TVPPA Accounting & Finance Conference October 21, 2011 Cost of Service, Hydro Credit, Environmental Adder, and Fuel Cost Jim Sheffield 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maine Wind P ower Forum Why Wind Power in Maine ? Colin High Resource Systems Group Inc. October 26, 2011.
Advertisements

Producing energy does not have to threaten the environment. In fact, its very production can reap major environmental benefits. The United States biomass.
Energy. oil and natural gas  supply 62% all energy consumed worldwide  how to transition to new sources?  use until mc of further use exceeds mc of.
1 AEP Perspectives on Development and Commercialization of CCS Technology for Natural Gas Power Generation Matt Usher, P.E. Director – New Technology Development.
Rate Plan. Value Story When asked, our customers identify the following topics as ways MidAmerican Energy provides value – Emergency Response.
Jefferson County PUD 1 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered professional engineering and management consulting firm with.
1 COST OF SERVICE OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY Utah Cost of Service Taskforce May 23, 2005 Dave Taylor.
Understanding Ontario’s Electricity System
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Efficiency in the Energy Industry of China By Shereen McCurter.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Cost of Service Ratemaking Michigan Public Service Commission Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.
New York State Energy Resources Marcus Doyle David Marye Mike Marziani Jimmy Perez.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
The good, the bad, and the ugly.. Coal Basics Most abundant of fossil fuels World’s largest energy source Type of rock composed of organic matter having.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
1 Overview of Allocating Revenue Requirements Based on Shares of Marginal Costs May, 2012.
Why Wind?.
Managing Retail Rate Changes Presented by Walter Haynes, Sr. Project Manager, Patterson & Dewar Engineers Central District Power Accountants Association.
Cost of Service Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker.
Contributions In-Aid and Development of Fees Utility Financial Solutions Mark Beauchamp, CPA, CMA, MBA President
Strategic Pricing Plan Central District Power Accountants Association Franklin, Tn. March 19, 2015.
CLEAN ENERGY TO PROMOTE CLEAN AIR & IMPROVE ELECTRICITY PRICE STABILITY Alden Hathaway, ERT Debra Jacobson, GWU Law School April 6, 2006.
California’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Law and Nuclear Power California State Assemblyman Chuck DeVore January 26, 2009 Presented in the California.
Regulatory Update Dennis Derricks May 5, 2010 Regulatory Update Dennis Derricks May 5, 2010.
Energy in the United States Electricity, Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy Summary report by Sarah Lahr Sustainable Air Quality 2/11/02.
Autumn Million Jen DePaoli
The Utility Push to Increase Customer Charge: What’s Wrong With It and How to Respond to It NASUCA Midyear Meeting Philadelphia, PA June 7-9, 2015 Kira.
[Legislative] [American policy] Passing of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) in Introduced competition within the supply sector.
TVA Distributor Assurance Update Central District Power Accountants Association Meeting Presented by: Autumn Burns March 19, 2015 TVA Restricted Information.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Why is WPL filing a rate case?  Last Base Case Rates were set January, 2007  Cost of our utility investments must be reflected in prices our customers.
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
OPSI Panel Climate Change Sonny Popowsky Consumer Advocate of Pennsylvania October 1, 2009 Annapolis, MD PA Office of Consumer Advocate 555 Walnut Street.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
From an Intervener's Perspective by Matt White.  An intervener is a non-utility that participates in a rate case to advocate its interest  Interveners.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
2003 Q3 Results Conference Call August 19, 4:00 PM (ET)
National Governors’ Association April 5, 2001 James Mahoney PG&E National Energy Group and any other company referenced herein which uses the PG&E name.
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 15 Energy Conservation.
Energy in the United States Electricity, Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy Summary report by Sarah Lahr Sustainable Air Quality 2/11/02.
April 19, 2004 International Energy Outlook 2004 Guy Caruso Administrator Energy Information Administration Thirty-First Annual International Energy Conference.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency eeactionplan The Role of Energy Efficiency in Utility Energy Planning Snuller Price Partner Energy.
1 Limestone County School District Energy Update Year Eleven Report September 2008 – August 2009.
Coal Production and Consumption in the United States Adam Shaw ME 449 February 11, 2002.
Sustainable Air Quality Michael Roberts February 4, 2002.
COST OF SERVICE STUDIES Carryn Lee Manager-Water & Sewer Rate Design Branch Assistant Director-Financial Analysis Division KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.
FAR Mtghttp://facilities.utsa.edu1 Facilities Monthly Work Order Billings September 22, 2010.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
Hanock Megenta 8 th Hour. What is Alternative Energy?  Alternative Energy is the use of non- conventional energy sources to generate electrical power.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS GAS LOAD FORECAST.
Operating Reserves and Extended Locational Marginal Pricing 1.
To Buy or To Build Is it really one or the other? APPA New Generation Workshop Portland, Oregon August 1, 2007.
Zero Waste Economics – Ending Subsidies for Wasting Dr. Jeffrey Morris Sound Resource Management - Seattle ZW Network.
1 Water Department FY 2014 Sources and Uses FY 2014 Sources Retail Sales$54,788,834 Wholesale Sales646,250 Other Operating Revenues145,000 Non-Operating.
Cost of Service Studies April 14,  Used to reasonably allocate costs (revenue requirement) incurred by utility amongst customer classes  2 Types.
Other methods of government intervention. Tradable pollution permits  Tradable pollution permits are rights to sell and buy actual or potential pollution.
STRATEGIC CONFERENCE SYDNEY AUSTRALIA FEBRUARY 28, 2006 INVENTORY OPTIMIZATION BY DAN OLIVER.
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
Communities Renewable Energy Study
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Homework Ch 12 Electricity Regulation
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Energy Conservation Program Update
Retail Rate Design & Administration
Purchased Gas Cost Adjustment (PGA) 101
Purchased Gas Cost Adjustment (PGA) 101
Presentation transcript:

TVPPA Accounting & Finance Conference October 21, 2011 Cost of Service, Hydro Credit, Environmental Adder, and Fuel Cost Jim Sheffield 1

 Two Kinds  TVA – Generation & Transmission: “Power Cost”  Distributor - Distribution Cost – Our Focus  What Does a C.O.S.S. Do?  FCA: Functionalization, Classification, Allocation  Functionalize: Gen, Trans, Distributor, Customer  Classify: Demand, Energy, Customer  Allocate to Class: Res, Com, Ind, Lighting  What C.O.S.S. Tell You ◦ Demand Cost, Energy Cost, Customer Cost, by Class 2

 Why Do a C.O.S.S.  Match prices to costs  Revenues collected reflect costs incurred  Changes in cost are matched by changes in revenue  Avoid cross-class subsidies, etc.  What Distributors are Learning  COSS’s information is useful, especially with new wholesale rates  Customer charges in general were (are) too low  Knowing costs is a big help in creating rates to recover costs 3

History  TVA Act (Section 11): “…the projects herein provided for shall be considered primarily as for the benefit of the people of the section as a whole and particularly the domestic and rural consumers to whom the power can economically be made available, and…sale to and use by industry shall be a secondary purpose, to…secure a sufficiently high load factor and revenue returns which will permit domestic and rural use at the lowest possible rates…”  The General Power Rate Schedule states: “The base demand and energy charges…shall be increased or decreased to correspond to increases or decreases determined by TVA in the value of the hydro generation benefit allocated to residential customers.” 4

 How Much Money - $250 Million/Year  Calculation: No Preference Case VS Preference Case ◦ No preference case – All Classes Receive Hydro ◦ Preference case - Assigns TVA/SEPA hydro dams’ production to the residential class only  Reduces demand and energy costs assigned to residential  Increases costs to remaining firm customers  Difference between costs allocated to Residential in the two studies is the Hydro Preference Benefit amount 5

 How Charged ◦ Residential rates reduced by the $250 million  Customer charge based on number of residential meters  Energy portion reduces per kWh rate ◦ Commercial and Industrial rates increased by $250 million ◦ Reduction to Residential and increase to C&I balance; no impact to TVA 6

 For Clean Air Compliance ◦ Effective October 2003, expires September 30, 2013  Collections ◦ $365 million/Year for 10 Years  What Next ◦ Costs Don’t Go Away 7

 Two Changes ◦ Quarterly to monthly ◦ From Fuel Cost Adjustment to Total Fuel Cost  Why: Fuel cost volatility caused inaccurate forecasts ◦ 3-month forecast is actually 7 – 9 month ahead forecast  June – August forecast based on December/January data ◦ Stable fuel, OK; Volatile fuel, not so much ◦ Big Deferred Account; Perverse price signals ◦ Monthly forecasts are accurate; valid price signals ◦ Fuel Cost is not a “base rate” type of cost 8

What’s in It  Contents based on FERC standards; conservative  Fossil Fuel Expense (Account 501) – “direct cost of fuel burned in TVA coal plants, including transportation and fuel treatment”  Purchased Power Expense (Account 555) – “Energy cost of purchased power”  Nuclear Fuel Expense (Account 518) – “cost of nuclear fuel amortization expense … including DOE spent fuel disposal charges”  Gas Turbine Fuel Expense (Account 518) – “direct cost of gas and oil burned in TVA plants”  Reagents Expense (Account 501.L) – “cost of emissions reagents such as limestone and ammonia”  Allowances Expense (Account 509) – “cost of emissions allowance expense such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides” 9

 How Big is It  Around $4 Billion/Year  Total TVA Revenues Around $11 Billion/Year  About 36%  Over 1/3 of that is Purchased Power  Who is Overseeing It ◦ TVPPA Fuel Cost Subcommittee, auditors (Ernst & Young) and TVA  Why the Concern? ◦ Is a passthrough ◦ Need transparency and accountability 10

? 11