Fermilab Booster Diagnostics, Monitors, and Software for Operational Control of Residual Radiation William Pellico Booster Accelerator FNAL HB2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
Advertisements

Booster Cogging Robert Zwaska Fermilab (University of Texas at Austin) Accelerator Physics & Technology Seminar Dec. 8, 2005.
Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
Development of a Chromaticity measurement application using Head-Tail phase shift technique.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
AGS pp Status Feb. 6, 2015 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
TUPD02 BEAM DIAGNOSTICS FOR THE ESS BLM BPM Trans Profile Bunch Shape BCM Preliminary System Count A. Jansson, L. Tchelidze, ESS AB, Lund, Sweden Hybrid.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
1 Electron Cloud Measurements at the Fermilab Main Injector Bob Zwaska Fermilab ECloud07 Workshop April 9, 2007.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
Craig Drennan Linac and Booster Beam Diagnostics Proton Source Workshop December 7 and 8, 2010.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Commissioning of the Fermilab Accelerators for NuMI Operation Robert Zwaska University of Texas at Austin NBI 2003 November 7, 2003.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Getting Beam to NuMI (It’s a worry!) Peter Kasper.
Run II DOE Review - Booster Eric Prebys Booster Group Leader FNAL Beams Division.
Booster Cogging Upgrades Craig Drennan, Kiyomi Seiya, Alex Waller.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
LLRF-05 Oct.10,20051 Digital LLRF feedback control system for the J-PARC linac Shin MICHIZONO KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JAPAN)
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
F 1 MW Proton Beam for Neutrinos Dave McGinnis AAC Meeting May 10, 2006.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
1 Simulation of transition crossing in the Fermilab Booster Xi Yang September 5, 2006 Xi Yang the work has been done in collaboration with Alexandr Drozhdin.
Diagnostics in the Fermilab Proton Source (Linac + Booster) Eric Prebys FNAL Beams Division.
Booster Cogging Bob Zwaska University of Texas at Austin Bill Pellico FNAL.
Jean Slaughter –April 5, 2004 – all experimenters’ meeting Purposes of SDA Store to store monitoring of performance Long term trends Analysis of specific.
Booster Acceptance, Apertures, and Alignment Kiyomi Seiya Proton Source WorkshopDecember 07, 2010.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
RHIC Run11 Summary May 6, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang Luminosity Availability Polarization RHIC setup issues.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Proton Source Improvement Workshop Cogging W. Pellico Dec 6&
Run II PMG 1/19/06 Pushpa Bhat 1 Run II Upgrades Status January 2006 Pushpa Bhat.
Craig Drennan Linac and Booster Beam Diagnostics Proton Source Workshop December 7 and 8, 2010.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Status of the Accelerator Complex Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Accelerator Division Fermilab 2009 Fermilab Users’ Meeting.
High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015.
Proton Planning Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
F Possible Proton Capabilities at Fermilab Dave McGinnis April 16, 2007.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
Proton Improvement Plan Bob Zwaska September 9, 2013 All-Experimenters Meeting.
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Limitations to Total Booster Flux Total protons per batch: 4E12 with decent beam loss, 5E12 max. Average rep rate of the machine: –Injection bump magnets.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Fermilab Control System Jim Patrick - AD/Controls MaRIE Meeting March 9, 2016.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
Maximum Credible Beam Loss in the Main Injector D. Capista January 26, 2012.
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Presentation transcript:

Fermilab Booster Diagnostics, Monitors, and Software for Operational Control of Residual Radiation William Pellico Booster Accelerator FNAL HB2008

Old Man Booster Designed in early 60’s –15 Hz Resonant Synchrotron –200 MeV - 8 GeV First Beam 1970 –Combined Function –Paint Can Loss Monitors –Transformer Style BPM –Wall Current Monitors –Analog Scopes –IPM device –Multiwire/Single Wire –Toroids Data Collected by Scopes/Photos Digital Scope points Nicholet (early 80’s) No Ramped Correction During the next 15 years diagnostics improved slowly LINAC Upgrade 200 – 400 MeV –New BPMs – 80’s –New BLMs – 80’s Based Upon Tev/Pbar Software for new hardware – orbit data! Pingers –Ramped Quads - Sextupoles late 80’s !! –Transverse and Cavity Mode Dampers Beam in Mid 80’s 2E12 – 3E12 Max Pulse 60 – 68 % efficient A long ways to go

Why all the changes Demands Changed Drastically ~1E17 protons/hour going to 1.3E17 protons/hour ~1.5E19 protons/week MiniBoonNE & then Numi Startup Integrated (E19) Yearly (E19) Record Year Protons Delivered

Present Operations 8 – 11 Turn Beam Operations –10 Turn for Slip Stack Operations : 4.7E12/pulse ~89 efficient (95 % with no notch) Cogged cycle in Booster –8 Turn for Numi slip stack cycles : 4.1E12/pulse ~90 efficient (Cogged Cycle) –10 Turn for MiniBoonNE Operations : 4.7E12/pulse 90 – 91 % efficient –11 Turn for Colliding beam bunches 5.1E12/pulse 95 % efficiency Booster uptime over 95% Beam Loss Average ~ 450 watts –Booster has never lost a magnet but radiation damage is present! –Booster needs to run a least another 7 years. Presently ~8.5 Hz (Able to 9.5 Hz)

Present Beam Control and Monitoring Web Based –Mostly Data Logging Losses –Long Term Trends –Survey data Wire Sigma Beam Current Beam Energy Bunch Length Efficiencies Orbit data Console Software –New Applications –Java apps Fast Digital Scopes HRM’s (Hot Link Rack Monitor ) IRM’s (Internet Rack Monitor ) Front End Software Tunnel Hardware –Gap Detectors –BLMs –IRM –Striplines New Corrector Magnets and PS Collimators

Booster Performance Each of the ~120 B:BLxxx4 and B:BLxxxD devices are data-logged. This enables us to monitor Booster performance with this system in a manner completely analogous to way it is done with the Chipmunks. For stable running periods, we record the average reading for each BLM and normalize it to the corresponding alarm maximum. The largest value thus obtained, is normalized to the beam delivery rate during that period in order to determine the maximum protons/hour that could have been delivered without tripping one of the BLM's. (A stable running period is a period of at least an hour in which neither the protons delivered per pulse nor the pulse rate varied by more than 5%. Stable periods are defined separately for x1D and x14 event types.Chipmunks Long Term BLM monitoring.. Performance versus TimePerformance versus Time: Here we plot, as a function of time, the maximum protons per hour that could have been delivered without tripping. The points are colored coded according to the average protons per pulse. Performance versus IntensityPerformance versus Intensity: Here we plot the maximum p/hr versus the average protons/pulse. The points are colored coded according to the time the period occured. Best Performance PeriodBest Performance Period: This plot shows the loss distribution for the best running period with an intensity greater than 4E12 protons/pulse. It shows the trip fraction for each BLM normalized to 1e17 p/hr. The horizontal axis is the location of each BLM in "Booster sector units". Limiting Location versus TimeLimiting Location versus Time: Shows the location of the BLM with the highest normalized reading. The points are colored coded according to the maximum protons/hour that was possible during the period. Limiting Location versus PerformanceLimiting Location versus Performance: Shows the correlation between performance and the location of the limiting BLM. The points are colored coded according to the time the period occured. Trip Fractions versus TimeTrip Fractions versus Time: This plot shows how close we were to tripping assuming the current trip points. Note that trip fractions greater than one indicate that we would not have been able to run with the current trip settings. The points are colored coded according to the protons/hour being delivered at the time. Plot SelectorPlot Selector: Here you can generate plots of various types including time lines for indivdual BLM's. Web Based diagnostics Plotting Options

Plot of sector BLM levels vs time Collected continuously Web Based diagnostics

BLM display that shows ring wide data as a fraction of their trip point. The data is a running average that is normalized to each BLM’s trip point. Green is displayed when the loss is decreasing while red indicates increasing losses. The beam permit will trip when any BLM reaches 1. Injection Loss Soon new kickers with larger aperture

Radiation survey data is stored in a database that can be accessed from the Booster web homepage. The data can be displayed several ways – including difference (Date 1 – Date 2) or individual BLM history. Survey data from Jul Web Based diagnostics Collimators & Notch Loss Extraction Region (Septa) Goal < 1foot

Survey Data Form

Collimator Secondary Set #1

Console application that plots any/all BLMs on selected event. The data is collected and displayed every 2 sec. Collimator Region

New Diagnostics – Beam Control Injection Monitoring –Energy –Bunch Length –Transverse Beam Parameters Multi Wires Crawling Wires BPM upgrade Acceleration Monitoring –Longitudinal Couple Bunch Transverse Modes (Including Head-Tail) –Transverse Instabilities Orbits Higher Order Harmonics Extraction Monitoring –Energy –Transverse Parameters –Phase Errors

Web Based diagnostics A VXI based software provides a running average of beam loss. Injected Beam Bunch Length Extracted Beam transverse sigma $14 cycle Efficiency 4.7E12/pulse Loss/Watts Linac Output Current

Web accessible scopes Fast digital scopes with web software are being used extensively. They are also connected to CATV system which allows quick – real time viewing. The LINAC energy is monitored by mixing two strip line detectors 50 m apart. A energy error results is a phase shift – shown as a voltage offset on the scope. Energy Error Input to a energy correction feedback loop - Klystrons

Wire scanner program that collects data from a fast scope. The software uses wavelets to reduce background noise. The software also has some basic fitting and analysis capabilities. Injected beam moving from injected orbit to closed orbit

A diode detected signal and RF sum collected by an IRM displays calculated longitudinal parameters. Used to monitor quad and Longitudinal dampers performance. Longitudinal fuzz is due to mistuned transition and dampers. Reduced Bunch Length

VSA Tune measurement system Data read via Ethernet to tune software.

A fast digital scope running Labview collects data from a gap detector, RF sum and triggers from a mountain range trigger box. Longitudinal modes and bunch lengths are calculated and displayed. (Segmented Memory Scope) The software allows 9 mode plots or single mode display. Mode 1 display

Booster BPM software is used to measure orbits, tunes and coupling. Every turn is saved and written to file on any Booster beam cycle. Automated data collecting every night on all cycles. Used for orbit smoothing with monitoring/alarm capabilities. Pinged beam to transition

Application that collects data from a fast scope that digitizes a gap detector in the MI-8 line. The software analyzes the bunches and calculates longitudinal modes, bunch – intensity, length and phase The software can display the data In several forms (Mtn. Range, Contour…) Mode Line Bunch Intensity Bunch Length Quad Osc. Bunches

New software/hardware < 2yrs Fast digitizing cards –BLM card 15 Hz capabilities –Pulse stretcher All pulsed devices – bdot probes with circular buffers Snapshot plots Very fast digitizers with large FPGA –Damper systems Transverse just tested Longitudinal next step New Correctors/BPM HRM’s being installed –All BPM’s can be read turn by turn –At present only BPM’s in the extraction region are read and data logged at a turn by turn rate. Booster LL system VXI based system is being designed using DSP designs embedded in FPGAs

Contributions Bill Ashmanskas FNAL Craig Drennan FNAL Proton Source Jim Lackey FNAL Proton Source Peter Kasper FNAL Bill Marsh FNAL Controls Dave McGinnis FNAL Brian Schuphach FNAL Operations Alex Waller FNAL Proton Source Bob Webber FNAL Bob Goodwin FNAL Controls