EInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) US Resource Centers Perspective: implementation and execution challenges Alan Blatecky Executive Director SDSC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conference xxx - August 2003 Fabrizio Gagliardi EDG Project Leader and EGEE designated Project Director Position paper Delivery of industrial-strength.
Advertisements

DELOS Highlights COSTANTINO THANOS ITALIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.
Joint CASC/CCI Workshop Report Strategic and Tactical Recommendations EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group Coalition for Academic Scientific.
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
GENI: Global Environment for Networking Innovations Larry Landweber Senior Advisor NSF:CISE Joint Techs Madison, WI July 17, 2006.
1 Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21st Century Science & Engineering (CIF21) NSF-wide Cyberinfrastructure Vision People, Sustainability, Innovation,
1 Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21st Century Science & Engineering (CF21) IRNC Kick-Off Workshop July 13,
Paul Messina Towards a robust software environment for e-Infrastructure Paul Messina Argonne National Laboratory Caltech (Ret.) USC-ISI December 9, 2003.
Open Workshop on e-Infrastructures, Helsinki October 4 – 5, 2006 Roadmap Parallel Session on last chapter of e-IRG Roadmap: Crossing the Boundaries of.
Fluff Matters! Information Governance in an Online Era Lisa Welchman.
© Prentice Hall CHAPTER 1 Managing IT in an E-World.
Introduction and Overview “the grid” – a proposed distributed computing infrastructure for advanced science and engineering. Purpose: grid concept is motivated.
1 Ideas About the Future of HPC in Europe “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of.
EInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) - 15 April 2004 Sharing ICT Resources – “Think Globally, Act Locally” A point-of-view from the United States Mary.
EInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) - 15 April 2004 Sharing ICT Resources – Discussion of Best Practices in the U.S. Mary E. Spada Program Manager, Strategic.
Knowledge Environments for Science: Representative Projects Ian Foster Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago
LOGO MIRJANA SEKULOVSKA, PhD, DEPUTY MINISTER OF INFORMATION SOCIETY Republic of Macedonia Ministry of Information Society.
Assessment of Core Services provided to USLHC by OSG.
Computing in Atmospheric Sciences Workshop: 2003 Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure Alan Blatecky Executive Director San Diego Supercomputer Center.
Working Plan of US-China Bilateral cooperation on biomedical data sharing.
UTIA Promotion & Tenure Workshop May 19, 2015 UTIA Promotion & Tenure Workshop May 19, 2015 Overall Philosophy: Maximize faculty FTE while maintaining.
US NITRD LSN-MAGIC Coordinating Team – Organization and Goals Richard Carlson NGNS Program Manager, Research Division, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing.
Supercomputing Center Jysoo Lee KISTI Supercomputing Center National e-Science Project.
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
Open Science Grid For CI-Days Internet2: Fall Member Meeting, 2007 John McGee – OSG Engagement Manager Renaissance Computing Institute.
SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE The US Federation Miron Livny Computer Sciences Department University of Wisconsin – Madison.
Sharing Research Data Globally Alan Blatecky National Science Foundation Board on Research Data and Information.
EARNEST Workshop Research Networking The Next Challenge Berlin, 23 May 2006 Wim Jansen.
NSF Programs and Possibilities Research Linkages EU-US 23 September 2004 Sylvia Spengler US National Science Foundation.
Spring 2003 Internet2 Meeting Cyberinfrastructure - Implications for the Future of Research Alan Blatecky ANIR National Science Foundation.
COSEE: History and Development Don Elthon Program Director, Ocean Sciences Education U.S. National Science Foundation.
DataTAG Research and Technological Development for a Transatlantic Grid Abstract Several major international Grid development projects are underway at.
An R&D Manager’s Perspective TechExpo October 5, 2004 Presented by: Veena Rawat.
Interoperability Grids, Clouds and Collaboratories Ruth Pordes Executive Director Open Science Grid, Fermilab.
National Center for Supercomputing Applications Barbara S. Minsker, Ph.D. Associate Professor National Center for Supercomputing Applications and Department.
SEEK Welcome Malcolm Atkinson Director 12 th May 2004.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
Authors: Ronnie Julio Cole David
RI The DEISA Sustainability Model Wolfgang Gentzsch DEISA-2 and OGF rzg.mpg.de.
Cyberinfrastructure What is it? Russ Hobby Internet2 Joint Techs, 18 July 2007.
GRID Overview Internet2 Member Meeting Spring 2003 Sandra Redman Information Technology and Systems Center and Information Technology Research Center National.
Middleware Camp NMI (NSF Middleware Initiative) Program Director Alan Blatecky Advanced Networking Infrastructure and Research.
Ruth Pordes November 2004TeraGrid GIG Site Review1 TeraGrid and Open Science Grid Ruth Pordes, Fermilab representing the Open Science.
Interoperability from the e-Science Perspective Yannis Ioannidis Univ. Of Athens and ATHENA Research Center
Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.
Group Science J. Marc Overhage MD, PhD Regenstrief Institute Indiana University School of Medicine.
Three Critical Matters in Big Data Projects for e- Science Kerk F. Kee, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Chapman University Orange, California
Funding: Staffing for Research Computing What staffing models does your institution use for research computing? How does your institution pay for the staffing.
ARL Workshop on New Collaborative Relationships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe September 26-27, 2006 ARL Prue.
Cyberinfrastructure Overview Russ Hobby, Internet2 ECSU CI Days 4 January 2008.
Cyberinfrastructure: Many Things to Many People Russ Hobby Program Manager Internet2.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
Central/Distributed Svcs at UM Kitty Bridges
Digital Data Collections ARL, CNI, CLIR, and DLF Forum October 28, 2005 Washington DC Chris Greer Program Director National Science Foundation.
NSF Middleware Initiative Purpose To design, develop, deploy and support a set of reusable, expandable set of middleware functions and services that benefit.
1 Why is Digital Curation Important for Workforce and Economic Development? Alan Blatecky Office of Cyberinfrastructure Symposium on Digital Curation in.
30 November 2001 Advisory Panel on Cyber Infrastructure National Science Foundation Douglas Van Houweling November 30, 2001 National Science Foundation.
Technology Transfer in The United States Paul Zielinski Director, Technology Partnerships Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology Chair,
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE The EGEE Project Owen Appleton EGEE Dissemination Officer CERN, Switzerland Danish Grid Forum.
NORDUnet NORDUnet e-Infrastrucure: Grids and Hybrid Networks Lars Fischer CTO, NORDUnet Fall 2006 Internet2 Member Meeting, Chicago.
EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI strategy and Grand Vision Ludek Matyska EGI Council Chair EGI InSPIRE.
CHAPTER 11 STRUCTURE AND CONTROLS WITH ORGANIZATIONS.
Internet2 Applications & Engineering Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development.
Co-ordination & Harmonisation of Advanced e-Infrastructures for Research and Education Data Sharing Grant.
The Swiss Grid Initiative Discussion Led by Peter Kunszt, CSCS.
Bob Jones EGEE Technical Director
Cognitus: A Science Case for HPC in the Nordic Region
Bird of Feather Session
Wrap-Up – NSF Site Visit 8 February 2010
Presentation transcript:

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) US Resource Centers Perspective: implementation and execution challenges Alan Blatecky Executive Director SDSC

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) Technology Drivers Data Storage (bits per square inch) (Doubling time 12 Months) Optical Fiber (bits per second) (Doubling time 9 Months) Silicon Computer Chips (Number of Transistors) (Doubling time 18 Months)

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids)

Observations Recent changes in the nature of science are creating an urgent requirement for a new class of distributed science infrastructure Emerging technologies are enabling new types of collaboration and possibilities in Science E-science has some unique requirements that will not be addressed by the marketplace Grid/Middleware technology and software development efforts are being done via a patchwork of diverse, short-term projects and programs Infrastructure includes an array of technologies and capabilities

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) Data & Storage Networks & Middleware Instruments & Labs Domain Expertise & Disciplines Institutions & Communities Computers & Grids E-Science Collaboration Knowledge Applications eInfrastructure

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) Reality Curves Hype Raw Performance Real Performance Reality Gap

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) Range of Challenges Technical - interoperability, production, services Logistical, legal - licensing policies, Intellectual Property policies, authority, authentication, security, etc Ideological – cultural and administrative domains International – sharing resources across national boundaries User –Don’t care about who or where, just want it to work –Throughput and results are the primary metrics –Must address system issues

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) Fundamental challenges Nature of science and engineering enabled by einfrastructure is fundamentally different from traditional approaches Organizational, institutional, managerial, economic changes required Conceptual frameworks and models are limited Need to develop new traditions of competing and cooperation –sharing becomes a fundamental tenant of einfrastructure

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) New requirements Shared resources, remote participation and control need to be integrated with local control New rules, social conventions, folkways and mores for einfrastructure research need to be developed Standard setting as a solution is wishful thinking – limited time to get agreement, swiftness of change, etc Persistence and success requires risk-taking at the outset; selection of approaches and technologies before they are “proven”

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) Important issues Need to “crawl” before you walk and run –Managing expectations and perceptions –Accomplishing “modest” goals first Understand difference between Production and Experimentation Coordination and cooperation needs to become a social norm –Individual – institutional – regional – national –Success metrics include a coordination component

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) Some Suggestions Continue exploration of establishing joint formal agreements among national funding agencies NSF and EU to set up 2 annual meetings –Program officers and Grid PIs, Middleware developers, etc –Selected scientific domains serve as a focus for each Funded major Grid and middleware projects to include specific international components, for example, –2 international trips each year to visit “sister” efforts or projects in another country –Reverse site visits – teams invited in to review and advise –% of resources set aside for international use only, etc

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) More Suggestions continued Major resource centers to establish annual coordinated workshops on Grid services and providers Sabbaticals for technologists and scientists to spend time at a center in a different country Student internship programs – sponsored by a resource center, funding agency Create specific scientific domain BOFs at each GGF Funding Agencies establish one or more achievement award programs –Best international exchange of technology –Best shared application, scientific collaboration/discovery –May include some monetary award as well

eInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) Incentive Suggestions Need to establish incentives for sharing and collaboration at the international level –Local, regional and global support –User as well as institution and organization May be as simple as starting with program officer recognition and encouragement Needs to be a common message from funding agencies Needs to be supported/encouraged by local institutions and management Included as a component in reviews and evaluation