Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Performance of the Raytheon Aquarius 1K mid-IR Array with the Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer William.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics in Astronomy - Interferometry - Oskar von der Lühe Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik Freiburg, Germany.
Advertisements

Light and Telescopes Please pick up your assigned transmitter
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
Astronomical Detectors
HAWCPol / SuperHAWC Software & Operations J. Dotson July 28, 2007.
AURA New Initiatives Office S.C. Barden, M. Liang, K.H. Hinkle, C.F.W. Harmer, R.R. Joyce (NOAO/NIO) September 17, 2001 Instrumentation Concepts for the.
TIGER The TIGER Instrument Overview Phil Hinz - PI July 13, 2010.
A Summary of Results from Nulling Interferometry W. Liu, P. Hinz, W. Hoffmann, and the MMT Adaptive Optics Group Steward Observatory, University of Arizona.
The Telescope Array Low Energy Extension (TALE)‏ Pierre Sokolsky University of Utah.
SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. Correction of Raw Image with Bias, Dark, Flat Images Flat Field Image Bias Image Output Image Dark Frame Raw.
This Set of Slides This set of slides deals with telescopes. Units covered: 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30.
Can people meet from 2:40 to 3:30 on Tuesday, September 5?
Imaging Planets in the Thermal Infrared Phil Hinz University of Arizona Outline: Observations of HR 8799 and Fomalhaut Survey of FGK stars in the thermal.
Some large-telescope design parameter considerations: Distributed pupil telescopes J.R.Kuhn Institute for Astronomy, UH How to “distribute the glass” in.
Overview of Scientific Imaging using CCD Arrays Jaal Ghandhi Mechanical Engineering Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
Digital Correlated Double Sampling for ZTF Roger Smith and Stephen Kaye California Institute of Technology The digital equivalent of dual slope integration.
AST3 detector properties
4. Telescopes Light gathering power and resolution Optical and radio telescopes Limitations of Earth’s atmosphere and satellite missions. Instruments (prism.
AAO Fibre Instrument Data Simulator 10 October 2011 ROE Workshop 2011 Michael Goodwin Tony Farrell Gayandhi De Silva Scott Smedley Australian Astronomical.
Detector Monitoring as part of VLT Science and Data Flow Operations Wolfgang Hummel DMO/DFO/QC group Lander de Bilbao, SDD/pipeline group Andrea Modigliani,
Super-hot pixels, hot pixels and DSNU on Hawaii-2RG detector
Beating Noise Observational Techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 11 Textbook.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Telescope Technologies
Measurement Results Detector concept works! Flood fields show MCP fixed pattern noise that divides out Spatial resolution consistent with theory (Nyqvist.
Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer LBTI/NOMIC data analysis B. Mennesson, D. Defrère, P. Hinz, B. Hoffmann, O. Absil, B. Danchi, R. Millan-Gabet,
Clio: 3-5  m planet-finding AO camera Ari Heinze (Steward Observatory) Collaborators: P. Hinz (Steward), S. Sivanandam (Steward), M. Freed (Optical Sciences),
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Telescope Guiding with a HyViSI H2RG Used in Guide Mode Lance Simms Detectors for Astronomy /2/09.
Control room High resolution flat screen monitors CCD image intensifiers are easily identified by their shape A modern fluoroscopic suite.
Multimedia Data Introduction to Image Processing Dr Sandra I. Woolley Electronic, Electrical.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
Detectors for Light Sources Contribution to the eXtreme Data Workshop of Nicola Tartoni Diamond Light Source.
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
ASTR 3010 Lecture 18 Textbook N/A
Telescopes and Instrumentation October 24. Calendar Next class: Friday November 7 Field trips! – Visit the 61” on Mount Bigelow Afternoon of Saturday.
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov Photons Shower Simulation Reconstruction Algorithm Toy MC Study Two Detector Configuration Summary M.Z. Wang and C.C.
Development of a high-speed single photon pixellated detector for visible wavelengths Introduction A photon incident on the photocathode produces a photoelectron.
Chapter 3: Factors of Image Quality 1. Interlaced vs. progressive scanning 2. Matrix size 5. Field of view (FOV) 3. Vertical resolution 4. Horizontal resolution.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 31th IADC Meeting, April , 2013, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany Improved Space Object Observation Techniques.
Observational Astrophysics I
Page 1 MIRAC3-BLINC Magellan results MIRAC4-BLINC plans Static and Deformable Secondaries Phil Hinz and Bill Hoffmann Steward Observatory Giovanni Fazio.
1 Optical observations of asteroids – and the same for space debris… Dr. D. Koschny European Space Agency Chair of Astronautics, TU Munich Stardust school.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
1 Stephen SchultzFiber Optics Fall 2005 Semiconductor Optical Detectors.
PVPhotFlux PACS Photometer photometric calibration MPIA PACS Commissioning and PV Phase Plan Review 21 st – 22 nd January 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
Olivier ABSIL Université de Liège * Pathways Towards Habitable Planets Barcelona, 14/09/2009.
Web Image Simulator Stefano Gallozzi & LBC Team Copyright © 2003.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
Basic Detector Measurements: Photon Transfer Curve, Read Noise, Dark Current, Intrapixel Capacitance, Nonlinearity, Reference Pixels MR – May 19, 2014.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
The InGaAs IR Array of Chunghwa Telecom Laboratory Chueh-Jen Lin and Shiang-Yu Wang, Optics and Infrared Laboratory In 2006, Advanced Technology Laboratory.
February 21, 2002TIPS meeting1 "Data contained herein is exempt from ITAR regulations under CFR 125.4(13) -- data approved for public disclosure." TIPS.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. CCDs: noise sources dark current –signal from unexposed CCD read noise –uncertainty in counting electrons in.
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
Debris Disks - LBTI Phil Hinz University of Arizona.
Comparison of a CCD and the Vanilla CMOS APS for Soft X-ray Diffraction Graeme Stewart a, R. Bates a, A. Blue a, A. Clark c, S. Dhesi b, D. Maneuski a,
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Pixel layouts for (a) a standard 3-T APS containing reset (R), row select (RS)
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Simulations and comparison of SOFI reconstructions with different optical pixel.
Big Bear Solar Observatory Some ground-based technology developments that will propel solar physics Phil Goode for Jeff Kuhn Big Bear Solar Observatory.
CCD Calibrations Eliminating noise and other sources of error.
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
Structure Function Analysis of Annular Zernike Polynomials
Observing and Data Reduction
Frequency of Mature Planets orbiting neighboring stars
Instrument Considerations
Observational Astronomy
Presentation transcript:

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Performance of the Raytheon Aquarius 1K mid-IR Array with the Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer William F. Hoffmann, Phillip M. Hinz, Denis Defrère, Jarron M. Leisenring, Andrew J Skemer Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona Bertrand Mennesson Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology Scientific Detector Workshop Florence, Italy October 7-11, 2013

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer 1. The Context Provide a ground-based astronomical instrument for mid- infrared (8-13 μm) high contrast Imaging of nearby stars Detect and measure exozodiacal light Detect and characterize planets Work supported by NASA through a contract with JPL The Goal of this work

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer The Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) Partners: Arizona, Italy, Germany, The Research Corporation, Ohio State University Location: Mt Graham, Arizona, elevation feet (3170 meters) Two 8.4 meter primary mirrors, edge-to-edge 22.7 meters Adaptive optics thin shell secondaries with Strehl ratio of 0.98 at 11 μm

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer LBT Interferometer (LBTI) Cryogenically cooled beam train Slow alignment mechanisms and atmospheric phase, tip/tilt correction Rigid external structure 4.13 m 3.6 m

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer LBTI Components (2-5 um) (1-5 um)

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer 2. The Instrument Nulling Optimized Mid-Infrared Camera (NOMIC) Array: Raytheon Aquarius Si:As 1024x1024 with 30 μm pixels Field of view: 12 arcseconds Pixel scale: arcseconds/pixel λ/D individual aperture at 11 μm: 0.27 arcseconds 15 pixels λ/D Fizeau interferometry at 11 μm: 0.10 arcseconds 5.5 pixels Aquarius

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer NOMIC Array, Electronics, Controller, and Computer Array is read in “rolling mode”. Pixels are reset as they are read Sub-array allows each channel reduced size, e.g. 128x256 or 128x128 pixels Pixel read speed 2.4 MHz. Full array pixels per channel Full array read 27 msec. Partial array ≥3 msec A/D converter 14 bit 16 Array output current sources, Preamplifiers. and A/D Converters    FPGA Formatting Co-adding Data Transfer PC De-interlacing Saving Quick look display & analysis

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Linearity Linear from 12% to 84% of saturation 3. Performance All Measurements are for “High Gain” (Small integrating Capacitance). Full well ~ 10 6 electrons

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Read and shot noise Noise is defined to be the standard deviation over a selected portion of the array of the difference between two images. Noise measurements Fit to measurements Fit minus read noise = shot noise Measured read noise Raytheon spec for read noise Conversion = 153 electrons/ADU Detector Bias = 1.8 V

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Array Quantum efficiency at 11 μm ~40% Calculated QE Fit to Calculation Conversion = 153 electrons/ADU Detector bias = 1.8 V QE is calculated from the shot noise and well filling in the previous slide. QE = (shot noise) 2 / (Well filling)

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Image Quality - Point source and noise Median-combined 11 μm image of frames at 55 msec each Subtracting telescope off-source nod beams, single aperture Part of the image containing Vega, stretched to show diffraction rings Part of the image away from Vega showing noise, linear stretch

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Image Quality - Artifacts Single raw frame showing detector artifacts, response variation from left to right, and horizontal lines Vega with histogram stretch to show artifact

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer ELFN Characteristics 1.ELFN is not noticeable in a single array read. It requires many coadds to see. 2.It appears at low frequencies, < 10 Hz 3.It is not 1/f noise. 4.It rises above the shot noise approximately a factor of two to five over about a factor of 100 in frequency 5.The rise starts at a “knee” which is at a higher frequency for higher incident photon flux 4. Low Frequency Excess Noise (ELFN)

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Plot of ELFN Noise Plot of the standard deviation of 126x126 pixel image difference pairs as a function of the frequency calculated from the time interval between pairs. The lower curve is for single pairs. The upper curve is for 2048 co-added pairs Detector frame 126x126 pixels

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer The Challenge For previous generations of IR telescopes with rapid beam switching ELFN was not a problem. For current and future generations of large telescopes beam switching is generally much slower than 10 Hz so that observing strategies must be adapted to minimize this effect.

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Adding Spatial Filtering to Noise Measurement The standard deviation of all the pixels over the array is not an appropriate measurement of noise when the energy from a star falls on a number of pixels. The values for these pixels must be added to detect and determine the flux from a star. In addition, in order to remove the effect of possible variation of the background over the array, a region outside the star is frequently subtracted, such as a neighboring area or an annulus. These steps are a form of spatial filtering which effects the noise determination and reveals something about its properties.

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer ELFN Noise with Source Sum & Bkgnd Subtract Plot of the standard deviation of 2x4 “pixel” difference pairs for source sum and background subtract as a function of the frequency calculated from the time interval between pairs. The flat curve is for single pairs. The irregular curve is for 2048 co-added pairs. The dashed line is the mean standard deviation w/o source sum × sqrt(2). Detector frame Background 15x30 Source 30x30 pixels

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer 18 It appears that With both temporal and spatial filtering, we can overcome most of the ELFN increase of noise with decreasing frequency for point source measurements However The resulting noise with temporal and spatial filtering is about a factor of 1.5 times that without ELFN This increase appears to be due to spatial and temporal correlation of the array readout noise. The task remains to understand and eliminate this correlation

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer 19 References LBTI web site: lbti.as.arizona.edu

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer 20 Backup Slides

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Two Approaches to Noise Calculation 1. Approach of Previous Slides We have first subtracted images at various time intervals to remove the fixed pattern and then defined the noise to be the standard deviation over the array. Subsequently we have summed over the source and subtracted the background 2. Alternative Approach We could first sum over the source and subtract a background to remove bias and then define the noise as the standard deviation of a time sequence of these differences. Subsequently we could difference time separated images to further reduce the noise

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Time variation of Sum over Source Drift with detector blanked-off is ~ 1.2 × 10 4 ADU in 130 seconds Temporal drift with background on array is ~ 8 × 10 4 ADU in 130 seconds Detector Detector and Background

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Subtract Nearby Split Background Photometric aperture Background regions (optimized for r=0.64 /D) Background subtracted Aperture only DIT=55ms WITHOUT NODDING SUBTRACTION WITH NODDING SUBTRACTION 40-min of sky data nodding every ~1min30 (June 27 th 2013)

Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer Fizeau Fringes