Pre-Implementation Project “Third-Quarter” Town Hall September, 2013 Visit www.uc.edu/sis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Responding to Extreme Changes between Self-Study and the Evaluation Visit Dr. Andrew Thompson, Provost Dr. Richard Resch, Provost (Retired) The American.
Advertisements

December 8, 2006 Educational Information System Replacement Plan All Administrators and Supervisors December 8, 2006 Fred Sherman Kathy Kyne.
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
UMR’s Accreditation Self-Study. The Value of Accreditation  Institutional Reputation  Standard of Quality  Vehicle for Self Improvement  Transferability.
Pre-Implementation Project “Mid-term” Town Hall January 24, 2013.
Institutional Course Evaluation Solution Faculty Senate Executive Committee September 12, 2012 Carol VanZile-Tamsen, Ph.D.; Associate Director, Office.
Chapter 6. Explain the process a HCO generally goes through in selecting a HCIS. Describe the SDLC and its four major stages. Discuss the various stages.
Dr. Judith Marwick, Provost, Harper College
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Project Update Monthly Research Administrators Meeting March 11, 2010.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Project Update Agency STARS Rapport Association August 2, 2007.
Town Hall Meeting: Development of Next Two-Year Budget and Strategic Initiatives Implementation (FY2010 and FY2011) January 21, 2009 Presented by: Scott.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Prioritization of Academic and Administrative Programs Academic and Administrative Author Training September 30 – October 1, 2014.
Town Hall Meeting Development of Next Two-Year Budget FY2010 and FY2011 December 4, 2008 Presented by: Scott Bass, Provost and Don Myers, Vice President.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Evaluation and Assessment Future Financial and Human Resource Administrative Systems Evaluation of options, costs, and campus readiness for transforming.
State of Oklahoma Information Services Division Contracts and Purchasing Unit 1.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
The Report of the Provost’s Advisory Group on the SUNY Assessment Initiative September 2009 Tina Good, Ph.D. President Faculty Council of Community Colleges.
University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.
MIDDLE STATES COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION: REACCREDITATION D ECENNIAL S ELF -S TUDY P ROCESS A CADEMIC S ENATE S EPTEMBER 17, 2015 Anne Wahl Michael.
Middle States Accreditation – update at Town Hall, 2/19/2014 Middle States Accreditation: Update at Town Hall Meeting February 19, 2014.
SHORTER COLLEGE Assessment Week Sponsored by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment & the Division of Academic Affairs.
Middle States Self-Study Process : 2013 College Senate SUNY Oneonta October 15, 2012.
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
Better use of your ERP Brad Reese – Client actor Tom Phillip – Visual expert Keith Landa – Token academic member Gary L. Pratt – Scribe John S. Bojonny.
Ad hoc Committee on Faculty Bylaws Todd Ellis Michelle Hendley Jimmy Johnston Michael Koch Eileen McClafferty John Relethford Renee B. Walker (Chair)
Penn State Electronic Theses and Dissertations Project Graduate Council Library Computing Services Graduate School University Libraries Center for Academic.
Building a Foundation for SEM Through a One Stop Center Implementation Bryan Newton, Associate Vice President Marketing & Enrollment Management Aiken Technical.
ACP Finance DC FB 4.Appointment of Taskforce Team Taskforce Team 5.Environment Scanning Plan (ESP) 8.Potential & feasible? 7.Confirm the ESP Result 10.Detailed.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
HLC Re-accreditation Update GENERAL FACULTY MEETING JANUARY 15, 2014.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
Enterprise IT Decision Making Governance Amy Gee, Portfolio Manager, EITDM Office of the CIO.
Baccalaureate Degrees in the California Community College System Jolena Grande, Cypress College James Todd, Modesto Junior College John Stanskas, ASCCC.
Correlating Engagement and Student Success (Online version) Student Success Specialist Western Oregon University Jesse Poole.
State Center Community College District Willow International Center Center-to-College Status Naming Process & Timeline.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN TIMELINE Mr. Rick Miranda Acting Vice President, Academic Affairs/Asst. Superintendent Dr. Kristi Blackburn Dean of Institutional.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
2018 Institution Self Evaluation Report (ISER) Joanne Whitaker and Sunny Pai Co-Chairs for ISER September 12, 2016.
Towards a New ERP: Status Update
Town Hall Meeting UC Travel & Expense Management Improvement Project
Student and Financial Aid Systems Transformation Project
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Electronic health record (EHR) software selection and purchase
Towards a New ERP: Status Update
2016 GOVERNANCE GROUP UPDATE
HLC Day February 13, 9:30am - 2:00pm, TUC Great Hall.
IT Governance Planning Overview
Administrative Review Process
Educational Information System Replacement Plan Overview
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Governance John Zomchick Interim Provost
Educational Information System Replacement Plan
OUHSC Graduate College Program Review Overview and Timeline
Electronic health record (EHR) software selection and purchase
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Online Program Management (OPM) Request for Proposals
Data Governance at UMBC: Built from the Bottom Up
Institutional Course Evaluation Solution
Land Acknowledgment We stand today on native lands and recognize and honor the Anishinaabe and Dakota nations As we gather to learn, network, and share.
Presentation transcript:

Pre-Implementation Project “Third-Quarter” Town Hall September, 2013 Visit

Project Sponsors Robert Ambach, Senior Vice President of Administration and Finance Beverly Davenport, Senior Vice President and Provost Nelson Vincent, CIO and Vice President of Information Technologies Visit

Steering Committee Aurora Bennett, College of Medicine Douglas Burgess (PM), Registrar Anton Harfmann, Dean’s Council Patricia Krekeler (PM), UCIT Carol Metzger, Finance Caroline Miller (Co-Chair), Enrollment Management Lee Mortimer, Institutional Research Andrew Naab, Student Government Robin Pittman (PM), Business Core Systems Jim Plummer (Co-Chair), Administration & Finance Russell McMahon, Faculty Senate Nelson Vincent (Co-Chair), UCIT Visit

Project Team Douglas Burgess (PM), Registrar Thomas Canepa, Admissions Paul Foster, UCIT (Blackboard) Nicholas Frame, Institutional Research Cecily Goode, One Stop Student Services Gary Grafe, UCIT (IT Architect) Ken Hirsch, College of Law Emily Kregor, The Graduate School Patricia Krekeler (PM), UCIT Bob Miller, Enrollment Management Mark Miller, UC Blue Ash Andrea Oaks, College of Medicine Dana Pawlowicz, Financial Aid Robin Pittman (PM), Business Core Systems M. B. Reilly, Public Relations Tara Warden, Academic Advising Ken Wolterman, Bursar Mark Young, UCIT Visit

Project Timeline – Phases I & II

Phase 1 & 2 Accomplishments Requirements Gap Analysis Critical Issues & Risk Analysis Options Assessment Readiness Assessment All resulting in a recommendation to proceed with Vendor and Implementation Partner RFPs Visit

Project Timeline: – Phases III & IV Visit

Summer Semester Activities Prepare a request for proposals (RFP) for a software product and an implementation partner – Electronic RFP utilizing DecisionDirector electronic tool Both RFP’s released on August 19 Visit

Fall Semester Activities Evaluate the RFP responses for the software vendors and the implementation partners Evaluate the vendor demonstrations and implementation partner presentations of the top finalists Perform reference checks Select the finalist Visit

Software and Implementation Services Vendor Selection Timeline Visit

Selection Process Steering Committee will review RFP responses to determine respondents that meet minimum requirements Steering Committee and Project Team will review and score the RFP responses. Visit

Selection Process Continued Finalists will be invited to campus to present scripted demonstrations based on University requirements Demonstration participants will provide feedback Steering Committee and Project Team will review demonstration feedback and incorporate into the scoring process Steering Committee and Project team will conduct and score reference checks Visit

At least Five installations Two w/in last three years At institutions w/25,000+ Minimum Qualifications Software Vendors / Implementation Partners Demos Visit

Product Support Product Development Reliability & Viability Functional Capability Technical Capability Scripted Demonstrations Reference Checks Cost of Ownership Evaluation Criteria Software Vendor Finalist Visit

Implementation Services Project Management Project Staffing Reliability & Viability On-Site Presentation Reference Checks Cost of Implementation Evaluation Criteria Implementation Partner Finalist Visit

Visit for full demo schedulewww.uc.edu/sis

Decision Process Steering Committee will review final scores and select the finalist for the vendor product and implementation partner Contracts will be negotiated Board of Trustees will be presented with final recommendation for approval Contracts will be signed Visit

Questions, Comments, or Concerns? Visit to