French feed back about AIR 2 & AIR3 Léa Riffaut, Jérémy Pinte.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conference « Directive 98/34 – an instrument of co-operation » Brussels, 22 June 2005.
Advertisements

Registration in Europe Current situation and future outlook Thomas K ü rner, M.D. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
An agricultural model good for pollinators: the way forward Panel 1: Definition of the existing problems with the current agricultural model, with focus.
Francesca Arena European Commission Health and Consumers Directorate General Future data requirements related to bees for the authorisation of plant protection.
Revision of Regulation 1107/2009 & Regulation 396/2005
Österreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit GmbHwww.ages.at Current situation - Article 43 Christian Prohaska Austrian Agency for Health.
MRL implementation process Learning from 5 years of implementation of Regulation 396/2005 ResEG proposal – March 13th, 2013.
Karin Nienstedt - DG SANTE / E3
ECPA view on the implementation and the adaptation of Regulation 1107/2009 ECPA ECCA Conference Brussels March 2015 Dr. Martyn Griffiths, Bayer SAS.
Chemicals Regulation Directorate (CRD)
Cut-Offs and Candidates for Substitution:
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers Reviewing the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 Crop Protection European Regulatory Conference
CMD(h) Report Progress report Truus Janse-de Hoog HMA meeting Budapest April 2011.
1 EU Risk Assessment on Nickel Joint Meeting Birmingham, 4 th October 2007.
ECPA, ECCA Regulatory Conference
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers ECPA/ECCA Regulatory conference on March 2014 Developments in the area of pesticide residues – Commission.
Léa RIFFAUT ANSES PPP Coordination Unit
Health and Safety Executive Feedback on the work of the Post Approval Issues (PAI) group Darren Flynn Chemicals Regulation Directorate.
Feedback from the efficacy workshop – lessons learnt and future challenges Steve Dobson.
Experiences with the AIR 2 evaluation and decision-making Herbert Köpp BVL Germany.
Making the zonal system work -Feedback from Southern Zone-
Kerry Gamble, Syngenta CP, Basel ECPA-ECCA Conference, March, Brussels Industry Overview on Key Zonal Challenges.
The Zonal Experience of the CP Industry
Bénédicte Vagenende Pesticides Unit Crop Protection European Regulatory Conference, March 2015 EFSA’s role in the evaluation of active substances 1.
Decision making for AIR active substances
Integrated Online Research Compliance System (iORC)
Health and Safety Executive Feedback from Post-Approval Issues Group Darren Flynn Chemicals Regulation Directorate.
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Registration Report: General aspects M. Trybou Federal Public Service of.
Development and application of guidance documents – industry view Dr Martin Schaefer ECCA-ECPA Conference March 2014.
Josefine Loriz-Hoffmann DG AGRI/G1 “Consistency of rural development“ “Stimulating regional economies through high speed internet access”, 07/05/2009 EU.
CONFIDENTIAL ©2014 PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE PRACTICE OF REGULATORY INTELLIGENCE: CASE STUDIES OMICS 5 th International Pharmaceutical.
UK NATIONAL AUTHORISATIONS Fay Beacon Pesticides Branch.
PROCEDURES IN THE CENTRAL ZONE MEMBER STATE FEEDBACK - HUNGARY Gábor Tőkés National Food Chain Safety Office Directorate of Plant Protection, Soil Conservation.
Advisory group on fruit and vegetables 7 March 2008
An agency of the European Union Presented by: Emer Cooke and Truus Janse-de Hoog Update on Transparency Progress report from HMA/EMA TF on Transparency.
Restructuring Mergers and CHANGE! Recordkeeping Advice Alice Patterson, Senior Advisor Government Recordkeeping Programme.
Paediatric Worksharing CMDh participation Work-sharing in Art 45 and 46 procedures Experiences in Art 29 procedures Presidency meeting 29 September 2011.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
The Growing Impact of EU Legislation
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers Commission view on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 ECPA/ECCA Brussels Regulatory Conference.
Health and Safety Executive Active Substance Approval Matt Burns Pesticides Branch.
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Registration Report Part Residues Frédéric Joris and Bruno Dujardin Federal.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
ECENA 4 th Exchange Programme Cluj Napoca, October, 2005 Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning of Kosovo Mr. Muhamet Malsiu, Acting Head.
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
Phytosanitary administration RS Status of neonicotionid insecticides for seed treatment in other EU countries Dr. Jernej Drofenik.
Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Part I – Technical process 13 th Working Group E meeting March.
EU legislation on GMOs: Overview and challenges Alberto Volpato, Counsellor for Health, Consumers, Agriculture Presented by Guy Van den Eede, Adviser for.
CLP and biocides:classification and labelling issues Maristella Rubbiani CSC-ISS Roma.
1 Package on food improvement agents Food additives Food enzymes Flavourings Common procedure Developments since earlier consultation.
Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSUR)
EFSA Trusted science for safe food Guilhem de Sèze
Vytenis Andriukaitis European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety
UA – Same biocidal product SPC translation review
Some questions from Industry:
Oliver Heiden Eurostat Unit E4
SSG on WFD and agriculture
State of play in the EU for criteria to identify endocrine disruptors
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014
other procedural issues
EU Water Framework Directive
Environmental objective document –
REFIT Fitness Check Chemicals Legislation
WG E on Priority Substances
BPR AS Review Programme
Introduction to the first meeting of the IPPC Review Advisory Group
Sub-Group on Review of Priority Substances – state of play
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Update on EU draft Regulation
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

French feed back about AIR 2 & AIR3 Léa Riffaut, Jérémy Pinte

AS assessment scheme in France Outcomes for AIR2 substances Outcomes for AIR3 substances

FR scheme for AS Splitting between scientific evaluation and decision making: Anses vs. Ministry of Agriculture A single desk: Anses (DPR) Anses: scientific evaluation and administrative checks (CoC) → MAAF MAAF: regulatory issues (data protection), risk mitigation & decision making → COM, EFSA, MSs, Notifier

AIR 2

FR Outcomes of AIR2 AIR2: 31 AS, 31 RMS, 31 co-RMS FR AIR2: 6 AS, 5 as RMS, 1 as co-RMS As RMS: different worksharing options tested – RMS drafting, co-RMS review (3) – RMS and co-RMS co-drafting (2) As co-RMS: review of RMS' assessment

FR Outcomes of AIR2 Assessment at FR level: approx. on time Now at EU assessment level – 3 after 'additional information' step – 1 before 'additional information' step – 1 about to be fully evaluated by EFSA

FR Outcomes for AIR2 RMS and co-RMS usually agreed. – Few disagreements listed in Vol1/Lev3 FR conclusions on the assessment – Proposal of non-approval due to higher protection goals – Proposal of approval Change of end-point(s) Change of EU-harmonised classification

FR Outcomes of AIR2 As RMS with a co-RMS co-drafting the RAR – Interesting and valuable exchanges – (Little) Extra work due to Co-ordination of evaluator's workload and cross commenting of conclusions of assessment Interdependance of sections: need of detailed scheduling of the evaluation in order not to await some input values from the other MS/section.

FR Outcomes for AIR2 Communication at every step – Between RMS and co-RMS – Within RMS – Between RMS, co-RMS and EFSA (in case of worksharing and co-drafting) Hard point: referring to the existing DAR vs. drafting a stand-alone RAR – Renewal is not assessment of a NAS

AIR 3

FR Outcomes for AIR3 Pre-notification steps Some pre-submission meetings … Some delays for decisions for pre- notifications

FR Outcomes for AIR3 Prenotifications – Some negative decisions Uncomplete prenotifications On-going discussions between parties – Challenging pending questions Notification of studies: – Partial list (possible amendment?) – Not fully own data package (physical availability / decision making before getting the letter of access) – Old studies not peer-reviewed

FR Outcomes for AIR3 Some meetings before supplementary dossier submission – Interesting and valuable steps With co-RMS and industry Workscheduling (pending studies, worksharing) – EU harmonised classification: No existing classification Existing classification challenged

FR Outcomes for AIR3 Communication – For every step, as early as possible With(in) industry and with (co-)RMS Quality of (finalised) prenotifications Homogeneous treatment of notifiers

FR worries for AIR3 Access to data for very old dossiers New procedure – New template for the RAR (stand-alone RAR & retyping paper copies of ancient DARs) – Changing deadlines for end of approval Change of MS as RMS between approval and renewal Workload: no spare evaluation time, difficulties for 2015 → delayed RARs? Postponed end of approval?

Conclusions

Full implementation of R(EC)1107/2009 Heavy workload – Starting with dossiers of ASs – Which will feed the art. 43 PPP re- authorisation: RMS for AS → zRMS for PPPs – Impact on periods of approval for AIR3 ASs. Need of planification, communication Experiencing a new procedure with AIR3

Thank you!