Curriculum Leadership Institute (CLI) Academic Program Governance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting Together The Standards-Based Puzzle
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Teacher Effectiveness Group Members: J.P. Espinoza, Kim Hackworth, Erik Hollis, Isaiah Locke, Jacob Moeller.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Welcome Sign In Enjoy some refreshments.. Goals for the Day DISTRICT GOALS: 1.) Identify strengths & weaknesses a grade/course and individually. 2.) Develop.
How do you do it?-- TPCK and Understanding by Design There is a new curriculum design model that helps us think about how to make assessment part of learning.
Valparaiso Community Schools Curriculum, Assessment, and Technology
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
Creating Coherence Work Session: Part 1 Copyright © 2013 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Connecting Teacher Evaluation and Support.
June 18-19, 2012 Embassy Suites Charleston, WV.  Day 1-Title I directors only ◦ WVDE reorganization and assignments of SEA coordinators ◦ Title I and.
COMMON CORE GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Mike Royal Vice Chair, State Board of Education January 9, 2015.
LCSD Professional Development Plan The Lansing School Community will work to educate and motivate all students to achieve their personal best in.
Tier 1: Core, Instructional Interventions All Students, All Settings Preventive, proactive support (e.g. school-wide behavior support, high quality.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
RtII Questions, Answers and Reflections Bethann M. McCain RtII Consultant, CIU #10 Elementary Cohort 2, Year 1 Day 2; December 21, 2010.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Keokuk School Improvement Advisory Council (SIAC) 11/04/2013.
Visual Art GPS Roll Out.  Student achieves standard  Project  Lesson plans  Fulton County Art Curriculum  GPS  National Standards.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
School Plan Updates Cambrian School District November 10, 2011.
The What vs The How.  What we teach is currently prescribed by the Victorian Curriculum Assesment Authority (VCAA)  Provide teachers with a set of curiculum.
TEAM-Math Teacher Leader Meeting October 28, 2004.
What Does Great Teaching Look Like? Professional Learning Communities USD #443 Secondary Schools.
Metairie Academy for Advanced Studies WELCOME LEAP Information February 18, 2014.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Presented to the ASD Board of Education Appoquinimink's Race to the Top Plan January 17, 2012.
November 1, 2012 Cambrian School District. School Plan (SPSA) process review Site SPSA updates Moving Forward Overview.
Marzano Strategies Primer Lit Center Mini Lesson Fall 2013 Teacher Tool Kit Fall
Welcome to Curriculum Mapping… The attendee will understand the purpose of curriculum mapping, with a focus on the alignment of instruction with desired.
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
ED 530 THEORIST PRESENTATION SPRING SEMESTER 2010 SCOTT LENIO Robert J. Marzano.
School Improvement Plan (SIP) Accreditation Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Welcome and Introductions. Two Year Time-Line for District Year One- Introduce All Nine Strategies & Buildings Will Design Implementation Process Marzano.
Artifact 12 A PowerPoint on Understanding by Design. This artifact was developed during my graduate class School Curriculum: Elementary EDE 6205 Fall 2006.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Shelton School District Hi Cap Program Review Results and Recommendations for April 29, 2014.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach.
Welcome! Please get some breakfast. Setting the Stage  Step 1: Learning Requirements  (What do students need to know & be able to do?)  Step 2: Class.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
The What and The How.  What we teach is currently prescribed by the Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority (VCAA)  AUSVELS provide teachers with.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
Connecting Classroom Walkthrough to High Yield Strategies
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
North Carolina High School Math Task Force Update Summer 2013.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
SIX PLUS ONE COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION MODEL OF PARENT ENGAGEMENT = 7.
Administrator Development Series Educational Program and Curriculum Document Review Webinar Instructional Resources and Instructional Strategies January.
Every student College, Career and Life Ready K Readiness (birth to 6) College and Career Ready in Boone County Literacy/Numeracy at grade level – RTI.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Menus of Best Practices and Strategies
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
Organizational Consulting
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Curriculum Leadership Institute (CLI) Academic Program Governance

Vocabulary  Curriculum Leadership Institute (The CLI Model)  Steering Committee  Curriculum Coordinating Council (CCC)  Subject Area Committees (SAC)  Outcomes  Components

Curriculum Leadership Institute (The CLI Model)  A management system for academic programs that includes a policy and a governance body  Proven, step-by-step, processes for curriculum, instruction and assessment  Based on 20 years of scientific research

Steering Committee  The governance body that creates a policy document that clarifies purposes, authority, and relationships  The policy document is approved by the superintendent and BOE to become permanent policy for how curriculum is handled  Chooses a Curriculum Coordinating Council (CCC)

For the sake of time… Steering Committee = CCC  In August of 2011, a lottery will be drawn for 1, 2, or 3 year seats  Applications will need to be submitted for review to replace empty seats

Curriculum Coordinating Council (CCC)  Represents all District educators  Will include a Board Member  Will report to the Citizen’s Advisory Council (CAC)  Develops a long range plan in 4 to 5 year cycles

CCC - YEAR 1  Creates Math SAC  Makes decisions regarding implementation requirements  Begins discussions of mastery, grading, homework, report cards, and RtI  Creates plan for extended learning outside the school day for both enrichment and additional learning support  Makes decisions about assessments  Initiates discussion and possible revision of mission statement; purpose statement…10 words or less

CCC – Beyond Year 1  Meets monthly  Incorporates the mission  Integrates staff development  Monitors progress of organization  Facilitates implementation process with administrators  Convert external pressure (something new from the State) into positive action

Subject Area Committee (SAC) WHO  Includes a CCC member  One educator from each grade level and/or course K-12  16 educators will be selected for the first subject…math

SAC Meeting Dates WHEN  December15  January 26  February 17 and February 18  March 16 and March 17  April 27 and April 28  May 17 and May 18

YEAR 1 of MATH SAC  Create a survey of the local curriculum  Collect and organize the local curriculum  Create “Wall Work”  Conference with ALL teachers  Identify gaps, repetitions, and common core  Create the document

CONTENT SAC = SCIENCE TEACHERS = ART

Year 2 = Validation Year 3 = Resources and Assessment Year 4 = Assessment Validation

What about…  Transitional outcomes will be implemented the first year – the higher the grade level the increase in transitional outcomes  This will be Board Policy – there are administrative ramifications when a teacher chooses not to teach the curriculum  The policy is the thread that creates the continuum not the people  Decisions will be made on homework policies and grading practices  RtI – this is scientifically researched based Tier I core curriculum

How do we, as YMS professional educators, continue to create change in our instruction to improve student learning through our PLCs while this District change takes place?

Our Foundation is Set

With Common Core

We Build the Structure

Using Curriculum Mapper

We Frame the Structure

With Instructional Strategies  Similarities and differences  Summarizing and note-taking  Reinforcing effort and providing feedback  Homework and practice  Nonlinguistic representations  Cooperative learning  Setting objectives and providing feedback  Generating and testing hypotheses  Cues, questions, and advance organizers

Always Asking Why…  Why am I teaching this lesson?  Why do I want my students to learn this lesson?  Why are our students successful?  Why are our students not successful?  Why is this important to students right now?

Who dares to teach must never cease to learn ~John Cotton Dana