The 70-Gene Profile and Chemotherapy Benefit in 1,600 Breast Cancer Patients Bender RA et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512. (Oral Presentation)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Against Stomach Cancer. 1980–1989 Progress Against Stomach Cancer 1980– : Combination chemotherapy improves outcomes for advanced stomach.
Advertisements

BIG-TRANSBIG HQ– Used with permission TRANSLATING MOLECULAR KNOWLEDGE INTO EARLY BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT Fatima Cardoso, MD TRANSBIG Scientific Director.
Advances and Emerging Therapy for Lung Cancer
Xeloda X-panding options in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer
516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
Implicaciones clínicas de los subtipos intrínsecos de cáncer de mama
Chemotherapy Prolongs Survival for Isolated Local or Regional Recurrence of Breast Cancer: The CALOR Trial (Chemotherapy as Adjuvant for Locally Recurrent.
Integration of Capecitabine into Anthracycline- and Taxane-Based Adjuvant Therapy for Triple Negative Early Breast Cancer: Final Subgroup Analysis of the.
Laura J. Van ‘t Veer Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California, San Francisco Biology of disease Who is at risk for what.
Can We Define Tumors That Will Respond to PARP Inhibitors? A Phase II Correlative Study of Olaparib in Advanced Serous Ovarian Cancer and Triple-Negative.
Expression profiles for prognosis and prediction Laura J. Van ‘t Veer The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
SON Breast Cancer Update: Current Controversies Oct 18, 2014 Who should we radiate and why? Lorna Weir Radiation Oncologist BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver.
Journal Club Cremona 24 Maggio 2008
Discordance in Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer during Tumor Progression Lindstrom LS et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S3-5.
Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients with Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Curigliano G et al. J Clin Oncol.
MammaPrint, the story of the 70-gene profile
Round-Robin Review of HER2 Testing in the Context of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer (NCCTG N9831/BCIRG006/BCIRG005) 1 Concordance of HER2 Central Assessment.
Metastatic Breast Cancer: One Size Does Not Fit All Clifford Hudis, M.D. Chief, Breast Cancer Medicine Service MSKCC.
Current concepts in Breast Cancer- Beyond TNM
Breast Plenary Abstracts How Do These Studies Impact Clinical Practice Today and in the Years Ahead? Presented By Eric Winer at 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting.
Can we use multigene-tests to guide the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer? R5 陳三奇 VS 趙大中 J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2013;11: J.
These slides were released by the speaker for internal use by Novartis.
Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis J. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97(3):
Wildiers H, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:1101. Breast Cancer in Elderly (>65 Years) Recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology Surgical.
Tang G et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S4-9.
HERA: KEY DESIGN ELEMENTS, RESULTS AND FUTURE PLANS NSABP 17 SEPTEMBER 2005 Brian Leyland-Jones Minda De Gunzberg Professor of Oncology, McGill University,
The 70 gene Mammaprint ™ signature: a comparison with traditional clinico-pathological parameters. Patrizia Querzoli 1, Massimo Pedriali 1, Gardenia Munerato.
Sgroi DC et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-9.
Metabolic Syndrome and Recurrence within the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Risk Categories in Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Lakhani A et al. Proc.
A Quantitative Multi-Gene RT-PCR Assay for Prediction of Recurrence in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC): Selection of the Genes in 4 Large Studies and Results.
Clinical Trials Evaluating the Role of Sentinel Node Resection in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer Krag DN et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA505.
These slides were released by the speaker for internal use by Novartis
Dubsky P et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S4-3.
NSCLC stage IIIA type of chemotherapy ? Swiss tumor board Bern – Dr. Christian Monnerat Département Pluridisciplaire d’Oncologie – Hôpital Neuchâtelois.
Radical Mastectomy is no longer the standard Improved adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy Chemotherapy Endocrine therapy Radiation treatment Reconstruction.
Neoadjuvant SystemicTreatment Strategies for Breast Cancer Donald W. Northfelt, MD, FACP Professor of Medicine Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Associate.
Effect of 21-Gene Reverse- Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay on Treatment Recommendations in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive and Estrogen.
Prognostic Value of Genomic Analysis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Mayer EL et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Extended adjuvant treatment with anastrozole: results from the ABCSG Trial 6a R Jakesz, H Samonigg, R Greil, M Gnant, M Schmid, W Kwasny, E Kubista, B.
Use of Oncotype Dx® Testing Breast SSG meeting 10 th July 2015 Dr Rebecca Bowen.
Clinical and technical validation of a genomic classifier (ColoPrint) for predicting outcome of stage II colon cancer patients Josep Tabernero, Vall d’Hebron.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
Baselga J et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S3-3.
Chee Lee, MBBS (Hons), MMedSci (Clin Epid), MBiostat, PhD, FRACP Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials: Practical and Design Considerations.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
R3 정수웅 / Prof. 김시영 This article was published on September 28, 2015, at NEJM.org. DOI: /NEJMoa Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
Molecular subclasses of breast cancer: how do we define them? The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Statement R4 신재령 / Prof. 김시영 Annals of Oncology 23: 2997–3006,
G Mustacchi 1, F Zanconati 2, D Bonifacio 2, L Morandi 3, MP Sormani 4, A. Gennari 5, P Bruzzi 4 1: Centro Oncolgico University of Trieste 2: Inst of Pathology,
Case 6 A 49 year old female was found to have a 1.3 cm spiculated mass on screening mammogram Ultrasound revealed a 1.2 cm hypoechoic mass with posterior.
J Clin Oncol 30: R2 윤경한 / Prof. 김시영 Huan Jin, Dongsheng Tu, Naiqing Zhao, Lois E. Shepherd, and Paul E. Goss.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage*: The 2015 Annual Meeting of the CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-12, 2015 San Antonio, Texas.
Ο ρόλος των μη χειρουργικών θεραπειών στο μη μεταστατικό μυοδιηθητικό καρκίνο ουροδόχου κύστεως Γεώργιος Δ. Λύπας Παθολόγος Ογκολόγος Α’ Ογκολογική Κλινική.
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
Phase III PlanB Final Analysis: Adjuvant TC vs ECT in Pts With High-Risk HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights* of the.
Slamon D et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 62.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Phase III SOLE: Continuous vs Intermittent Extended Letrozole After Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Early HR+ Breast Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
Perez EA et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 80.
Prognostic and Predictive Value of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in Postmenopausal Women with Node-Positive, Estrogen- Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
THBT neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is to be used in post-menopausal breast cancer woman Antonino Grassadonia Università «G. D’Annunzio» – Chieti-Pescara.
Presented By Marco Colleoni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8007.
Untch M et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
Effect of Obesity on Prognosis after Early Breast Cancer
Sarah-Jane Schramm, Anna E. Campain, Ricenterd A
Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival
Agendia Summary of Results Internal use only.
Presentation transcript:

The 70-Gene Profile and Chemotherapy Benefit in 1,600 Breast Cancer Patients Bender RA et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512. (Oral Presentation)

Source: Bender RA et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512. Introduction Gene expression profiling has enabled assignment of risk profiles for patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) not easily achieved using clinicopathologic variables 70-gene signature predicts 10-yr distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) [J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98(17):1183] –Low risk: 90%; High risk 71% 70-gene signature predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009 Feb 13 Epub ahead of print) –Low risk: 0%; High risk: 20% Current study objectives: –Pooled meta-analysis including patients from 7 large data sets at multiple institutions across Europe (N = 1,696) –Analyzed 541 patients with 0-3 involved lymph nodes who received endocrine therapy (ET) or ET plus chemotherapy (ET + CT)

Patients Treated with Adjuvant ET or ET + CT 7 Clinical Studies in the Meta-Analysis No. of Patients (n = 1,696) 0-3 Lymph Nodes Involved (n = 541) * Van de Vijver Buyse Bueno-de-Mesquita Bueno-de-Mesquita Mook 2008a Mook 2008b14827 Kok Source: Bender RA. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512. *Abstract included 575 patients, including all lymph node positive disease; here patients with >3 nodes excluded

Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) of Treated Patients as a Function of 70-Gene Risk Profile (MammaPrint) Source: With permission from Bender RA. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512. Low risk (n=252, 47%) High risk (n=289, 53%) HR 3.88 ( ) P< % 82% Percent Survival Time in years

DDFS in Patients Receiving ET vs ET + CT MammaPrint Low Risk (n = 252) ET (n=174, 69%) ET+CT (n=78, 31%) HR 0.26 ( ) P=0.20 Time in years 99% 93% Source: With permission from Bender RA. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512. Percent Survival

DDFS in Patients Receiving ET vs ET + CT MammaPrint High Risk (n = 289) Time in years ET (n=141, 49%) ET+CT (n=148, 51%) 88% 76% HR 0.35 ( ) P<0.01 Source: With permission from Bender RA. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512. Percent Survival

Summary and Conclusions Patients with a “low risk” 70-gene profile are at sufficiently low risk of developing distant metastases that adjuvant CT appears to add no benefit to ET alone Patients with a “high risk” profile are at high risk of developing distant metastases and are likely to benefit from the addition of CT to ET MINDACT, the ongoing prospective randomized clinical trial in Europe, is assessing the benefit of treatment assignment, based on gene expression profiling instead of conventional clinicopathologic risk assessment Source: Bender RA et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512.

Eligibility: T1, T2 or operable T3 invasive breast cancer; 0-3 positive nodes; unilateral tumor Target accrual: 6,000 Evaluate for clinical-pathological risk (using Adjuvant! Online) AND 70-gene signature risk (using MammaPrint ® ) Clinical high risk, genomic high risk Discordant risk between standard clinical- pathological and 70-gene signature criteria Clinical low risk, genomic low risk Chemotherapy No chemotherapy Use clinical- pathological risk results to determine chemotherapy or not Use 70-gene risk results to determine chemotherapy or not Source: Cardoso F et al. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(5): MINDACT: Comparison of 70-Gene Signature with Clinical Assessment in Selecting Patients with Node-Negative Breast Cancer for Adjuvant Chemotherapy R