NH 3 Monitoring in the Upper Green River Basin, Wyoming John V. Molenar 1 H. James Sewell 2 Jeffrey Collett 3 Cassie Archuleta 1 Mark Tigges 1 Florian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nitrogen Deposition at Rocky Mountain National Park: the RoMANS Study Mike Barna Bill Malm Bret Schichtel Kristi Gebhart Air Resources Division National.
Advertisements

Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.
Examples of 1-Hour NO 2 and SO 2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP June 14, 2011.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Passive Ammonia Monitoring in the Four Corners Presented at WESTAR Technical Conference on Oil and Gas Development, Pinedale, Wyoming, September ,
Prototype Compact Denuders for Ambient Air Sampling Misha Schurman(1), Jeffrey L. Collett, Jr. (1), Susanne V. Hering (2), Derek E. Day (3), William C.
A Tale of Two Extremes: Contrasting NH 3 at the Bakersfield and Pasadena Supersites Jennifer Murphy Milos Markovic Trevor VandenBoer Raluca Ellis Department.
Southern Ute Indian Tribe’s Participation in the 2011 Passive Ammonia Study Conducted by EPA Region 6.
Modification of Network Sampling Systems for Measurement of NH 3 Derek Day, Misha Schurman, Katie Beam, Jeff Collett, William Malm MOTIVATION Ammonia (NH.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Measurement of NO y During SCOS97-NARSTO Dennis R. Fitz University of California, Riverside College of Engineering Center for Environmental Research and.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Kevin A Cavender EPA-Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards Precursor Gas Monitoring NO y Monitoring Training.
Episodic Dust Events of Utah’s Wasatch Front and Adjoining Region Jeffrey D. Massey 1, W. James Steenburgh 1, and Thomas H. Painter 2 1 Department of Atmospheric.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
Lesson 3: Ocean Acidification Chemical Oceanography.
Ozone Season Summary 2014 Sunil Kumar MWAQC-TAC Meeting, COG September 9, Item #2.
Monitoring Station Location and Siting Initially on a residential porch at Marina Towers, aligned with the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (PRGS)
Colorado Front Range Emissions Study Regional study of the impact of oil and gas operations on ambient hydrocarbon levels in the Northern Front Range based.
Lindsey Kuettner and Dr. Patricia Cleary  Department of Chemistry  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Back Trajectory Analysis and Measurement of Ozone.
IMPROVE Ion Study Plan Presented by Marc Pitchford to the RPO Technical Groups Dallas, TX 12/3/02.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
Impact of a renewable biomass energy power plant in urban landscape with complex terrain in Central Italy: modelling assessment and suggestions for monitoring.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang Garche Bukarest EU-Twinning Project RO 2006 IB EN 09 Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Field Methods of Monitoring Atmospheric Systems Measurement of Air Pollution Copyright © 2009 by DBS.
Misha Schurman (1), Jeffrey L. Collett, Jr. (1), Susanne V
MRPO Nitrate and Organic Speciation Special Studies Donna Kenski National RPO Technical Meeting Dallas, Dec. 3-4, 2002.
U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement: Transboundary PM Science Assessment Report to the Air Quality Committee June, 2004.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Ozone Monitoring in Wyoming Cara Casten Wyoming Dept. of Environmental Quality – Air Quality Division March 10, 2004.
Observations The collection of slope values were plotted against time and box plots show the distribution for each of the six daily trips of the vessel.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
PM Model Performance in Southern California Using UAMAERO-LT Joseph Cassmassi Senior Meteorologist SCAQMD February 11, 2004.
Causes of Haze Assessment Update for Fire Emissions Joint Forum -12/9/04 Meeting Marc Pitchford.
Trajectory Calculations Trajectory or backtrajectory analyses use interpolated measured or modeled meteorological fields to estimate the most likely central.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
New Mexico Pilot Study: Salt Creek and White Mountain Wilderness areas Prepared by: Ilias Kavouras, Vic Etyemezian, Jin Xu, Dave DuBois, Marc Pitchford.
Jericho Project Air Quality Assessment. TOPICS METHODOLOGY EMISSION SOURCES RESULTS AND ASSESSMENT MITIGATION AND MONITORING CONCLUSION.
A second, but different NBL case Seasonal Variation Diurnal Variation Continuous Tower-Based Ozone Measurements L.C. Patrick 1, S.J. Oltmans 2, J.C. Williams.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality PM Hour NAAQS Modeling Issues in the State of Utah WRAP Workshop on Regional Emissions.
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Principal Investigators: William C. Malm 1 Jeffrey L. Collett, Jr. 2 Authors: Michael G. Barna 1 Kristi A. Gebhart 1 Bret A. Schichtel 1 Contributors:
Continuous Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Monitoring Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, Ottawa Tom Dann Luc White,
Preliminary Analysis by: Fawn Hornsby 1, Charles Rogers 2, & Sarah Thornton 3 1,3 North Carolina State University 2 University of Texas at El Paso Client:
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Atmospheric Deposition Unit 4451 Research on Air Pollution Distribution and Effects in California Mountains Andrzej Bytnerowicz, Michael Arbaugh, Nancy.
Donna Kenski Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Des Plaines, IL
EGU, European Geosciences Union General Assembly, April 2007 Wien, Austria. Time series and trends of tropospheric halocarbons in the Mediterranean.
CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Source apportionment of reactive nitrogen deposition
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Examples of 1-Hour NO2 and SO2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP April 28, 2011.
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Measuring Atmospheric N Inputs
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Low-Power Annular Denuder System for Measurement of HNO3, NH3 and PM2
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
Presentation transcript:

NH 3 Monitoring in the Upper Green River Basin, Wyoming John V. Molenar 1 H. James Sewell 2 Jeffrey Collett 3 Cassie Archuleta 1 Mark Tigges 1 Florian M. Schwandner 3 Suresh Raja 3 1 Air Resource Specialists, Inc 2 Shell Exploration & Production Company 3 Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University Background image courtesy of: Dave Bell Photos PO Box 1738 Pinedale, WY ww.davebellphotos.com

Background: oil & gas development in Upper Green River Basin Monitoring & Laboratory Procedures Results & Interpretation

Upper Green River Valley Nestled between the high peaks of western Wyoming's Wind River, Gros Ventre and Wyoming Ranges, the valley is home to: More than 100,000 big game animals Largest mule deer herd in U.S. Continental America's longest big game migration route and a crucial link to the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) Largest publicly-owned big game winter range in the GYE One of the west's last best sage grouse habitats and a world-class fishery One of the largest natural gas reserves in the U.S.

1986

1999

2007

Oil & Gas Emissions Particulates – roads & disturbed land VOCs – drilling fluids, separation, dehydration, produced water, gas venting, gas compression NO x – diesel drilling rigs, gas compression, vehicles, flaring

WRAP BART CALPUFF Modeling The Interagency Workgroup on Air Quality Modeling (IWAQM, 1998) recommends three background values for CALPUFF modeling: 0.5 ppb for forested lands; 1.0 ppb for arid lands; and 10 ppb for grasslands. Most of the western U.S. Class I areas are characterized by arid and forested lands, consequently a 1.0 ppb background ammonia value was selected for the WRAP RMC BART CALPUFF modeling.

WRAP BART CALPUFF Modeling The complex non-linear sulfate-nitrate-ammonia system is highly dependent on availability of ammonia - NH 3 (g) SO 2 (g) ↔ H 2 SO 4 (g) NH 3 (g)+ H 2 SO 4 (g) ↔ (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 (p) NO 2 (g) ↔ HNO 3 (g) NH 3 (g) + HNO 3 (g) ↔ NH 4 NO 3 (p)

Monitoring Plan

Objectives of the Upper Green River Basin Ammonia Air Monitoring Project measure background ammonia (NH 3 ) concentration for one year for use in refined visibility analyses measure concentrations of other related gases and particles to provide information about the local nitrogen budget attempt to identify the source regions attributable to these gases and particulates.

Monitoring Constraints sample at existing monitoring site desire to use well known and accepted sampling and analysis protocols a priori assumption that NH 3 would be at low concentrations cost

Monitoring: Instrumentation URG dual annular denuder system (Model 3000CA), mounted at a sample height of 1.5 meters A dual channel URG denuder/filter pack sampler is used to collect samples of ambient trace gas (ammonia, nitric acid, and nitrate) and PM 2.5 aerosol species (ammonium, nitrate, and sulfate) The prepared denuder/filter pack set is shipped to the site operator on a weekly basis, who installs it into the URG sampler according to a defined twice-weekly schedule that results in alternating 3-day and 4-day integrated samples The spent denuder/filter pack is shipped to the atmospheric science laboratory at CSU.

Ammonia Sampler Air Temperature Controller and MFC Flow Recorders Controller Housing PM 2.5 Size-Selective Inlets Temperature-Controlled Housing for Denuders and Filters Air Quality Station Shipping Case

Laboratory Analyses The denuders are extracted immediately upon arrival at CSU and the extracts are refrigerated until further analysis The filters are also unloaded immediately and stored frozen until extraction and analysis Samples are analyzed by ion chromatography on a monthly basis Data is validated according to EPA protocols and consist of concentrations in μg/m3 and ppbv for gases

Results

Neutralization Convert mass to molar values Ratio [NH 4 + ] / [NO 3 - ] + 2[SO 4 2+ ] Then: ratio = 1 fully neutralized ratio < 1 acidic < 0.5 very acidic ratio > 1 excess NH 4 +

Source Regions

Residence Time Analysis Ammonia weighted back trajectories were used to identify the geographic source areas most likely to contribute to the highest measured ammonia days. Trajectories were generated using the Hybrid-Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Air Resources Laboratory (ARL). Detailed information regarding the trajectory model and these data sets can be found on NOAA’s Web site ( Three back trajectories were generated per day, including end times of 0400, 1200 and 2000 MST and end heights of 100 m. Each hourly point along a 72-hour back trajectory paths was weighted with measured ammonia concentration corresponding to the end date of each trajectory. The ammonia values associated with each hourly point were then summed and normalized into 1/4 degree horizontal grid cells of latitude and longitude.

Conclusions NH 3 concentrations are highly seasonally dependent. Ranging from near detectable limits Dec-Feb, to peak values of 1.5 ppb during the summer average NH 3 was 0.24 ppb Residence time analysis indicates that NH 3 is transported into the region primarily from the west along the Snake River Valley and Southwest along the Wasatch front.