Children Ever in Care Terry V. Shaw, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare This research is funded by the.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Population Estimates and Projections in the U. S. John F. Long

Advertisements

LINKING RECORDS TO ADVANCE CHILD PROTECTION: A CALIFORNIA CASE STUDY Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD University of Southern California Barbara Needell, PhD.

US Berkeley 2/12/2013 linking population-based data to child welfare records: a public health approach to surveillance Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD University.

Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,

RISK OF RE-REFERRAL AMONG INFANTS WHO REMAIN AT HOME FOLLOWING REPORTED MALTREATMENT Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD James Simon, MSW Joseph Magruder, PhD.

California Child Welfare Indicators Project Q Slides Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California, Berkeley.

Deaths Due to Child Abuse and Neglect, as Reported by the Oklahoma Department of Human Services Prepared by the Community Service Council of.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data 201: The Empirical Data Strikes Back* Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center.

California’s Child Welfare Outcomes & Accountability System: Using Performance Measures to Encourage Improvement Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for.

Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.

Children Ever in Care Joseph Magruder, MSW Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare This research is funded by the.

An overview of basic California foster care data Joe Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,

Building a Better Child Welfare System for Fresno's Children: Using Data as Our Foundation (and Friend!) Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social Services.

Reunification for Siblings in Out-of-Home Care Using a Statistical Technique for Examining Non-independent Observations Presented by: Joseph Magruder,

Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.

Census-based measures of fertility, mortality, and migration Hist 5011.

California Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability Legislation: Evolving Toward System Improvement with Longitudinal Data & Analysis Panel on Increasing.

The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.

Projection of West Virginia K-12 (0-19 Years Old) Population Christiadi Bureau of Business and Economic Research College of Business and Economics West.

Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Prepared for The California Disproportionality Project Center for Social Services.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Race/Ethnic Disparities in Child Welfare New Research Synthesis from Fluke et.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Foster Care in California: What the Data Tells Us Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,

Uses of Population Censuses and Household Sample Surveys for Vital Statistics in South Africa United Nations Expert Group Meeting on International Standards.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Black/White and Black/Hispanic Racial Disparity in Child Welfare: Controlling.

PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT AMONG CHILDREN REPORTED TO CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES Joseph Magruder, PhD Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Wendy Wiegmann, MSW Barbara.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley The Child and Family Services Review Composite Scores: A “Great Start” Barbara.

1. What is a census? 2. Why is it difficult to compare census information between countries? 3. Why can census information be unreliable? 4. How can population.

REPORTER TYPE AS A PREDICTOR OF CASE DISPOSITION Bryn King, MSW Jennifer Lawson, MSW Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD January 13, 2012 Society for Social Work.

Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.

The New Data Frontier Central California Area Social Services Consortium (CCASSC) and the Fresno County Experience The Administrative Use of Data to Promote.

AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.

Child Welfare in North Carolina: Ethnic and Racial Disproportionality and Disparity by D. F. Duncan UNC-CH School of Social Work June 10, 2009.

1. ____Teen mothers are twice as likely to die in childbirth. 2. ____A child born to a teen mother is twice as likely to die before the age of one. 3.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Predictors of Child Welfare Contact Between Birth and Age Five: An Examination.

Match the ten ‘heads’ on this page with the definition ‘tails’ on the next slide. Leave two lines for each, though some are smaller! NOTE THESE ARE ALL.

Workshop on the Improvement of Civil Registration and Vital Statistics in the SADC Region, Blantyre, Malawi, 1 – 5 December 2008 Vital statistics and their.

Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org How to Use KIDS COUNT Data How to Use KIDS COUNT Data Houston Conference on Children June 15, 2005 Frances.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: A Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Black/White Racial Disparity in Child Welfare: Findings from Linkages to Birth.

Child Welfare Administrative Data: The UCB Performance Indicators Project cssr.berkeley.edu/CWSCMSReports Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts Children’s Roundtable Summit.

Projections of the Ethnic Minority Populations of Britain D.A. Coleman and M.D. Smith Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Oxford.

When permanency remains elusive: A longitudinal examination of the early foster care experiences of youth at risk of emancipating Joe Magruder, MSW Emily.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.

Families & Poverty Introduction to Family Studies.

CALIFORNIA’S MOST VULNERABLE PARENTS: WHEN MALTREATED CHILDREN HAVE CHILDREN Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Bryn King, MSW Julie Cederbaum, PhD Barbara Needell,

2010 World Programme on Population and Housing Censuses Workshop on Civil Registration and Vital Statistics in the UNESCWA Region Cairo, Egypt, December.

NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.

Overview of California’s Child Welfare Indicator Data Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University.

Black Disproportionality 18.6% 5.9% = 3.15 Hispanic Disproportionality 50.2% 53.7% = 0.94 White Disproportionality 26.7% 28.7% = 0.93 Black vs. White.

Santa Fe Community Baseline Report Early Childhood Indicators Prenatal – Four years Old November 16, 2015.

United Nations Sub-Regional Workshop on Census Data Evaluation Phnom Penh, Cambodia, November 2011 Evaluation of Internal Migration Data Collected.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Data Trends & Child Outcomes Center for Social.

CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Longitudinal Dynamics of Youth in Foster Care Joseph Magruder Emily Putnam-Hornstein.

AB 636 presented at the joint hearing between the ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES and the ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE ON FOSTER CARE Sacramento, CA.

Families & Poverty Introduction to Family Studies.

RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS: INCREASED OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINED PERMANENCY Joseph Magruder, PhD University of California, Berkeley Daniel Webster, PhD University.

1 READY BY 21 TASKFORCE Harford County Department of Community Services Local Management Board Health Benchmark December 7, 2010.

Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University of California, Berkeley

Civil registration system and its use for vital statistics

Foster Care in California: What we Know from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.

CHAPTER 3 FERTILITY MEASURES .

Presentation transcript:

Children Ever in Care Terry V. Shaw, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare This research is funded by the California Department of Social Services and the Stuart Foundation Presented at the 46 th Annual National Association for Welfare Research and Statistics (NAWRS) Workshop. August 23, 2006

Problem What does administrative data tell us about lifetime incidence of child welfare system involvement? What are the differences between using birth or census based cohorts and synthetic cohorts?

Cohorts California’s Administrative Data Base - the Child Welfare Services Case Management System (CWS/CMS) has been operational long enough to allow analysis of lifetime in-home child welfare services and foster care utilization for a cohort of six year old children. The cohort includes all children, not just those with child welfare involvement.

Cohort Composition Two types of cohort composition: –Birth: Those children who were born in the state in a specific year based on birth data. –Census: Those children who were age=0 in a specific year according to the Census data. Both present problems because of: –deaths, –in and out migration, and –inconsistent definitions of ethnicity.

Birth Cohort Denominator = Vital Statistics Birth Records Consideration of ethnicity based on mother to match birth records CWS/CMS birthplace data are incomplete so it is not possible to accurately limit cases in the numerator to children born in the state

Census Cohort Denominator = Department of Finance (Census based) Population Projection Consideration of ethnicity based on child to match population projections Denominator doesn’t include children who have died or moved out of the state, but numerator does

Lifetable (Synthetic Cohort) A created or hypothetical cohort of children based on data from one year that is set up as though they relate to a single cohort. For this example all children ages 0 up to age 6 for a given year are examined and the rates for each age/ethnic group is used to calculate an overall rate of penetration into the child welfare system.

Child Welfare Service Incidence History for California Children born in 1999

CWS Involvement Before Age 6

Synthetic Cohort First Referrals before age 6 – by year

Synthetic Cohort First Substantiated Referrals before age 6 – by year

Synthetic Cohort First Removals before age 6 – by year

Child Welfare Service Incidence History for California Children born in 1999 Compared with Synthetic Cohorts

Lifetable – pros and cons Can be used on the local level to produce an estimate of the overall incidence rate of penetration into the child welfare system. Allows an examination by age and ethnicity. The incidence rates are estimates and can not, by themselves, show trends in the penetration rates. Highly sensitive to changes in policy.

Next Steps During the next several years we well be able to analyze changes in cohort incidence for successive cohorts of children, including changes in disproportionality. We intend on studying the lifetime incidence of types of abuse and neglect. In 13 years, it will be possible to study referral incidence throughout the childhood of the cohort born in 1999.

The End! Joseph Magruder – Terry V. Shaw – (510) Center for Social Services Research Web Page