Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going? Using Student Surveys to Assess and Improve Literature Courses Kelly Douglass, PhD Asst. Professor, English Riverside.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

Session 2: Informational Text Audience: Science, Social Studies, Technical Subject Teachers.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
GCSE Crossover Coursework Pre1914 texts: Shakespeare and the Prose Study.
Critical Thinking in the College Classroom: Teaching the Teachers Bill Reynolds, Mark Berg, & Jedediah Morfit The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey.
Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
General Education Outcomes (GEOs) JOE TERRERI Professor of Mathematics General Education Outcomes Coordinator.
Introduction Developing reading & writing skills for primary school
RUBRIC FOR CLASS DISCUSSION 0 Absent. 1 Present, not disruptive. Tries to respond when called on but does not offer much. Demonstrates very infrequent.
Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Andrea L. Beach,
Nassau Community College THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK G eneral E ducation A ssessment R eview Kumkum Prabhakar, Assistant Professor of Biology.
On Scoring Guides everything you were afraid to ask PART TWO.
Fostering Continuous Improvement of Curriculum - Learning Outcomes Peter Wolf Director, Centre for Open Learning Educational Support University of Guelph.
Terms, practices, and outcomes. What connections do we make? What about those connections is meaningful?  across courses  through reflection  linked.
Student Learning Outcomes: Tools for Intentionality.
Ideas to Action Critical Thinking to Foster Student Learning and Community Engagement Patricia R. Payette, Ph.D. January 9, 2008.
Deep Learning ThroughLiteracy-Rich Instructional Strategies Sara Overby Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Debbie Poslosky Taken from the Common Core Standard Document.
Department of Music School of Liberal Arts B.M.Ed In music CIP Code (681) 1 Program Quality Improvement Report
WORLD LANGUAGES : A Year of Transition. Today’s Outcomes  Celebrate the start of the school year  Greet new teachers  Explore areas of focus.
David Gibbs and Teresa Morris College of San Mateo.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Universal Design for Learning in the College Classroom Abstract This Faculty Learning Community (FLC) integrated components of Universal Design for Learning.
Eportfolio: Tool for Student Career Development and Institutional Assessment Sally L. Fortenberry, Ph.D., and Karol Blaylock, Ph.D. Eportfolio: Tool for.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD REPORT, DECEMBER 7, 2010 SLO Coordinators: Maggie Taylor (FCC) and Eileen Apperson(RC)
Developing Programmatic Objectives Presentation to Department of English SUNY Oneonta October 1, 2008.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
PEARSON COMMON CORE LITERATURE GRADES 11 AND 12 (2015)
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Session 2: Informational Text Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers.
. Reaffirmation 2014Off-site review is completedOn-site review is February 2014QEP is ready to be submitted in January 2014.
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
AP Language and Composition. Designed to be the equivalent of a first-year college writing course. Requires students to become skilled readers and composers.
WRIT 1122 Faculty meeting September 23, Satisfaction with goals and features  The survey results showed that faculty are satisfied overall with.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 21 Evidence in Learning and Teaching.
MRS. LIMA AP Literature & Composition. What are AP Courses? Provide the opportunity for academically prepared and motivated students to complete.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
University of Delaware How to get started with PBL: moving to a new paradigm Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson
Integrating HOTS in Literature Instruction Overview of Literature Program ( Adapted from Online course) After reading this presentation, teachers will.
Using Research on Student Learning as a Framework for Curricular Redesign Joanne Baird Giordano University of Wisconsin Colleges.
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
Reflections, Discussion Threads and Peer Review for Assessment in Online Learning Kristine Rabberman, Ph.D. Carol A. Muller, Ph.D.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
Overview of Types of Measures Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
Mary Ann Roe e-Colorado Portal Coordinator Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Jennifer Jirous Computer Information Systems Faculty Pikes Peak.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
EDSS 540: Literacy in Secondary Schools Kelli Burns.
English Extension 1 Preliminary Course. A Word From BOS  2 English (Extension) 12.1 Structure  The Preliminary English (Extension) course consists of.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Critical Information Literacy
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Welcome to Honors ENGLISH 3
High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan
Clayton County Public Schools
Mapping Outcomes it’s not so bad.
A new “pre-graduation expectation” for graduating seniors
The Heart of Student Success
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going? Using Student Surveys to Assess and Improve Literature Courses Kelly Douglass, PhD Asst. Professor, English Riverside Community College

Riverside Community College District  Three campus district  First day enrollment for Fall 2007 district wide: 29,371 (  49% of students taking an English class report educational goal of BA (with/without AA)

English Discipline  Common curriculum across district  39 full time faculty members; 136 part- time faculty members  Discipline offers 44 courses; 19 are literature courses  13 literature courses offered in Spring 2006 (across district)

Why a student survey?  Intimidation about collaborative assessment of different courses  Most other course offerings had been or were being formally assessed by Spring 2006  Body of research indicating reliability

Factors for validity and reliability of student self-reporting 1.The information requested is known to the participants 2.The questions are phrased clearly and unambiguously 3.The questions refer to recent activities 4.Participants think the questions merit a serious and thoughtful response 5.The questions do not threaten, embarrass, or violate the privacy of the participate or encourage the participant to respond in socially desirable ways Qtd. in William E. Knight et. al. “Student Self-Reported Gains Attributed to College Attendance: Comparing Two- Year and Four-Year Institutions” Original Literature Review in G. D. Kuh’s “Using Student and Alumni Surveys for Accountability in Higher Education” in J. C. Burke (Ed.), The Many Faces of Accountability (2005) and The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual Framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties (2001)

Student Learning Outcomes for Literature Courses 1.Recognize and appreciate some of the distinctive features of the major writers, literary works, movements, trends, and genres in ________ literature from _____ to _____. 2.Explain how this literature both reflects and shapes the literary history of ______ with an awareness of how differences of culture, gender, and other social markers may shape a writer’s interactions with this history. 3.Relate literary works from different ______ authors and time periods to one another and synthesize ideas that connect them into a tradition. 4.Employ college-level methods of literary analysis to reading and interpreting _____ literature and literature in general. 5.Demonstrate critical thinking and writing skills through the process of constructing responses to, interpretations of, and arguments about literature.

Pre/Post Test General Questions 1.How many English classes have you taken in college? (include composition courses like 60AB, 50, 1AB) 1.What interests/interested you about this class? 1.What do you most want to get out of the class? / What is the most important thing you gained from this class?

Survey Questions and Corresponding SLOS 4. How confident are you about your writing skills? (SLO 5) 5. How confident are you about your ability to analyze literature (SLO 4) 6. How would you rate your knowledge of the following: a.) Major writers and literary works of period and culture, b.) Literary movements and trends of period and culture c.) Literary genres (SLO 1)

Survey Questions and Corresponding SLOs 7. When you read, are you able to relate what you read to outside circumstances of the period about which you’re reading such as history, culture, and/or politics? (SLO 2) 8. When you read, are you able to relate what you read to your own personal circumstances or philosophies? (SLO 5)

What interests/ed you about this class? Req. for transfer / major / program / career / grad units; Eng. major Subject area interest Interest in Prof. Gen. reading pleasure % scale Desire to see lit. in new ways; analyti- cal skills Wtg. skills ScheduleNo reply Other

What do you most want to get out of this class? (PRE) What is the most important thing you have gained from this class? (POST) % scale A good grade / units for transfer / applies to career More knowledge of / exposure to subject area Increased ability to analyze / understand lit. More writing practice / skills Pleasure / Enjoyment No reply Other

Data for Questions 4 - 8

Question 8 Findings: A Poorly Written Question Measures a skill that is not directly taught Does not effectively represent SLO; narrow definition of skill through personalization

Question 4: How confident are you about your writing skills? “Significant insignificance” in survey results Writing not primary focus of literature courses Students more aware of benefit/growth in content knowledge component than writing component The class made them aware of writing skills as an area for improvement or interest

Responses to Study: Teaching Practices More tools to help students “develop interpretive independence” Reconsideration of writing assignments, particularly more that are better aligned with SLOs In response to student desire for more traditional academic content: More occasional “straight lectures,” particularly on theoretical structures A few more canonical authors Depends very much on what is already being done in the classroom; reactions were very subjective

Responses to Study: SLOs SLO 5: “Demonstrate critical thinking and writing skills through the process of constructing responses to, interpretations of, and arguments about literature.” Subpoint 3: “Support premises with effectively integrated, relevant, thoughtful, and sufficient evidence drawn (as appropriate) from literary texts and the writer’s prior experience and knowledge. Subpoint 5: “Think creatively within and beyond literary studies, making some connections between the literary work, and the intellectual and cultural forces that shape individuals’ lives.”

Responses to Study: Assessment and Future Projects Instructor responses to assessment: Interesting information, but some difficulty translating into classroom change Helpful for refining exactly the kind of assessment to do in individual classrooms Encouragement to create a writing based writing-SLO related assessment plan for the literature classes

Responses to Study: Assessment and Future Projects Assessment Plan: Writing based General prompt for all literature courses Will measure portions of two SLOs: Employ college-level methods of literary analysis to reading and interpreting _____ literature and literature in general. Demonstrate critical thinking and writing skills through the process of constructing responses to, interpretations of, and arguments about literature.