Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information"— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information
Daiji Hayashi Nagoya Univ. Contents Introduction Setup for beam test Measurement contents Results Summary My name is Daiji Hayashi, a master course student. The title is performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information. At first, I introduce Aerogel RICH. Setup for beam test, measurement contents. At last,I will summarize my talk.

2 Introduction Proximity focusing RICH with Aerogel radiator
For upgrade of Belle detector Kinematic region 0.7~4 GeV/c, K/π separation>4σ Due to a limited space available → Proximity focusing Aerogel RICH Let me move on introduction. Present RICH is like this illustration. This is aerogel radiator. This is PMT. The principle is particle separation with Cherenkov angle theta c depending on the mass of the particle. The particle separation power is 4 sigma at kinematic region of 0.7 to 4 GeV. Considered to cover forward region

3 K/π separation per track : 5.0σ @ 4 GeV/c
R&D studies ; history Multi radiator Aerogel RICH First Aerogel RICH RICH with TOF (X,Y,T) sθ : 13mrad Npe/ring : 8.5 K/π separation per track : 4 GeV/c sθ : 14mrad Npe/ring : 6.4

4 Research interest Can we improve the performance of Aerogel RICH by adding high precision timing measurement ? RICH with TOF (X,Y,T) Aerogel RICH (X,Y)

5 New type Aerogel RICH R G ⊿TOFR=42psec ⊿TOFG=47psec RICH with TOF
ΔTOF1(K-π)=42psec ⊿TOFR=42psec (1 photon) R Aerogel ⊿TOFG=47psec (Multi photons) 4GeV G IP 1.8m 0.2m Cherenkov photons generate in glass PMT Multi anode MCP-PMT from BURLE at later can reach 19 psec for multi photons. More than 2.4σ for multi photons? Investigated possibility of ‘RICH with TOF’ with Beam test

6 Beam test setup Estimate time resolution of ‘RICH with TOF’
by measuring time difference between start counter. Multi-anode MCP-PMT BURLE R Start counter Aerogel radiator R Cherenkov photon from aerogel MWPC MWPC 1.045 1.053 G MCP-PMT HPK R3809U G Beam(p) Cherenkov photon from window Quartz Scintillation trigger counter Multi-anode MCP-PMT : Burle MCP-PMT (13 pixels readout by KC3781A TDC(Kaizu works) via FTA820 amplifier(ORTEC)) Start counter : HPK R3809U MCP-PMT attached quartz bar on window (TTS : s=10 psec)

7 Start counter BURLE MCP-PMT Trigger counter

8 64 anode BURLE MCP-PMT BURLE 85011-501 MCP-PMT: 64(8×8) anode pads
pitch : 6.45mm, gap : 0.5mm 2 MCPs 25 mm pores bialkali photocathode gain : 0.6x106 collection efficiency : 60% box dimensions : 71mm square active area fraction : 52% Dependence of # of detected photons Measured by laser pulse @ Nagoya Expectation: @ glass hit point(G) Npe : 12(simulation) Time resolution : 35 psec @ ring image point(R) Time resolution : 56 psec

9 Beam test measurement contents
1.Time resolution for 1 glass hit point(G). 2. Proton / p separation (G). 3. Time resolution for 1 (G) 4.Time ring image point(R).

10 Time resolution @ glass hit point(G)
Measured time resolution at the pixel hit by beam. Parameters were adjusted with threshold scan & HV scan. Threshold scan @ HV=2.4kV HV threshold=150mV TDCBURLE-TDCSTART COUNTER Time resolution(psec) Time resolution(psec) Event Gain:0.49x106 Threshold(mV) HV(kV) 1 photon Pulse height Time resolution : 34psec TDC count(/25psec) (Time walk corrected)

11 Proton / p separation demonstration (1)
To examine TOF capability of ‘RICH with TOF’, measured TOF of proton and p at glass hit point(G) between start counter and BURLE MCP-PMT. Distance between start counter and Burle PMT : 65 cm Setup MCP-PMT BURLE MWPC MWPC MCP-PMT HPK R3809U ACC Beam(p/p) G Trigger counter Quartz

12 Proton / p separation demonstration (2)
Irradiated proton and p of momenta 2 GeV/c, 2.4 GeV/c, and 3.4 GeV/c. TDCBURLE-TDCSTART 2 GeV/c Expected DTOFp-p and measured points p DTOFp-p Event p TDC count(/25psec) Time resolution : 38psec Confirmed separation of proton and p with TOF. TOF information is correctly measured.

13 Expansion of photon detection area
At glass hit point(G), not only 1 pixel but also neighboring pixels detect Cherenkov photons. BURLE PMT pixel map # of detected pixels ADC mean of each pixels Beam pass pixel Event Read out 13 pixels # of pixels Multi pixels detect Cherenkov photons for 1 track. Can multi pixel information improve time resolution?

14 Time resolution @(G) for 1 track
Estimated time resolution which information of neighboring pixel was included. TDC average of 5 pixels Evaluate TDC average of neighbor 5 pixels. Event BURLE PMT pixel map 28psec Beam pass pixel TDC count(/25psec) Time resolution for 1 track : 28psec (Time resolution for 1 pixel : 34psec)

15 Time resolution @ ring image point(R)
Measured time ring image point(R) Parameters : HV=2.6kV, threshold=20mV PMT TDCBURLE-TDCSTART COUNTER Aerogel Event Time resolution for 1 pixel : 51psec(1 photon) TDC count(/25psec)

16 Summary 51/√Npe (Npe=6; 21psec) Separation power of TOF(R & G)
Possibility of ‘RICH with TOF’ was estimated with beam test. Results: Time glass hit point(G) : 34psec Time (G) for 1 track : 28psec Time ring image point(R) : 51psec/pe Test with p/p beam demonstrated TOF capability. If uncorrelate 51/√Npe (Npe=6; 21psec) Results are consistent with expectation. (Expectation value: Point(G) : 35psec, Point(R) : 56psec) Separation power of TOF (G) Separation power of TOF(R & G) with Burle MCP-PMT STOF= 4GeV/c SEPARATION POWER(s) Aerogel threshold MOMENTUM(GeV/c)

17 Backup Backup slides

18 Proton / p separation with 1 pixel
Expected TOF distance and measured points P=+2.0GeV/c P=+2.4GeV/c P=+3.4GeV/c p 36psec 46psec 38psec p 41psec 38psec 37psec

19 Separation power estimation
Separation power with TOF at (R) and (G) Total separation with TOF of (R) and (G)

20 Time walk correction Before correction After correction

21 Number of detected photons
adc(ch1) ~120

22 Time resolution of start counter
Measured time resolution by putting 2 identical PMTs in the beam. Adjusted threshold value with threshold scan. Parameters:HV=3.4kV, ATTN=30dB, Quartz 1cm Time resolution(psec) 2ns 200mV Start counter signal(before ADC) 1 photon Threshold(mV) Reason of time resolution-deterioration Lower threshold: Small slope of signal form. Higher threshold: Miss photons which arrive on photocathode at early timing. Time resolution of start counter 10.0psec

23 Set up (Circuit)

24 Circuit fluctuation Input signal is clock signal via differential circuit. RESULT Circuit HPK threshold[mV] HPK ATTN[dB] Burle threshold[mV] Time resolution [psec] HPK-HPK -20 W/O 8.6※1 Burle-HPK -50 10 12.9 ※1 Divided by Circuit fluctuation of CAMAC sistem is usually 9 ~ 10 psec.

25 Analysis process At first, both p & p events are mixed.
Because protons are not detected with ACC-trigger, we can select only p events from the mixed events by cutting ADC pedestal of ACC-trigger. Decide parameters of function for time walk correction by fitting ADC-TDC 2d distribution of p events. Apply the parameters for both p & p events, and we can get corrected TDC distribution of both p & p events. p p p p

26 Start counter High-resolution TOF using Cherenkov light
Small-size quartz : Cherenkov light (Decay time ~ 0) MCP-PMT : TTS < 50ps for single photon Test counter Num. of photo-electron ~ 260  Time resolution = 10.6 psec (including 8.8psec readout fluctuation) The purpose of this study is to make a high-resolution TOF using the Cherenkov light. To get the high resolution, we use small-size quartz and MCP-PMT. Its TTS is less than 50ps for single photon. We tested this type of counter. Here is the result. The obtained number of photo-electron is about 260 and the time resolution is 10.6 ps, including 8.8ps readout fluctuation.


Download ppt "Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google