EASA MDM.032 Working Group Lisbon 11 – 12 March 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Westin Dragonara Resort, Malta 4 March 2013 Implementation of the new Air Operations Regulations in Malta Capt Michael OBrien Head of Flight Operations.
Advertisements

EASA and the EU Regulatory Framework
A concept for better regulation in general aviation
A concept for better regulation in general aviation
01 DEC 2006Koeln M-005: Limited Pilot owner maintenance EASA workshop 01 December 2006 JP Arnaud.
05 July 2007Cologne NPA WG66.009: Type and Group Ratings Juan Anton.
European Aviation Safety Agency 3 July 2008 Cologne: Part-M workshop (Opinion 02/2008) 1 NPA (Task ): "Licences for non-complex aircraft.
04 July 2007Cologne : Aircraft Maintenance Licence for Light Aircraft Juan Anton.
European Aviation Safety Agency Slide show for rulemaking task M.017.
Experiences on the road to Fatigue Risk Management Regulation
Definitions Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking Directorate EASA FBA introduction : insist on Standardisation rather than on inspections.
Ensuring Better Services and Fair Value “Introduction and roadmap to implementation of ISO in Zambia’s water utilities” Kasenga Hara March 2015.
Part-M Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking Directorate EASA FBA introduction : insist on Standardisation.
Certificates of Airworthiness
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop From national to EU rules - Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
“Reform of the Child Care System: Taking Stock and Accelerating Action” South East Europe 3 – 6 July 2007, Sofia.
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop Future simplifications for General Aviation Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking.
Cranfield Safety and Accident Investigation Centre Independent Investigation How it works in aviation Prof Graham Braithwaite.
The European Gliding Union and the Harmonisation of European Regulations in Aviation by the EASA EHPU General Conference Zürich, 18 February 2006.
UAS in civil applications – New challenges - General Aviation Safety Program Diana Dumitrache – President.
AIR LAW for PPL(A)s.
Evgeny A. Gorbunov, General Director, Union of Aviation Industrialists
European Aviation Safety Agency
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Page 1 Introduction of new European Requirements on Continuing Airworthiness (Not yet published) The presentation is based on the final draft. Franz Graser,
IAOPA Europe Regional Meeting Reykjavik - 7. Maj 2014 GA SUB SSCC.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
M. ANGELA JIMENEZ 1 UNIT 5. REGULATION OF EXTERNAL AUDIT IFAC AND E.C.
Regulatory matters è The newly created European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is harmonising most regulations in aviation across Europe: è Licensing è.
Proposal to the MDM.032 Working Group Y Morier Meeting
1 11 December 2012E&M Sub-SSCC EASA Rulemaking Update (Continuing Airworthiness) Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking Directorate EASA.
5/26/20161 AUDIT SERVICES PRIVATE/CORPORATE Captain Iain Tulloch tel /
EATS 2009 Evolving European Regulatory Environment Prague November 2009 Jean-Marc Cluzeau EASA Rulemaking Directorate.
2008 © European Aviation Safety Agency European Aviation Safety Agency Preparing for new responsibilities Patrick Goudou Executive Director 2008 US/Europe.
PtF Permit to Fly. European Aviation Safety Agency PtF Slide 2 Permit to Fly - Some major principles of the new rules - Frequently asked questions - Discussion.
S tatus of the Harmonisation of the European Regulations in Light Aviation Roland STUCK EGU President Norwegian Gliding Days Elverum 28 October 2006.
Update on European Rulemaking for ETOPS-LROPS Global ETOPS/LROPS Implementation: Timetables and Approaches Yves Morier, St Petersburg, 4 June.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Eric Sivel Date: 8 June 2006 “Global Aviation Safety Processes: Refining, Reinforcing, and Streamlining”
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
IAOPA Regional Meeting Larnaca 22 September 2007 EASA OPS.001 Working Group.
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
Development of Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions for Periodical Technical Inspections of Wheeled Vehicles and the Reciprocal Recognition.
M mc EU ROAD TRANSPORT POLICY AND INFRAESTRUCTURE Directive 2003/59/EC. Driver Training Ankara, 19/20 September 2006.
Approximation of legislation to the internal market acquis An EU funded project managed by European Agency for Reconstruction Directive 89/106/EEC on Construction.
8 June 2006Portland, Oregon, USAE. Sivel EASA Working Group on regulation of non-complex motor aircraft engaged in non-commercial operations E Sivel (EASA)
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
Technical & General Meeting Luxemburg, March
CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser Ministry of Health, ROMANIA.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
2005 Europe/US International Aviation Safety Conference, Cologne 7-9 June The Europe-US International Aviation Safety Conference 2005 ‘ Aviation Safety.
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
EU rules for Third Country operators ??
Rulemaking update Neil Williams Policy Lead - Airworthiness
The European Federation of Light, Experimental and Vintage Aircraft
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
EASA CRD on NPA & MDM032 EAS Cologne 14th March 2008.
Screeners and the Screener Organisation
Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
EASA European Aviation Safety Agency
AIRWORTHINESS OF AIRCRAFT
EMF Working meeting Madrid 8-9 March 2008
Unmanned Aircraft DRONES – UAVs in Cyprus
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
European Aviation Safety Agency
A concept for better regulation in general aviation
Annex II Amendment possible implications Jan Fridrich, EMF Vicepresident European Microlight Federation Working Meeting Oslo 24. – 25. March 2007.
EASA’s MDM.032 WG Regulation of aircraft other than complex motor powered aircraft when used in non-commercial activities UK CAA Presentation 18/19.
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

EASA MDM.032 Working Group Lisbon 11 – 12 March 2006

HISTORY September 2002Regulation 1592/2002 November 2005Amendment to 1592/2002 December 2005MDM.032 Working Group

ANNEX II (e) Revised aeroplanes, helicopters and powered parachutes having no more than two seats, a maximum take-off mass (MTOM), as recorded by the Member States, of no more than: (i) 300 kg for a land plane/helicopter, single-seater; or (ii) 450 kg for a land plane/helicopter, two-seater; or (iii) 330 kg for an amphibian or floatplane/helicopter single-seater; or (iv) 495 kg for an amphibian or floatplane/helicopter two-seater, provided that where operating both as a floatplane/helicopter and as a land plane/helicopter, it falls below both MTOM limits, as appropriate; (v) kg for a land plane, two-seater equipped with an airframe mounted total recovery parachute system; (vi) 315 kg for a land plane single-seater equipped with an airframe mounted total recovery parachute system; and, for aeroplanes, having the stall speed or the minimum steady flight speed in landing configuration not exceeding 35 knots calibrated air speed (CAS);

ULTRALIGHTS & EASA The Commission considered that ultralight aircraft should perhaps no longer be systematically exempted from common rules, as the performance of some of these aircraft now matches that of light aircraft. It would therefore like work to begin as soon as possible to examine if, and to what extent, certain types of ultralight aircraft should be subject to common rules (Issued with revised Annex II Nov 2005)

EASA MDM.032 Working Group Regulation of aircraft other than complex motor powered aircraft, used in non- commercial activities

RECREATIONAL ‘recreational operation’ means any non commercial operation with a non complex-motor-powered aircraft (Issued with revised Annex II Nov 2005)

COMMERCIAL OPERATION ‘commercial operation’ means a remunerated aeronautical activity covered by a contract between an operator and a customer, where the customer is not, directly or indirectly, an owner of the aircraft used for the purpose of this contract and the operator is not, directly or indirectly, an employee of the customer (Issued with revised Annex II Nov 2005)

COMPLEX AEROPLANE MTOM > 5700 kg >9 passengers >1 pilot Turbojet (Issued with revised Annex II Nov 2005)

SPECIFIC TASKS (1) Develop a concept for the regulation of aircraft other than complex motor powered aircraft when used in non-commercial activities after a review of: –Current regulatory system and implementation measures applied to that segment of aviation today –Other approaches to that segment of aviation that have been put in place in other countries –In service experience.

SPECIFIC TASKS (2) In developing this concept the group may wish to consider; –the possibility of creating sub-categories of aircraft in this segment of aviation –the possibility of using industry standards

SPECIFIC TASKS (3) Develop implementing rules for the issue of recreational private pilot licence Develop general implementing rules for the operations of the concerned aircraft Rethink the implementation means today applied to these aircraft in airworthiness. This may lead to modifications to the Basic Regulation, slight adjustments to the essential requirements and the development of different implementing rules for airworthiness and continuing airworthiness.

SPECIFIC TASKS (3) Finally, based on the new implementing measures proposed, the content of Annex II could be reviewed in order to better adapt it to the actual needs of the concerned segment of civil aviation.

TIMESCALES Start of work in March Publish interim report on the concept for regulatory system and implementation measures July The interim report will be circulated as an A-NPA in accordance with article 14 of the Rulemaking procedures Opinion to modify regulation (EC) 1592/2002 to introduce the new concept for airworthiness shall be issued by March 2007 following accelerated consultation process. Opinion to modify airworthiness implementing rules not linked to the change to regulation (EC) 1592/2002 shall be issued by March 2007 following accelerated consultation process. Elements for NPA for recreational private pilot licence rules shall be ready by September Elements for NPA for general operational rules shall be ready by September NPA to change airworthiness implementing rules and associated AMC linked to the change to regulation (EC) 1592/2002shall be ready by September 2007.

PRAGUE RESOLUTION 1 That the European Microlight Federation is committed to defending the regulatory status quo for microlights outside EASA of all its members, with the aim of preventing the erosion of any and all their existing rights and privileges.

MDM.032 WG COMPOSITION Leroy, Alain – EASA Certification (Chairman) Altmann, Jürgen – EASA (Secretary) Akerstedt, Hans - EAS Fridrich, Jan - EAS Newby, Graham - EAS Roberts, David - EAS Stuck, Roland - EAS Schuegraf, Rudi - EAS Taddei, Bertrand - EAS Konrad, Jo - IAOPA Pedersen, Jacob - IAOPA Wilson, Mark - ECOGAS Daney, Claude Alain - ECOGAS Barratt, Reinert Christie - CAA Norway Le Cardinal, Hugues - DGAC France Forbes, Graham - CAA UK Morier, Yves - EASA Rulemaking Sivel, Eric - EASA Rulemaking

PRAGUE RESOLUTION 2 That the European Microlight Federation forms a Project Group, to include members from a wide range of views, to prepare a proposal for EASA relating to the aviation activities of its members that might be better suited to a new category.

EASA THREATS Part 21 - design Part M - airworthiness Pilot medicals Aerial work Charges

ASSESSMENT BODY ‘assessment body’ means an approved body which may assess conformity of legal or natural persons with the rules established to ensure compliance with the essential requirements laid down in this Regulation and issue the related certificate;

QUALIFIED ENTITY ‘qualified entity’ means an accredited body which may conduct certification tasks under the control and the responsibility of the Agency or of a national aviation authority

QUALIFIED ENTITY Qualified entities conducting specific certification tasks in accordance with the applicable certification procedures on behalf of the Agency, or on behalf of the Member States when those latter carry out certification tasks in application of this Regulation, shall comply with the criteria laid down in Annex V and shall demonstrate possession of the necessary organisation and expertise. These capabilities and means shall be recognised through the issuance of an accreditation by the Agency.

QUALIFIED ENTITY 1 The entity, its Director and the staff responsible for carrying out the checks, may not become involved, either directly or as authorised representatives, in the design, manufacture, marketing or maintenance of the products, parts, appliances, constituents or systems or in their operations, service provision or use. This does not exclude the possibility of an exchange of technical information between the involved organisations and the qualified entity.

QUALIFIED ENTITY 2 The entity and the staff responsible for the certification tasks must carry out their duties with the greatest possible professional integrity and the greatest possible technical competence and must be free of any pressure and incentive,in particular of a financial type, which could affect their judgment or the results of their investigations, in particular from persons or groups of persons affected by the results of the certification tasks.

QUALIFIED ENTITY 3 The entity must employ staff and possess the means required to perform adequately the technical and administrative tasks linked with the certification process; it should also have access to the equipment needed for exceptional checks.

QUALIFIED ENTITY 4 The staff responsible for investigation must have: – sound technical and vocational training; – satisfactory knowledge of the requirements of the certification tasks they carry out and adequate experience of such processes; – the ability required to draw up the declarations, records and reports to demonstrate that the investigations have been carried out.

QUALIFIED ENTITY 5.The impartiality of the investigation staff must be guaranteed. Their remuneration must not depend on the number of investigations carried out or on the results of such investigations. 6.The entity must take out liability insurance unless its liability is assumed by one Member State in accordance with its national law. 7.The staff of the entity must observe professional secrecy with regard to all information acquired in carrying out their tasks under this Regulation.

RECREATIONAL (JK) Non commercial (which excludes passenger transportation from A to B, but includes instructions and training flights) flying in aircrafts from zero up to a (yet to be defined) weight limit (for example kg according to the proposed EASA-Recreational Pilot Licence).

SYSTEM (JK) The system should include design, production, quality assurance, licensing, airworthiness and operation.

LICENSING (JK) It should allow pilots to proceed in the flying community from simple single seated aircrafts step by step up into a later EASA category. The requirements shall be drafted according to the complexity of aircraft, airspace and passengers - public safety interest.

AIRWORTHINESS (JK) The airworthiness of the aircraft should be demonstrated according to safety interests, for example to numbers of seats, complexity of systems and MTOW, according to the applicable Certification Specifications. The quality monitoring shall start from a pure manufacturer’s declaration with deposition of documents and production, inspection by a qualified entity, up to additional audits by qualified entities.