Argument and Explanation Development in Secondary Science Day 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Advertisements

February 11, 2014 KINDERGARTEN SCIENCE: DAY 2. Paul Drummond Jennifer Gottlieb Science Consultants, MISD WELCOME!
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Science Breakout New Teacher Meeting 6, Year 2 March 31, 2011.
Planning for Inquiry The Learning Cycle. What do I want the students to know and understand? Take a few minutes to observe the system to be studied. What.
SALT AND CITRIC ACID- SATURATION INVESTIGATIONS Rebecca McPherson.
Science Network Meeting October 23, 2014 Welcome!.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Writing and Argumentation in Elementary Science: Day 1
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Science Focus Lesson SC.5.N.1.1 Practice of Science
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Claim-Evidence-Reasoning (CER) How does weathering and erosion occur?
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
3 Dimensions of the Next Generation Science Standards Spokane County Water Resource Center Wendy Whitmer- Regional Science Coordinator 1.
P RACTICING NGSS Sara Dozier Integrated Middle School Science Partnership.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences (COSIA) Session 3 Teaching & Learning.
Cycles and Patterns MSI 2015 Ginger Tutton Debra Curtis Riverfront Christian School.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
+ The Strength of Modeling in Science Focus: Energy in temperature changes and changes of state.
40 Multiple Choice Items TIMED! 35 Minutes Data Representation (38%) Research Summaries (45%) Conflicting Viewpoints (17%) Content Includes: Biology,
Today’s Agenda Dig deeper into SEP’s for MS Reading debrief 8 th grade experience NGSS to instruction by grade levels Wrap-up and prep for summer.
Writing a Scientific Argument Using the CER Model Adapted from Dr. Kristen Trent Summer 2014.
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Scientific Method Scientific Method Interactive Lotus Diagram By Michelle O’Malley 6 th Grade Science League Academy Work Cited Work Cited Forward.
Big Idea 1: The Practice of Science Description A: Scientific inquiry is a multifaceted activity; the processes of science include the formulation of scientifically.
Welcome Administrator Module K-12 Alliance. Who’s in The Room? Site Administrator District level Administrator Curriculum Specialist Science Coach/specialist.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Copyright©2007 Education Service Center Region XIII Mineral Wells ISD 5E CSCOPE Overview.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
November 20, 2013 SECOND GRADE SCIENCE: DAY 1. Paul Drummond Jennifer Gottlieb Science Consultants, MISD WELCOME!
Universal Access/SDAIE Session 3: Lesson Planning Protocol - Language Objectives Title III Access to Core Professional Development Office of.
Scientific Communication
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
Good Morning! Let’s start with some science!. What’s our goal here? Provide an example of a science lesson with literacy and dialogue strategies integrated.
Welcome Science 5 and Science 6 Implementation Workshop.
Supporting Students in Science Thinking and Writing Workshop #3: Teaching Strategies & Assessment Kate McNeill & Mandy Knight Boston College.
Science and Engineering Practices: Models and Argumentation “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Scientific Method Lesson 2 1 Scientist _________________________________.
CER and Annotating Text District Learning Day August 6, 2015.
1 Year 1 Science Teacher Leadership Academy Session 6.
Claim, Evidence, & Reasoning — Writing Scientific Conclusions
Next Generation Science Standards –
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2015.
Welcome! We’re glad to see you! Review the documents on the table and consider why education is important. Why do we care that all students learn? Who.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Welcome!  Please sign in and pick up your handouts  Find a seat that fits your needs  6 people per table to support the work we will do today.
AESM Summer 2015: Focusing on Science Considering the New Standards and Developing a Framework for Planning.
Welcome Back STLN January 27, Agenda Welcome Recap of November Updates ? What’s Next? Tasks/ Work analysis Break More looking at student work Lunch.
WKEC STLN Welcome Back! January 29 th, Congratulations to Jessica and her beautiful family!
Welcome Science Teachers! Today Propel/ASSET Notebooking 8:30-11:30 Resources PTEI 5-HS 12:00-3:30 Kristen Golomb: Science Coach ASSET Resources Lesson.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
SUPPORTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATIONS AND ARGUMENTS IN THE CLASSROOM WITH TEACHERS OFFICE OF SCIENCE TEACHING ACTIVITIES FLORIDA STATE.
SCIENCE AND THE THE COMMON CORE Kevin English & Aaron Kelly Stephens Sacramento Area Science Project.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
Claims, Evidence, and Reasoning
Comparing Old to New Science Standards How Have they changed?
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Module 4 Unit 1. Lesson 1 Reading and Talking with Peers: A Carousel of Photos and Texts about…
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Craig Gabler Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113.
Shifts in Science Education Testing, Standards, Curriculum, and Instruction Virginia Rhame, Science Specialist, NWAESC Lesley Merritt, Science Specialist,
Collaboration to Refine and Enhance Science Teaching (CREST) Welcome Teachers! Thursday, January 28, 2016.
Page 1 New SD Science Standards – What Is Important? Marcia Torgrude –
5 E’s - Instructional Model
First Grade Science: Day 1
Engage Cobb Conference
Next Generation Science Standards
Presentation transcript:

Argument and Explanation Development in Secondary Science Day 1 October 2, 2014 Macomb Intermediate School District

~Hand, Norton-Meier, Staker, and Bintz Welcome! When procedures are uniform for all students, where data are similar, and where claims match expected outcomes, then the reportage of results and conclusions often seems meaningless to students and lacks opportunities for deeper student learning about the topic or for developing scientific reasoning skills. (If everyone gets the same answer why ask the question? How meaningful is this type of experience? Is this just another school exercise done to them?) ~Hand, Norton-Meier, Staker, and Bintz   What do you think?

Argument and Explanation Development: Objectives Discourse Writing Tasks

Objectives for Today Explore the meaning of the terms argument and explanation with respect to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Create and/or modify tasks so that they have high cognitive demand and will support the science practices of argument and explanation. Experience gathering evidence to support the practices of argument and explanation within the 5E Learning Cycle framework. Plan a lesson sequence that sets students up for a scientific argument.

What does argument mean in our everyday language?

Argument Clinic

Argument in Science In science, an argument is used… “to promote as much understanding of a situation as possible and to persuade colleagues of the validity of a specific idea….[it] is ideally about sharing, processing, and learning about ideas” (NRC 2008, p 89)

Argument & Explanation: What’s the difference? Create a representation that shows how the NGSS defines argument and explanation and also shows the relationship between the two.

Argument & Explanation: What does it look like in the classroom? For each example: What do you notice? What do you wonder? What might this look like in your classroom?

Fears We relinquish some control. We worry about chaos ensuing. We wonder how we will address students who do it “wrong.” (How can we get them to the “right” answer?) We worry that we won’t be able to address all students’ questions and needs. (What if a student says something or does something and I don’t know how to respond?)

A new model for the practice of science

Orchestra students are musicians; students on the basketball team are athletes; what opportunities do our science students have to be scientists? In other words, if orchestra students are musicians, and students on the basketball team are athletes, are our science students scientists? Pause the video as you consider this question with your group.

From thinking that one scientific method fits all Our shift in thinking… From thinking that one scientific method fits all To thinking about how to engage our students in the practices of scientists Asking questions and defining problems Developing and using models Planning and carrying out investigations Analyzing and interpreting data Using mathematics and computational thinking Constructing explanations and designing solutions Engaging in argument from evidence Obtaining, evaluating and communicating information

From thinking that “hands-on” science is ESSENTIAL Our shift in thinking… From thinking that “hands-on” science is ESSENTIAL To thinking that engaging students EVERY DAY in scientific practices and thinking is POWERFUL

A new model for the practice of science

Shifting our practice… From… How am I going to teach this? To… How are students going to learn about this? Next Generation Science Standards Science & Engineering Practices Asking questions and defining problems Developing and using models Planning and carrying out investigations Analyzing and interpreting data Using mathematics and computational thinking Constructing explanations and designing solutions Engaging in argument from evidence Obtaining, evaluating and communicating information

Argument and Explanation According to the SEP, what are the hallmarks of a high quality argument at your grade level? Explanation?

Claim – Evidence – Reasoning (CER) Getting Started Claim – Evidence – Reasoning (CER) CLAIM: What do you know? EVIDENCE: How do you know that? REASONING: Why does your evidence support your claim?

Claim – Evidence – Reasoning (CER) What grade level? Rewrite the student response so it reflects a higher grade band. How might the task be changed to produce a higher level of student work?

So how do we put it all together so that it’s meaningful for our students?

~Hand, Norton-Meier, Staker, and Bintz When procedures are uniform for all students, where data are similar, and where claims match expected outcomes, then the reportage of results and conclusions often seems meaningless to students and lacks opportunities for deeper student learning about the topic or for developing scientific reasoning skills. (If everyone gets the same answer why ask the question? How meaningful is this type of experience? Is this just another school exercise done to them?) ~Hand, Norton-Meier, Staker, and Bintz  

~Hand, Norton-Meier, Staker, and Bintz When procedures are uniform for all students, where data are similar, and where claims match expected outcomes, then the reportage of results and conclusions often seems meaningless to students and lacks opportunities for deeper student learning about the topic or for developing scientific reasoning skills. (If everyone gets the same answer why ask the question? How meaningful is this type of experience? Is this just another school exercise done to them?) ~Hand, Norton-Meier, Staker, and Bintz  

We need to change our thinking with respect to experimentation!

Separate Unit on the Scientific Method Experimentation Conventional Separate Unit on the Scientific Method Then spend the rest of the year learning content through text resources or telling.

? Experimentation Conventional Students read the text to learn vocabulary and background information about clouds. Students then observe the cloud in a jar that confirms what they already “know.”

Shifts in practice for NGSS Experimentation Shifts in practice for NGSS ? Students ask questions about cloud formation and do some investigating on their own. Students search for answers to their questions as they read the text.

5E Learning Cycle 5E Model is based from the SCIS Model of Instruction by researchers Atkins and Karplus in 1967. 5E Model was originally proposed by BSCS (Biological Science Curriculum Study) in the late1980’s.

Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate 5E Learning Cycle http://www.bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model

Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate http://www.bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model

Tasks for Argumentation

Jeremy’s Vacation Using the data provided, create a representation that will help you show which city Jeremy should visit and at what time of year (spring, fall, winter, or summer). You may represent your data in any way you choose. You may choose to represent all or only some of the data, as long as you can use your representation to justify your recommendations for Jeremy’s vacation (where to go and when to go there). From Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013, page 3.

Comparing 2 Tasks Task A Task B Create a bar graph that shows the average monthly high and low temperatures in each city. Identify where and when Jeremy should go on vacation. Using the data provided, create a representation that will help you show which city Jeremy should visit and at what time of year (spring, fall, winter, or summer). From Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013, page 3.

Low and High Cognitive Demand Read the two experimentation tasks on page 12. How are they similar? How are they different? Features of Tasks Low Cognitive Demand High Cognitive Demand

Low and High Cognitive Demand Read the tasks on pages 14 & 15. How are they similar? How are they different? Features of Tasks Low Cognitive Demand High Cognitive Demand

Low and High Cognitive Demand Read the summary table on pages 20 & 21. What do you notice? What do you wonder? Features of Tasks Low Cognitive Demand High Cognitive Demand

What is The Teacher’s Role? Page 16 What is The Teacher’s Role?

Tasks that support argumentation Page 16 High cognitive demand Students engage in multiple ways that are productive Students produce artifacts task science concept Student artifacts Argumentation! Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Increasing the Cognitive Demand of a Task Take a look at the Measuring Fastplant Growth task on page 12. How might you increase the cognitive demand of this task?

Increasing the Cognitive Demand of a Task Page 18 Eliminate or minimize prescriptive directions Provide complex data Give students an audience Re-sequence tasks Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Math Class Needs A Makeover

Thriving in times of change It is unreasonable to ask a professional to change much more than 10 percent a year, but it is unprofessional to change by much less than 10 percent a year. ~Steven Leinwand

What might be your 10%? Think of a task you will do with your students in the near future. Jot down some notes about some ways you might makeover the task in order to ramp up the cognitive demand.

Tasks that support argumentation Page 16 High cognitive demand Students engage in multiple ways that are productive Students produce artifacts task science concept Student artifacts Argumentation! Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate http://www.bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model

Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate task science concept Student artifacts

Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate

What ideas or questions do you have about how light travels? Engage What ideas or questions do you have about how light travels? Draw a diagram that shows how both people can see the light.

Explore: How does light travel? What can you find out about the way light travels?

How does light travel? This is the activity I did: These are the patterns and observations I found: These patterns and observations are important because:

Explore: How does light travel? What can you find out about the way light travels? What if you have 2 light sources?

Explore: How does light travel? How is this the same? Different? What image will you see?

Explore: How does light travel? What can you find out now?

Explore: How does light travel? What can you find out now?

Explore: How does light travel? What can you find out now?

Explore: How does light travel? How is this the same? Different? What will you see on the screen?

Explore: How does light travel? Activity Observations How do these observations help answer the focus question?   How does light travel? Light particles… …travel in straight lines …travel in all directions …are invisibly small …travel at high speed

Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate

Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate task science concept Student artifacts

Explain: How does light travel? Imagine that you have a pair of Magic Science Glasses. When you look at light with your Magic Science Glasses, you see the particles that make up light. Put on your Magic Glasses and “look” at the light particles that we’ve been experimenting with. Use what you see about how these particles are behaving and what they look like to explain all the patterns we noticed in our experiments. Use a whiteboard to create a representation that answers the focus question: How does light travel? Activity Observations How do these observations help answer the focus question?   How does light travel? Light particles… …travel in straight lines …travel in all directions …are invisibly small …travel at high speed

Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate task science concept Student artifacts

Planning Time Think of a science concept your students will learn in the near future. What explanation do you hope your students will develop by the end of the learning cycle? (write it out….what does excellent student work look like?) What evidence will students need in order to develop this explanation? What will students do to gather the evidence they need to develop an explanation?

Sharing / Reflection Take a photo of something you want to remember on someone’s chart paper. Find someone you don’t know yet and show them your photo. Explain why you took that photo.

Objectives for Next Time Explore a protocol for analyzing student work. Develop an understanding of how to orchestrate class discussions that support students as they develop a scientific explanation. Plan a lesson sequence that includes a 5 Practices discussion.

Before we meet again…. Have your students do the task you developed. Bring examples of student work with you to our next meeting on November 6. Record a class discussion.

Argument and Explanation Development in Secondary Science: Day 2 November 6, 2014

So what is rigor? Rigor is NOT… …fifty math problems for homework when fewer will achieve mastery. …more worksheets for the student who finished the assignment early. …using a seventh grade text book with your high performing sixth grade students. …covering more material in a shorter period of time. …cold or impersonal. …just for a select group of students. ~Debbie Shults

One Definition of Rigor “Rigor is the goal of helping students develop the capacity to understand content that is complex, ambiguous, provocative, and personally or emotionally challenging.” from Teaching What Matters Most: Standards and Strategies for Raising Student Achievement by Richard W. Strong, Harvey F. Silver and Matthew J. Perini, ASCD, 2001. According to Strong, Silver, and Perini

Features of High Cognitive Demand Tasks Pages 20-21

At our last meeting…

Tasks that support argumentation Page 16 High cognitive demand Students engage in multiple ways that are productive Students produce artifacts task science concept Student artifacts Argumentation! Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate task science concept Student artifacts

Objectives for Today Develop an understanding of how to orchestrate class discussions that support students as they develop a scientific explanation. Plan a lesson sequence that includes a 5 Practices discussion.

Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate task science concept Student artifacts

Class Discussions Remember the Measuring Fastplant Growth task on pages 12 and 19. Read the Kelly Davis story on pages 24 – 27. As you read… Identify the instances of student authorship of ideas and approaches Identify any instances of holding students accountable to the discipline

Class Discussions Show and Tell Orchestration

Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate task science concept Student artifacts Orchestrating class discussions

Orchestrating Class Discussions Anticipating Monitoring Selecting Sequencing Connecting From Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate Day Height (cm) Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Plant 4 Plant 5 Plant 6 11 9 8 10 7 13 12 16 15 17 18 24 25 26 23 20 28 29 27

Example LEsson We know that individual humans vary quite a lot from one another – we are different heights and weights; we have different skin, hair, and eye color; the thickness of our hair varies, etc. Is there variation in populations of other types of organisms? Would we see variation in a population of plants? What kind of variation would we see? How would we measure and describe that variation? Task: Following data collection, students were asked to create a representation of their data on a whiteboard that would enable them to answer the following question, “How tall is a typical Fastplant on a certain day in its life cycle?” Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate task science concept Student artifacts

Orchestrating Class Discussions Anticipating Monitoring Selecting Sequencing Connecting From Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

What representations do you anticipate from students? Anticipating What representations do you anticipate from students? Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Orchestrating Class Discussions Anticipating Monitoring Selecting Sequencing Connecting From Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Monitoring What monitoring questions might you ask students as they work to make their thinking visible? Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Orchestrating Class Discussions Anticipating Monitoring Selecting Sequencing Connecting Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

What might you do? Adapted from Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

Orchestrating Class Discussions Read the Nathan Gates story on pages 33 - 40. As you read… Where do you see each of the 5 Practices?

Focus on Discourse Read pages 85 – 88. As you read, select your own: Sentence that is meaningful to you, that you feel captures a core idea of the passage Phrase that moved, engaged, or provoked you Word that captured your attention or struck you as powerful From Making Thinking Visible by Ritchhart, Church, and Morrison, Wiley, 2011, page 207.

Using Focused Talk Small Group Work Whole Class Discussions Making student thinking visible Guiding student thinking in productive directions Directing students’ attention to what matters Create a whiteboard that represents the big ideas of your section.

Checklist and Reflection Tool Do these match the thinking in the passages we just read? In what way?

Checklist and Reflection Tool As we watch the videos…. What do you notice? Where are the missed opportunities?

Checklist and Reflection Tool Read pages 54 – 59. What do you notice?

Checklist and Reflection Tool Read pages 74 - 80. What do you notice?

Planning for Argumentation task science concept Student artifacts Planning for Argumentation

Planning for Argumentation

Explaining the behavior of water Students will be able to: Depict the molecular behavior of water in all three phases in drawings on whiteboards. Explain the molecular behavior of water in the solid, liquid, and gaseous phases. How does water behave?

Focus Question

The Science Concept How does water behave? Science concept

The Science Concept How does water behave? Features: Spacing Heat Movement Forces Type & Size

Science Concept: Sample Student Work

The Task How does water behave?   Science concept Student artifacts Task

Setting up for the Explore learning phase What evidence do students need in order to fully support the science concept? How will they come to know that this is how water behaves?

What evidence do students need to support this idea?

How does water behave? Task Exp. 1: Exp. 2: Exp. 3: Exp. 4 Activity Patterns and Observations How do these observations help answer the focus question?  Exp. 1: Observation of physical properties of S, L, and G phases of water S: retains shape L: flows to bottom of container G: escapes out of container S: not compressed with syringe L: not compressed with syringe G: can be compressed with syringe  Exp. 2: Measure mass and volume of water at different temps Mass of water didn’t change in different temperatures Volume of water was the same for 2.8oC and for 20oC. The volume increased by about 10% at 0oC.  Exp. 3: Observation of behavior of ice in liquid water Ice floats on liquid water, but not all the way at the top. Part of the ice cubes are under the surface of the water and part of them are above the surface.  Exp. 4 Observation of boiling and condensation  When heat is added to the flask, the water level decreases. Small droplets of water collect in the tubing (and we can also see “fog” in the tube) and then droplets form in the test tube that is sitting in the cup of ice.

How does water behave? Task Exp. 1: Exp. 2: Exp. 3: Exp. 4 Activity Patterns and Observations How do these observations help answer the focus question?  Exp. 1: Observation of physical properties of S, L, and G phases of water S: retains shape L: flows to bottom of container G: escapes out of container S: not compressed with syringe L: not compressed with syringe G: can be compressed with syringe  Exp. 2: Measure mass and volume of water at different temps Mass of water didn’t change in different temperatures Volume of water was the same for 2.8oC and for 20oC. The volume increased by about 10% at 0oC. Particles in S are farther apart than in L Mass stayed same – so particles aren’t changing mass as they change phase – just changing spacing  Exp. 3: Observation of behavior of ice in liquid water Ice floats on liquid water, but not all the way at the top. Part of the ice cubes are under the surface of the water and part of them are above the surface.  Exp. 4 Observation of boiling and condensation  When heat is added to the flask, the water level decreases. Small droplets of water collect in the tubing (and we can also see “fog” in the tube) and then droplets form in the test tube that is sitting in the cup of ice.

How will they generate this evidence?

Setting up for the Explain Learning Phase How will you ask students to demonstrate their thinking in order to set them up for a class discussion? High cognitive demand Students engage in multiple ways that are productive Students produce artifacts Task: Imagine that you have a pair of Magic Science Glasses and you use them to look at a glass of water. But instead of the water, you see the pieces that make up water, the particles.   “Look” at the solid, liquid, and gaseous water that we’ve been experimenting with. I want you to use what you see about how these particles are behaving and what they look like to explain all those patterns that we noticed in our experiments. In your groups, DRAW a representation of what you see when you put on your Magic Science Glasses. How does water behave?

How will students demonstrate their thinking?

Orchestrating Class Discussions Anticipating Monitoring Selecting Sequencing Connecting From Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

How will you orchestrate the class discussion?

What will you need to summarize? Feature of Water Solid (Ice) Liquid (Water) Gas (Vapor) Spacing  Farther apart than liquid Closest Far apart  Forces    Motion  Heat Energy From Cartier, Smith, Stein, and Ross, 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-Based Discussions in Science, NSTA Press, 2013.

How will the class summarize the discussion?

Thank you!

Welcome Back! Day 3 January 21, 2015

One new thing I’ve tried in the classroom since we last met is…. Welcome! One new thing I’ve tried in the classroom since we last met is…. …and as a result, my students….  

Objectives for Today Learn how writing fits into the process of argument and explanation development in science. Develop and use tools that provide feedback to students on their writing. Experience a collection of writing instructional strategies and create a plan for teaching the writing component of argument and explanation development in your classroom.

Previously….

Argument and Explanation According to the SEP, what are the hallmarks of a high quality argument at your grade level? Explanation?

Claim – Evidence – Reasoning (CER) Getting Started Claim – Evidence – Reasoning (CER) CLAIM: What do you know? EVIDENCE: How do you know that? REASONING: Why does your evidence support your claim?

Claim – Evidence – Reasoning (CER) What grade level? Rewrite the student response so it reflects a higher grade band. How might the task be changed to produce a higher level of student work?

So how do we put it all together so that it’s meaningful for our students?

~Hand, Norton-Meier, Staker, and Bintz When procedures are uniform for all students, where data are similar, and where claims match expected outcomes, then the reportage of results and conclusions often seems meaningless to students and lacks opportunities for deeper student learning about the topic or for developing scientific reasoning skills. (If everyone gets the same answer why ask the question? How meaningful is this type of experience? Is this just another school exercise done to them?) ~Hand, Norton-Meier, Staker, and Bintz  

Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate task science concept Student artifacts

Argument and Explanation Development Task Discourse Writing

Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. How does argument & Explanation Development fit into the 5E learning cycle? Students gather evidence to be used as they develop an explanation. Engage Explore Explain Elaborate Evaluate task science concept Student artifacts

And now it’s time to write… task science concept Student artifacts Students write evidence-based explanations

Getting Started with writing Claim – Evidence – Reasoning (CER) CLAIM: What do you know? EVIDENCE: How do you know that? REASONING: Why does your evidence support your claim? COUNTER-ARGUMENT: What other claims might be made…and why are they not supported by the evidence?

Chemical Reaction Assessment Task Did a chemical reaction occur?   Measurements Melting Point Volume Solubility in Water Density Before stirring and heating Sample of butanic acid -7.9 oC 2.00 cm3 Yes 0.96 g/cm3 Sample of butanol -89.5 oC 0.81 g/cm3 After stirring and heating Sample of Layer A -91.5 oC No 0.87 g/cm3 Sample of Layer B 0.0 oC 1.00 g/cm3 From NcNeill and Krajcik, Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science, Pearson, 2012.

Student Work: What do you notice? From NcNeill and Krajcik, Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science, Pearson, 2012.

Basic Rubric

Basic Rubric Now, use the basic rubric to individually score each piece of student work. How do your scores compare to the rest of your group?

Tangible and Transparent Actionable User-friendly Timely Ongoing Feedback What kind of feedback will help students improve their writing? Goal Referenced Tangible and Transparent Actionable User-friendly Timely Ongoing Consistent Wiggins, G. (2012). Effective Feedback. Educational leadership.

Feedback What kind of feedback will help students improve their writing?

What kind of feedback will help students improve their writing? What is the question you are trying to answer? Have you answered it? What evidence do you have to support your thinking? What did you observe that makes you think that? Does what you have written agree with observations you have recorded? How do you know this evidence supports your claim? What is it about (your evidence) that lets you know that (your claim) is valid? What are the scientific principles? What other claims might be made? What questions do you have now?

What feedback would you give? From NcNeill and Krajcik, Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science, Pearson, 2012.

What we really want is a written argument in paragraph form that meets the expectations laid out in the basic rubric. Sometimes, this will be the conclusion to a lab that answers a question. Sometimes, it will be a paragraph (or more) that pulls together evidence from several lab experiences to answer a question.

What do we do if our students aren’t ready yet? What are some baby steps we can take that will help them understand how to do this?

Create a rough outline of your science content for the year…..

Then add your writing instructional strategies that you might use during that time….. And decide when to check in with the rubric….

Let’s focus on writing instructional strategies

Analyze Examples Are fat and soap the same substance? For each of the following explanations, underline and label the claim, evidence, reasoning, and counter-argument. Which explanation is the strongest? Why?

Analyze Examples

Analyze Examples Might this instructional strategy be helpful with your students? What might it look like in your content area? What examples might you use?

Multiple Choice Arguments Might this instructional strategy be helpful with your students? What might it look like in your content area? What examples might you use?

Reconstructing Arguments Does the size of an animal affect their heart rate at rest? Mammal Resting Heart Rate (beats per minute) Human 75 Horse 48 Cow 45-60 Dog 90-100 Rat 120 Mouse 498

Reconstructing Arguments Might this instructional strategy be helpful with your students? What might it look like in your content area? What examples might you use?

Graphic Organizers and Writing Scaffolds What is the relationship between voltage, current, and resistance in a simple circuit?

Graphic Organizers and Writing Scaffolds Might this instructional strategy be helpful with your students? What might it look like in your content area? What examples might you use?

Focus on “Appropriate and Sufficient” Evidence Sample # Mass (g) Volume (mL) 1 27.0 10.0 2 142.0 19.5 3 81.0 30.2 4 288.4 32.4 Maria was given several samples of unknown metals and she was trying to figure out if any of them were the same material. She measured the mass and volume of each sample. She made a claim that samples 1 and 3 are the same material. Does she have sufficient evidence to support her claim? What might she do to strengthen her argument?

Focus on “Appropriate and Sufficient” Evidence Question: What data will you provide? What data will you not provide (but they need for a quality argument)? Might this instructional strategy be helpful with your students? What might it look like in your content area? What examples might you use?

Focus on Evidence and Reasoning Question: What is the relationship between the organization of the periodic table and atomic radius? Claim: As you move across a period from left to right, the atomic radii decrease. As you move down a group, the atomic radii increase. What is appropriate evidence and reasoning for this claim?

Focus on Evidence and Reasoning Might this instructional strategy be helpful with your students? What might it look like in your content area? What examples might you use?

Focus on Counter-arguments Which ball will hit the ground first? Explain your thinking. A B

Focus on Counter-arguments Might this instructional strategy be helpful with your students? What might it look like in your content area? What examples might you use?

Then add your writing instructional strategies that you might use during that time….. And decide when to check in with the rubric….

1 short term goal that I plan to accomplish in the near future: Reflection 3 ideas for teaching argument/explanation writing that I’m excited to try: 2 interesting things I learned as we looked at student work this morning: 1 short term goal that I plan to accomplish in the near future: