Impact of Heavy Truck Traffic on Pavement Performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Traffic Data For Pavement 2012 FHWA Highway Information Seminar, Arlington, VA Tianjia Tang, PE, Ph.D. Chief, Travel Monitoring and Surveys Division 421.
Advertisements

Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
Pavement Design Session Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Shongtao Dai, Ph.D, PE Office of Materials Minnesota Department of Transportation 6/24/08 Kevin Erb University of Wisconsin Extension 9/22/08 Mn/DOT Office.
No. 18 of 19 Geosynthetics in Asphalt Pavements by Prof. S.F. Brown FEng University of Nottingham The information presented in this document has been reviewed.
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
SW Region Construction Conference February 19 th 2014 Joe Schneider – Work Zone Engineer Traffic Section – SW Region La Crosse Office.
By Mr.Surasak Kaewdee Transportation Engineering Dr. Kunnawee Kanitpong (Adviser) Asian Institute of Technology ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC LOADING CHARACTERISTICS.
Minnesota Department of Transportation House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee February 23, 2015.
Tranlation: EASL’s Average Daily Traffic Time or Traffic Pavement Condition Index Pavement Performance Pavement Condition High Performance Intersections.
Presented by Peter Lynch Freight Operations Program Manager University of Wisconsin – Madison On WisDOT MAASTO 2012 – Wednesday, October 17, 2012.
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitation Pavement Structures By Matt Mason.
1 PAVEMENT DATA ITEMS. 2 Climate_Shapes (4 LTPP zones) Soil_Shapes Metadata Estimates Section level data HPMS Pavement Data Summary level data.
Transportation Engineering II
Pavement Preservation Design April 20, Roadway Conference.
PaveDAT Pavement Damage Assessment Tool Roger Mingo, P.E.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Tommy Nantung INDOT Research & Development Division July 22, 2014
Presented to AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport presented by Donald Ludlow Cambridge Systematics June 17, 2009 Wisconsin Truck Size and Weight Study.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
APAM Annual Paving Conference April 21-22, 2015 Mt. Pleasant, MI Michael Eacker, MDOT Justin Schenkel, MDOT.
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
Lec 28, Ch.20, pp : Flexible pavement design, ESAL (Objectives)
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES. n Historic development of pavement condition indices n The basic functions of condition indices in PMS n Different types of.
MEPDG AC/AC Overlay Design. MEPDG Overlay Designs PMS & Rehab Example Initial Overlay design.dgp.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
Session 3-6 HMA Overlays.
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
Introduction Transportation System Objectives : Military; Knit together the inhabitants of a territory by providing mutual access and communication; Economic.
Flexible Pavement Thickness Design / AASHTO Method
Effect of Wide-Base Super Single Tires on Pavements David Huft, SDDOT Research Program Manager AASHTO Research Advisory Committee Meeting Madison, WI July.
1 Idaho Highway Cost Allocation Study Patrick Balducci, Battelle Joe Stowers, Sydec July 27, 2010.
Nondestructive Testing and Data Analysis Module 2-3.
Performance & Distress of Flexible Pavement Serviceability/Performance Concept.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
Concrete Pavements The Right Tool for The Right Job.
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1:
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Lesson 13 (Some of these pictures show bicyclists not wearing.
SW Region Construction Conference February 19 th 2015 Jim Romanowski – Work Zone Engineer Traffic Section – SW Region Madison Office.
User perceptions of highway roughness Kevan Shafizadeh and Fred Mannering.
Vision for Mechanistic Concrete Crosstie and Fastener System Design
New Mexico Department of Transportation Research Bureau Expanding the Use of Weigh-In-Motion Data.
1 Hot-Mix Asphalt and Flexible Pavement Design: the MEPDG Kevin D. Hall, Ph.D., P.E. Professor and Head, Dept. of Civil Engineering University of Arkansas.
RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGESAND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BYTRUCKS RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGES AND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BY TRUCKS Terry Swygert South.
Laval University’s experience with the wide-base single tires
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Pavement Health Track Analysis Tool for Determining the Health of Pavement Networks Sponsored by FHWA Contractor: Battelle/ARA Team.
2003 Warranty Presentations Caltrans WARRANTED HMA PAVEMENTS PAVEMENTS.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
MODULE 1-2 Introduction to HMA Pavements. Learning Objectives Describe the types of (HMA) pavements Identify the role of each pavement layer Discuss key.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
User perceptions of highway roughness
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:. for better or for worse? Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
Sand Mining Road Impacts Committee of the Board February 7, 2012 This presentation is available at the Winona County website under.
FUZZY APPROACH FOR ESTABLISHING THE PAVEMENT CONDITION QUALITY INDEX Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng Institute of Technology Management and Institute of Traffic and.
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
“Analysis of Pavement Condition along Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard by Pavement Distress Approach” Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Major in Transportation.
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Presenters: Sumon Roy1 and Badrul Ahsan1
Barry Paye, PE Chief Materials & Pavement Engineer Wisconsin DOT
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
Flexible pavement design
Walker Street Reconstruction Project 25% Design Public Hearing
2019 Pavement Workshop May 21-23, 2019
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

Impact of Heavy Truck Traffic on Pavement Performance Valbon Latifi Hani H. Titi Nicholas Coley Mohammed Matar Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Introduction Height and Weight Restrictions in Wisconsin: Width: 8’6” Overweight (OW) = 80,000 lbs Oversize (OS) = Height: 13’6” Width: 8’6” Length: 45’ (Single Unit) 75’ (Tractor-Trailer) Superheavy (SHL) = 270,000 lbs Only Single Trip permit records used for analysis.

Background Wisconsin (WI) issued approximately 96,000 single trip permits from June 2007 to June 2013 432 permits were (SHLs) Only Oversize (OS) permits excluded from analysis (height, width, and length restrictions)

Previous Studies Acimovic (2007) conducted research on reconstructed OSOW corridor in Colorado, discovering rutting occurred less than a year later. Rutting occurred due to repeated and excessive loading of OSOW trucks. Chatti (2004) stated that rutting damage induced on the pavement by multiple axles increased the number of axles per group increased as well.

Research Methodology Locate corridors in WI with high use of OW and SHL trucks. Analyze pavement performance with AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design Build various Axle Load Spectra with baseline traffic and then the addition of OW permitted vehicles Use Vehicle Class Distribution comparing statewide data to localized data.

Permit Fees vs. GVW #2 #3 #1 Three random single trip permits highlighted to see discrepancy in permit fee structure and policy.

Permit Fees vs. Trip Length #1 #3

Comparison of SHL Fees Truck GVW (kips) Trip Length (mi.) Fee Cost per kip Cost per mile 1 585.6 493 $566 $0.97 $1.15 2 605.0 134 $574 $0.95 $4.28 3 749.0 21 $705 $0.94 $33.57 Single trip permit fees for SHL’s cost approximately $1.00 per kip. No correlation between distance of trip and permit fee. Should potential increase in damage imposed by SHL loads be included in permit fees with regards to distance traveled?

Case Study (Wisconsin State Highway 140) 12 miles from IL border to I-43 and WI-11 21,613 permits in 6 years 103 SHL permits in 6 years Bypasses the I-90/I-39 tollway in Illinois Field survey and 6 hour traffic count were conducted Courtesy of Google Maps

WI-140 Typical Section 2” HMA Overlay 2” HMA 4.5” Aggregate Base Course A-6 Soil Subgrade 1.5” milled surface and 2” overlay in 1996

WI-140 Pavement Condition July 22, 2013 Severe alligator cracking, rutting, longitudinal cracking, potholes, and shoulder failure.

WI-140 Pavement Condition Obliterated shoulder Potential shoulder failure due to wide base trucks or large farm equipment. July 22, 2013

OW Vehicles Photos taken in the field on July 22 and November 4, 2013.

Farm Equipment Photos taken on November 4, 2013. 10 passed through in 6 hour traffic count.

AASHTOWare Program created to capture pavement design through the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). Unlike previous AASHTO Design Guides, MEPDG is a pavement analysis tool, determining the stresses and when they are projected to occur over the design life. Three main inputs: Traffic Pavement Structure/Material Properties Climate

Traffic Count on WI-140 (07/22/13) Vehicle Class Total Count 1 3 2 163 68 4 5 21 6 7 8 9 67 10 11 12 13  Total 335 2.5 hour count (8:45 am to 11:15 am) 30.1% trucks (Class 4 to 13) 66.3% of the trucks were Class 9 10 marked as OS and potentially OW

Traffic Count on WI-140 (11/04/2013) Vehicle Class South Bound North Bound TOTAL 8:00 am to 10:00 am 10:00 am to 12:00 pm 12:00 pm to 2:00 pm SB Total NB Total 1 2 58 54 60 172 71 80 61 212 384 3 25 19 20 64 24 23 66 130 4 5 7 9 6 22 10 43 8 28 26 74 34 31 90 164 11 12 13  Total 128 125 116 369 154 410 779

Traffic Count on WI-140 (11/04/2013) Vehicle Class Total Count 1 2 384 3 130 4 5 25 6 43 7 8 9 164 10 11 12 13  Total 779 6 hour count (8:00 am to 2:00 pm) 33.9% trucks (Class 4 to 13) 62.1% of the trucks were Class 9 15 marked as OS and potentially OW

WisDOT’s Vehicle Class Distribution Rural Principal Arterial - Interstate Rural Principal Arterial - Other Rural Minor Arterial Urban Principal Arterial - Other 4 1.3 3.1 8.3 5 25.8 19.8 31.7 23.4 6 6.1 11.2 9.4 3.7 7 0.3 1.1 3 2.5 8 7.2 11 12.1 9 55.5 50.6 31.9 62.6 10 0.8 1.6 1.7 2.2 1 0.2 12 0.5 0.1 13 1.2 0.4 1.9

WisDOT’s Axles per Truck Vehicle Class Axle Type Single Tandem Tridem Quad 4 1.3 0.7 5 2.2 6 1 7 0.4 0.8 8 2.4 0.6 9 1.9 10 1.1 11 4.9 0.1 12 13 1.2 Standard values for WisDOT pavement design using AASHTOWare

VCD from WI-140 (11/04/2013) Vehicle Class Total Count of Trucks % of Traffic 4 2 0.76 5 25 9.47 6 43 16.29 7 1.89 8 3 1.14 9 164 62.12 10 3.79 11 12 1.52 13  Total 264 100 Truck count to be used with AASHTOWare as an alternative to WisDOT standard values.

WI-140 Pavement Survey Pavement survey data input in MicroPaver. Visual distress survey (HS: high severity; MS medium severity) Pavement survey data input in MicroPaver. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranged from 13 to 17.

Contour Map of Rutting Rutting Depth (in): Majority of rutting occurring on the outer wheel path.

WI-140 Rutting Southbound outer wheel path on November 4, 2013

Axle Load Spectra (Single) Baseline Traffic Baseline Traffic with OSOW Permits Included

Axle Load Spectra (Tandem) Baseline Traffic Baseline Traffic with OSOW Permits Included

Axle Load Spectra (Tridem) Baseline Traffic Baseline Traffic with OSOW Permits Included

Axle Load Spectra (Quad) Baseline Traffic Baseline Traffic with OSOW Permits Included

International Roughness Index (IRI) Threshold: 200 in/mi Final IRI at 20 years using only WisDOT standards occurs after 18 years of service using ALS with permits integrated and 6 hour traffic count for VCD.

Rutting Threshold: 0.5 in Final rutting at 20 years using only WisDOT standards occurs after 14 years of service using ALS with permits integrated and 6 hour traffic count for VCD.

Fatigue Cracking Threshold: 20% Final fatigue cracking percent at 20 years using only WisDOT standards occurs after 15 years of service using ALS with permits integrated and 6 hour traffic count for VCD.

Analysis of Results WisDOT standards for AASHTOWare of pavement design does not take OW trucks into consideration. VCD and ALS traffic data could lead to most accurate results. Final stresses of pavement occurring after 20 years of service showed up years earlier using VCD of WI-140 along with OW traffic integrated into ALS.

Future Research Locate roadways with heavy truck traffic and analyze pavement in Illinois, Iowa, and Minnesota conducting field surveys.

Summary Certain state highways with high OW traffic (and high regular truck traffic) have serious pavement problems, such as WI-140. Future research will utilize MEPDG to explore effects of OW and SHL trucks on pavement.

Acknowledgements CFIRE for the financial support of this project. WisDOT for providing permit data (Kathleen Nichols, Lynn Judd, and Ed Lalor) IADOT for providing permit data (Paul Trombino III, Phou Baccam, and Randal Anderson)

Questions? Contact: Dr. Hani Titi, titi@uwm.edu Valbon Latifi, vlatifi@uwm.edu Nicholas Coley, njcoley@uwm.edu