Freight Corridor Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oregon Freight Plan July 28, Linking Freight Improvements to Economic Growth Travel Time Freight Transportation Improvements Productivity Competitiveness.
Advertisements

Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan Pennsylvania Rail Freight Seminar May 22, 2013 Pennsylvania Long Range Transportation Plan Pennsylvania Long Range.
Operations Planning Organizing for Travel Time Reliability Ohio Planning Conference July 15, 2014.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
1 SAFETEA: Transportation System Management, Operations and ITS Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration.
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Transport Investing in Regions SEATS Meeting 17 February 2012.
Transport Sustainable Mobility and Integrated Planning in Urban Areas: Trade Union Dialogue with Local Authorities Day 2: 5th February 2013, SESSION 1:
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Freight Issues and Policy Options Memphis Freight Planning Conference October 2, 2001 Gary Maring, FHWA.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Gzim Ocakoglu European Commission, DG MOVE World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), 24/06/2010.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
FHWA Office of Operations Research and Development and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) AASHTO National Connected.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
MARYLAND FREIGHT SUMMIT Freight in the Mid-Atlantic Region Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration September.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative 2006.
MIT - October 1, 2004Jeffrey D. Ensor 1 RSTP Planning for Operations Jeffrey D. Ensor Malaysia Transport Group M.I.T. October 1, 2004.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Five Year ITS Strategic Plan (2010 – 2014). 2 U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration Overall ITS Community.
© OECD/IEA 2011 Energy Efficiency in Central Asia: Challenges and Opportunities VII KAZENERGY EURASIAN FORUM World in Transition Shaping Sustainable Energy.
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on ITS Cross Regional Cooperation and Freight and Logistics Applications June 22, 2010 I ntelligent.
Freight-21: A National Strategic Freight Mobility Program & Trust Fund Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.
PROJECT OVERVIEW FHWA Talking Freight Seminar December 15, 2004 Dilara Rodriguez Project Manager, CALTRANS National I-10 Freight Corridor Study.
Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.
State and Regional Corridors and Networks: Lessons Learned George Schoener, Executive Director I-95 Corridor Coalition ____________.
1 Clarus Clarus Nationwide Surface Transportation Weather Observing & Forecasting System Paul Pisano Team Leader Road Weather Management Office of Transportation.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Provisions Jeff Lindley Director of the Office of Transportation Management Office of Operations Federal Highway.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
1 USDOT Congestion Initiative Baltimore – Washington Regional Traffic Signal Forum Maritime Institute Linthicum, MD March 14, 2007 Regina McElroy Director,
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
The TBWG/Bi-National Planning: A TC Perspective Jacques Rochon, Director, Highway Policy Transport Canada, December 4, 2002.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
ITS P ROGRAM O VERVIEW JEFFREY F. PANIATI ITS JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Freight Forum RTC Washoe March 31 st, The reliable, cost effective, and safe movement of goods and products across the State of Nevada and.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Transportation Infrastructure Perspective Ross Chittenden Deputy Executive Director, Contra Costa Transportation Authority.
Orientations towards the Scoping Paper H2020 Transport Programme Committee Brussels, 22 June 2016 SMART, GREEN and INTEGRATED TRANSPORT.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Project Overview – Phase 1
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
FUTURE CAPACITY BUILDING NEEDS dISCUSSION
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Freight Corridor Study National I-10 Freight Corridor Study PROJECT OVERVIEW T E A M

Study Area

Total I-10 Truck Flows

US/Mx Border Crossing Truck Flows

Ports of Influence along I-10 – TEU’s

Total Economic Impact I-10 Corridor Trade (2000) Trade Value: $1.38 Trillion Jobs: 10.43 Million Earnings: $339.41 Billion Source: Wilbur Smith Associates

Mid-Term and Long-Term Time Horizons 2008 2013 2025 Short-Term Mid-Term and Long-Term Bottlenecks Physical Operational Strategic Innovative technologies Operational solutions State Specific Corridor-Wide

Study Scenario Development Scenarios were a function of: Economy & trade Operational impacts innovation Seven Scenarios (compared against the base case) Fundable Supportable Practicality (can it be implemented) A mix of modular solutions: Capacity Technological Operational Policy Private Industry

Potential Strategies Scenario 1: Widening Scenario 2: ITS Others Scenario 3: Truck/Auto Separation Scenario 4: Multimodal Rail Corridor Scenario 5: Multimodal Waterway Corridor Scenario 6: Urban Truck Bypass Scenario 7: Truck Productivity Scenario 2: ITS Scenario 1: Widening Potential Strategies

Scenario 1: Widening Potential Strategies

Needs Versus Expenditure Trends

Scenario 1: Widening Potential Strategies Scenario 2: ITS

ITS - User Service Bundles 1. Advanced Transportation Mgmt 2. Advanced Traveler Information Assumes ITS deployments progress over time 3. Maintenance and Construction Ops 4. Multi-Agency TMC 5. Commercial Vehicle Ops (CVO) 6. Advanced Vehicle Safety Systems 7. Emergency Management 8. Integration Note: Italicized bundles are not included in the National ITS Architecture

ITS Capital Costs Full Build- Out to 2025 Field Devices = $33.6 million TMC Development = $97.0 million Full Build- Out to 2025 Communications Infrastructure = $474.9 million Total Costs = $605.5 million Total Benefits = $1,785.3 million B/C Ratio = 3.0

Summary of Results Deficient Mileage - Reduction Added Lanes Truck/Auto Separation Rail Barge

What combination of options (menu) Provides best outcome? Scenario 1: Widening What combination of options (menu) Provides best outcome? Scenario 2: ITS Scenario 3: Truck/Auto Separation Scenario 4: Multimodal Rail Corridor Scenario 5: Multimodal Waterway Corridor Scenario 6: Urban Truck Bypass Scenario 7: Truck Productivity Others

Comprehensive Congestion Management Plan Where Feasible Add More Lanes Corridor-wide ITS/CVO Traditional DOT Strategies PLUS Where Makes Sense Truck/Auto Separation Urban Bypass Truck Productivity Potential DOT Freight Strategies Entire Corridor Rail Intermodal Development Gulf States Barge Service Development

Not a Traditional Highway Corridor Study Address Range of Policy Issues Multimodal Approach Need for Increased Funding Transportation & the Economy Drive freight innovations Identify the State DOT’s Role in Freight

Issues Cut Across State Lines B Jobs Freight issues transcend boundaries Safety, capacity, emissions, funding, continued growth, etc

Increasingly Service Oriented Expect Continued Reliance on Trucks Also….. Our Economy Increasingly Service Oriented Expect Continued Reliance on Trucks Need for Reliable Highway System

Lessons from the I-10 study Grow the Pie The Interstate Highway System’s capacity for inter-regional goods movement and travel is vital to the nation’s economic health. Analysis of mobility demands and ways to meet those demands, clearly indicate a need for increasing maintenance and enhancement funding to expand goods movement capacity across the I-10 corridor. Increased funding should not be “categorized”, so that states can tailor the mix of capacity increasing improvements to those that are feasible and work best in any given area.

Lessons from the I-10 study (cont’d) Technology Accelerators Technology strategies (e.g. ITS/CVO) show high Returns on Investment and should be a component of any capacity improvements. Implementing a standard architecture through- out the corridor will accelerate the impact of technology innovations Innovations in highway development (e.g. auto/truck separation) and in truck mobility/ operations (mass flow concepts) should be accelerated through research, investment and deployment.

Lessons from the I-10 study (cont’d) From Each Mode According To Its Ability, To Each Mode According To Its Need All system elements; interstate and state highways, local streets and roads, railroads, airborne and waterborne conveyances satisfy certain mobility demands most efficiently. Each element must continue to contribute to overall mobility and should be enhanced as feasible. Prevent inappropriate intermodal shifts of mobility burdens (such as using the Interstate System to satisfy local circulation needs and using trucks to carry bulk commodities best moved by rail or barge) can delay the need for, and reduce the magnitude of, Interstate System capacity improvements.

Future Roles for the I-10 Partnership Promote the lessons learned from the I-10 Study. Develop and implement a consensus ITS architecture, integrated with improvement efforts on other corridors. Help shape the FSHRP (Future Strategic Highway Research Program) agenda. Serve as a forum for sharing successes, challenges, innovations, and war stories.

The Major I-10 Corridor ITS Themes Increase transportation security Enhance overall mobility Ease freight congestion

Why Should ITS Along the I-10 Corridor Be Integrated?? The best way to maximize the benefits of ITS is through the integration of different systems. - ATMS/ emergency coordination - Multi-state coordination improves efficiency and security of entire network From the original study: Total Costs = $605.5 million Total Benefits = $1,785.3 million B/C Ratio = 3.0

What is Happening Now? Many metro areas along I-10 have implemented elements of the National ITS Architecture Integrated ATMS and ATIS Emergency + ATMS coordination Not all states have implemented statewide elements Regions, states, MPO’s do not share info across the corridor

A Corridor-Wide Architecture…… …Goes beyond a regional or statewide instantiation of the national architecture …Addresses sharing of information… Between states Commercial-vehicle info Hazmat Emergency coordination Between shipper nodes and carriers More Efficient Connectivity Real-Time System Management Information Program

National Corridor Initiatives West Coast Corridor Canamex Freight Mobility Tourism Integrated ATMS Info I-29/35 Pan-American Port-to- Plains

ITS Corridor Initiatives GCM I-95 Coalition So Cal Houston

ITS Corridor Initiatives

- 10 of the Top 20 Int’l Freight Gateways Are Within 150 miles of the I-10 Corridor - 7 of these have direct connections to I-10

A Corridor-Wide ITS Vision: Integrated – Transportation Exchange Network (I-TEN)

Integrated – Transportation Exchange Network (I-TEN) Element 1: Establish corridor-wide communications system capable of providing real- time information for management and operations in the corridor

Integrated – Transportation Exchange Network (I-TEN) Element 2: Support long range real-time transportation network monitoring needs

Integrated – Transportation Exchange Network (I-TEN) Element 3: Support inter-jurisdictional architecture needs, e.g. (Center-to-center (C2C) communications

The ITS/CVO Architecture is Subset of the National ITS Architecture Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) CVISN Commercial Vehicle Information Systems & Networks (CVISN) Architecture Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO) ITS/CVO I B C International Trade Modernization Photo Courtesy of Hunter Engineering Company International Border Clearance Architecture

Integrated – Transportation Exchange Network (I-TEN) How is this accomplished? I-TEN Integration Study to Define Architecture and Programs Define Program Funding Mechanism Implementation of corridor-wide and strategic program elements

I-TEN Integration Study Purpose: Establish a corridor-wide architecture and communications infrastructure to enable future technology integration efforts. Establish roles, responsibilities and timelines for future planning and deployment of ITS technologies that can increase transportation security, enhance overall mobility and ease freight congestion.

I-TEN Integration Study Proposed Work Scope Task 1- Identify Strategic Concepts Task 2- Specify User Needs And Vulnerabilities Task 3- Develop I-10 ITS Integration Work Plan Task 4- Define I-10 Corridor ITS Architecture

I-TEN Integration Study Address alternative operational opportunities within Corridor Recommend and organize stakeholder group – orientation to freight movements Identify operational and safety problems and opportunities Identify system needs related to above problems and opportunities Identify ITS Themes (common functional elements) from above needs Expand baseline review Inventory of existing and planned systems Task 1- Concept of Operations

I-TEN Integration Study Identify information and service requirements Interviews with carriers Interviews with DMV’s/ DOT’s / other stakeholders Identify Barriers & Opportunities Identify / Assess Institutional Barriers Opportunities for integrating public and private data and technology to further the vision Develop Data, Systems and Technology Requirements Functional Requirements Data Flows Technology Constraints Based on Existing Systems Task 2- Identify User Requirements

I-TEN Integration Study Review, Refine and Prioritize ITS Service Needs and Interoperability Requirements Integrated communication services Carrier/Shipper (traveler) information Traffic management Corridor-wide security enhancements Emergency management CVISN, including Level 2 deployment International border screening Task 3- Develop I-10 ITS Integration Work Plan

I-TEN Integration Study Review final deployment plan with selected stakeholders Develop I-10 Sys. Arch., building on existing statewide and regional architectures in corridor Will use TurboArchitecture tool. Define potential field tests and corridor projects –scopes / budgets Define technology & telecomms standards Integrate business process, data and system architecture requirements and service needs. Develop business plan/model and deployment schedule Task 4- Define I-10 Corridor ITS Architecture

I-TEN Integration Study Summary I-10 Corridorwide ITS deployment requires an integrated approach to achieve maximum mobility and economic benefits I-TEN would provide the framework for implementing corridor-wide and strategic deployment of I-10 Corridor ITS enhancements Complementary to other I-10 initiatives (e.g., truck lanes / truck tolling, etc.)

Thank You