Hard to Find. Purpose of IDEA To ensure that all children with prepare them for further education, employment disabilities have available to them a free.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007.
Advertisements

Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator #14 Post School Outcomes Study Cohort III: Exiters Technical Assistance Session #2 Presented by The New.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSITION PLANNING For Students with Disabilities Asking the First Question Transition planning for students who receive Special Education.
Participating in Your Child’s IEP Meeting
Coordinating the IEP and IPE YTP Fall Summit February 21, 2008 Clayton Rees, YTP Coordinator Barbara Garland, Madras HS SpEd Director.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Arizona Statewide Post School Outcomes (PSO) Survey Results Summer 2014 Collection SY 2012–13 Exiters.
“What do you want me to do now?”
Charlotte Y. Alverson, Ed. S. Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008 Blueprint for Success: Helpful Hints for Writing.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound check.
Ms. Ramirez Special Education Teacher Eleanor Roosevelt Intermediate School #143 v.
The Multidisciplinary Team Testing Considerations, and Parental Participation in the Assessment Process Chapter Seven.
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1.
Your Students, Your Outcomes: Using Your PSO Reports Sally Simich, ODE Pattie Johnson, TRI Charlotte Alverson, NPSO 1.
Clarification Week…. How’s it going? Do you need anything from us?
Got Data! Now What? Charlotte Y. Alverson April 14, 2011.
Indicator 13 File Review 1)Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2)CCTS.
6. Implications for Analysis: Data Content. 1 Prerequisites Recommended modules to complete before viewing this module  1. Introduction to the NLTS2.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
CCTS 1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound.
Transition Planning Parent Information Meeting Brooke Gassman, Keystone AEA Parent - Educator Coordinator Lori Anderson, DCSD Transition Facilitator Stephanie.
A webinar hosted by the New Hampshire Transition Community of Practice Professional Development Workgroup and UNH Institute on Disability Facilitated by.
1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound check.
A Longitudinal Look at the Post-High School Experiences of Youth With Disabilities Findings From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) Renee.
Do We Have all the Workers? Strategies for Gaining Representativeness Loujeania W. Bost, Ph.D. NDPC-SD & Deanne Unruh, Ph.D. NPSO State Planning Institute.
Beyond Perkins Addressing the Needs of Students with Special Needs.
Everyone Counts, Everyone In: Essentials for Participation in the 2015 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Survey Requirements, Data Collection, and Results Spring.
Educational Services for Individuals with Exceptionalities Transition Planning.
( ':~
“I NEVER PLANNED NOT TO GO TO COLLEGE”: VOICES OF YOUNG ADULTS WITH ASPERGER SYNDROME TRANSITIONING TO COLLEGE PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A QUALITATIVE STUDY.
Growing Up and Moving On: Family Involvement in Transition Lauren Lindstrom, Ph.D. University of Oregon Youth Transition Program Conference February 16,
Practical suggestions to increase the response rate when gathering post-school outcomes data. OSEP Approved January 2007 On the web at:
YOUTH TRANSITION PROGRAM (YTP) PUT INTO PRACTICE Reynolds School District.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
1 Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008 Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute.
Secondary Transition Services YTP Statewide Conference Hood River, Oregon February 18, 2010 February 2010Oregon Department of Education1.
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,
Ethics & Boundaries In the School Setting. You are in a position of power and with that comes great responsibility.
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
1)Type your name, address, and zip code (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2)CCTS will conduct a.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Indicator 14 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Report
Road to Discovery: Transition to Adult Living, Learning and Working 1 Funded by the Iowa Department of Education Developed by PACER Center®
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
Technology Help or Hinderance? DOMINIQUE JOHNSON EDU671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: FREDERICK ANSOFF 2 JUNE 2014.
Introductions. 5 of Anything Part 1- Take turns at your table telling the other team members each person’s 5 favorite movies. Part 2- As a group select.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data.  Understand why collecting PSO data is so important for district decisions on how to best serve students  Learn.
Post-Secondary Transition
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Transforming the Future with PSO Data
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Preparing Students with Disabilities for Life after School
Trend Data Guest Speakers: Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE
Transition: Preparing for Life after High School
Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008
Wisconsin Transition Improvement Grant (TIG) Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Tools to Improve the Postsecondary education and employment outcomes.
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Utilizing Indicator 14 data and Evidence Based Resources 2017
The Transition Planning Process
CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Hard to Find

Purpose of IDEA To ensure that all children with prepare them for further education, employment disabilities have available to them a free and appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living. 2 IDEA Regulations §300.1(a)

Is this IDEA purpose being fulfilled? Since 2010, States have been required to determine the Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were: 1.Enrolled in “higher education” 2. In “competitive employment” 3.Enrolled in “some other postsecondary education or training” 4.In “some other employment” Not engaged – not required for federal reporting Part B Indicator Measurement Table

BACKGROUND: How data are collected Census versus Representative Sample – 33 states attempt census of all leavers Method used to collect the data – 53 states use some type of survey method Data are collected when youth have been out of school for at least one year Questions are designed to determine how youth have been engaged since leaving high school United States Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (2012). Part B State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Reports 2012 Indicator Analyses.

BACKGROUND: Who responds Respondents are former student or his/her family member Response Rate refers to the number of youth who answered the survey and is one measure of the quality of the survey results February 2011 (FFY 2009) 48 states reporting February 2012 (FFY 2010) 47 states reporting February 2013 (FFY 2011) 52 states reporting Range of Response Rates 4.68% to 94.66%7.25% to 100%* *Fewer than 10 leavers 9% to 100% Median Response Rate 47.2% (sd = 21.77) 44.50% (sd = 22.37) 49.00% (sd = 23.71) United States Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (2011, 2012). Part B State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Reports 2011 & 2012 Indicator Analyses.

BACKGROUND: Who responds Representativeness, another measure of the quality of survey data, refers to how similar respondents are to all youth who left school that year. The more similar respondents are to all leavers the more confidence we can have that the results reflect all students. To determine how well the respondent group represents all leavers, we examine five subgroups: – Disability category – Gender – Race/ethnicity – Exit status – Age

Post-School Outcomes for Student with Disabilities as Measured by Indicator 14 7 United States Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (2011, 2012). Part B State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Reports 2011 & 2012 Indicator Analyses.

How well do these data represent all youth with disabilities? Representativeness lacking in all categories.

Need NPSO charge: – To assist states in the development of a rigorous, yet practical data collection system yielding valid and reliable data that facilitate States’ use of post- school outcome data to improve in-school programs for children with disabilities. – Underrepresentation in key groups of youth: Disability category emotional behavioral disability Minority youth Youth who dropout

Locating Hard to Find 6 NPSO conducted 6 focus groups with young adults and their family members in four states: – Tennessee – Minnesota – Arizona – South Dakota Purpose of the focus groups was to learn strategies for contacting youth one year after they leave high school

Method Separate focus groups for parents and youth Each lasting about 1 hour Focus groups were held at a State Transition Conference or high school A semi-structured interview protocol Worked with local teacher or community contact to identify youth and parents, targeting minority families, youth at-risk of dropping out of school, and those served for emotional behavior disability Youth and Parents were given $25 gift card for participating

Focused Questions How long should the interview take to complete? Do you think they would prefer a call from a former H.S. teacher or a professional interviewer? What would make them feel comfortable or motivate them to participate? What would make you feel this is a valuable use of time? Would you prefer to be contacted by , phone, mailed form, or online? Would you like to know the employment and postsecondary education outcomes of students with disabilities in your school district? How could you use that information? Would it be ok for a parent or other relative close to you answered the questions?

Results Demographics of the focus groups Themes to individual questions Emergent themes

Demographics 41 Youth and 22 Parents 59% youth reported minority including Hispanic, Black, American Indian or Alaska Native 29% youth reported specific learning disability 17% youth reported intellectual disability 12% youth reported other disability (incldig VI, autism) 7% youth reported multiple disabilities, including emotional behavioral disabilities 35% youth reported unknown disability

How long should the interview take to complete? Parents and youth generally agreed that 15 to 20 minutes was an appropriate amount of time for the interview. A few parents emphasized that for some students it would take longer. Youth emphasized a short survey form and short interview.

Would you prefer to talk with a teacher or a professional interviewer? Majority of the youth preferred to talk with a former teacher “Yeah, I would talk to a teacher because I know them” and “I know their names” (MN Males) Only a couple of students preferred to talk with a professional interviewer “…it’s easier to say things to interviewers that you think you’ll never see again. That it will remain confidential. You can say more things, there’s less restrictions on who or what is being talked about because no one will be offended” (TN Male)

Be enthusiastic Be interested in the answers Convey a non-judgmental tone Don’t sound as if you’re reading a script Knowing the information will help other youth with disabilities Money for the hardest to find - $5 Gift certificates to restaurants Information about jobs and colleges Knowing the questions Being comfortable with the interviewer – former teacher Knowing why the questions are being asked “Make sure it is legit”; not a scam 1- 2 week notice Formal letter – personalized and signed Hand addressed, white envelope Reminders – like colleges recruiting

What’s the best way to reach you? No single best method for contacting youth or their families – /Internet Questionnaire – Phone Interview – Social Networking – Facebook, My Space – private message from a teacher – Mailed Questionnaire – In Person Interview Pre-Notification was more important than the method used to make contact Youth were skeptical about completing the survey via or Internet, saying “I don’t usually respond to messages or things that are from the Internet because I don’t trust anybody” and “There’s like way too much of that ad stuff” [to complete a survey] (AZ Youth)

Would you like to know the employment and postsecondary education outcomes of former students with disabilities? Youth were interested in learning the PSO of former students, saying, – ‘I guess if it were good, I’d be more motivated to go to school” and “to see where I am with them…to see where we match” and “I’d like to see where I was at with some other people around my age” (MN Youth). – “Motivation”. “’Cause if you see what someone else is dong, that’ll give you this thought of mind that I can do something similar…” (TN Youth) – “I would try to like use it; they can do it so can I” (SD Youth)

How could you use the information? Parents and youth wanted know the PSO results of former students. – Parents: help students have ‘buy-in’ for completing the survey (AZ Parents) – Motivational tool for their child, saying, “well these kids made it….” or “to encourage [our child]. Because a lot of times they get in that kind of depression, where they just don’t feel they can do anything”(TN Parents). – Saw PSO results of other students as ‘giving us hope… someone with the same disability can do this, that makes me feel good that she can also do it….We’re not alone in one boat;” (TN Parents) – Accountability mechanism for school: use the information to help them decide what school to enroll their child in (AZ parents), and to “put a bug in some administrators’ ears about what we need’(SD Parent) and to “…make sure the schools are doing what they’re supposed to be doing” (TN Parent).

Would it be ok if your parent or a relative answered the questions for you? No definitive preference for whether youth were comfortable with a parent or other relative answering questions on their behalf. “I’d rather do it myself…I guess my parents don’t know exactly what’s going on…It’s just, I’d rather know what you ask.” (MN Male) “They already know everything about me.” (TN Male)

Parents’ Strategies for Contacting Youth: How to reach youth one year later? Have someone maintain contact with youth during the first year out of school. Identify who will contact youth during the last IEP meeting. Ask youth who they would like to hear from or who they would talk to a year later (e.g., favorite teacher); should be someone with a personal relationship with the youth (e.g., favorite teacher, principal, or case manager). Include information about the survey in the senior information and graduation packets along with invitations, announcements, and ordering tapes of the graduation ceremony.

Parents’ Strategies for Contacting Youth: How to reach youth one year later? Exit survey to collect contact information – multiple phone numbers, addresses, favorite high school teacher Social networking through private messages Pre-notification letter to parents and youth – hand written, white envelope, not windowed envelope, with a 1 page information sheet Build relationship via Internet before they leave school, provide study tips or other incentives; practice the interview before youth leave school Media campaign to get people interested

Parents’ Strategies for Contacting Youth: How to reach youth one year later? Data mining via public records Contact through other agencies: Vocational Rehabilitation, Developmental Disabilities, behavioral health authorizes – ask the agency to contact the youth on behalf of the school with a signed release of information Other family in school – siblings, cousins Contact near significant dates when youth may have been in touch with family – holidays, their birthday, New Year’s Day

Emergent Theme: Hardest of the Hardest to Find The Allens: Not going to respond to or answer his phone – Money -- $5.00 – Have a young female call – Face to face interview with a teacher Be strategic with resources Appeal to their desire to help others

Emergent Theme: What Youth Need to Learn about the PSO Survey None of the youth (or parents) were familiar with the possibility of being contacted a year after they left school – Talk about the survey/interview; develop informational materials Several youth didn’t understand ‘interview’ in context of ‘to gain information’. “They’ll end up getting the job or something’ (AZ Male) – Practice the interview to ensure youth understand the questions and are comfortable answering them; talking with a stranger

Recommendations Ask Youth to Identify Who Should Respond – Ask youth whether they are comfortable with a parent or family member answering on their behalf and who that person would be Conduct an Exit Survey – Best and multiple forms of contact – Who youth would like to hear from one year later Provide Multiple Forms of Pre-Notification – In school: share the results from previous years – Talk about the survey/interview

Recommendations Provide a “traditional business letter” from the school principal explaining the purpose of the survey/interview, why it is important, and how the information will be used. Use for pre-notification and if using an Internet survey, ensure it is easily distinguished from spam by using the school name or logo Leave a message with a call back number to distinguish from telemarketers

Recommendations Teach youth about the survey – Practice calling them and letting them answer the questions Use multiple methods of contact – /Internet questionnaire, phone interview, paper questionnaire Target resources strategically for the hardest of the hard to reach – Incentives

Post-School Outcome Data have the power to change lives For Additional Information Charlotte Y. Alverson