Skills for Routines Breakout Sessions Breakout session 1: Preparing for a routine: Self-assessment and calibration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Advertisements

Primary Strategy Subject Leader Briefing June/July 2008 Leading on learning – making best use of Assessment for learning.
Analyzing Student Work
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Skills for Routines Breakout Sessions Breakout session 2: Setting the agenda and running the routine meeting.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
Case Studies – Australia Ross Attrill – International IDEA.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
7 Strategies of Assessment for Learning
Managing Change Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
Leading with Wonder National Title I Conference February 2015 U.S. Department of Education Office of State Support (OSS)
Workforce Planning Training for Supervisors Presentation Subtitle/Description Presenter’s Name Date.
Objectives Define collaboration as it relates to parent leadership and collaboration in a variety of settings Learn about the defining characteristics.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Creating Effective Facilitation Plans for Capacity Building CHA/CHIP Support Laurie Call 1.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Conducting Effective Meetings The purpose of this module is to enhance participants’ knowledge and skill in observing team meetings.
Skills for Routines Breakout Sessions Breakout session 3: Ensuring routines are data driven.
1 Formative Assessment Debbie Owens AMSP University of Kentucky Kathy Strunk AMSP University of Tennessee.
PROTECTING YOUR EMPLOYEES IN PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES Conducting A SWOT Analysis Toolkit includes:  Sample Facilitator Guidelines/Notes  Sample Facilitator.
ASSESSING & DEVELOPING YOUR WORKPLACE COMMUNICATION SKILLS Professional Year Program - Unit 1: Workplace Communication.
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
Charting a course PROCESS.
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Leadership in the Financial Aid Profession Aaron Steffens MASFAA President-Elect
1.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
QS 702 Phase II: Encouraging the Integration of Technology Into Higher Education.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Innovation in Fieldwork and Managing Change Developing Fieldwork Coordinator Leadership Capability.
McLean & Company1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
December 2, 2014 Baltimore, MD. 2 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The delivery approach focuses on four questions “delivery” (n.) is a systematic.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #1 January 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Ensuring the Fundamentals of Care in Family Planning and Reproductive Health Services MODULE 2 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum.
Implementation of the Essential Standards The Australian Quality Framework (AQTF) is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent,
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
21 st Century Assessment Examples of Practice Clinic Session 9:45 – 11:15.
Taking the Chair A National Development Programme for Chairs, Vice Chairs and Chairs of Committees Module Three Activity 3.1 OHT 1.
Analysis of 2007 BOD Assessment Checklists Prepared by: Cambria Tidwell.
2 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Session Objectives At the end of this session, you will: ▪ Understand the core components and tools of driving.
Is the Charter delivering for you? TPAS Conference November 2014.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute What makes implementation difficult? TodaysMeet.com/delivery.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Effective Learning Support: The key to quality and success Enhancement of Learning Support.
KIM TREE Developing an effective lesson plan Starting Point Check the Unit Specification –Check the date –Check the version –Check for changes –Check.
1 DED Action Plan Review Taking on the Duty NADP Annual Conference 2007 Honey Lucas ECU Projects Officer.
Board Feedback Results Board Meeting Dallas April 2007 Board Feedback Results Governance Committee Report Presented at Los Angeles July 2007.
Facilitate Group Learning
KVEC Presents PGES Observation Calibration Are You On Target?
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
>>UNITEC INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Success strategies for international student learning.
Commissioning Support Programme Post-16 Commissioning David Brown NASS Conference 9 th October 2009.
Participatory Evaluation The Fieldworx Way Eleesa Johnstone.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Teaching in a Small Group Angela Jackson, MD Director, Primary Care Training Program Boston University School of Medicine.
1 2 Assessing Pupils’ Progress Spring term 2009.
PLC Year 2 Day 2 Inquiry Cycle
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Focused Conversation for TTA
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Chicago Public Schools
Presentation transcript:

Skills for Routines Breakout Sessions Breakout session 1: Preparing for a routine: Self-assessment and calibration

1 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Our objectives for this session ▪ Understand tools and reasons for conducting a self-assessment and calibration ▪ Practice conducting a self-assessment and calibration

2 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute As you know, any good routine should include a focus on performance and an opportunity to come to a shared view of performance Strong execution ■ Buy-in to purpose and preparedness? ■ Clear roles and responsibilities? ■ Participants come prepared? ■ High-quality materials? ■ Well facilitated? ■ Clear next steps? Regularity ■ Happens regularly enough? ■ Right people present? Focus on performance ■ Clear area of focus? ■ Shared view of performance? ■ Focus on most important aspects? Action on performance ■ Helps identify most critical barriers? ■ Tough questions asked? ■ Creative problem-solving? ■ Encourages learning?

3 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute To arrive at that shared view of progress, we recommend any routine be driven by some type of self-assessment Sample self-assessment results

4 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The Assessment Framework is a tool to help participants reflect on the likelihood of successful implementation Assessment Framework: Likelihood of delivery Red Amber/Red Amber/Green Green Highly problematic – requires urgent and decisive action Problematic – requires substantial attention, some aspects need urgent attention Mixed – aspect(s) require substantial attention, some good Good – requires refinement and systematic implementation Key Quality of planning Capacity to drive progress Evidence of progress JudgementRating Rationale Summary

5 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Many versions of the Assessment Framework exist; users generally should adapt to fit their context Examples of assessment framework rubrics

6 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute A calibration discussion should occur after the accountable leads do their self-assessment to ensure that the ratings are accurate and balanced relative to one another Purpose of calibration discussion: ▪ Ensure ratings are accurate ▪ Tease out relative strengths and challenges ▪ Push on the rationale, get more detail ▪ Surface some of the bigger challenges that should be the focus of the stocktake

7 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute A successful calibration depends on asking the right questions Why did you decide on this rating? What evidence do you have? How do you know? What would it take to make this [one rating higher]? These two strategies are rated the same, but the evidence seems different – should they both be [rating]? Why? We have several strategies that fall into one rating or several categories within a strategy that are all rated the same – should any be rated higher or lower to show relative strength or challenge? What is keeping it from being [one rating lower]?

8 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Exercise: Self-assessment and calibration WhatHowTime ▪ Choose a strategy or project that you are currently working on; record that on a white card ▪ Review the rubric and make your judgments for quality of planning; record rationale, post to brown paper ▪ Discuss and calibrate ▪ Repeat with capacity and evidence of progress ▪ Discuss and calibrate ▪ Post final rating ▪ Discuss and calibrate ▪ Individuals ▪ Volunteer ▪ 30 minutes ▪ Brown paper ▪ Cards ▪ Markers Materials