ITALIAN MAGNETIC NETWORK AND GEOMAGNETIC FIELD MAPS OF ITALY AT YEAR 2005.0 G. Dominici¹, A. Meloni¹, M. Miconi¹, M. Pierozzi², M. Sperti² ¹Istituto Nazionale.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geomagnetic Measurements Workshop: DIflux: Absolute Measurement of the Geomagnetic Field orientation in Space prepared for the XIVth IAGA WORKSHOP ON.
Advertisements

Repeat station crustal biases and accuracy determined from regional field models M. Korte, E. Thébault* and M. Mandea, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (*now.
Geomagnetism (I).
The German Repeat Station Survey 2006 M. Korte and M. Fredow, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam In 2006 a complete survey of the German repeat station network.
Slovak Repeat Stations – Epoch Fridrich Valach, Peter Dolinský, Magdaléna Váczyová Hurbanovo Geomagnetic Observatory GPI SAS, Slovak Republic The.
Cartography. What is Cartography? The science of Map Making. Been around for centuries. For humans as a reference to find their way. What is a map made.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 23 February 2010 GISC3325.
Models of the Earth.
Class 25: Even More Corrections and Survey Networks Project Planning 21 April 2008.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Introduction The primary geomagnetic storm indicator is the Dst index. This index has a well established ‘recipe’ by which ground-based observations are.
Angular measurement 1. Line of sight – the join of the points S and P Horizontal direction – the intersection between the vertical plane  i where is.
Geomagnetic field Inclination
An Automatic Instrument to Measure the Absolute Components of the Earth's Magnetic Field H.-U. Auster, M. Mandea, A. Hemshorn, E. Pulz, M. Korte.
Section 1: Finding Locations on EarthFinding Locations on Earth
INTRODUCTION TO UTM COORDINATES AND MAP DATUMS.
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Harry Williams, Cartography
Croatian Geomagnetic Network for Field Mapping Croatian Geomagnetic Network for Field Mapping (CGNFM) was similarly designed as the repeat stations network.
LEQ: What new technologies will I be using in our study of watersheds? Key Terms: GPS GIS Key Terms: GPS GIS.
Chapter Menu Introduction Section 1: Geography Skills Handbook
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
CLASSIFICATION OF SURVEYING
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Outline  Construction of gravity and magnetic models  Principle of superposition (mentioned on week 1 )  Anomalies  Reference models  Geoid  Figure.
Chapter 3 Section 1- Finding Locations on Earth
Secular variation in Germany from repeat station data and a recent global field model Monika Korte and Vincent Lesur Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, German Research.
Ørsted Results The perpetually changing geomagnetic field The geomagnetic field An artist’s concept of the geomagnetic field illustrated by field lines.
© NERC All rights reserved Measuring the Earth’s Magnetic Field Chris Turbitt.
© NERC All rights reserved UK Repeat Station Report T J G Shanahan and S Macmillan June 2009 MagNetE Workshop Helsinki, Finland.
PERFORMANCE MONITORING OF A NEW INSTALLATION AT APIA OBSERVATORY A.Jackson, A.Beraducci, T.Tafua.
Analysis of the geomagnetic field transfer functions during the 2009 L’Aquila seismic sequence A. De Santis 1,3, G. Cianchini 1,2, Di Lorenzo C. 1, Di.
© NERC All rights reserved Chris Turbitt Observatories Manager Geomagnetism Team British Geological Survey BGS Observatory Network.
Chapter 2-Maps as Models of the Earth By Samantha Pereira.
4’th Oersted International Science Team Conference British Geological Survey, United Kingdom Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp., USA Carpathian Branch.
Models of the Earth Chapter 3. Ch03\80017.html.
Globes- 3-D representation of the earth Pros: Accurate shape, landmasses correct size and shape Cons: Inconvienent, only able to see one side at a time.
EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE Chapter 3 Models of the Earth 3.1 Finding Locations on Earth.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
Gravity Summary For a point source or for a homogeneous sphere the solution is easy to compute and are given by the Newton’s law. Gravity Force for the.
Geography Skill Handbook Finding Location. Methods of Surveying: GPS- Global positioning Satellite- a series of satellites that can determine absolute.
The Geographer’s Tools
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
Models of the Earth Section 1 Preview Key Ideas Latitude Longitude Comparing Latitude and Longitude Great Circles Finding Direction Section 1: Finding.
Geomagnetic Charts of Southern Part of Korean Peninsula as of LIM, Mutaek* 1, MOON, Jiyoung 2, PARK, Youngsue 1, SHIN, Younghong 1, RIM, Hyoungrae.
Figure 2. Spatial Distribution ISOPORIC MODELLING OF THE GEOMAGNETIC FIELD COMPONENTS AT THE EPOCH PENINSULA AND BALEARIC ISLANDS. V.M. Marin(1),
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 5 March 2009 GISC3325.
Ionospheric characteristics above martian crustal magnetic anomalies Paul Withers, M Mendillo, H Rishbeth, D Hinson, and J Arkani-Hamed Abstract #33.02.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Figure 4: Temporal and spatial evolution of horizontal wind field on 11 February 2010 estimated by SDI (monostatic (blue)) and FPI bistatic (without vertical.
Incorporation of geomagnetic data and services into EPOS infrastructure Pavel Hejda 1, Aude Chambodut 2, Juan-Jose Curto 3, Simon Flower 4, Elena Kozlovskaya.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 1 Apr 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 4 Apr: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Magnetics (Measurement, Anomalies)
U.S. Coast & Geodetic Survey/NOAA Steps to Creating a Nautical Chart Historic types of surveys required – Astronomical Observations – Land survey (triangulation)
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
SOUTHERN REGIONAL SPACE RESEARCH CENTER – CRS/INPE-MCT SPACE SCIENCE LABORATORY OF SANTA MARIA – LACESM/CT-UFSM LOW COST FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER DEVELOPMENT.
Dario Sabbagh (1),(2), Carlo Scotto (2), Vittorio Sgrigna (1) (1) Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Via della Vasca.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 30 Mar 2016
Chapter 3: Models of the Earth
What is the magnetic potential of a dipole?
Chapter 3 Objectives Distinguish between latitude and longitude.
A snapshot of the 3D magnetic field structure simulated with the Glatzmaier-Roberts geodynamo model. Magnetic field lines are blue where the field is directed.
Finding Locations on Earth
GG 450 February 19, 2008 Magnetic Anomalies.
DI3 – A new Procedure for Absolute Directional Measurements
P Kotzé (1), M Korte (2), M Mandea (2,3)
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Recent results from Odessa Observatory
REPEAT STATIONS MEASUREMENTS IN UKRAINE IN 2006
Outline Construction of gravity and magnetic models Reference models
A. Ippolito(1), C. Cesaroni(1) and L. Spogli(1,2)  
Presentation transcript:

ITALIAN MAGNETIC NETWORK AND GEOMAGNETIC FIELD MAPS OF ITALY AT YEAR G. Dominici¹, A. Meloni¹, M. Miconi¹, M. Pierozzi², M. Sperti² ¹Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via di Vigna Murata, Roma ²Istituto Geografico Militare, Via Cesare Battisti, 10/12 - Firenze The 2005 survey started in September 2004 and was concluded in November In this period of time Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) has made measurements on the national repeat station network and also repeated some measurements outside Italy. This was the case for 11 repeat stations in Albania, in collaboration with the National academy of the Sciences of Albania and with the university of Tirana, and on 3 repeat stations in Corsica, thanks to the information furnished by the Institute de Physique du globe de Paris (IPGP). Moreover INGV made 2 new measurements in the islands of Elba and Capraia. REDUCTION PROCEDURES Magnetic elements observed at the repeat stations are reduced firstly to 02 UT for the diurnal variation correction, with reference to digital data from L’Aquila or Castel Tesino Observatory, or to the portable variometric station when the station was installed. The value of element E (i.e., D,I or F) at station s, reduced i.e., at 02 UT was calculated following the: E s (02 UT ) d = E var (02 UT ) d + [E s (t) – E var (t) d ] Where: E s (02 UT ) d = Value of E at station s reduced at time 02 UT of day of measure d E var (02 UT ) d = Value of E at variometer station at time 02 UT of day of measure d E s (t) d = Value of element E observed at station s at time t at that day d E var (t) d = Value of element E at variometer station at time t at that day d Secondly data are reduced to L’Aquila for the fixed epoch, i.e following the: E s (2005.0) = E Obs (2005.0) + [E s (02 UT ) d – E Obs (02 UT ) d ] Where: E s (2005.0)= Value of element E at station s reduced to epoch E Obs (2005.0)= Mean value of element E at the Observatory for epoch E Obs (02 UT ) d = Value of element E measured at the Observatory at the time 02 UT of the day of measure d NORMAL FIELD A ‘normal’ geomagnetic (reference) field expresses, generally in the form of a second degree polynomial in latitude and longitude, the value of the field at a certain location as if the field was only due to the Earth’s core sources (Haines, 1990, Barton, 1996). In fact this is the only time dependent part that undergoes the well known secular variation and then its knowledge is necessary in maps updating procedures. The normal field was computed independently for each element and results, for a generic element E, from the expression (Bullard, 1967): E= a 0 + a 1  + a 2 + a 3  ² + a 4 ² + a 5   and are latitude and longitude respectively and a i are the coefficients. The coefficients a i were determined by means of a least squares fit over the observational values. An empirical rule given by Bullard (the so-called Bullard’s rule; Bullard, 1967) relates the number of coefficients of a global Spherical Harmonic model with that of a regional model, and, in turn, the details represented by the regional model itself. To avoid contamination from stations located in anomalous areas, when the coefficients were determined, the Chauvenet rejection criterion was used COEFFICIENTS OF THE NORMAL GEOMAGNETIC FIELD IN ITALY FOR D (') =   ² ²  F (nT) =   ² ²  H (nT) =   ² ²  Z (nT) =   ² ²  I (') =   ²   = ( Lat. – 42° ) in minutes = ( Long. – 12° ) in minutes D, I in minutes F, H, Z in nT 2005 Repeat station network. Red crosses indicate repeat stations, filled circles indicate Observatories and diamonds indicate variometer stations; large circles indicate coverage areas for rapid time variations as recorder at Observatories and variometer stations. The magnetic characteristics of the Italian territory to a detail that allowed the compilation of an appropriate scale cartography for the identification of the crustal magnetic contribution, were the object of an effort that dates back to the end of the 70s of nineteen hundred. Within the Finalized Project Geodinamica (PFG-CNR), the measurement of horizontal H, vertical Z and total field F, on 2552 stations distributed in homogeneous way, was completed. These stations, constituting the so-called second order network, has been since then, the basis of the national magnetic cartography. For what concerns magnetic declination D, the second order network was born earlier than the PFG-CNR started points of measurement were in fact determined in the 30s of nineteen hundred by the Military Geographical Institute (IGM). For military demands, in fact, a network was established for declination; information on this can be found in Talamo, 1975, in which the latest survey completely realized by the IGM is reported. In this poster the repeat stations survey undertaken at that led to on update of the national cartography is described. Italian II order network undertaken by CNR-PFG for elements F,H and Z: the measurements have been made in years Italian II order network undertaken by IGM for element D: the measurements have been made in years ESSENTIAL REFERENCES: -Bullard, E.C., The removal of trend from magnetic surveys, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2, , Coticchia A., A De Santis, A. Di Ponzio, G. Dominici, A. Meloni, M. Pierozzi, M. Sperti, La Rete Magnetica Italiana e la carta magnetic d’Italia al , Italian Magnetic Network and Geomagnetic Field Maps of Italy, Bollettino di Geodesia e scienze Affini, 4, , Haines, G.V., Regional magnetic field modelling: a review, J. Geomag. Geoel.,42, , Meloni, A., Battelli, O., De Santis, A. and Dominici, G., The magnetic repeat station survey and normal reference fields for Italy, Annali di Geofisica, Vol. XXXVII, N. 5, , Molina F., E. Armando, R. Balia., O. Battelli, E. Bozzo, G. Budetta, G. Caneva, M. Ciminale, N. De Florentiis, A. De Santis, G. Dominici, M. Donnaloia, A. Elena, V. Iliceto, R. Lanza, M. Loddo, A. Meloni, E. Pinna, G. Santarato, R. Zambrano, Geomagnetic Survey of Italy. Repeat Stations Network and Magnetic Maps: a Short Report. Annales Geophysicae, 3, 3, , Newitt, L.R., Barton C.E. and J. Bitterly, Guide for magnetic repeat station surveys, IAGA Working Group, -Talamo R, Le carte magnetiche d’Italia delle isodinamiche della H e delle isogone dell’Istituto Militare e loro aggiornamento al , Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini, Vol. XXXIV, n.1,p.34 Also in this survey a DIM ( Declination Inclination Magnetometer ), a portable theodolite fitted with a fluxgate magnetometer, was used for the angular measurements of the Earth’s magnetic field (therefore the declination D and the inclination I) and a nuclear precession magnetometer (in second plane in the photo) for the measurement of the field intensity F. All other elements can be derived. For the azimuth determination in newly constituted stations, as well as on those in which the visibility of the old azimuth marks is limited or absent, a gyroscopic theodolite was used. This instrument was preferred to Global Positioning System (GPS) instruments, since it can also be used for measurements in galleries or roof covered places, or even where, in presence of bushes of tall stem, the GPS could show problems for the satellites limited visibility. Moreover the two instruments show, on the overall, comparable precisions of tenth of minutes. MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS GEODETIC MEASUREMENTS For every repeat station a monograph is realized. In the monograph the site is described, instructions are given to easily reach it, what land marks are useful for the approach, what azimuths are visible and all those information that could be useful for identification MONOGRAPH FUTURE WORKING HYPOTHESIS In this figure we show a ‘selection’ of Italian Network Stations. The average spacing is around Km. This repeat stations selection was based on their distribution and low values of anomaly with respect the normal field. The measurements will be made in the summer of 2007 and so the measures will be reduced to the epoch