 RBs oversee various programs and have specific information needs for each  e.g., 303(d), MS4, 401/wetlands, irrigated lands, point source dischargers,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Advertisements

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America Step 7 Identify Population Objectives Population Objective is set here.
WORLDWIDE INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT First meta-analysis of systemic pesticides - neonics 800 peer reviewed publications 29 independent scientists Environmental.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife Pam Landry, MassWildlife Education Coordinator Photos by Bill.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
ECOSYSTEM SNAPSHOT: FRESH WATER HABITATS. FEATURED POPULATION: AMERICAN TOAD.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Draft Conceptual Model for LOSL Integrated Ecological Response Model Limno-Tech, Inc. 501 Avis Drive Ann Arbor, MI
Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (RBP). Background to RBP changes in community/assemblage composition used to evaluate existence and degree of impact.
Advantages of Monitoring Vegetation Restoration With the Carolina Vegetation Survey Protocol M. Forbes Boyle, Robert K. Peet, Thomas R. Wentworth, and.
Understanding Wildlife Habitat What is Wildlife Habitat? The kind of place where an… –Animal –Bird –Fish –or plant live in a natural state.
RAPID ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (RAP) Terrestrial Ecosystems Freshwater Ecosystems Marine Ecosystems.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Project and Ambient Assessments.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Prepared for the 3rd SBB telecon 20 Mar 2012 Michele Walters, BI-01 task coordinator.
HYDROLOGY AND ECOLOGY. HYDROLOGY WATER QUALITY HYDRAULICS GEOMORPHOLOGY ECOLOGY SOCIO/ECONOMICS RESEARCHTEACHINGPOLICYCONSULTANCY VERTICAL INTEGRATION.
Chapter 14 Animals and Behavior An animal with a skull and a backbone; examples include mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish Click for Term.
Membership Need to clarify members and determine who has authority to vote on group decisions.
Lecture 8: Introduction to Stock Assessment
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning Chapter 9 Wildlife Biology and Management.
Don Robertson NIWA Wellington NZ Freshwater Fish Database.
Distance Sampling – Part I Ecological MethodologyLEC-02 Althoff.
Health - a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity World Health Organization 1946.
Aquatic Ecosystems Chapter Seven Section One Freshwater Ecosystems.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Biodiversity - the variety of life on Earth - makes our planet livable and beautiful.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Goals of CRAM program –Roles of Teams –Need and Intended Uses Summary of Science of Rapid Assessment Conceptual Model Development Process and Schedule.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
USFWS’ Arctic Strategy: Managing Fish and Managing Fish and Wildlife Populations in a Changing Landscape SEARCH Science Steering Committee Meeting October.
The Importance of Healthy Riparian Areas and their Current Status in Wisconsin Tim Asplund, Buzz Sorge (WI DNR) Advanced Lake Leaders – Green Lake Sept.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
DOE ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP Natural Resource Trusteeship John J. Bascietto
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Animal Groups Your Name.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
USAID Biodiversity Code Biodiversity Conservation in Agriculture Symposium Punta Cana, Dominican Republic May 31 - June 2, 2006.
IERM Overview Goals: 1. Development of an integrated, whole-system model for ecological response to water level/flow scenarios 2. Blend ecological research.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
1 Nov 8, 2001 STORET For Managers. 2 STORET Ambient Water Quality and Biological Data.
Ecological Assessment of Symonds Yat Rapids Eric Palmer Cresswell Associates.
Visual Decision Frameworks –Habitat GIT Adaptive Management based on annual review. Share progress and address challenges and opportunities Adjust management.
Proposed Topics for Application of Sediment Quality Objectives.
Wildlife Biology AG-WL-4. Reflection  What did you learn from yesterday’s activity?
Wetlands. Wetlands  An ecotone or transitional zone between land and water  Shallow water, saturated soil, vegetation adapted to waterlogged conditions.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
Unit 7 – Water Systems Section 2- Wetlands.
NICHE AND COMPETITION. NICHE Range of physical and biological conditions in which a species lives and the way the species obtains what it needs to survive.
Cottonwood’s Proposed Site-Specific Selenium Standards in the Cherry Creek Basin Comments Presented by: Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority Regulation.
Alternative Evaluation Framework for Managing Dioxins/Furans in Dredged Material Proposed for Open-Water Disposal Tad Deshler Windward Environmental LLC.
Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.
Planning Riparian Buffer Practices in FY16 Rachel Maggi NRCS West Area Biologist.
Chapter 17 Biological Communities Coach Fults. Interaction Among Species Some interactions among species are the result of a long evolutionary history.
Wildlife Workshop RIDEM Division of Fish & Wildlife Mary Talbot, Senior Wildlife Biologist Jennifer Brooks, Volunteer Coordinator.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
PNAMP Monitoring Terminology Data Dictionary The meta data file provides a better explanation of the project’s intent. The estuary work group is still.
Watershed Health Indicators
Tim Asplund, Buzz Sorge (WI DNR)
Wildlife Biology and Management
Community interactions are classified by whether they help, harm, or have no effect on the species involved Ecologists call relationships between species.
Who are we? Hi my name is Ann Ann Angelidis Steve Angelidis.
Conservation Management
Community interactions are classified by whether they help, harm, or have no effect on the species involved Ecologists call relationships between species.
Recommendations from the SMC Bioassessment Workgroup
Understanding Wildlife Habitat
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

 RBs oversee various programs and have specific information needs for each  e.g., 303(d), MS4, 401/wetlands, irrigated lands, point source dischargers, timber, NNE, hydromodification  Need a translation of how current (and future, as needed) indicators, waterbody types, and beneficial uses (BUs) relate back to specific program goals  Would assist agency staff to know what they need in order to make informed decisions  Would also make a connection back to program-specific needs Big Picture

Long-term Goals for the Tool 1. Develop “guidance” for users to determine which indicators are most appropriate for assessing BU attainment under different scenarios 2. Develop a translation of assessment results for interpreting beneficial use attainment (vet this with agencies) ~ construct a conceptual framework to guide this process 3. Develop a procedure for integrating & interpreting information from multiple types indicators  chemical, physical, biological datasets  stressor data

Strawman Organizational Scenario for the BU Interpretive Tool

Uses of waters that support terrestrial ecosystems including, but not limited to, preservation and enhancement of terrestrial habitats, vegetation, wildlife (e.g., mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, invertebrates), or wildlife water and food sources. Uses of waters that support wildlife habitats, including, but not limited to, the preservation and enhancement of vegetation and prey species used by wildlife, such as waterfowl. Water quality requirements of wildlife pertain to water directly ingested, the aquatic habitat itself, and the effect of water quality on the production of food materials. The two most important types of wildlife habitat are riparian and wetland habitats WILD Beneficial Use

Keep in mind:  Focus of WILD is on terrestrial wildlife (e.g., mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, invertebrates; not fish) and vegetation  Focus on direct relationships/linkages of indicator(s) to specific aspect of WILD  Assume focus is on is terrestrial insect taxa only (no aquatic larval stage) Constructs for WILD BU Interpretive Tool

 Distal Measure of Condition (alternatively, “facilitation”)  Indicates whether physical and biological elements are in place to facilitate natural processes that underlie BU attainment  Snapshot that can be assessed in single visit  Cheaper to assess than “function” (below)  But… less directly related to attainment of the BU  Proximal Measure of Function (alternatively, “success”)  Indicates whether naturally occurring processes have been successfully carried out during the recent history at that site (ex. recruitment, biogeochemical processes)  Processes occur over time, which may mean multiple site visits required  More directly related to attainment of the BU  But…generally more expensive to assess than “condition” Proposed Definitions

Wildlife food sources Wildlife water sources Water directly ingested or absorbed Seasonality of water availability (hydroperiod) Nest surveys Occupied tree cavities Roosting behavior Aquatic toxicity Nest/egg mass counts Demographic surveys Tissue analyses and bioaccumulation studies Terrestrial vegetation (riparian) Terrestrial Substrates Habitat structure and diversity WILD BU Definition INDICATOR CLASS PROXIMAL MEASURES: function (success) (SWAMP protocol available) LEGEND Mortality due to poor water quality RATIONALE for why to measure Drinking; Reproduction for amphibians; Bathing, cooling Data loggers to monitor hydroperiod Vegetation as food source for granivorous birds, insects, turtles Animals as food source for trophic support: Fish (as food source only) Benthic and terrestrial macro-inverts Amphibians &reptiles Birds and small mammals Gut-content analysis or observations of feeding behavior Roosting and breeding habitat for birds Habitat for terrestrial invertebrates, reptiles Burrow occupancy Physical (Habitat) Biological Chemical ATTRIBUTE Vegetation abundance Diversity; Biomass/productivity Prey abundance Diversity; Biomass/productivity Toxicity testing using surrogates e.g., Ceriodaphnia DISTAL MEASURES: condition (facilitation) (SWAMP protocol available) Stressors analysis and causal assessment CRAM/PHAB vegetation transects, releves, point- intercepts transects, point-intercepts BMI Bioassessment Presence/absence surveys CRAM Vegetation transects and intercepts Clip harvest and leaf area NOTE: We will treat each line as a hypothesis; will need to articulate a validation scheme for each one

 Is this the right approach to building a tool to assist in determination of BU attainment?  Is the structure appropriate and effective?  Does this make an effective translation between assessment endpoints and programmatic needs?  Is thisdeveloped enough to merit starting discussions with a broader group of regulators? To Discuss

 Hold a meeting with a broader group in Sacto  Present and hold a workshop at CABW  Build support for the continuation of this work  Continue developing version for other BUs (WARM, COLD, etc.) Next Steps