E.C. AschenauerSTAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December 20111.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
Advertisements

Barrel PID upgrade K. Inami (Nagoya-u) and PID group - R&D status - TOP counter - iTOP - Focusing DIRC - To do, cost estimation.
PHENIX Decadal Plan o Midterm upgrades until 2015 o Long term evolution after 2015 Dynamical origins of spin- dependent interactions New probes of longitudinal.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute The HERA-B RICH counter.
Design and First Results of a Cosmic Ray Telescope For Use In Testing a Focusing DIRC M. P. Belhorn University of Cincinnati The BELLE group at the University.
The problem: The latest theoretical and experimental results suggest investigating a physics domain for p t higher than the actual one covered by the HMPID.
Assisi – 23 June 2005 Tito Bellunato 1 Status of the LHCb RICH detector and the HPD Beauty 2005 Assisi – 23 June 2005 Tito Bellunato – Università degli.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Lens ALens B Avg. Angular Resolution Best Angular Resolution (deg) Worst Angular Resolution (deg) Image Surface Area (mm 2 )
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
Particle Identification
Carsten Schwarz PANDA June 2004 CID Cherenkov Imaging Detectors ● RICH software at HERMES, Ralf Kaiser, Glasgow ● Present status of DIRC, C.S., GSI ● Spiralling.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana March 17, 2006 Super B Workshop, Frascati Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Aerogel RICH and TOP: summary.
Position Sensitive SiPMs for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters C.Woody BNL January 17, 2012.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
May 31, 2008 SuperB PID sessionMarko Starič, Ljubljana Marko Starič J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Report on hardware tests and MC studies in Ljubljana.
Performance of the PANDA Barrel DIRC Prototype 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt 2 Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Marko Zühlsdorf.
Photodetection EDIT EDIT 2011 N. Dinu, T. Gys, C. Joram, S. Korpar, Y. Musienko, V. Puill, D. Renker 1 Micro Channel plate PMT (MCP-PMT) Similar to ordinary.
HPD Performance in the RICH Detectors of the LHCb Young Min Kim University of Edinburgh IoP HEPP Conference – April
Experimental set-up for on the bench tests Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE/Photonis Multi-Channel.
Development of the RICH Detectors in LHCb S. Easo Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory June 5, 2002 RICH2002 PYLOS, GREECE For the LHCb-RICH Group.
The calibration and alignment of the LHCb RICH system Antonis Papanestis STFC - RAL for the LHCb Collaboration.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
work for PID in Novosibirsk E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
TRD Technology at ALICE Matthias Hartig Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt/Main.
July 4, 2008 SuperBelle Meeting, KEKPeter Križan, Ljubljana Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Burle MCP PMTs as photon detector.
AMS-RICH Detector. J. Berdugo – CIEMAT (Madrid, Spain) 1 AMS-02 Phase II Flight Safety Review AMS Ring Imaging CHerenkov PURPOSE: 1.Precise measurement.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana March 6, 2006 CBM RICH Workshop Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute RICH counters for HERA-B and Belle.
1 Summary Detector Working group? EIC meeting, Hampton, May 2008 E.C. Aschenauer E. Kinney B. Surrow.
The 21st International Conference on Ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, March 30 – April 4, Knoxville, TN Results from cosmics and First LHC.
6-Aug-02Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX Upgrade mini-Workshop1 Boris Khachaturov, Alexander Kozlov, Ilia Ravinovich and Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann Institute, Israel.
CLAS12 Rich Imaging Cherenkov Counter
TPC/HBD R&D at BNL Craig Woody BNL Mini Workshop on PHENIX Upgrade Plans August 6, 2002.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
1 Participation of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna) in PANDA experiment at Future GSI Facility Nuclear Structure Physics Physics with Antiprotons.
Mauro Iodice INFN Roma (Italy) Hall A Collaboration Meeting - JLAB May 18, 2004.
Future Possibilities for Measuring Low Mass Lepton Pairs in Christine Aidala for the Collaboration Quark Matter 2002, Nantes.
RICH Simulation in LHCb LHC Detector Simulation Workshop S.Easo, RAL, On behalf of LHCb–RICH group.
Aerogel Cherenkov Counters for the ALICE Detector G. Paić Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM For the ALICE VHMPID group.
October 2002Sienna, JL. Faure, DAPNIA/SPP In 8th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors Jean-louis Faure CEA-DAPNIA-SPP Progress.
Radia Sia Syracuse Univ. 1 RICH 2004 Outline:  The CLEO-III RICH Detector  Physics Requirements  CLEO-III RICH at work… Performance of the CLEO-III.
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
Tests of a proximity focusing RICH with aerogel as radiator and flat panel PMT (Hamamatsu H8500) as photon detector Rok Pestotnik Jožef Stefan Institute,
Il Ring Imaging CHerenkov (RICH) detector a Jefferson Lab – Hall A.
23/02/07G. Vidal-Sitjes, VCI2007 Vienna Conference on Instrumentation1 The LHCb RICH detector G. Vidal-Sitjes on behalf of the LHCb RICH team Outline:
Aerogel RICH & TOP counter for super KEKB Y.Mazuka Nagoya University June 14-16, 2006 The 3 rd SuperB workshop at SLAC.
TORCH – a Cherenkov based Time-of- Flight Detector Euan N. Cowie on behalf of the TORCH collaboration E N Cowie - TORCH - TIPP June 2014.
Matthias Hoek Institut für Kernphysik Next Generation Cherenkov Counters* *For Accelerator Experiments 52. International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics.
Study of Cherenkov detectors for high momentum charged particle identification in ALICE experiment at LHC Guy Paic Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM.
Particle Identification of the ALICE TPC via dE/dx
PID detector and EMC for HIEPAF 邵明,唐泽波 核探测与核电子学国家重点实验室 中国科学技术大学近代物理系.
FARICH status E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
The Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors for LHCb Antonis Papanestis CCLRC – RAL On behalf of the LHCb RICH group.
Focusing Aerogel RICH Optimization A.Yu.Barnyakov, M.Yu.Barnyakov, V.S.Bobrovnikov, A.R.Buzykaev, V.V.Gulevich, S.A.Kononov, E.A.Kravchenko, A.P.Onuchin.
Particle Identification (PID) at HIEPA Experiment
Highlights from RICH2007 PPD Seminar S.Easo, A.Papanestis, S.Ricciardi
Focusing Aerogel RICH with SiPM Photodetectors
E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia
Particle Identification in LHCb
RICH simulation for CLAS12
Potential Options on the PID Detector at HIEPA
Multianode Photo Multipliers for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors
Progress on the Focusing DIRC R&D
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #17 Wednesday ,April 4, 2012 Dr. Brandt
Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information
Presentation transcript:

E.C. AschenauerSTAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December 20111

A STAR  Main physics interests  Flavour separation for transverse asymmetries  Spin transfer measurements  eRHIC: hadrons at high rapidity for 5 GeV x 100 GeV  Important Considerations  Momentum resolution  Talk by Anselm  Space constrains  Needed momentum coverage  Impact of fringe magnetic field on photon detector E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December

Needed Momentum Coverage E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December GeV x 100GeV 250GeV x 250GeV Decadal Plan: concentrate on 2<rapidiy<4 Momentum Coverage needed: GeV In general needs are very similar to RICH detectors in fixed target experiments or forward spectrometers

THE FAMILY OF RICH COUNTERS E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December With focalization  Extended radiator (gas) (gas)  the only approach at high momenta at high momenta (p > 5-6 GeV/c) (p > 5-6 GeV/c)  EXAMPLES: SELEX, OMEGA, DELPHI, SLD-CRID, HeraB, OMEGA, DELPHI, SLD-CRID, HeraB, HERMES, COMPASS, LHCb HERMES, COMPASS, LHCb Proximity focusing  thin radiator (liquid, solid) (liquid, solid)  Effective at low momenta momenta (p < 5-6 GeV/c) (p < 5-6 GeV/c)  EXAMPLES: STAR, ALICE HMPID, ALICE HMPID, CLEO III CLEO III DIRC (Detection of Internally Reflected Cherenkov light)  Quartz as radiator and as light guide  Effective at low momenta (p < 5-6 GeV/c) (p < 5-6 GeV/c)  The only existing DIRC was in operation at BABAR operation at BABAR PANDA is planning two PANDA is planning two

RICH Design Equations  Cherenkov threshold equation : cos  c = 1/  n  All light is emitted at a fixed Cherenkov angle to the direction of flight of a particle  c =√(2  -1/  2 )  =n-1 radiator index of refraction  c =√(2  -1/  2 )  =n-1 radiator index of refraction  particle velocity  particle velocity N pe =N 0 L  c 2 L radiator length N pe =N 0 L  c 2 L radiator length N 0 figure of merit N 0 figure of merit  Transforming that light to the focal plane of a mirror transforms a ring in angle space to a ring in coordinates R=F  c F mirror focal length R=F  c F mirror focal length  Single photon counting - statistics really applies (no charge sharing)  =  R /√(N PE)  R photon pixel resolution  =  R /√(N PE)  R photon pixel resolution  Isochronous - all photons reach the focal plane at the same time E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December

SINGLE PHOTON DETECTORS E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December the requests:  QE: high QE (above standard PMT photocathodes having peak-values of %)  r: rate capabilities (> 100 kHz/ mm 2 )  t: time resolution below 100 ps  B: insensitivity to high magnetic fields (B=1T and more)  $: reasonable costs to make large systems affordable  L: Large area and wide angular acceptance of each single sensor the approaches:  Poly- and nano-crystalline diamond-based photocathodes (QE)  Photocathodes based on C nanotubes (QE)  Hybrid avalanche photodiodes HAPD (B)  Si photomultipliers (QE,r,t,B)  Microchannel plate (MCP) PMTs (B,t)  Micro Pattern Gas Detectors (MPGD) + CsI (r, B, $)  Large, wide aperture (hybride) PMTs (L ) astroparticle experiments promising for a far future

SINGLE PHOTON DETECTORS E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December single photon detectors : the CENTRAL QUESTION since the beginning of the RICH era the CENTRAL QUESTION since the beginning of the RICH era 3 groups (with examples, not exhaustive lists) Vacuum based PDs  PMTS (SELEX, Hermes, BaBar DIRC)  MAPMTs (HeraB, COMPASS RICH-1 upgrade)  Flat pannels (various test beams, proposed for CBM)  Hybride PMTs (LHCb)  MCP-PMT (all the studies for the high time resolution applications) Gaseous PDs  Organic vapours - in practice only TMAE and TEA (Delphi, OMEGA, SLD CRID, CLEO III)  Solid photocathodes and open geometry (HADES, COMPASS, ALICE, JLAB-HALL A)  Solid photocathodes and closed geometries (PHENIX HBD, even if w/o imaging) Si PDs  Silicon PMs (only tests till now)

LARGE SENSITIVE AREAS ↔ GASEOUS PDs E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December  photoconverting vapours are no longer in use, a part CLEO III (rates ! time resolution !) (rates ! time resolution !)  the present is represented by MWPC (open geometry!) with CsI  the first prove (in experiments !) that coupling solid photocathodes and gaseous detectors works  Severe recovery time (~ 1 d) after detector trips ion feedback   Aging CsI ion  Moderate gain: < 10 5 (effective gain: <1/2) bombardment  The way to the future: ion blocking geometries  GEM/THGEM allow for multistage detectors With THGEMs: High overall gain ↔ pe det. efficiency! Good ion blocking (up to IFB at a few % level) MHSP: IFB at level opening the way to the physicists’ dream (Philosopher’s Stone): Gaseous detectors with solid photocathodes for visible light (this is for far future) (this is for far future)  PHENIX HBD – first application   noise performance: pedestal rms 0.15 fC or 0.2 p.e. at a gain of 5000, but several pe/channel   Photon detector – 1 m 2

RADIATOR MATERIALS E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December  the “low momentum” domain <10 GeV/c: Aerogel vs quartz  Aerogel Separation up to higher momenta (but Rayleight, transmission …) Lower density  smaller perturbation of particle trajectories, limited number of photons (variable index of refraction to partially overcome) Progresses in aerogel production  Quartz  saturation at lower momenta (but removing chromaticity…) high density  large number of photons, trajectory perturbation excellent transparency, excellent mechanical characteristics  detectors of the DIRC family  the “high momentum” domain > 10 GeV/c: gas radiators low density gasses for the highest momenta or the best resolutions (NA62) Still a major role played by C-F gasses; availability of C 4 F 10 … Gas systems for purity (transparency) and pressure control

AEROGEL NEWS I E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December News from NOVOSIBIRSK PRODUCTION STATUS   ~2000 liters have been produced for KEDR ASHIPH detector, n=1.05   blocks 200  200  50 mm have been produced for LHCb RICH, n=1.03   ~200 blocks 115  115  25 mm have been produced for AMS RICH, n=1.05   n=1.13 aerogel for SND ASHIPH detector   n=1.008 aerogel for the DIRAC   3-4 layers focusing aerogel High optical parameters (Lsc≥43mm at 400 nm) Precise dimensions (<0.2 mm)

AEROGEL NEWS II E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December News from JAPAN   3rd generation:2002- A-RICH for Belle upgrade (new solvent) Home made ! largely improved transparency very good homogeneity both density and chemical comp. 2-layer samples   4 th generation: high density aerogel prototype result with 3 GeV/c pions 2005 sample 2001 sample n~1.050 photon yield is not limited by radiator transparency up to ~50mm n = n = mm transmission length(400nm): 46mm n = x35x10mm 3 transmission length: 18mm at 400nm

COMPASS RICH-1  K p in operation at COMPASS since 2001 PERFORMANCES:  photons / ring (  ≈ 1, complete ring in (  ≈ 1, complete ring in acceptance) : 14 acceptance) : 14    -ph ≈    -ph (  ≈ 1) : 1.2 mrad   ring ≈   ring (  ≈ 1) : 0.6 mrad   2   /K 43 GeV/c   PID efficiency > 95% (  particle > 30 mrad) 5 m 6 m 3 m mirrorwall vessel radiator: C 4 F 10 photondetectors: CsI MWPC E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December Single Radiator: C 4 F 10

COMPASS RICH-1 – UPGRADE 1/2 E.C. Aschenauer Large uncorrelated background in the forward direction (  beam halo ) UPGRADE overlap of event images STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December

COMPASS RICH-1 – UPGRADE 1/2 E.C. Aschenauer Technical data  Hamamatsu 16 anode PMTs (R7600 – UV extended glass) (R7600 – UV extended glass)  quartz optics  surface ratio 1:7 ($ !)  wide angular acc. (± 9.5 degrees)  high sensitivity pre-amplifier  fast, high time resolution digital electronics  dead zone: 2% even with 46 mm pitch About performance  photons / ring (  ≈ 1, complete ring in acceptance) : 56 in acceptance) : 56   time resolution better than 1 ns    -ph ≈    -ph (  ≈ 1) : 2 mrad   ring ≈   ring (  ≈ 1) : 0.3 mrad   2   /K 55 GeV/c   PID efficiency > 95% (also < 30 mrad) photons MAPMT concentrator field lens online event display STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December

HERA-B Photon Detector E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December m 4 m Used a lens system to increase active to dead area of photon detector

Most Relevant RICH Design for STAR E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December LHC-b: 2 RICHs with 3 radiators

E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December RICH-1 (modern HERMES RICH) RICH-2 2<p<60 GeV 17<p<100 GeV mrad mrad 5cm Aerogel (n=1.030) ~200 cm CF 4 (n=1.0005) 85 cm C 4 F 10 (n=1.0014)

LHC-b HPD based Photondetector  3 m 2 area have been equipped with photodetectors providing: Single Photon Sensitivity ( nm) Single Photon Sensitivity ( nm)  2.5 x 2.5 mm2 granularity  Fast readout (40 MHz)  Active-area fraction > 70%  Hybrid Photo Diodes (HPD) 168 HPDs RICH1 262 HPDs RICH2 E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December k channels

LHC-b HPD based Photondetector  HPD combines vacuum photo-cathode technology with solid state technology  Photoelectron, released from a photo-cathode, is accelerating by an applied 20kV voltage onto silicon detector. Then it creates ~ electron-hole pairs.  The light pattern incident on the photo-cathode is imaged onto silicon matrix.  No dead regions  30% QE at 200 nm  Fast signal (rise-fall times of a few ns) and negligeable jitter (<1 ns) (<1 ns) E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December

LHC-b RICH performance E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December Stunning performance  For Details

Summary  The RICH-1 concept of LHC-b is ready to go for STAR and eRHIC-detector without enormous R&D  If we drop the Aerogel there could be interesting R&D for the photon detector by making it a GEM  No sensitivity to magnetic field  An R&D discussed in the LoI proposal for EIC  So if we decide a RICH is important for the pp physics program there are good designs available we can rely on  For eRHIC a RICH in forward and backward direction is a must  Most critical momentum resolution  c =√(2  -1/  2 ) E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December LHC-b momentum resolution

E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December BACKUP

TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December  Radiator materials  aerogel material (BELLE upgrade, super B factory)  radiation hardness of fused silica (future DIRCs in PANDA)  gas systems (C-F gasses: DIRAC, LHCb)  Mirrors & optics  construction of light mirrors (LHCb)  Mirror reflectivity (MAGIC)  Mirror alignment monitoring (COMPASS, LHCb)  Mirror alignment adjustment (COMPASS)  (Dichroic) mirrors for focusing DIRC and TOP approaches  Electronics  Self-triggered read-out electronics (CBM)  Fast electronics (COMPASS)

Needed Momentum Coverage E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December

What is the best Detector concept E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December Energy loss dE/dx Cerenkov Radiation Too small p lever arm Match radiator and lepton p-range Transition Radiation: sensitive to particle  (  >1000) Aerogel; n=1.03 C 4 F 10 ; n= e Talk by M. Hartig on the ALICE TRD project

ALICE Experiment: PID Capabilities E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December (relativistic rise) TPC:  (dE/dx) = 5.5(pp) – 6.5(Pb-Pb) % TOF:  < 100 ps TRD:  suppression  10 90% e-efficiency

Transition Radiation Detector E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December Radiator: irregular structure - Polypropylen fibers - Rohacel foam (frame) 4.8 cm thick self supporting Gas: Xe/CO 2 85/15 % Drift region: 3 cm length 700 V/cm 75  m CuBe wires Amplification region: W-Au-plated wires 25  m gain ~ Readout: cathode pads 8 mm (bending plane) 70 mm in z/beam-direction 10 MHz Schematic View

Transition Radiation Detector E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December  Large area chambers (1-1,7 m²) -> need high rigidity -> need high rigidity  Low rad. length (15%Xo) -> low Z, low mass material -> low Z, low mass material Design

Electron Identification Performance E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December LQ Method: Likelihood with total charge LQX Method: total charge + position of max. cluster Typical signal of single particle PID with neural network e/  -discrimination < For 90% e-efficiency Result of Test Beam Data

Offline Tracking Performance E.C. Aschenauer STAR Upgrade Workshop, UCLA, December dN ch /dy = 6000 Efficiency: high software track-finding high software track-finding efficiency efficiency lower combined track efficiency lower combined track efficiency (geometrical acceptance, particle (geometrical acceptance, particle decay ) decay ) Efficiency independent of track Efficiency independent of track multiplicity multiplicity Momentum resolution: long lever arm ITS + TPC +TRD long lever arm ITS + TPC +TRD (4cm <r<370cm) (4cm <r<370cm) resolution better for low resolution better for low multiplicity (p+p) multiplicity (p+p)  pt/pt  5 % at 100 GeV/c and  pt/pt  5 % at 100 GeV/c and B = 0.5 T B = 0.5 T Efficiency and Resolution for Pb+Pb