Kant. Kant desire Kant desire impulse Kant desire impulse incentive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Morality: constitutive of or overcoming self-interest?
Advertisements

Non-Consequentialism
What is deontology?.
The Categorical Imperative
Moral law and Kant’s imperatives.
Kant’s Ethical Theory.
Categorical Imperative
KANTIAN ETHICS IN FIVE EASY (?) STEPS. Sandel’s Classification of Normative Ethical Theories 1.Core concept: maximizing happiness – Utilitarianism (morality,
KANT 2 IMPOSSIBLE TO UNIVERSALIZE IMMORAL PRINCIPLES.
categorical imperative
Phil 160 Kant.
O’Neill’s Kantian Argument for Famine Relief
Kant on Duty. Introduction Kant will be the culmination of two themes traced over the ages Kant will be the culmination of two themes traced over the.
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is the means to achieve what is identified as good or valuable l Deontological Ethics:
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: morality is the means to achieve what is identified as good or valuable l Deontological Ethics:
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
Kant’s deontological ethics
Michael Lacewing Deception and lies Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Kantian Ethics Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Kant’s Deontological Ethics. The Plan  What is Deontology?  Good Wills and Right Actions  The Categorical Imperative  Examples and Applications.
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Immanuel Kant. Two worlds Reason is part of the intelligible world Sensible (Lesser faculty) Part of the world of nature (empirical)
Categorical and Practical Imperative
Immanuel Kant Duty Ethics The moral worth of an action depends on motive (do the right thing for the right reason)
Duties, Rights, and Kant Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
Kant’s Ethics Kant’s quotes are from FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS.
The Categorical Imperative Kantian Ethics. Learning Intentions and Outcomes You will: Investigate the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative.
Ethical Principles: “Good” vs. “Right” Current Issues – LHS.
Immanuel Kant Deontological Ethics.
Kant (5) Humanity as an end in itself. 3 formulations of the CI Universal law formulation: Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same.
Utilitarianism Objection –Too permissive –Utilitarian response: (1) bite the bullet (2) try to show negative side-effects, long-term consequences –Rebuttal.
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
Aristotle Human beings have a function
KANT Kant was looking for some sort of objective basis for morality – a way of knowing our duty.
Class 6 Kant. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) From Königsberg, Germany.
Utilitarianism Act Utilitarianism: The right act is that which maximizes happiness (only version we’ve been discussing thus far) Rule Utilitarianism: The.
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l to describe an.
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Utilitarianism Utilitarians focus on the consequences of actions.
The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant.
Standard Form ► 1. State your position ► 2. 1 st Premise (Fact 1: State fact and source) ► 3. 2 nd Premise (Fact 2: State fact and source) ► 4. 3 rd Premise.
1 History of Ethics Section 3 Some Kantian Themes.
LO: I will know about the hypothetical and categorical imperatives Hmk: Part a essay question ‘Give an account of Kant’s theory of ethics’ (25)
Kant. The Good Will and Duty Kant did not believe that any outcome was inherently good. Pleasure or happiness could result out of the most evil acts.
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
KANTIAN ETHICS Immanuel Kant ( ).
Immanuel Kant and the Enlightenment Immanuel Kant: German ( ) Enlightenment: 1700's (18th Century) Applies the new rational scientific method of.
Immanuel Kant The Categorical Imperative. Part I. The Ethics of Duty More than any other philosopher, Kant emphasized the way in which the moral life.
The Categorical imperative
KANT Kant was looking for some sort of objective basis for morality – a way of knowing our duty.
Theory of Formalism.
Kant’s theory of imperatives
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Part I. The Ethics of Duty
Noddy’s Guide to Kant.
The Categorical Imperative
Deontology Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology.
Ethics: Kantian “DUTY” Ethics.
Kant’s Moral Theory.
Kantian Ethics.
The Categorical Imperative
Deontology Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology.
Presentation transcript:

Kant

Kant desire

Kant desire impulse

Kant desire impulse incentive

Kant desire will impulse incentive

Kant desire will impulse free incentive

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational If you want to do well on an exam, you must study.

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational If you want to do well on an exam, you must study.

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational If you want to do well on an exam, you must study. If you want X, you must Y.

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational If you want to do well on an exam, you must study. If you want X, you must Y.

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational If you want to do well on an exam, you must study. If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational If you want to do well on an exam, you must study. If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative If you want people to trust you, you must tell the truth.

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational If you want to do well on an exam, you must study. If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative If you want people to trust you, you must tell the truth.

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational If you want to do well on an exam, you must study. If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative If you want people to trust you, you must tell the truth. You must _____.

Kant desire will impulse free incentive rational If you want to do well on an exam, you must study. If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative If you want people to trust you, you must tell the truth. You must _____. categorical imperative

The moral law must be a universal law.

In order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey the moral law.

The moral law must be a universal law. In order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey the moral law. Therefore, in order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey a universal law.

The moral law must be a universal law. In order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey the moral law. Therefore, in order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey a universal law. If an act cannot possibly obey a universal law, it cannot be permissible.

The moral law must be a universal law. In order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey the moral law. Therefore, in order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey a universal law. If an act cannot possibly obey a universal law, it cannot be permissible. Therefore, one should always act in such a way that one can conceive of one's act as obeying a universal law.

The moral law must be a universal law. In order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey the moral law. Therefore, in order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey a universal law. If an act cannot possibly obey a universal law, it cannot be permissible. Therefore, one should always act in such a way that one can conceive of one's act as obeying a universal law. Categorical Imperative, first formulation:

The moral law must be a universal law. In order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey the moral law. Therefore, in order for an act to be morally permissible, it must obey a universal law. If an act cannot possibly obey a universal law, it cannot be permissible. Therefore, one should always act in such a way that one can conceive of one's act as obeying a universal law. Categorical Imperative, first formulation: Act so that you could will there to be a universal law commanding everyone to act that way.

lying = convincing someone that you're telling the truth when you aren't

The command, "Everyone must lie" abolishes truth-telling.

lying = convincing someone that you're telling the truth when you aren't The command, "Everyone must lie" abolishes truth-telling. The command, "Everyone must lie" makes it impossible to lie.

lying = convincing someone that you're telling the truth when you aren't The command, "Everyone must lie" abolishes truth-telling. The command, "Everyone must lie" makes it impossible to lie. Contradiction in concept

lying = convincing someone that you're telling the truth when you aren't The command, "Everyone must lie" abolishes truth-telling. The command, "Everyone must lie" makes it impossible to lie. Contradiction in concept: the law makes itself impossible to obey.

lying = convincing someone that you're telling the truth when you aren't The command, "Everyone must lie" abolishes truth-telling. The command, "Everyone must lie" makes it impossible to lie. Contradiction in concept: the law makes itself impossible to obey. Everyone must refuse to help others in need when it would require only a small sacrifice.

lying = convincing someone that you're telling the truth when you aren't The command, "Everyone must lie" abolishes truth-telling. The command, "Everyone must lie" makes it impossible to lie. Contradiction in concept: the law makes itself impossible to obey. Everyone must refuse to help others in need when it would require only a small sacrifice. My purpose in making the law: to advance my own happiness.

lying = convincing someone that you're telling the truth when you aren't The command, "Everyone must lie" abolishes truth-telling. The command, "Everyone must lie" makes it impossible to lie. Contradiction in concept: the law makes itself impossible to obey. Everyone must refuse to help others in need when it would require only a small sacrifice. My purpose in making the law: to advance my own happiness. Contradiction of will

lying = convincing someone that you're telling the truth when you aren't The command, "Everyone must lie" abolishes truth-telling. The command, "Everyone must lie" makes it impossible to lie. Contradiction in concept: the law makes itself impossible to obey. Everyone must refuse to help others in need when it would require only a small sacrifice. My purpose in making the law: to advance my own happiness. Contradiction of will: one makes a law for a purpose, but the law makes it impossible to achieve that purpose.

If you want X, you must Y.

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means Y is good only as a means to an end

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means Y is good only as a means to an end You must _____.

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means Y is good only as a means to an end You must _____. categorical imperative

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means Y is good only as a means to an end You must _____. categorical imperative The moral law must be good as an end in itself, not as a means to an end.

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means Y is good only as a means to an end You must _____. categorical imperative The moral law must be good as an end in itself, not as a means to an end. Only one thing chooses its own end: the rational will.

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means Y is good only as a means to an end You must _____. categorical imperative The moral law must be good as an end in itself, not as a means to an end. Only one thing chooses its own end: the rational will. The rational will is an end in itself.

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means Y is good only as a means to an end You must _____. categorical imperative The moral law must be good as an end in itself, not as a means to an end. Only one thing chooses its own end: the rational will. The rational will is an end in itself. Categorical Imperative, second formulation:

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means Y is good only as a means to an end You must _____. categorical imperative The moral law must be good as an end in itself, not as a means to an end. Only one thing chooses its own end: the rational will. The rational will is an end in itself. Categorical Imperative, second formulation: Act so that you treat all of humanity, including yourself, as an end in itself, never as merely a means to an end.

If you want X, you must Y. hypothetical imperative end means Y is good only as a means to an end You must _____. categorical imperative The moral law must be good as an end in itself, not as a means to an end. Only one thing chooses its own end: the rational will. The rational will is an end in itself. Categorical Imperative, second formulation: Act so that you treat all of humanity, including yourself, as an end in itself, never as merely a means to an end.