Navigating the Substantive Change Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

Texas Workforce Education Course Manual (WECM) 1995 – 2012
Council of Graduate Schools PhD Completion Project Phase II ( ) RFP: Eligibility and Requirements December 9, 2006 Washington, DC.
Overview of the IEEE Process. Overview of Process l Project Approval l Develop Draft Standards l Ballot Draft l IEEE-SA Standards Board Approval l Publish.
Overview of the IEEE Process IEEE P1620 Working Group Meeting 18 September 2002.
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Substantive Change Process
Substantive Change Policy – Response to the HEOA of 2008 Accreditation Provisions Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Understanding Expectations for the Self Study from the HEOA 2008 Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Debra G. Klinman.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Jerry McCarthy, ATS Teri Cannon, WASC.
Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Please join the audio portion of this training: Access code * *
NAVIGATING THE WASC SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE PROCESS Sharyl McGrew, M.S. Substantive Change Manager, WASC Leanne Neilson, Psy.D. Provost and VP for Academic.
1 Assistant Chair Webinar Thursday, September 15, 2010 Please join the audio portion of this training: , Access Code: ReadyTalk Help.
1 Assistant Chair Training Wednesday, September 16, 2009 Please join the audio portion of this training: , Access Code: ReadyTalk Help.
Webinar on New Federal Regulations April 18, 2011 Ralph Wolff, President Senior College Commission, WASC Please join the audio portion of this webinar.
How to do business with the Council James Trotter Senior Procurement Manager Leicestershire County Council.
Probe Process New Program Request Process Substantive Change February 1, 2012.
ExCEL August Institute ExCEL After School High School Credit Recovery
Quality Enhancements in After- School and Out-of-School Time (ASOST-Q) Competitive Grant (FC 530) Grant Information Webinars May 23 rd and 30 th, 2014.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Proposal Preparation and Submission. We will: Prepare budgets according to: Federal/sponsor regulations TAMUS policies Coordinate subcontract and collaborative.
Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process
LA GRAD Act LCTCS Conference LA Board of Regents March
WASC Accreditation Visit March 2009 Doug Moses and Rob Dell Co-Chairs, WASC Steering Committee Eleanor Uhlinger Chair, WASC Capacity and Preparatory.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Substantive Change Procedures to Establish a Broward College International Center David Moore, Ph. D. June 2015.
Office of Sponsored Programs November  Focus on What is Important  Proposal Structure  Proposal Development Process  Proposal Review.
Fifth Year Interim Reports Texas Association for Institutional Research Ralph Russell Director of Institutional Support Commission on Colleges.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Curriculum, CurricUNET, and YOU! How to Successfully Navigate the Curriculum Development Process Cathy Cox CRC Chair Fall Staff Development Day August.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
The IR Role in Subscriber Managed Course Reviews QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
CCLC Conference March 18, 2005 Pam Deegan, CIO President, Miramar Randy Lawson, CIO President Elect, Santa Monica.
Office of Academic Affairs and Student Success Katie High, Interim Vice President India Lane, Assistant Vice President
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
1. 2 State Regents’ Policy Workshop Thursday, July 14, :00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Webinar.
Recognize the practices that have GA and SACSCOC implications Recognize the Substantive Change compliance processes, actions, and timeframes Identify.
Addressing Past Recommendations; Substantive Change Reports; & Eligibility Requirements Carlotta Campbell, College of Alameda Maggie Taylor, Fresno City.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
UW-Platteville Vision UW-Platteville will be recognized as the leading student-focused university for its success in achieving excellence, creating opportunities,
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Support of Scholarly Activities (SOSA)
Purpose of this Presentation
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
New Program Director Workshop:
Post-Doctoral Trainee Senior Professional Research Staff Staff
Welcome June 8, 2018.
Support of Scholarly Activities (SOSA)
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
New Certificate Program
The Value of the Substantive Change Process
Fort Valley State University
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
Standard II Randy Beach, ASCCC South Representative Stephanie Droker, Vice-President, ACCJC Deborah Wulff, Vice-President of Academic Affairs, Cuesta College,
Presentation transcript:

Navigating the Substantive Change Process Sharyl McGrew, WASC, ACSCU Bill Ladusaw, University of California, Santa Cruz Leanne Neilson, California Lutheran University Karen Dunn-Haley, University of California, Merced SPONSORED BY ACSCU IN COLLABORATION WITH ACCJC

Our Goal Our goal today is to give you the information you need to get a substantive change proposal approved- the first time! SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Agenda 1:00 – 1:15 Welcome and introductions 1:15-2:15 Substantive change basics 2:15-2:30 Break 2:30-3:30 Common stumbling blocks 3:30-4:00 Q&A, Wrap-up SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Please Introduce Yourself Name Institution and Role/Position Experience with Substantive Change What would you like to cover today? SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

60 Second Survey By show of hands: How many of you are ALOs? Have you done a sub change in the last year? Do you have a sub change review coming up in the next year? SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Learning Outcomes By the end of this workshop you will be able to: …apply the policies and procedures of substantive change when developing proposals for your campus. …find sample proposals and other electronic resources. …understand and avoid some of the common stumbling blocks in substantive change proposals. SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Pop Quiz What percentage of substantive change proposals are approved during the first review? 95% 77% 66% 50% SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

What is a Substantive Change? Definition: A change that may significantly affect an institution’s quality, objectives, scope, or control. Why does WASC Review? Mandated by the Department of Education to ensure that any substantive change to the educational mission or program(s) of an institution after the agency (WASC) has accredited or pre-accredited the institution does not adversely affect the capacity of the institution to continue to meet the Standards of Accreditation. -Title 34: Education §602.22 (See Handout) SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Degree Level Approval (Handout) G = General May offer programs at that degree level without prior approval S = Specified May offer programs in a specific discipline without prior approval I = Individual All new degree programs must be approved SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

What triggers a WASC review? Structural Changes Change of ownership, mission, control Degree Level ‘New’ to your institution New degree program (for institutions with “I” or “S” degree level approval) Off-Campus Site (+25 miles, 50%+ delivered) Distance Education program (50%+ delivered) Duration: Change in clock or credit hours SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Sub Change Review Process (Handout) SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Who Conducts the Reviews? SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Two Categories of Review Committee Review Review by Sub Change Committee panel Final approval by the Commission Committee and Commission Review (Structural Change) Pre-implementation site visit Review by Structural Change Committee panel Approval by Commission SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Committee Review SC Committee Commission Types of Substantive Change: Modality New Site (+25 mile, +50% rules) Distance Education (+50% rule) New degree programs that require approval under Degree Level Approval policy Scope Duration Fast Track Review 5 year authorization Cost: $1,000-$1,500 Time: Submit application 6-8 Months before desired implementation Commission Not Accept ($750) Interim Approval SC Committee SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Committee & Commission Review (Structural Change) Not Accept $750 Structural Panel Site Visit $500 +Costs SC Committee Commission Types of Substantive Change: Degree Level Approval Changes Joint degree programs New degree level Legal Status or Form of Control Merger, change in ownership, affiliation or sponsorship Mission Significant change in the objectives of the institution Commission Required Sanction imposed Any proposal at the Committee’s discretion Cost: $3-20,000 + Legal and Visit fees, as applicable Time: Submit application 7-10 months before desired implementation SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Resubmission Review Commission 1st Reader + Staff Not Accept $750 Interim Approval 1st Reader + Staff Commission Type of Substantive Change: Subsequent review of proposal ‘Not Accepted’ by Substantive Change Committee Cost: $750 Time: Reviewed 1-30 days after submission SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Fast Track Authorization What does it cover? What do you get? Modality Distance Ed Off-campus site Regional Center (specific) Degree Level Bachelor’s Master’s 5 years of expedited proposals Reviewed in 30-45 days No site visits until comprehensive review (CPR, EER) Significant cost savings ($250/proposal instead of $1000) SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Staff Liaison & Sub. Change Mgr. Approval: Implementation Can Begin Expedited Review Types of Substantive Change: Review of proposals consistent with previously granted Fast Track authorization Cost: $250 Time: Submit application and proposal 30-60 days before desired implementation Staff Liaison & Sub. Change Mgr. Not Accept Approval: Implementation Can Begin SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

What Triggers a Site Visit? Pre-implementation Site Visit (Structural Change) First degree at a degree level Joint doctoral program Change in mission, legal status or form of control Post-implementation Site Visit (DOE required) Off-campus site (<3 Sites Rule) International program (first program in a new country) Following the completion of a change in ownership, merger, etc. Committee or Commission Required Visit Following Committee or Commission review for extenuating circumstances SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Recent Changes Policy Revisions 2009 Higher Ed Opportunity Act Contracts w/unaccred. organizations delivering >25% of program Remote verification of students in DE programs 2010 Substantive Change Manual Fast Track extended to 5 years Elimination of Blended degree category SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Coming in 2010-11 Dual Degree policy Exemption for off-campus sites if: Accredited +10 years At least 3 off-campus sites Meet criteria re: capacity and quality assurance SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Let’s Review! What is a Substantive Change? What are the two major types of reviews? What types of changes require approval? When should I file an application? SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Substantive Change Resources #1 Campus Resource, the ALO WASC Staff Institutional Liaison Substantive Change Staff Online Resources wascsenior.org/subchange 2010 Substantive Change Manual Substantive Change Application These presentation materials (www.wascsenior.org/subchange) samples.wascsenior.org templates and rubrics (www.livetext.com) SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Online Resources wascsenior.org Institutional Resources Document Library SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

http://samples.wascsenior.org Samples Search Type of proposal Type of institution Look for recent proposals as criteria change Contact other ALOs and ask for help! SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Please follow the directions. LiveText 101 http://www.livetext.com Please follow the directions.  SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

LiveText Best Practices MS Word- be careful and paste without formatting Export your proposal for archiving ‘File’ documents by using LiveText labels Share LiveText documents. Make Public or create a Visitor Pass SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Pre-Submittal Checklist (Handout) ALO should thoroughly review the proposal before submitting through LiveText. Are all questions answered completely? Is this proposal understandable to an outside reviewer? Do all attachments and hyperlinks open? Have common “Not Accept” issues been addressed?

Preliminary Review by WASC WASC staff review the proposal and return it to the ALO for clarification, missing information, technical issues. ALO has one week to respond. Virtually ALL proposals are returned to ALO after preliminary review. Number of “Not Accept” proposals has dropped significantly. SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Questions? SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Meeting Outcomes Check …apply the policies and procedures of substantive change when developing proposals for your campus. …find sample proposals and other electronic resources. …understand and avoid some of the common stumbling blocks in substantive change proposals. SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Break SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Proposal Review 15 minutes: Read the proposal Score the proposal using the rubric Discuss with your group: What are the strengths and weaknesses of this proposal? Evaluate against: The rubric The Pre-submittal Checklist The “Not Accept Report” 5 minutes: Report back to the other groups SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

Meeting Outcomes …apply the policies and procedures of substantive change when developing proposals for your campus. …find sample proposals and other electronic resources. …understand and avoid some of the common stumbling blocks in substantive change proposals. SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE

This presentation is online: wascsenior.org/subchange Suggestions? William A. Ladusaw, Ph.D. WASC Substantive Change Committee Co-Chair Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education University of California, Santa Cruz 831.459.4908 vpdue@ucsc.edu Leanne Neilson, Ph.D. Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs California Lutheran University 805.493.3145 neilson@clunet.edu Karen Dunn-Haley, Ph.D. Accreditation and Faculty Development Coordinator University of California, Merced 209.228.4761 kdunn-haley@ucmerced.edu This presentation is online: wascsenior.org/subchange Sharyl McGrew Substantive Change Manager Accrediting Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities, WASC 510.748.9001 ext. 312 smcgrew@wascsenior.org SUSTAINABILITY: A VISION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2010 WASC CONFERENCE