Submission doc.: IEEE 802.19-15/0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Coexistence Scenario and Use Cases Date: 2015-01-13 Authors: Notice: This.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission July 2009 Ari Ahtiainen, NokiaSlide 1 A Cooperation Mechanism for Coexistence between Secondary User Networks on.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /0019r0 March 2015 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 March 2015 Opening Report Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0032r0 April 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 The new coexistence use cases for IEEE Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE SubmissionSlide 1 Expectation for IEEE P system from a primary protection viewpoint Notice: This document has.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0040r0 May 2015 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 May 2015 Opening Report Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Discussion of LAA LBT Categories
Doc.: IEEE /0091r1 SubmissionAlireza Babaei, CableLabsSlide 1 Fair Spectrum Sharing Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
New Federal Spectrum Access System - US 3.5GHz bands -
Doc.: IEEE /160r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Output power management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Doc.: 19-11/81r1 Submission July 2011 Junyi Wang, NICTSlide Liaison Report Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is.
Categorization of coexistence network configuration
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission July 2014 Hyunduk Kang et al, ETRISlide 1 Status of ISM Bands Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0262r1 Submission March 2010 Ha-Nguyen Tran et al., NICTSlide 1 Requirements and Amendment Regarding TVWS Database Access Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.
September 2013doc.: IEEE DiscussionJinyoung Chun, LG Electronics Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0287r0 Submission March 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Overview and Issues Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE November06-RR-TAG_Liaison_Report.ppt _RR-TAG_802.22_Liaison_Report_November06 Submission November 2006.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0073r0 September 2015 Alaa Mourad, BMW GroupSlide 1 Wireless Coexistence in the Automotive Environment – Interest group.
Doc.: IEEE /161r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Resource management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Doc.: IEEE d Submission November 2014 John Notor, Notor Research Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r0 November 2015 Chen Sun, Sony ChinaSlide 1 Explanation of IEEE Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0074r2 Submission May 2010 Tuncer Baykas, NICTSlide TG1 Introduction and Status Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0097r0 November 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Information exchange between independent IEEE systems Date: xx.
Doc.: IEEE /84r2 Submission October 2009 Mark Cummings, SWIMSlide 1 Working Draft PAR Presentation Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0018r0 January 2016 Naotaka Sato, SonySlide 1 Liaison to Wireless Innovation Forum Date: Authors: Notice: This.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0011r2 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 System architecture for information exchange between independent IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /41r0 SubmissionSlide 1 P System Architecture Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered.
Doc.: IEEE /20rev0 SubmissionSlide 1 P Assumptions and Architecture Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Motivation for Monitor WSO Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0021r1 Janurary 2016 Chen SUN, SonySlide 1 Application scenario and text change proposal for coexistence management considering.
Doc.: IEEE /129r0 Submission September 2010 Junho Jo/Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 IEEE System description Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0015r0 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Proposal for CM discovery/selection/ association as CE operation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0017r0 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Proposal on proxy coexistence service for moving WSO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission March 2013 Stefan Aust (NCOS)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 High Level Architecture View Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence architecture of Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Submission June 2010 Tuncer Baykas, NICTSlide TG1 and System Design Document Notice: This document has been prepared.
Spectrum Sharing in 3.5 GHz Band
Submission doc.: IEEE /0027r0 March 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Considerations on Difficulty of Possible Coexistence Scenarios in Studying.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0052r1 March 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Supplemental document for text proposal on amendment to entity operations Date:
July 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: FCC MBAN Overview of Report and Order Date.
Studies in WAC SG Date: Authors: September 2016
September 2015 Opening Report
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Janurary 2016
Proposal on system description, reference model and draft outline
On the Objectives and Scope of the WS Coexistence PAR
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Sub-GHz proposal for ] Date Submitted:
Resource allocation principles for coexistence system
July Tutorial – Possible Solutions
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
PAR Comments Date: Authors: July 2010 May 2010
TG1 Introduction and Status
FCC rules and design Date: Authors: October 2010
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Sub-GHz proposal for ] Date Submitted:
November 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Text Proposal for FCC NPRM Response Date.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2012
Discussion on SG Formation
November 2014 IG CUB Opening Report
March 2015 SG CUB Opening Report
TG1 and System Design Document
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Month Year May 2016
Examples of deployment scenarios
July Tutorial – Possible Solutions
November 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Text Proposal for FCC NPRM Response Date.
January 2015 Opening Report
January 2015 Opening Report
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2016
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Coexistence Scenario and Use Cases Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 2 Abstract Coexistence in Unlicensed frequency Band (CUB) Study Group (SG) was formed in the last November. CUB SG should focus on the following coexistence use cases; o Coexistence between managed and unmanaged Radio Access Technologies (RATs) o Coexistence among same/different managed RATs within a single operator o Coexistence between same managed RAT with multiple operators o Coexistence between different managed RATs with multiple operators CUB SG should focus on coexistence scenarios of unlicensed wireless devices operating in the specific frequency bands; o 5GHz U-NII Bands o 3.5GHz Band of United States (US). CUB SG should provide the following solutions o Solution for coexistence between different operators o Unrestricted-RAT solution for any regulatory domains

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Coexistence in TV band Whitespace (TVWS) provided by IEEE system Slide 3Sho Furuichi, Sony January 2015 Master Device (eNB) Slave Device (UE) LTE-Unlicensed Master Device (AP) Slave Device (Terminal) IEEE m Master Device (AP) Slave Device (Terminal) weightless IEEE system Master Device (AP) Slave Device (Terminal) IEEE af Registered Location Secure Server (RLSS) IEEE system can manage spectrum usage of any RATs for TVWS. Geolocation Database (GLDB)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Service types defined in IEEE [1] Information service o Coexistence Manager (CM) provides the White Space Object (WSO) information about its potential neighbors including their operating frequencies, potential interference levels, etc. Management service o CM provides the WSO reconfiguration requests that create such configuration of this WSO that its operation is improved according to some criteria. Slide 4Sho Furuichi, Sony January 2015 Interface C between a CM and a TVWS database is not defined in this standard and is implementation dependent

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Coexistence Scenarios in the specific frequency bands The target band of CUB SG was specified as sub 6GHz, but this is not clear. IEEE focused on coexistence among unlicensed wireless devices in TV band. We suggest CUB SG focus on coexistence scenarios of unlicensed wireless devices in the specific bands; o 5GHz U-NII Bands o US 3.5GHz Band Slide 5Sho Furuichi, Sony January 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Coexistence Use Cases -System Coexistence use cases to be studied; 1.Coexistence between managed and unmanaged RATs 2.Coexistence among same/different managed RATs within a single operator 3.Coexistence between same managed RAT with multiple operators 4.Coexistence between different managed RATs with multiple operators Slide 6Sho Furuichi, Sony January

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Example 1: Coexistence between IEEE 802 system and non 802 system in 5GHz U-NII Bands Example case o IEEE 802 system: Wi-Fi o Non 802 system: LTE-LAA[2] Slide 7Sho Furuichi, Sony January 2015 LTE macro cell (e.g. 700MHz) LTE Small cell (5GHz) IEEE 802 system (5GHz) Licensed spectrum License-exempt spectrum Unlicensed device (LTE small eNB) Unlicensed device (802 system AP) Necessary to coexist

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 8 Example 2: Coexistence in Generalized Authorized Access (GAA) tier in the 3.5GHz Band of US FCC is now making new rule (i.e. Part 96) for a three-tiered authorization framework in the 3.5GHz Band to realize the Citizens Broadband Radio Service [3]. o Incumbent Access, Priority Access and GAA tiers. In the GAA tier, wireless systems operate as unlicensed systems. IEEE 802 systems may be included in the GAA tier. Then, IEEE 802 systems will have to coexist with various non 802 systems, not only among IEEE 802 systems.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Information exchange Information sharing enables intelligent channel selection/allocation for same and/or different managed RATs Coexistence among different managed RATs within a single operator Expanding network planning to take LTE and managed Wi-Fi access points into account Coexistence between same managed RAT with multiple operators Intelligent information sharing of channel allocations of managed RATs in the 5GHz U- NII Bands (unlicensed) Providing an interrogation mechanism cross operator borders whilst keeping deployment information internal to all involved parties Coexistence between different managed RATs with multiple operators Expanding network planning to take LTE and managed Wi-Fi access points into account Intelligent information sharing of channel allocations of managed RATs in the 5GHz U- NII Bands (unlicensed) Providing an interrogation mechanism cross operator borders whilst keeping deployment information internal to all involved parties Each RAT measures spectrum environment requested by the intra-network (core network) and report its channel information, interference power level, geo-location information, etc. to database managed by operator Slide 9Sho Furuichi, Sony January 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Implementation example of coexistence between different managed RATs with multiple operators [4] Slide 10Sho Furuichi, Sony January 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Regulations in 5GHz Bands Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) o Mandatory in UNII-2 bands o No need in UNII-1 and UNII-3 bands Transmission Power Control (TPC) o Mandatory in U-NII 2 bands in EU and Japan o No need in U-NII 2 bands in US Listen Before Talk (LBT) o Mandatory in EU and Japan o No need in US, Korea and China Slide 11Sho Furuichi, Sony January 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Solutions Solution for Coexistence between Operators o Information sharing enables intelligent channel selection/allocation for same and/or different managed RATs Unrestricted-RAT solution for any regulatory domains o IEEE 802 system will have to coexist with various RATs. o Rules related to coexistence/sharing are different among regulatory domains. Slide 12Sho Furuichi, Sony January 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 Summary Coexistence scenarios in the specific frequency bands o 5GHz U-NII Bands o US 3.5GHz Band Coexistence use cases o Coexistence between managed and unmanaged RATs o Coexistence among same/different managed RATs within a single operator o Coexistence between same managed RAT with multiple operators o Coexistence between different managed RATs with multiple operators Necessary solutions o Solution for coexistence among multiple operators o Unrestricted-RAT solution for any regulatory domains Slide 13Sho Furuichi, Sony January 2015

Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 14 References 1.IEEE Standard Association, “IEEE Std “, July GPP TSG RAN, “RP Study on Licensed-Assisted Access using LTE”, September Federal Communications Commission, “GN Docket No FUTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING”, April GPP LTE-U Workshop, “RWS Requirements and Coexistence Topics for LTE-U”, June 2014