The Facts are In… updated >. Understand how it works See the results data Compare to other options Understand the investment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Healthcare Management system. Standards based design. [ Supports HXP (Health Exchange Protocol) a standard in exchanging health care data ]
Advertisements

Phoenix Adaptive Control Technology Showcase Cobb County Georgia
1. Green Lights Program Objectives Improve Quality of Synchronization in a Short Timeframe Noticeable Improvements to Motorists Appropriate Allocation.
Xroutes - Affordable Route Optimization Integrated with GPS TimeTrack Rep Name: Title: This document contains intellectual property not to be reproduced,
.nowNAZTEC 1. Overview AGENDA Benefits Algorithm Simulation 2 Case Studies Real-time adaptive traffic control system Adjusts signal timing based on current.
1. We can’t promise all green lights… …but we can minimize the number of red lights, stops and delays.
1 Charlie Wetzel, PE, PTOE County Traffic Engineer Seminole County Florida 10/18/11.
Presented by: SAGE KAMIYA, P.E., PTOE
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Metro’s Countywide Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Ronald B. Achelpohl, PE Operation Green Light Mid-America Regional Council.
INNER CITY INVESTMENT SUMMIT TRANSPORT, INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Presenter: L N Mangcu SED: Transport and Roads Department.
A Mobile-Cloud Pedestrian Crossing Guide for the Blind
1 Austin Transportation Department Ali Mozdbar, P.E., PTOE Division Manager, Traffic Signals Traffic Signal Features for Pedestrians & Bicyclists.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MANAGEMENT. PURPOSE Purpose: Foster understanding through development of educational outreach materials Illustrate benefits and basic techniques.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
EX-1 Intersections & Interchanges Improved Traffic Signal Control Ramp metering Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Automated Enforcement.
Gresham Traffic Signal System Optimization A Comprehensive Evaluation of Corridor Performance After Deploying Adaptive Signal Control.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker Paramics User Group Meeting February.
Axis Intelligent Video Intelligence where you need it.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker.
CIVITAS PLUS INTELIGENT TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL IN THE CITY OF SKOPJE Lovren Markic, Site Leader Athens 24 April 2012.
Gainesville Area Traffic Management System. Traffic Management System  In 1984, the original Traffic Signal Master Plan was developed for the Gainesville.
Make your messaging reliable use it Messaging. A single and global solution Send, receive and process any type of message through the appropriate channel.
Traffic Signal Standards. History Chaos NEMA (TS 1) 170 (CALTRANS / NY) 170E i NEMA TS ATC 2070N Memory Plug-in Others... Electromechanical.
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting Adaptive Signal Control Workshop Session 2: Field Experience January 11, 2004.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 7 Field Operations.
San Jose Traffic Signal Communications and Synchronization Project Presented by Ho Nguyen City of San Jose, Department of Transportation May 12, 2009.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
Signalized Intersection Delay Monitoring for Signal Retiming SafeTrip-21 Safe and Efficient Travel through Innovation and Partnership in the 21 st Century.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
NYSE MKT: ITI August 2014 Innovation for Better Mobility.
Reggie Chandra, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE Operation Green Light Manager of Traffic Operations, MARC.
ACS Lite EconolitePerspective. Outline Development Experience Implementation Outlook.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
SWARCO | First in Traffic Solutions. SWARCO | First in Traffic Solutions. Intelligent Transport Systems: PUBLIC TRANSPORT.
Application of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for Statewide Traffic and Evacuation Monitoring and Management in Louisiana April 16, 1999.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION: A Coordinated Effort Tom Dancey, P.E. Signal System Engineer City of Springfield CITY OF SPRINGFIELD & MISSOURI DEPARTMENT.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
Georgia’s Regional Traffic Operations Program Christopher Barrow, E.I.T. Traffic Engineer II.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overcoming Multi-Jurisdictional Challenges Lessons Learned Implementing Bus Signal Priority.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
1 Adaptive Control Software – Lite (ACS-Lite) Eddie Curtis, P.E. FHWA Resource Center / HOTM NTOC Webcast March 27, 2008.
Talking Freight Presentation C-TIP Vantage Overview November 17, 2010.
Using Information Technology to Reduce Traffic Jam in a Highly Traffic Congested City Sayed Ahmed and Rasit Eskicioglu We propose a cost effective and.
Portland State University 11 By Maisha Mahmud Li Huan Evaluation Of SCATS Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System.
Wireless Sensor Network Solutions Regional Mobility Solutions Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other.
SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION STUDY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
Traffic Management System Status Update February, 2008.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.
Communication Systems
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
INTEGRATING ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IN PROJECT-LEVEL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Meiwu An, Pikes Peak Area Council.
1 Bottleneck Identification and Forecasting in Traveler Information Systems Robert L. Bertini, Rafael Fernández-Moctezuma, Huan Li, Jerzy Wieczorek, Portland.
Presented by NTOC Webcast Gary Piotrowicz, PE, PTOE OAKLAND COUNTY SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION PROJECT.
City of Portland - Isolated Timing Operations January 9, 2005 Isolated Timing Operations - Workshop on Best Practices for Signal Timing Bill Kloos Signals.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Urban Traffic Management System Development of an Intelligent Urban Traffic Management System Riza Atiq bin O.K. Rahmat.
Image and Signal Processing   CAMEA, spol. s r.o. Headquarters: Kořenského 25, , Brno Branch offices: Prague, Lanškroun.
ITS Virginia Annual Conference April 20, 2012 Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Outline Sensys SensMetrics Solution SensMetrics Performance Measures
Geo Targeted Mobile Advertising
MOVA Traffic Signal Control Trial
INTELLIGENT CARPARK GUIDANCE SYSTEM
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting
ITE Midwestern District Conference June 20, 2017
School of Civil Engineering
Presentation transcript:

The Facts are In… updated >

Understand how it works See the results data Compare to other options Understand the investment

What does the data say?

[Facts] Most widely deployed 1.5 million vehicles daily 535 intersections 84 corridors 43 cities 15 states

[Facts] DOT relationships SCDOT MoDOT Caltrans CDOT PennDOT FDOT TexDOT VDOT NYDOT ODOT WVDOT

[Facts] Management before InSync Coordinated TOD plans Running free Coordinated TOD plans Running free, fully actuated Coordinated TOD plans

[Facts] Peak delay reductions 77% 78% 85% 86% Best peak time results 53% 70% 48% 72% 89% 89% 66% 73% 71%

[Facts] Peak stop reductions 90% 100% 95% 82% 93% Best peak time results 33% 50% 62% 71% 92% 91% 67% 67% 90%

[Facts] Peak travel time reduction 29% 42% 32% 50% 42% Best peak time results 44% 20% 42% 41% 46% 19% 29% 49%

[Facts] Peak fuel reduction 16% 32% 19% 38% 26% Best peak time results 28% 30% 34%

[Facts] Emissions reduction 41% 39% 25% 34% 35% Best peak time results 42% 23% 38%

[Facts] Crash reduction 17% Source: Lee’s Summit, MO Police Department 30% Source: Springdale, AR Police Department

How it works: hardware

Global Optimizer Analog to DIGITAL Local Optimizer

Analog to DIGITAL State machine

Runs Free Optimizes Sees/Vision Inputs detector calls Picks state (or phase pair)

Twisted pair of copper Fiber Wireless

:FUSION Integrates existing presence detectors, such as loops

Failure mitigation: Loss of video detection = historical data used (and InSync:Fusion) Loss of communications = no change (intelligence is local) Loss of processor = detection sends calls to controller, controller can roll back to plans

How it works: the model

Local: Optimizes intersections + Occupancy + Delay = Priority Global: Coordinates desired progression

Northbound Time Distance Global optimizer coordinates progression

Northbound Southbound 1 Global optimizer coordinates progression

Northbound Southbound 1 Global optimizer coordinates progression

Pedestrian Module Optimizes pedestrian traffic with vehicular traffic

How it works: user interface

How does it work? Real-time State machine and cameras CentralSync Intelligently fully actuated local and global progression

How does InSync compare?

#1 Affordability Up-time Maintenance Reduction in stops Reduction in delay Reduction in travel time Source: Selinger, et al. “Adaptive Traffic Control Systems in the United States: Updated Summary and Comparison” HDR [Facts]

[Facts] Results or regrets? “Knowing what you know now, would you have installed the same system if you have the opportunity to do it all again?” 100%

What is the investment?

Typically $25,000 to $35,000 per intersection Includes detectionAsk us for a price sheet (Does not include communications or installation) Investment

Questions and Answers The proven solution. Chuck O’Connor Phone: Web: