President & CEO Midwest ISO December 17, 2003.
Standards Development: Update to IMO Regulatory Standing Committee May 14, 2003.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
NBA Survey of the Australian Blood Sector Suppliers Summary of Responses and Feedback.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, January 19, :00 to 4:00 p.m. EST 4 th Quarter
RTS Roundtable. RTS Team 2 Goals for Today 1.Outline key communications to partners 2.Identify how we can better inform, or support you to inform, elected.
Program Management Overview (An Introduction)
Centralized vs. Decentralized: Pros, Cons & Best Practices
Shared Learning Services : Key Learnings Session 102 November 9, 2009.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, September 15, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT 3 rd Quarter
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) May 17, 2011 Tri-Chairs: Laura Dalton, Verizon Communications Natalie McNamer, T-Mobile USA Gwen Zahn,
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
1 Oregon’s Key Performance Measurement (KPM) System KPM Review Processes Prepared for the Interim Joint Committee on Ways and Means October 16, 2008.
WECC Market Interface Committee Update WSPP Spring 2008 Meeting April 8, 2008 Robert D. Schwermann MIC Chair.
2013 Calendar Year Customer Survey Results
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, December 2, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, May 13th, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
2014 Calendar Year Customer Survey Results. Background Open for comment February 12, 2015 through March 31, 2015 for evaluation of prior year – 21 close.
Joint Outreach Team Implementation Plan July 12, :30-11:30 a.m.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
1 Independent Market Monitoring in the Midwest ISO Presented to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, May 19, :00 to 4:00 p.m. EDT 2 nd Quarter 2011.
Bulk Power Transmission System
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Tuesday, April 21, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2005 Meeting Management Support Survey Review For 2006 Subcommittees.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Tuesday, July 21, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
Updated 1/28/2011.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment David Nevius Senior Vice President North American Electric Reliability Council.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Wednesday, January 28, :00 to 3:00 p.m. ET.
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Proprietary Information. Do not copy or distribute without permission from TranServ - © TranServ International, Inc. INDEPENDENT, INNOVATIVE, RELIABLE.
Craig Williams Market Interface Manager August 21, 2014 ISAS, Portland, OR.
Duke Energy Carolinas Transition to AFC Methodology Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, March 17, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
PacifiCorp & CAISO Regional Transmission Organization Presented by Scott Gutting President, Energy Strategies, LLC Independent Energy Producers Annual.
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
Transmission Advisory Group NCTPC Process Update Rich Wodyka September 7, 2006.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Tuesday, October 21, :00 to 3:00 p.m. ET.
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Duke Energy Independent Entity Update
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Energy Day Strawman Proposal
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
MAC Board Effectiveness Survey
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
4th Quarter 2015 Thursday, October 15, :00 to 3:30 p.m. EST
Mandatory Reliability Standards
Duke Energy Carolinas Stakeholder Meeting
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
MAC Board Effectiveness Survey
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

Duke Energy Carolinas Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services September 12, 2008

22 Agenda Customer Survey Results Customer Recommendations Budget Future of Independent Entity Services Appendix –Survey Questions and Results

3 Attachment K – IE Responsibilities Evaluation and approval of all transmission service requests Calculation of Total Transfer Capability (TTC) and ATC Operation and administration of Duke Energy Carolinas’ OASIS Evaluation, processing and approval of all generation interconnection requests, and performance of related interconnection studies Coordination of transmission planning

4 Survey Objectives Seek continuous improvement of services provided while ensuring the highest value of service Confirm the collaborative efforts showed a seamless transition of tariff administration services to customers Gauge general confidence of customers

5 Summary of Survey Questions Customer Satisfaction –View of Performance Customer Expectations Customer Experiences –Consistency of Service Suggested Improvements Expected Impact of Survey –Expected follow-up Survey conducted by: Practical Approaches

66 Customer Satisfaction Overall Midwest ISO Service Performance Reflects Customer Satisfaction (23 Respondents) RatingPercentage Midwest ISO Exceeds Expectations26% Midwest ISO Meets Expectations74% Midwest ISO Fails to Meet Expectations0%

77 Customer Expectations Timeliness Accuracy Availability Consistency Compliance with Tariff and Business Practices Communication

88 Customer Experiences Customers have: –Seen increased improvement in Independent Entity services since start-up –Indicated Midwest ISO is more knowledgeable now of the Duke Energy – Carolinas system –Seen that Midwest ISO has good understanding of upcoming regulatory changes

99 Customer Observations Independent Entity Staffing – customers seem to be comfortable with: –Quality of the personnel –Number of dedicated staff –Current staffing levels for after-hours coverage –Execution of FERC requirements NERC and NAESB standards

10 How IE services are provided? Customers would like to see the IE improve current services by: –More personalized service –Follow up on suggested business practice changes –Increased understanding of the geographic intricacies of the Duke system –No delays in study schedules (Generation Interconnection) –Know when to contact Midwest ISO versus Duke Energy – Carolinas

11 How the Tariff is Administered? Customer feedback noted two suggestions: –Review the minimum (Daily Firm) and maximum (Hourly Non-firm) lead time for requesting transmission service reservations to further align adjacent markets –Make it easier to do business during Daylight Savings Time change –Make it easier to do business across regions in different time zones

12 Proposed Plan The NC Planning Collaborative meets the requirement of FERC Order 890 to provide transparency for transmission planning –Independent oversight is no longer needed from the Midwest ISO Continue to use Midwest ISO for the remainder of the Independent Entity functions in order to efficiently implement substantial pending changes in tariff requirements Continue to use Potomac Economics as the Independent Market Monitor

13 Budget Initial IE contract specified $2.2 Million Midwest ISO Services delivered under budget with a reduced scope “scaling back” after hours coverage while performing additional work due to changes in FERC requirements

14 IE Proposed Next Steps Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting –This is the forum for discussing customer survey topics and emergent topics (Upcoming changes, stakeholder input) –Tuesday, October 21, 2008 – 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET

15 Questions / Feedback?

16 Appendix The following slides are the nine questions asked of the survey participants

17 Survey Question 1: As you think about the service (s) you receive from Midwest ISO on behalf of Duke Energy Carolinas’, would you say the services you receive: Participant Response RatingPercentage Midwest ISO Exceeds Expectations26% Midwest ISO Meets Expectations74% Midwest ISO Fails to Meet Expectations0%

18 Survey Question 2: Describe what the 2-3 key expectations are that you have of this group Participant Response is found on slide 7 of this presentation

19 Survey Question 3: As you think about the service (s) you receive, would you say that over the past year, things are: Participant Response RatingPercentage Worse5% The Same57% Better38%

20 Survey Question 4: If you could change ONE THING in the way the services/relationship works today, what would that be? Participant Response is found on slide 7 of this presentation

21 Survey Question 5: Comparing the Tariff Administration Service(s) you receive from Midwest ISO to the Tariff Administration Services(s) you received from Duke Energy-Carolinas, would you say Midwest ISO is: Much better Better About the same Worse Participant Response RatingPercentage Much Better10% Better25% About the Same65% Worse0%

22 Survey Question 6: Comparing the Tariff Administration Service(s) you receive from Midwest ISO on behalf of Duke, to the Tariff Administration Services(s) you received from other providers, would you say Midwest ISO/ Duke Independent Entity is: Much better Better About the same Worse Than the services you received elsewhere. Participant Response RatingPercentage Much Better21% Better58% About the Same16% Worse5%

23 Survey Question 7-9 Survey Question 7: Is there any issue currently unresolved that we should bring to their attention? – Participant Response corresponds to the information on slides 8, 9,10, 11 & 14 Survey Question 8: What should we have asked you about that we didn’t? –Participant Response corresponds to the information on slides 8, 9,10, 11 & 14 Survey Question 9: Do you think Midwest ISO will take your input seriously and act on it? –Why or why not? Participant Response corresponds to the information on slides 11 & 14