Imagine Your Goals: Evaluation Claire Henderson and Stefanie O’Hara Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London Contact

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Case Study 1 Matthew. Context Pre existing mental health condition before joining the programme. Assessed by the Medical Team at university and by his.

Advertisements

Assessment and Evaluation. Assessment and evaluation Evaluation is a judgement Evaluation is a judgement. How well is this course (part of the course)

Team Leader Presentation: Collecting Outcomes. Introduction The Changes: Three month outcome form no longer in use Hard outcomes collected by text message.

How to Create a Non-Course Survey Presenter: David J Neiss CoursEval Implementation & Support Specialist.

the ability of individuals, institutions and societies to perform functions, solve problems, and set and achieve objectives in a sustainable manner. (The.

A step by step guide for Instructors. Washington Administrative Code requires certification for all full-time, and some part-time, professional-technical.

Dual Diagnosis Training Project for Criminal Justice Liz Hughes Centre for Clinical and Academic Workforce Innovation (CCAWI), University of Lincoln.

Joe Nickel Project Manager Football and MH action group.

Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.

Training Evaluation Presentation by Ranjith Menon.

Education Not Discrimination (END) A Time to Change project, located in Rethink 1.

1 Taking the What is the NSS and why should students take part?

Sexual and reproductive health of women with disability in the Philippines: Building evidence for action.

Development and evaluation of recovery focused group and Skype self management programmes for people living with early dementia and their carers Dr Andy.

Does It Work? Evaluating Your Program

Doheny M. 1, Richardson N. 1, Brennan L. 2, Lambe B. 3, Osborne A. 1, Carroll P. 3 1 Centre for Men’s Health, Institute of Technology Carlow 2 Men’s Development.

Deb Hearle and Nina Cogger.  Cardiff University: Periodic Review & Re-validation  Health Professions Council: Re-Approval  College of Occupational.

Data Collection – Beyond Baseline SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: New Program Training March 9, 2011.

Privacy and Dignity 7 Standard.

Recommendations and proposed future work From data gathering to recommendations Thematic Group 4 WG 4 Questions for the last STEPS year.

- Objective of the Program Evaluation - The process of the Program Evaluation.

SRE – Training for School Staff. ‘Could do better….’ ‘Sex education was taught only once, and very briefly. The girls had a talk about periods and the.

Smoking and health inequalities Study Aims 1.Collation and dissemination of existing evidence 2.Extend the knowledge base 3.Identify opportunities for.

The IRB's Position on Quality Projects vs. Research R. Peter Iafrate, Pharm.D. Chairman, Health Center IRB University of Florida.

Mental Health Matters Ann Creed –

Bheki Sithole 30 Nov Sibayeni Lodge Most at Risk Behavior Populations (MSM): Feedback, Challenges and Experiences.

What is an effective induction (within an academic context) and how do you implement it across the whole university or college? Michael Hill Action on.

Czesław Czabała Academy of Special Education.  Develop person’s ability to deal with their inner world: thinking and feeling, managing life and taking.

1 April 2012 Quality assurance in education at NTNU.

Scheduling. Operation Protocol Send an application form to patients Receive the returned application form from patients Check doctor’s schedule Check.

South West Healthy Schools Plus Schools Presentation.

Workshop 6 - How do you measure Outcomes?

Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Research Ethics.

New roles for the teacher in adult education ECER Budapest 11 September 2015 Bjarne Wahlgren, Aarhus University, Denmark Sia Hovmand Sørensen, The Danish.

Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.

These are the training aims that you will use to deliver the “Who’s Challenging Who?” training session.

Phase 2 Project Logistics: Overview 1. Project Start-up Activities 2. Training 3. Focus Groups and In-depth Interviews 4. Household Survey a.Sample selection.

An Evaluation of the Fathers’ Development Work Programme.

The Library Imperial College London The story of iLIP: Developing an online information literacy staff development programme for library staff Debbi Boden,

Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.

LINKS Evaluation. Why evaluate? Evaluation of the LINKS Advising Program is particularly important in this pilot year. It gives participating staff, students.

PREPARING FOR PARTICIPATION IN HALT-2 LECTURE 6. To outline the steps necessary to prepare successfully for the HALT 2013 PPS. LECTURE OBJECTIVES.

Presentation 1: Developing information for participants in your research – getting started This presentation contains some exercises to help you get started.

GCSE ICT Introduction. How is the GCSE course organised? The GCSE course has three parts: Assignment (Year 10 project) - this section is set by the examination.

Office of the Chief Information Officer Introduction to Qualtrics for Online Survey & m-Learning Office of the CIO.

Activity 1 Stickies on the board Any unanswered questions so far Issues or challenges What do I want to know before the end of this session?

WEEK 9 supporting significant life events Olutoyin Hussain.

Advising SLCM_WP_310 1 of 28SLCM_WP_310 Advising.

SCWDC Policy Training Delivery Design: Individual Recommended: Read the policy prior to taking this training. It is helpful to have a copy of the.

Title of Study : Preliminary findings from “An evaluation of the impact of the inclusion of a "Health and Well Being Module" in the undergraduate curriculum.

Promoting Mental Health Improvement

Understanding Outcomes Version 2.1 – September 2008 Slide 1 Understanding outcomes BIG’s approach to outcomes for applicants.

Evelina London Child Health Programme Integrating services Claire Lemer 29 th April 2014.

The United Kingdom experience in data collection and statistics on disability Ian Dale Head of Disability Analysis Department for Work and Pensions Steel.

1 in 4 adults will experience a mental health problem each year 1 in 10 children will experience a mental health problem Approximately half of all lifetime.

Think Positive Ending Stigma and Discrimination and the Student Self-Management Project.

A Strategic Approach to the Development of evidence- based HIV/AIDS Workplace Education Policies and Behaviour Change Communication Programmes A Case Study.

The SWISH project Smarter Working In Social & Health care Dr Steve Iliffe, Kalpa Kharicha: University College London Prof Jill Manthorpe, Prof Cameron.

Mental Health & Suicide Awareness in a University Setting

Claire Coleman and Peter Tormey

9th November 2017 Dear residents, dear family members, dear guardians,

Think Positive Ending Stigma and Discrimination and the Student Self-Management Project.

Research Ethics Matthew Billington

Managing a Research Project

GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION

Privacy and Dignity 7 Standard.

Informed Consent Before taking part in this study it is important that you understand: This study aims to evaluate the benefits of lessons on sexually.

Agency Partnership Worker Individual

Experts by Experience Group Observations.

Presentation transcript:

Imagine Your Goals: Evaluation Claire Henderson and Stefanie O’Hara Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London Contact

Aim To examine the effectiveness of Imagine Your Goals as (1) an exercise and social contact intervention and (2) a means to tackle stigma and discrimination among people associated with participating football clubs.

Objectives: (1) participants Objective 1.To compare the wellbeing of participants at the start and end of their IYG programme; Objective 2. To compare the access to social resources of participants at the start and send of their IYG programme

Non participants Objective 4. To compare mental health related knowledge among club staff at the start and end of IYG. Objective 5. To compare mental health related attitudes among club staff at the start and end of IYG. Objective 6. To compare mental health related intended behaviour among club staff at the start and end of IYG Objective 7. To compare fans’ support for IYG during year 1 vs. year 2 of the programme.

Participants and non participants Objective 3. To assess the nature of the social contact between people with and without mental health problems during the course of IYG.

Measurement (1) Questionnaires Work with Stefi to choose one set of participants Participants: basic information, social resources, wellbeing, social contact Participants of other programmes: social contact IYG staff: knowledge, attitudes, reported and intended behaviour Self completion vs help needed for some participants Return baseline then follow up forms to us

Measurement (2) Focus groups IYG participants only 2 sets of groups at 6-10 clubs only Quiet room for audiorecording and privacy Start of programme: entry route, hopes and fears, why this programme End of programme: actuality vs. expectations/fears; exit route; recommend to others

Informed consent 1. Information sheet; Q & A 2. Quiz 3. Consent form Questionnaires vs. focus groups: same process, different documents

Confidentiality (1): questionnaires Baseline questionnaire attached to consent form Follow up questionnaire- front sheet for name We assign study ID # then detach consent/name form and keep separately No identifying data entered into database

Confidentiality (2) Focus groups Participants asked to keep what is discussed in the group within the group First name use only Transcriptions anonymised Audiofiles erased once transcript finished

Local feedback We would like to come back to present results to as many participants as wish to attend

Fan survey 2011 and 2012 (TBD) Awareness of IYG and TTC Approval of club involvement with IYG/TTC Knowledge, attitudes and intended behaviour – a few questions for each