Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Advertisements

Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
District of Columbia TMDL Implementation Planning April 20, 2015 Metropolitan Washington COG.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
YOUR SCHOOL AND YOUR WATERSHED LORNA ROSENBERG- US EPA MID-ATLANTIC OCT 1-2, 2014 CHESAPEAKE BAY SCHOOLS WORKSHOP – SHEPHERDSTOWN, WVA.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments Briefing to the Water Resources Technical Committee January 8, 2009 Briefing to the Water Resources Technical.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Preparing for 2017 RA Update March Tampa Bay Reasonable Assurance Update Annual assessment of water quality and attainment status of chl-a.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Water Resources Technical Committee Chesapeake Bay Program Overview & Updates July 10, 2008 Tanya T. Spano.
OVERVIEW: CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTS AND WATER & CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVITIES Water Resources Technical Committee Oct. 29, 2015 Presented by Tanya.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
Carin Bisland, EPA Principals’ Staff Committee 5/14/12.
Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Chesapeake bay program
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
So I have a TMDL Wasteload Allocation
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Presentation transcript:

Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1

Some Terminology In MD – restoration plans In VA – action plans In DC – implementation plan All refer to need for MS4 permittees to file plans documenting how and when they will achieve all applicable wasteload allocations (WLAs) for promulgated TMDLs 2

Permit Requirement Details As part of the TMDL restoration plans, County shall: Include the final date for meeting applicable WLAs and a detailed schedule for implementing all structural and nonstructural water quality improvement projects, enhanced stormwater mgmt prgms, and alternative stormwater control initiatives necessary for meeting applicable WLAs; Provide detailed cost estimates for individual projects, programs, controls, and plan implementation; Evaluate and track the implementation of restoration plans through monitoring or modeling to document the progress toward meeting established benchmarks, deadlines, and stormwater WLAs; and Develop an ongoing, iterative process that continuously implements … projects, programs, etc. (Language from Maryland permits issued in 2014) 3

4 Non-Bay TMDL WLAs in Region Notes: Data derived from individual MS4 permit addendums in Virginia; MDE’s TMDL Data Center accessed at Did not separately count WLAs for different sections of the same watershed # of stormwater wasteload allocations by category in major COG jurisdictions DCMD Pollutant CharlesFrederickMontgomeryPrince George's Biological Oxygen Demand 2 (Nutrients)5 (Nutrients) Enterococci 22 Escherichia (E.COLI) 322 Fecal Coliform (F.COLI) 1 Nitrogen (TN) 1 26 Phosphorous (TP) 1467 Sediment (TSS) Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 7 27 Other Toxics Trash 12 VA Pollutant AlexandriaArlingtonFairfaxLoudounPrince William Escherichia (E.COLI) 3216 (6 nested)111 (7 nested) Fecal Coliform (F.COLI) Nitrogen (TN) Phosphorous (TP) Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 314 Sediment (TSS) 321

Deadlines for Plans MD Phase I permits – within 1 year of permit issuance MD Phase II permits – tbd VA Phase I permits -- within 2 years of permit issuance VA Phase II permits – 2-3 years depending on when TMDLs were issued DC Phase I permit -- within 2 years of permit issuance “Approval” of regulatory agency 5

Basic Elements of Plan Individual (or aggregate) wasteload allocations – as set by TMDLs Baseline Loads – load of a specific pollutant generated by the MS4 at the time of TMDL issuance – used to determine load reduction needed to attain WLA either in percentage (percent reduction) or absolute load terms Almost always based on modeling Maybe CBP watershed model (BayFast tool) Helpful to calculate BMPs on ground at that time 6

Basic Elements (cont) Final Dates by which individual WLAs will be attained. Interim Goals – amount of progress in load reduction to be achieved during current 5-year permit term (beyond that- ?) In DC plan, milestones = enforceable targets in 5-year permits; benchmarks = estimated annual lead reductions -- not enforceable Assessing Progress - via modeling or monitoring 7

Other Elements of Plan Adaptive Management / Living Document– permit language or guidance talks about ability to modify schedules and other plan elements in response to new conditions Can you modify load allocations? (not without reopening TMDL) Can you modify final attainment date? Consolidated plans can be used rather than individual plans for each WLA Examples include Montgomery, DC Public Participation – (MD and DC) may become more stringent in MD following recent Court of Special Appeals decision Documenting spending (MD and DC) 8

Issues Addressing infeasible or inaccurate TMDLs/WLAs Percent reductions for non-Bay nutrient and sediment TMDLs may exceed Bay TMDL reductions Bacterial reductions tend to be higher than nutrient, sediment reductions Some WLAs (PCBs, some other toxics) don’t lend themselves to numerical reduction approach Relationship to Bay Program’s new Toxics Management Strategy Who’s responsible for gathering data for delisting 9

More Issues Accounting for new development How adaptive will plans prove to be? Changing Baselines – New version of CBP watershed model will change land use and loading estimates Can end dates be adjusted Metrics / comparison between jurisdictions 10