PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM 2013-2014 Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.

Advertisements

Wisconsin Student Assessment System Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 WSAS Test Proficiency Summary Report Assessment Seminar #2.

STATE TEST DATA SPRING 2012 Report to SSD School Board.

BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.

Assessment and Accountability at the State Level NAEP NRT (Iowa Tests) Core CRTs DWA UAA UBSCT NCLB U-PASS Alphabet Soup.

Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.

Achievement Analyses – Matched Cohort Groups Oklahoma A+ Schools® vs. Randomly Matched OKCPS Students  OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS  PLANNING, RESEARCH,

+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,

ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2012 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.

Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October

North Arlington Public Schools NJASK Data Presented by: Dennis Kenny, Nicole C. Russo, Elaine Jaume, Marie Griggs & Jennifer Rodriguez.

Dec. 14, 2010 APS BOE Workshop Graduation Requirements High School Presented By: Division of Instruction PACESetters!

WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.

Madison Public Schools Testing Reports Results Presenter Lee S Nittel Presenter: Lee S Nittel Director of Curriculum and Instruction.

Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments

How to Interpret Test Scores. 1. What are standardized tests?  A standardized test is one that is administered under standardized or controlled conditions.

1 State Testing March 2006 Grades 3-8 (NJASK and GEPA)

1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.

CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.

LAKE HAMILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 2006 SCORE REPORT: ITBS AND BENCHMARK NRT: National Reference Test given to grades K-9 = MC only = ITBS (Iowa Test of Basic.

End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.

District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.

District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District October 18, 2012.

Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

Educator Effectiveness CFMS Staff Meeting, January 2013.

HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL Alex Anemone, Ed.D. October 6, 2014 NJ Testing Report Spring 2014.

NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.

Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.

R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOLS DATA PRESENTATION P ART I October 2015.

Vae View Elementary School Improvement Plan

NJASK Comparison Scores to Essex Fells, J Districts, & Statewide (Slides 2-9) Tracking NJASK Scores for 3 rd, 4 th,& 5 th Grades (Slides ) Tracking.

Tanaina Elementary SBA Data Look May rd Grade SBA Advanced Proficient Below Proficient Far Below 91.9%

Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.

Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.

2012 NJASK Results- Garwood Public Schools. NJASK- New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge  Administered in grades 3-8  Language Arts, Mathematics,

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.

Minnesota Assessments June 25, 2012 Presenter: Jennifer Dugan.

MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.

Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.

Bay District Schools Non-FCAT Tested Decisions.

2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.

TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)

Presented to West Manor Administration and Faculty By: Felicia Belcher April 16, 2014.

Millbrae Elementary School District

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Measuring College and Career Readiness

NHCS READY Report October 2016.

Ridgefield Public Schools data presentation Part I

Ridgefield Public Schools data presentation Part II

Cedar Falls Board of Education October 2017

Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012

School District BOE Presentation

What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.

CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT

Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System

Student Assessment Data and NJ School Performance Report

or How to get the school to send you to the movies

Education Services October 3, 2017.

Kearny School District •

PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration

Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October 2014.

Glen Ridge District Testing Report

Assessment Report Board of Education 2014

Measuring College and Career Readiness

District Assessment Report

Measuring College and Career Readiness

West Virginia Parent Report for General Summative Assessment Results

Presentation transcript:

PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report

Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs)

Grade 1 Writing 2013 Average Spring Score Growth from Fall to Spring (Points) Growth from Fall to Spring (Percentage) % This CRT is scored on a rubric from 1-4.

Grade 2 Science 2013

Grade 3 Writing 2013 Average Spring Score Growth from Fall to Spring (Points) Growth from Fall to Spring (Percentage) % This CRT is scored on a rubric from 1-5.

Grade 5 Social Studies

Grade 6 Health

Grade 6 Study Skills (Pilot)

Grade 7 Science

Spring 2013 NJASK Results PARTIALLY PROFICIENT PROFICIENTADVANCED PROFICIENT

District Factor Group According to the NJDOE: District Factor Group - DFGs were first developed for the purpose of comparing students’ performance on statewide assessments across demographically similar school…the DFGs were calculated using the following six variables that are closely related to SES:  % of adults with no high school diploma  % of adults with some college education  Occupational status  Unemployment status  % of individuals in poverty  Median family income

GRADES 3-8 NJASK RESULTS

Language Arts Mathematics 3 rd Grade: 2013 NJASK

Language Arts Mathematics 4 th Grade: NJASK 2013

Language Arts Mathematics Current 5 th Grade Students

Language Arts Mathematics 5 th Grade: NJASK 2013

Language Arts Mathematics Current 6 th Grade Students

Language Arts Mathematics 6 th Grade: NJASK 2013

Language Arts Mathematics Current 7 th Grade Students

Language Arts Mathematics 7 th Grade: NJASK 2013

Language Arts Mathematics Current 8 th Grade Students

Language Arts Mathematics 8 th Grade: NJASK 2013

Language Arts Mathematics Current 9 th Grade Students

NOTABLE POINTS – BRAG BOARD DMS and LLE outperformed the state mean in all 76 of the tested categories. DMS equaled or outperformed the DFG in 45 out of the 49 categories (5 th Grade Math) LLE outperformed the DFG in 23 out of the 27 categories (3 rd and 4 th Grade Math).