1 Travel Forecasting for New Starts The FTA Perspective September 27, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Advertisements

Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Improvements to Project Development and Program Management of New Starts Projects FY 2008 Proposed Effective April 30, 2006.
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Smith Myung, Cambridge Systematics Sean McAtee, Cambridge Systematics Cambridge Systematics.
USING SUMMIT FOR TRANSIT AND MODEL ANALYSIS AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP October 23, 2006.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Managing Data Resources
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division Oregon Transportation Plan 2005 Modeling Alternative Policy Choices Becky Knudson,
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
Chapter 3: System design. System design Creating system components Three primary components – designing data structure and content – create software –
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Planning Process ► Early Transport Planning  Engineering-oriented  1944, First “ O-D ” study  Computational advances helped launch new era in planning.
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning Trip Distribution Additional suggested reading: Chapter 5 of Ortuzar & Willumsen, third edition November 2004.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
Large Starts Issues for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking New Starts/Small Starts Listening Session and Seminar San Francisco, CA February 15-16, 2006.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Chapter 6 : Software Metrics
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Computers in Urban Planning Computational aids – implementation of mathematical models, statistical analyses Data handling & intelligent maps – GIS (Geographic.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
2030 Mobility Plan City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department January 2011.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Travel Demand Modeling Experience Bellevue-Kirkland-Redmond Travel Demand Modeling Experience Jin Ren, P.E. City of Bellevue, Washington, USA October 19,
1 Predicted-versus-Actual Studies: Why/how to do them and Lessons Learned Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB Transportation Planning Applications.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
CEO, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
13 Step Approach to Network Design Steps A Systems Approach 8Conduct a feasibility Study 8Prepare a plan 8Understand the current system 8Design.
Travel Forecasting for New Starts A Workshop Sponsored by The Federal Transit Administration March 23-25, 2009 Tampa.
Travel Forecasting for New Starts A Workshop Sponsored by The Federal Transit Administration March 23-25, 2009 Tampa.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Summit in the Wasatch John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council.
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill.
an Iowa State University center SIMPCO Traffic Modeling Workshop Presented by: Iowa Department of Transportation and Center for Transportation Research.
1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Analytical Reporting of Travel Forecasts Using Summit Nazrul Islam Office of Planning & Environment Federal Transit Administration.
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
Preliminary Evaluation of Cellular Origin- Destination Data as a Basis for Forecasting Non-Resident Travel 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
May 9, th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Session 18 1 IMPROVING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRANSIT PATH- BUILDING AND MODE.
Proposed Interim Guidance – Small Starts. 2 Purpose Before Final Rule, evaluate and rate projects to: Advance projects into project development Provide.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
PURPOSE & NEED Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Quantify Uncertainty in Travel Forecasts
Using Linked Non-Home-Based Trips in Virginia
Future Construction FasTracks Corridors Federal Funding Analysis
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Trip Distribution Review and Recommendations
Transit Survey White Paper
Presentation transcript:

1 Travel Forecasting for New Starts The FTA Perspective September 27, 2004

2 Topics  Why FTA cares about forecasts  What FTA is doing about forecasts  What FTA requires about forecasting  What project sponsors should be doing

3 Why FTA cares about forecasts  FTA responsibilities  Accuracy record of forecasts  External scrutiny

4 FTA Responsibilities  Evaluation of “New Starts” proposals FTA Major Capital Investment Program Discretionary funding Annual recommendations to Congress based on mandated criteria: Mobility *Environment * Land use *Operating efficiency * Cost-effectiveness *Finance * Strong ties to travel forecasting *

5 FTA Responsibilities  Count all of the benefits (and costs)  Maintain a level playing field  Ensure that promises can be kept  Make solid cases for good projects

6 Accuracy of Forecasts  FTA analysis of 19 latest New Starts Full Funding Grant Agreement Subsequent to 1990 Pickrell report Open to service Documented guideway ridership forecasts

7 Accuracy of Forecasts  2003 assessment Exceeded AA forecast:3 of % of AA forecast:3 of % of AA forecast:4 of 19  1990 assessment Exceeded AA forecast:0 of % of AA forecast:0 of % of AA forecast:1 of 10

8 Accuracy of Forecasts  Conclusions Forecast accuracy is much better Risk of large errors still remains Enhanced quality control is crucial

9 External Scrutiny  Annual Office of Management and Budget Congress General Accounting Office  Special studies Office of the Inspector General General Accounting Office

10 What FTA is Doing about Forecasts  User benefits  Detailed reporting of forecasts  Summit  Research

11 User Benefits Transportation system user benefits User benefits are the changes in mobility for individual travelers that are caused by a project or policy change, measured as hours of travel time savings, and summed over all travelers.

12 User Benefits  Changes in mobility Shorter transit times: in-vehicle, walk, wait Fewer transfers Changes in unmeasured characteristics Relief of crush loading conditions (Shorter auto times due to lower congestion) Project-oriented growth [new option in 2003]

13 Detailed Reporting  Reporting of trips and user benefits Totals across all socio-economic segments District-to-district summaries  reports Row totals, column totals  thematic maps Frequency distributions of per-trip benefits Results for individual socio-economic segments

14 Reporting: Transportation Benefits for Individual Travel Markets Report 1-5 Total User Benefits (hours) for the Build Alternative All Transit-Access Markets Home-Based-Work Production Attraction District District | | Total CBD | | 41 2 Urban | | N Suburb | | N Rural | | 10 5 W Suburb | | NW Suburb | | 15 7 NW Rural | | 93 8 S Suburb | | SW Suburb | | SE Suburb | | SE Rural | | E Suburb | | E Rural | | NE Suburb | | NE Rural | | External | | Other | | Total | | | | 8364

15 Reporting: Transportation Benefits for Travel Produced in Each Zone

16 Detailed Reporting  Unhappy outcomes Previously unknown “properties” of models Problems with highway time savings Inconsistencies among models nationally Problems in definitions of the alternatives  New opportunities Understanding and refinement of projects Making a better case for projects

17 Detailed Reporting  Brief “make the case” write-up The case for your project as you and FTA can make it given the “justification” criteria in TEA-21 “Three” pages supported by your forecasts Problem(s) that you are trying to address Causes of the problem(s) Specific ways the project addresses the problem(s) Reasons that the project is preferable to lower-cost options

18 Calculations in Summit  User benefit calculations Embedded function Several (in-stream) runs per build alternative For each mode choice run (purpose; time of day?) For summations across purposes, times of day User specifications Filenames Table titles

19 Calculations in Summit  User benefit calculations Required inputs Special output file from base alternative FTA-standard output file from build alternative Zone  district equivalence file Outputs Report file – district-to-district user benefits; totals Output file – district-to-district user benefits (binary)

20 Special Mode Choice Output Files for Summit User Benefits TRIP GEN; TRIP DIST MODE CHOICE HBW Ps/Qs HBW TIME OF DAY; ASSIGNMENT TRIP GEN; TRIP DIST MODE CHOICE HBO Ps/Qs HBO TIME OF DAY; ASSIGNMENT TRIP GEN; TRIP DIST MODE CHOICE NHB Ps/Qs NHB TIME OF DAY; ASSIGNMENT Prices/Quantities files from mode choice application

21 Summit Applications to Compute User Benefits Alt HBW Ps/Qs Summit Summit applications: Alternative versus Base Base HBW Ps/Qs User Bens: D-D & TEsum Alt HBO Ps/Qs Summit Base HBO Ps/Qs User Bens: D-D & TEsum Alt NHB Ps/Qs Summit Base NHB Ps/Qs User Bens: D-D & TEsum Summit District-District Row/Col-Sums

22 Calculations in Summit  Other features Analytical reporting of forecasts Row-sums and column sums  GIS Selected rows and columns  GIS Trip-length frequency distributions  grapher Trip tables stratified by + and – user benefits Analytical summaries of trip tables Software interfaces:TP+TransCAD Emme/2MinUTP TRANPLAN

23 Research  Technical methods Reliable quantification of congestion relief Reasonable alternative-specific constants Synthesis of data on guideway ridership Approaches to quality control Others  Guidance and requirements

24 What FTA Requires about Forecasting for New Starts  Models that tell a coherent story  Forecasts that can be explained  A case for the project built upon insights obtained from the forecasts

25 Coherent Models  Consistency with current good practice Level playing field Likelihood of “promises kept”  Threats to coherency of models Naïve or less-than-rigorous calibration and validation Incorrect travel markets represented in person-trip tables Odd properties in mode choice models Inconsistencies between transit path-builder and mode choice Inaccurate network speeds for auto and bus travel

26 Model Calibration, Validation  Does it tell a coherent story about behavior? Nesting structure and coefficients Constants and implied effect of unincluded attributes  Does it reproduce current travel patterns? Any beginner can match totals by adjusting Ks Scrutiny of markets and patterns within the totals  Does it predict rational responses to change? For changes inherent in New Starts projects For all model components

27 Travel Markets  Trip productions & traveler characteristics  Production-attraction flows  Characteristics of travelers  Implications for mode choice Calibration Forecasting

28 Mode Choice  Unusual coefficients  Bizarre alternative-specific constants  Non-Logit decision rules  Problems in choice-set formation

29 Transit Path-Builder and Mode Choice Model  Conformance between parameters in: Transit path selection Mode choice utility expressions for transit choices  Consequences of disagreement “Better” paths may look worse to mode choice Build alternatives may lose some trips and benefits  Consistency crucial; possible exceptions Bifurcation of 1 st wait time? Treatment of transfers?

30 Network Speeds  Highway Replication of current average travel times Comparability between alternatives  Bus Relationship to auto speeds Replication of current average travel times Handling of “dead” highway links

31 Bottom Line  Purpose of models Insights into problems, solutions, benefits Development of a solid case for a project  Required performance by models Remain consistent with current good practice Provide coherent insights Support a coherent story about the project