PROJECT DESCRIPTION & GOALS The Trip Demand Synthesis Process and the aTaxi + Rail Transit Mobility Concepts By Julia Phillips Hill Wyrough.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Metropolitan Area Revisions Based on Census 2000.
Advertisements

ISTEA is Now 20 Years Old and We are Still Searching for the Land Use-Transportation Connection. Actually, Analysis of that Connection Has Been Sought.
South Jersey Rail Past, Present and Future John J Reiser Senior Seminar.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
Transportation leadership you can trust. FDOT Systems Planning White Paper A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
Smart Driving Cars: Transit Opportunity of NHTSA Level 4 Driverless Vehicles Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering.
OSG Analysis on the Gloucester County Rail Line Study State Planning Commission December 3, 2008.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Morris County Sam Powell Jennifer Lee. Introduction Morris County is located in Northern New Jersey, 25 miles west of New York City Affluent County Recent.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
September 16, 2008 From the Paved State Back to the Garden State Mobility without Highways for New Jersey Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
By Alain L. Kornhauser, PhD Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering Director, Program in Transportation Faculty Chair, PAVE (Princeton Autonomous.
Friday, January 11, 2013 North East Jersey Essex Population: 783,969 Area (square miles): 130 Census Blocks: 8,751 Hudson Population: 634,266 Area (square.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. TOPICS 1.ROADS AND PUBLIC GOODS 2.RATIONALE TO JUSTIFY ROAD BUILDING 3.URBAN PLANNING AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION (UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES)
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Vision Statement Our vision is to provide a safe and efficient multi-modal transportation system that supports the economic vitality of the area, protects.
TECHNIX 2009 January, 11, 2009 From the Paved State Back to the Garden State Mobility without Highways for New Jersey Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
A New Policy Sensitive Travel Demand Model for Tel Aviv Yoram Shiftan Transportation Research Institute Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Serving New Jersey’s Personal Mobility Needs: With Walking, Bicycling, aTaxis and Trains Mercer County.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
Connectivity & Mobility
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan I-95 Corridor Stakeholder and Service Provider Meeting #2 June 13, 2011.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Smart Driving Cars: Where Might We End Up? Ridesharing and Fleet Size Estimates for a New Jersey Area –Wide aTaxi System Alain L. Kornhauser Professor,
Hunterdon, Warren and Mercer Counties Meredith Bertasi & Alex Pouschine Orf 467 F14.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
Somerset and Union Counties An Analysis of aTaxi Trip Distribution in Somerset and Union Counties, New Jersey ORF 467: Transportation Systems Analysis.
2015 Emerald Coast Transportation Symposium Stephanie Lane, Director CSX Industrial Development November 13, 2015.
Orf 467F’14 by Alain L. Kornhauser, PhD Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering Director, Program in Transportation Faculty Chair, PAVE.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
County Executive Congratulations! You are the County Executive. Your job is to research the demographics of the county. Scroll down to find your county.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Transportation Planning: An Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering.
A-Taxi System: Analysis of Passaic, Morris, & Bergen County Luke Cheng Proma Banerjee.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
By Alain L. Kornhauser, PhD Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering Director, Program in Transportation Faculty Chair, PAVE (Princeton Autonomous.
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
Regional Roads Committee
Local Aid & Economic Development
Community Transportation Initiatives in New Jersey
Project description & goals
aTaxis: Demand Management in Middlesex County
Why Ride Sharing is Challenging
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Average Vehicle Occupancy (AVO) Analysis of aTaxis
New Jersey’s Rail Network
Average Vehicle Occupancy (AVO) Analysis of aTaxis
Presentation transcript:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION & GOALS The Trip Demand Synthesis Process and the aTaxi + Rail Transit Mobility Concepts By Julia Phillips Hill Wyrough

The Need for Change New Jersey has 3 rd longest commute time in nation 1 Average NJ commuter in traffic over 52 hrs/yr Average cost of NJ traffic is $8.3 billion – equivalent to $1,465 per licensed NJ driver Total of $345 million in fuel wasted in congestion per annum 1 US Census Bureau NJIT 2007 – Alternative Performance measures for Evaluating Congestion 3 Ibid. 4 Ibid.

Potential within aTransportation Reduce congestion through ridesharing and greater utilization of existing NJT railway infrastructure Reduce fuel consumption and spending, minimize environmental impact Improve highway safety by removing human error Create a mode of transportation superior in efficiency, comfort, and availability to existing modes

aTaxi System Autonomous Transit as a subgroup of Personal Rapid Transit No new infrastructure Both spatially and temporally specific Preexisting technology Ability to meet existing demand currently met by automobile industry as well as demand of those presently lacking access to personal transportation

Goal of ORF467 aTaxi Project To assess the potential for ridesharing in New Jersey as comprehensively as possible Increase accuracy of data extrapolated by trip generator through continued collection of real data Bulid upon Fall 2012’s findings regarding improved efficiency with relaxation of constraints to: Destination pixel size (CD – common destination) Wait times (DD – departure delays)

Fall 2013 Advancements Substantially improved employment and patronage data by: Correcting data for major employers Using patronage data and total sales numbers to more accurately produce employee data Time of day data Factored in NJ Railway Transit Multimodal trips Intrastate rail trips

Trip Generation Step 1: Identify population (Age/Gender/Class of Worker) Generate number of residents per location Uniform sampling of ages by range Assign “traveler types” Produce income data # people, Lat, Long

Trip Generation Step 2: Assign place of work Assign a county > industry > employer per traveler of “work” type

Trip Generation Step 3: Assign schools Check person’s age/education level/enrollment Assign to Private (~15%) and Public (~84%) schools Dormitory students attend closest University

Trip Generation Step 4: Assign activity patterns Each resident follows a specific type of tour Tours can consist of between 0 and 7 arcs between Home, Work, School, Other 17 Patterns Type determined by specific demographic data Averages out to daily trips per person

Tour Types

Assumptions Residents located at centroid of census blocks Uniform distribution within age intervals All tours begin and end at home

Pixelation of New Jersey Convert New Jersey into a grid system of 0.50mi x 0.50mi pixels Convert longitude and latitude as follows:

Pixelation of New Jersey NJ State GrideZoomed-In Grid of Mercer

Pixelation of New Jersey Locate an aTaxi stand at the center of each pixel in NJ Any trip to within the pixel can be reasonably assumed to be served by nearest aTaxi stand All trips within New Jersey can then be converted to trips from aTaxi stand to aTaxi stand

Deep South Jersey oTrips

South Jersey oTrips

Jersey Shore oTrips

Route 18 Corridor oTrips

Route 206 Corridor oTrips

North Western New Jersey oTrips

North New Jersey oTrips

North East New Jersey oTrips

Out of State oTrips

Trip Type Distributions for NJ

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Hunterdon

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Atlantic

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Salem

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Sussex

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Warren

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Bergen

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Cape May

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Cumberland

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Essex

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Mercer

Distribution of oaTaxiTrips: Hudson

Mode Split Model 3 modes Walking/Bicycling NJ Transit railway aTaxis Walking/Bicycling Intrazonal oPixel adjacent to dPixel Train All trips to/from NYC or Philadelphia Trips originating or ending near train stations Can be combined with aTaxi and/or walking

Mode Split Model NJ Transit Rail LinesCongested Roadways NJDOT Statewide Capital Investment Strategy FY2008

Geographic Distribution of oTrainTrips

Geographic Distribution of ShortTrips

Geographic Distribution of oaTaxiTrips

Breakdown of Trip Types