The Instructional Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
ACE-Achieving Classroom Excellence.  2005: Achieving Classroom Excellence Act (SB 982) ◦ Established the ACE Task Force and guiding principles  2006:
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
Cristina Hudgins Middle Tennessee State University
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Legal and Ethical Issues
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 The Instructional.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting NAME OF SCHOOL DATE.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Free and Appropriate Public Education and Least Restrictive Environment Chapters 9 & 12.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Reedy Creek Elementary September 22, 2010 Diane Crook-Nichols Principal.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Legal Framework.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 11 The Instructional Program This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Attendance Directors Meeting April 18, 2012 Home School and Homebound.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1  How has history shaped the evolution of inclusive education?  What are the major components of IDEA 2004?  What are the five components of NCLB?
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Laws Governing ESL Programs in the US Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
The New IDEA in Special Education
1 Choice Provisions in No Child Left Behind Cheri Pierson Yecke, Ph.D. Director of Teacher Quality and Public School Choice Laura O. Lazo Education Program.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
EDU 4245 Class 5: Achievement Gap (cont) and Diagnostic Assessments.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Types of Statewide Assessments Currently Used in Grades 3-8.
What you need to know About Title I Parent Meeting Presentation.
Chapter 11 The Instructional Program
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
American Institutes for Research
What you need to know About Title I
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
UNIT SIX| EDUCATion.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
No Child Left Behind.
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
EDN Fall 2002.
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Presentation transcript:

The Instructional Program Chapter 11 School Law and Public Schools, 2008 Nathan L. Essex

Control of Public Schools The U.S. Constitution makes no reference to education. The Tenth Amendment places responsibility on each state to provide free public schools. The legal authority for defining the curriculum of public schools is the state legislature, in a few states, it is the state legislature and the state board of education. State v. Harworth established the state’s responsibility for public education.

Compulsory Attendance Every state requires children between certain ages, usually 6-16 years old to attend public, private or home school. The parent has an obligation to the child and state to ensure that the child receives an appropriate education. Exceptions: Wisconsin v. Yoder-the state’s interest regarding universal and compulsory education is by no means absolute to the exclusion or subordination of all other interests. The First Amendment prohibits state action that interferes with a parent’s right to control the religious upbringing of his or her child. Additionally, married students who are emancipated and are no longer under their parents’ care.

Attendance Every state requires that children between 6 or 7 and 16 or 17 attend public, private or home school. Parents who fail to get their children to school face criminal charges. One exception to the attendance requirements are if a student has a religious belief that conflicts continuing education as in Wisconsin vs. Yoder. Yoder was Amish and stopped schooling after 8th grade. Another exception may be if a student is married and no longer under their parents’ care. Students who are home schooled are required to meet standards for curriculum and instruction, length of instruction, and days in which instruction should be provided.

Residence Schools generally are required to educate students who reside within the districts boundaries. Residence is a student’s actual dwelling place. Domicile is where the student intends to remain indefinitely. A student’s domicile follows that of his or her legal guardian. If the child is emancipated the domicile is determined by where the student intends to remain indefinitely.

Curriculum Curriculum standards, such as courses offered and achievement required, are based through state policy. Local schools may develop other standards as long as they do not contradict state requirements. State legislation requires that certain subjects be included in school curricula such as American history. However, the specifics are left to be decided by local school districts. Many schools fear teaching the Bible due to possible lawsuits. However, many Bible classes are being offered at public schools throughout the United States (see bibleinschools.net). Some guidelines for Bible use include teaching objectively and in a strict secular manner, instructing teachers on how and what to teach, and formulating policies for teachers, students, and parents to follow.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 There are four guiding principles: stronger accountability, increased flexibility, expanded options and improved instruction. States must insure that students are tested in math and reading by 2005-06 school year. By 2007, state must insure that students are tested at least one annual assessment in science in at least one grade level: 3-5, 6-9 and 10-12 . States must set and then meet adequate yearly progress toward the goal of having children meet proficiency levels in core subjects by the year 2013-14. Schools that fail to meet AYP face sanctions including offering supplemental services, transportation or restructuring.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Districts have flexible use of funds and may transfer up to 50 percent of the funding they receive under the four major state grant programs (Teacher Quality state grants, Educational Technology state grants, Innovative Programs, and Safe and Drug-Free Schools) to any one of the program or to Title I.

Grading and Academic Requirements Courts generally are reluctant to interfere in cases involving academic matters as they feel educators are better equipped to evaluate students. The state does however have the authority to set graduation requirements and check student competencies based on standardized tests. Courts will typically support the schools in grade reduction in relation to student absences as long as the policies are reasonable and do not violate the state’s attendance statute. School districts may use grade reduction for misbehavior as long as a relationship is shown between the misconduct and their classroom work. Students are to be awarded a diploma if he or she has met the academic requirements for graduation. However, a student may be denied participation in the graduation ceremony if misconduct has occurred.