Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
-- in other words, logic is
Advertisements

Argumentation.
Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Logic and Logical Fallacies A.P. English Language.
Standardizing Arguments Premise 1: New Mexico offers many outdoor activities. Premise 2: New Mexico has rich history of Native Americans and of Spanish.
Logos Formal Logic.
Preparing to Persuade: Reasoning and Logic. Aristotle’s “Proofs” “logos” to describe logical evidence “ethos” to describe speaker credibility “pathos”
Stephen E. Lucas C H A P T E R McGraw-Hill© 2004 Stephen E. Lucas. All rights reserved. Methods of Persuasion 16.
Speaking to Persuade Persuasion Defined Motivating Your Audience
Logical Fallacies Introduction. What is a logical fallacy? A fallacy is an error of reasoning. These are flawed statements that often sound true Logical.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Causality, Reasoning in Research, and Why Science is Hard
Persuasive Writing Writing whose Purpose is to CHANGE MINDS and BRING ABOUT ACTION.
How We’re Persuaded ETHOS = LOGOS = PATHOS =
What Are Essays? The Application of Reason. Define Rhetoric “Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. Its goal is to change people’s opinions and influence.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
PERSUASIONANDARGUMENT Chapter 15 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Chapter 5: Reading and Evaluating Arguments
Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.
Persuasion Principles of Speech Chapter What is Persuasion? How have you been persuaded today? Used in all aspects of life Both verbal and non-verbal.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
Grading Criteria for Assigment 1 Structure – –sense of time, present and past –conflict with two distinct sides –description of cause of conflict –shared.
The Method Argumentative or Persuasive writings act as an exchange between two or more parties (the Writer and Reader) where one side tries to convince.
Eng 111 Dana Frierson Fall Types of Reasoning (Logic) n Deductive u Inferring particular “fact” from general assumptions u General to specific n.
 Graded papers and grade reports o Keep the MLA Argument Paper to refer to the annotation to help you revise and edit your paper on your own.  How to.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
AP English Language and Composition
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
McGraw-Hill©Stephen E. Lucas 2001 All rights reserved. CHAPTER SIXTEEN Methods of Persuasion.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
English 10 Honors Units 6, 8, and 12.  Choose a topic  This may be the most difficult part of the entire process.  Consider the following :  What.
Introduction to Public Speaking Chapters 15 and 16.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
Chapter 10 (a deliberate attempt to influence the thought and behavior of others through the use of personal, psychological, and logical appeals)
The construction of a formal argument
{ Methods of Persuasion Speech class.  The audience perceives the speaker as having high credibility  The audience is won over by the speaker’s evidence.
Logical Fallacies: Or, How to Really Fail at Argumentation “Logic is the beginning of wisdom, not the end.” – Dr. Spock, Star Trek.
Argumentation.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
Rhetorical Proofs and Fallacies Week 10 – Wednesday, October 28.
Argument: What you don’t know already Works Cited Page Murphy, Barbara L & Estelle Rankin. 5 Steps to a 5 AP English Language. New York: McGraw-Hill,
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
EVALUATING ARGUMENTS AND BUILDING ARGUMENTS ENGL 121 Howard Community College.
Chapter 24: Persuasive Speaking
The Art and Craft of Persuasion Based upon: Moser, Joyce, and Ann Watters, ed. Creating America: Reading and Writing Arguments, 3 rd Ed. New Jersey:Prentice.
METHODS OF PERSUASION Chapter 16. Credibility Ethos – the word that Aristotle used to describe what we now think of as a speaker’s credibility Credibility.
Logical Fallacies 13 Common Errors in Logic P in the book.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.
Argumentation.
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Lecture 10 - ARGUMENT.
Developing your arguments
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Unit 15: Using Persuasive Strategies (Chapter 17)
Philosophy.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Logical Fallacies Introduction.
Presentation transcript:

Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School

Logical Proof Logical reasoning is the easiest way to convince because the information is presented as fact. However, not all information is common sense to the audience so the speaker has to connect the dots. To do this, the speaker can use: –Deductive reasoning –Inductive reasoning

Introduction Logic –the study of reasoning –allows us to test the truth or falsity of inferences and reasoning –used in problem solving

Inference …reaching a conclusion on the basis of evidence and reasoning –the creation of new ideas or information from existing ideas or information –the process of creating new statements from other statements these statements are called Propositions Propositional Logic—the logic of propositions—analyzing the validity of propositions

Induction Inductive reasoning –the inference of a general law from particular instances –the process of summarizing observations to derive a generalization about the world –we rarely observe all of the instances if a particular phenomena, so we can never be sure it is true in all cases—we can estimate probability

Induction A daisy is a flower. A rose is a flower. A violet is a flower. Therefore, plants with colorful blooms are flowers.

Deduction Deductive reasoning is a way for the speaker to draw a direct line from a general concept to the specific end of their purpose. …the inference of particular instances by reference to a general law or principle Sherlock Holmes’ deductive reasoning techniques The format for these sets is called a syllogism

Syllogisms All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. –The 1 st statement is the generalization or general rule called the major premise –The 2 nd statement is an observation or specific fact called the minor premise –The 3 rd statement is the inference that follows the first two statements called the conclusion

Validity and Truth The Rules of Inference tell us whether a syllogism is valid or not, but not if it is true. –Validity is simply a matter of correct reasoning. To determine if a conclusion of a valid syllogism is true, we have to agree that the premises are true. –When a syllogism is both valid in reasoning and the premises are true, we say the conclusion is sound.

Accuracy vs. Precision Accuracy: proximity to target or true value Precision: proximity to similar situations Accurate, but not precise Precise, but not accurate

Fallacies Fallacies are mistruths that are used to make a point. Fallacies are generally used to dramatize a position, dramatize information or to compensate for the lack of supporting information. While popularly used, they can lead to a destruction of the credibility of the speaker and therefore a destruction of the speech itself.

Types of Fallacies Types of fallacies include: –Unwarranted or Hasty Generalization (Including information that does not apply.) –Errors in casual information Post Hoc – Unproven cause-effect relationship Non Sequitur – Stating a conclusion that does not necessarily follow the argument. –Begging the Question (States as fact what needs to be proven.) –Ignoring the Question (Misdirection of attitude)

Types of Fallacies (Cont.) Types of fallacies include: –False Analogy (A parallel that does not exist.) –Either/Or Fallacy (Stating only two options when more exist.) –Ad Hominem (Attack of character on the opposition) –Red Herring (Addition of information to confuse) –Ad Populum (Public opinion MUST be right, right?)

Identifying Fallacies See if you can determine what, if any, fallacy is present in the following statements: –“The Ford Explorer is the most popular SUV on the market, so it must be the safest.” –“You were the only person working when the accident happened so it must be your fault.” –“If you don’t finish this paper, you will become a bum and live in a van down by the river.” –“The rate of crime is increasing in our schools because of the reduction of art and music programs.”

Identifying Fallacies (Cont.) –“If you do not vote for the private school funding bill you simply do not care about children.” –“Stand back! I can help. My dad is a doctor.” –“Johnny is not fit to lead this project because he can’t even tie his shoes in the morning.” –“Mom, if you don’t buy me an iPhone, it means that you don’t really love me.” –“Would we not work harder if we made more money?” –“You either finish the project tonight or you will get eaten by a werewolf.”

Validity and Truth Validity does not guarantee truth and truth does not guarantee validity. In order to have a sound syllogism, the form must be valid and the premises must be true.